Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ETEC 540 Individual Research Project by Claude D'Souza
ETEC 540 Individual Research Project by Claude D'Souza
Claude DSouza
ETEC 540
half of the 20th century have experienced lessons taught by teachers using overhead projectors. I
vividly recall such lessons taught in my elementary and high school classrooms, as the
ubiquitous fluorescent light would suddenly disappear and be replaced by a single rectangular
headlight illuminating a vacant white canvas at the front of the room. The teachers voice was
then heard as her large shadowy hand entered the bright stage and began to fill it up with words,
diagrams, symbols, formulas, etc. Most of the students would hurriedly get out their notebooks
and begin to copy down, as quickly and as neatly as they could, whatever information appeared
in this illuminated space. The overhead projector played a significant role in my educational
history, both as a student and later on as an elementary teacher, offering a viable alternative to the
traditional blackboard. It is a tool of educational technology that was developed not only with
help from its predecessors, but also from the cultural environment it belonged to.
Gardner (1997) offers both philosophical and historical perspectives in his study of the
overhead projector, by looking at how this tool evolved from earlier inventions, and investigating
how the art and technology behind this tool were being interacted with well before it came to be
scientifically understood. First, the history of the overhead projector is traced back to the magic
lantern, which initially served the purpose of entertaining children. The lantern in turn
influenced the creation of devices such as the slide projector and the epidiascope, the latter
created to project images of book pages on a screen. According to Gardner, the origins of
technology lie in social values and cultural needs. Even though the technology was in place for
the overhead projector to be created decades earlier, it didnt appear until educators valued visual
as well as verbal input, and the financial resources were in place for this educational technology
to be purchased in schools.
initially used not in classrooms, but in bowling alleys. They assert that the Tel-E-Score was
used to project written bowling scores on screens at the head of the alley. The educational use of
devices such as the overhead projector was brought about by a need for greater classroom
efficiency. However, Kidwell et al. claim that this initial use of the projector as an educational
tool did not take place in a traditional school setting, but rather in a US military classroom. At
the onset of World War II, thousands of new recruits were in need of technical training, and many
had little education. Kidwell et al. explained that the US government provided special attention
and funding for the overhead projector during this time. This led to improvements in the
production of overhead projectors such that they became sturdy and inexpensive enough to be
brought into the ordinary classroom. Kidwell et al. recognize cellophane, which was invented in
1912 and used later in the making of inexpensive transparencies, as a key contributor to the
success of the overhead projector. It appears then that the overhead projector is a product of its
culture, influenced by the popularity of bowling and the need for efficient teaching during World
War II.
Prior to the war, in the early part of the 20th century, an interest arose in using visual
media in the school (Reiser, 2001). This may partly be attributed to lantern slide projectors and
stereograph viewers that were used in some schools during the second half of the 19th century.
The growth in the visual instruction movement during the early 1900s is evidenced by the
establishment of five national professional organizations for visual instruction, the new
publication of five journals focusing on visual instruction, the design and implementation of
visual instruction courses in more than twenty teacher-training schools, and finally the
development of a bureau of visual education in at least twelve greater urban school systems in
Following the war, the combination of aggressive marketing and government grants
brought about the proliferation of the overhead projectors in school classrooms (Kidwell et al.,
2008). The appeal for educators was that the projector could meet both pedagogical needs and
improve classroom management, as this new tool now enabled teachers to remain facing unruly
students while writing down important information for the students to read and/or copy.
Furthermore, Kidwell et al. mention projectuals, innovative teaching aids created specifically
for the projectors, such as the iron filings in a bag of fluid that, when used with magnets, could
help students visualize magnetic fields. These devices made it possible to engage students by
technological components, each of which can be traced back to ancient times. The idea of
showing images on a screen dates back to the camera obscura of Ancient Greece, and small
mirrors were first used in Ancient Egypt. These technologies were later combined during the
Renaissance period, as artists used a portable camera obscura with an angled mirror to view
subjects and trace their outlines on to paper. Gardner emphasizes the understanding of
technology through interaction and exploration with various materials that were behind the
projector, and that this knowledge precedes the scientific understanding that helps to create it.
Copper was used for ancient weapons and cooking pots, glass for ancient ornaments, windows
and containers, mirrors for personal adornment, fans for personal comfort, windmills for
pumping water and grinding flour: science and technology always have their roots in practical
techniques, in the arts and crafts, in the universal human activities which keep our bodies and
souls together (Gardner, 1997, p. 19). Gardner offers a materialist view of the roots of science
Although the overhead projector was a popular instructional tool in the classroom, as
proven by its aforementioned proliferation throughout schools in North America post World War
II (Kidwell et al., 2008), not all scholars believe that the students learning experience was
improved by the adoption of this device. Knowlton (1992) asserts that although tools like the
overhead projector may overtly contribute to student learning of course content such as Math,
they also play a role in providing the students with an underlying education via the pedagogical
practices themselves. This education includes lessons in power and authority, lessons in
order and disorder, lessons in what counts as knowledge, who counts as a source of knowing,
(and) what is thinking (Knowlton, 1992, p.22). Knowlton claims that tools used in the
classroom could imply a sense of teacher control or authority, even though the teachers
themselves may say otherwise. The overhead projector is specifically identified as such a tool by
Knowlton, based on how it affects the power dynamic in the classroom. First, light from the
projector reveals knowledge at the front of the room, and the light is provided by the teacher,
who stands illuminated above the students sitting in the dark, and who is closer to the
information than them. Knowlton further adds that the information from a projector is delivered
in a bodiless state and therefore considered to be inclusive of all perspectives, unlike delivery of
material from a teacher, whose perspective is limited. Finally, the use of a projector enables
teachers to move more quickly through material, avoiding students and their questions by cutting
out distractions and anything that may slow down the information progress.
In order to change this classroom environment, Knowlton (1992) claims that teachers
should turn on a few lights while using the overhead, shut down the projector intermittently to
discuss the material and/or take question breaks, and limit the use of the overhead or use other
view of the overhead projector would likely agree that while this tool may have increased
teaching efficiency and the students acquisition of knowledge, at the same time it may have
increased the perceived distance between students and the knowledge material , as well as their
The overhead projector may never have come to exist in the school classroom if it was
not for an emphasis on visual input in education, combined with the development of this
instructional tool during World War II. The overhead projector has influenced the way teachers
prepare for and present the class material, as well as the way students experience learning during
instruction. Although there has been some criticism of the projector as a teaching tool, it is still a
preferred teaching tool by many educators. Although not the first type of projector used in
classrooms, this particular device shifted projector technology from the occasional to the
References
Charles Beseler Company (1965). Picture story of how to solve a math problem
Gardner, P.L. (1997). The roots of technology and science: A philosophical and historical view.
Kidwell, P. A., Ackerberg-Hastings, A., & Roberts, D.L . (2008). Tools of American
Knowlton, E. (1992). The hand and the hammer: A brief critique of the overhead projector.
Reiser, R.A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part 1: A history of
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alcue/2677060383/