, 3 (113), 2004 .

612.821: 616.8

.. , .. , .. , .. , .. ,
.. , ..

*
,
,
,

(), () -
(). -
( ) . 153 ,
82 ( 53,911,1)
, 36 ( 5610,1) 35 ( 428,3) .
89 (43 , 21 25 ), -
. 64 -
(39 , 10 15 ), . -
01, -
(), , -
. , -
( , -
), .
. -
-
( ). ,

. , -
, -
.
: ,

- [9, 21] -
, , ,
- , -
. - . -
, [11, 13, 14, 16, 2022],
, , , , -
- , -
, , - -
. - , -
- .
.
, -
, - . [26, 29] ,
-
, - -
[12]. , [19, 24, 25, 31, 32]
, -
- . ,
- [3, 7, 30], , -,
. , , -

* ( 01-04-49296
02-04-48410).

85
 , 3 (113), 2004 .

, -
, - .
. , 25 -
- (10 15 ),
- 4715,3 , -
(, - , -
), (- .
), , -
, , - :
, , -
, - , -
, - ;
[17]. ,
- ; ( )
: , , ,
- , 2 ;
-, , -
. ,
- .
- -
. . ,
- , -
, , ,
, Fugl-Meyer Test [34]. , -
- -
(), - c -
- UMCT (The Upright Motor Control Test)
[18].
, , - (, ) -
[2, 5, 9, 10, 27, 33].
UPDRS (The Unified Parkinson;s Disease Rating
- Scale), Hoehn, Yahr [23].
-
, -
. Pourcher, Barbeau [28]. ,
- -
: BBS (The Berg Balance
- Scale) [15]
, PIGD (The
. - Postural Instability and Gait Disorder) , -
, - .
-
, - (. 1).
- -
- -
, -
.
. 153 - 01, (-
. 82 ( 53,911,1) - ) [1, 8].
-
; 36 ( - 150
5610,1) (- 2%.
); 35 ( -
428,3) . ( )
89 (43 , -
, 21 25
), :
- , , (
( ). - ).
64 (39 , -
15 , 10 - Statistica for
), Windows ( 4.5.)
: (-

86
 , 3 (113), 2004 .

) 2 ( ); -
( ) - . ,
() ( ); - ( ) -
-
. ,
-
-
01. . -
-
: -
. .
: , - .
, -
-
, -
, - -
. , - .
, 64 -
. (. 2). -
.
. , -
- , -
-
, -
. ,
4344 . ,
. . -
- -

- (. 3).
. 2526 - -
. : -
-
. -
,
( (. 4).
) 1 ; - , -
. - -
- -
. -
-
2528 . 15 . - , -
.
. ,
[2, -
8], -
1
(MSD)




() 47,45,8 60,8510,5 42,214,1 49,56,1 62,09,0 39,28,6
16,75,5 6,53,74 5,93,3 17,14,8 5,74,5 6,35,8
Hoehn & Yahr () 2,740,59 2,60,6
Pourcher, Barbeau () 18,96,1 19,17,5
Berg Balance () 45,212,3 34,613,5 48,411,5 36,714,6
PIGD () 5,32,9 5,73,4

. , ,
.

87
 , 3 (113), 2004 .

- , .
: - , -
, , , - -
- -
. , - -
- , ,
- -
( ) (. 5). (. 6).
-
- , -

( 41%). , - , -
- ,
(p=0,07).
2
(MSD)



Berg Balance PIGD Berg Balance PIGD

45,44,3 33,45,2 4,21,67 43,33,7 35,58,7 4,411,72
55,24,7** 35,37,5 3,01,1** 47,35,8 36,27,8 4,01,4

. ** p<0,01 . ;
; .
3
(MSD)




29,55,8 76,319,7 16,813,9 28,84,6 89,921,6 17,615,4
10,02,1** 112,421,4 11,25,4* 18,85,2 100,322,4 16,914,6

. * p<0,05; ** p<0,01 . -
; ; .

4
(MSD)






76,58,43 92,68,5 90,76,2 71,425,51 84,76,3 82,85,43
60,54,5 74,56,4 73,34,1 62,673,39 62,837,8 79,834,7
82,45,7 99,37,9 105,65,4 80,889,11 85,710,9 95,95,8
108,76,8 107,68,3 98,55,3 89,765,6 99,78,7 105,84,8

100,54,91# 98,67,8 95,54,5 69,587,93 89,94,5 81,74,9
90,43,9* 79,47,1 82,43,5# 66,114,45 65,37,6 75,184,8
104,43,2 117,74,6* 110,64,6 92,118,8 90,76,7 101,913,7
110,34,5 120,33,5 112,44,8* 89,765,6 101,78,1 105,84,5

. # ; * p<0,05.
; ; -

88
 , 3 (113), 2004 .

5
(SD)





() 21,01 1,390,68*** 2,30,8 1,80,5*
() 0,760,80 0,70,76 1,11,3 1,00,8
() 0,851,39 0,561,05*** 0,731,8 0,651,2*
94,35,5 98,9+2,8*** 95,56,3 96,95,6

. * p<0,05; ** p<0,01; *** p<0,001 .

. (-
-
, , ) -
, - , -
, , - .
, -
, -
Berg Balance , -
Test -
PIGD - , , , -
. (
).
. ,
- -
, ,
. , , -
. -
, -
, -
. , , -
-
: - .
-
; ,
; ,
, -
. . -
- , .
, , , -
. , , -
, , - ,
. -- .
, , -

6
(MSD)


(
)


2,20,74 1,320,68** 2,330,72 1,90,8
2,10,6 1,720,53** 2,30,96 2,00,9
2,041,12 1,981,1 1,91,2 1,91,2
PIGD 4,21,67 3,01,1** 4,411,72 4,01,4

. ** p<0,01 .
89
 , 3 (113), 2004 .

, - , .. , .. , .. //
. . . 2000. . 50. . 3.
- . 421433.
- 5. -
. , , -
, / .. , .. , ..
- . // , : . -
, .-. . ., 2003. . 125126.
- 6.

/ .. , .. , .. . //
.
. . . 2003. . 53. 3. .
THE POSTURAL SWAY BIOFEEDBACK IN NEUROLOGY 306312.
7. /
L.A. Chernikova, K.I. Ustinova, M.E. Ioffe, .. , .. -, .. -
Yu.A. Ermolaeva, S.S. Sliva, E.O. Devlikanov, , .. // . . 2003. 2.
G.A. Pereyaslov . 3642.
The postural disorders are the most clinic symptom in the 8. .. -
patients with poststroke hemiparesis, Parkinsons disease and / ..
spinocerebellar ataxia. The aim of this study is to determine the // -4: . -
effect of the sway biofeedback on postural stability in patients , 2002. . 292299.
with poststroke hemiparesis, cerebellar ataxia and Parkinsons 9. .. -
disease. A total 153 patients including 82 patients with poststro-
ke hemiparesis (PH), 36 with prevalence of rigidity ataxia
(SCA) were investigated. All patients were randomly divided : . .
into two groups: the basic group of 89 patients (43 with PH, 21 . . / .. . ., 2000. 24 .
with IDP and 25 with SCA) who received complex therapy enc- 10. .. , -
losed the postural sway biofeedback and the control group of 64 - -
patients (39 with PH, 15 with IDP, 10 with SCA) who didnt re- / .. , ..
ceived the postural sway biofeedback. The patients stood on a // -3: /
force platform and were trained to change the position of center . .. . , 1998. . 8087.
of pressure (CP) presented as a cursor on a monitor screen in 11. .. -
front of the patients. The effect of balance training was estima- , :
ted with the clinical and stabilografic tests. The patients of the -
basic group in comparison to the control group demonstrated : . . - . / .. -
more significant improvement of their postural stability for the . ., 1998. 48 .
clinical (Berg Balance Scale, PIGD) and the stabilografic tests. 12. .. -
Besides, there was more significant improvement in some clini- -
cal symptoms and functional ability (Barthel ADL Index) in the / .. // ,
basic group in comparison to the control group. The results sug- . 2003. 1. . 36.
gest that postural disorders in the patients with poststroke hemi- 13. Abreu B.C. The effect of environmental regulations on po-
paresis, Parkinsons disease and spinocerebellar ataxia can be stural control after stroke / B.C. Abreu // Am. J. Occup.
decreased with the help of the balance training of the postural Ther. 1995. Vol. 49. 6. P. 517525.
sway biofeedback. They also indicated that the including of the 14. Badke . Patterns of rapid motor responses during postural
balance training in rehabilitation programs improves some cli- adjustments when standing in healthy subjects and hemiple-
nical and functional ability of trained patients. gic patients / . Badke, . Duncan // Phys.Ther. 1983. Vol.
63. P. 1320.
15. Berg K. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an
1. - - - instrument / K. Berg, S.L. Wood-Dauphinee, J.T. Willi-
/ .. , .. , .. , mans // Can. J. Public Health. 1992. Vol. 83. P. 911.
.. // - 16. Carr J.H. Motor relearning programme for stroke / J.H.
: - Carr, R.B. Shepherd. Rockville: Md, Aspen Publishers.
. .-. . . 1983.
, 2000. . 341345. 17. Cerebellar ataxia: Abnormal control of interaction torques
2. .. across multiple joints / A.J. Bastian, T.A. Martin, J.G. Kea-
ting, W.T. Thach // J. Neurophysiol. 1996. Vol. 76. P.
: . . . . / 492509.
.. . ., 2004. 24 . 18. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population /
3. .. J. Perry, M. Garrett, J.K. Gronley, S.J. Mulroy // Stroke.
(- ): 1995. Vol. 26. P. 982989.
. . . . / .. . ., 19. Clinical correlates of motor performance during paced po-
2003. 25 . stural tasks in Parkinsons disease / D.J. Beckley, V.P. Pan-
4. zer, M.P. Remler et al. // J. Neurol. Sci. 1995. Vol. 132. P.
: 133138.
/ .. 20. Di Fabio R.P. Stance duration under sensoral conflict con-
ditions in patients with hemiplegia / R.P. Di Fabio, M.B.

90

Badke // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1991. Vol. 72. 5. P.
292295.
21. Dickstein R. Postural sway of the affected and nonaffected
pelvis and leg in stance of hemipaparetic patients / R. Dicks-
tein, N. Abulaffio // Arch. Phys. Med Rehabil. 2000. Vol.
81. 3. P. 364367.
22. Garland S.J. Postural responses to unilateral arm perturbati-
on in young, elderly and hemiplegic subjects / S.J. Garland,
T.J. Stevenson, T. Ivanova // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
1997. Vol. 78. 10. P. 10721077.
23. Hoehn M.M. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortali-
ty / M.M. Hoehn, M.D. Yahr // Neurology. 1967. Vol. 17. P.
42742.
24. Horak F.B. Postural inflexibility in parkinsonian subjects /
F.B. Horak, J.G. Nutt, L.M. Nashner // J. Neurol. Sci. 1992.
Vol. 111. P. 4658.
25. Horak F. Clinical assessment of balance disorders / F. Ho-
rak // Gait & Posture. 1997. Vol. 6. P. 7684.
26. Nashner L.M. Adaptation of human movement to altered
enviroments / L.M. Nashner // Trends Neuroscience. 1982.
Vol. 5. P. 358361.
27. New quantitative and qualitative measures on functional
mobility prediction for stroke patients / M.Y. Lee, M.K.
Wong, F.T. Tang et al. // J. Med. Eng. Technot. 1998. Vol.
22. 1. P. 1424.
91
, 3 (113), 2004 .
28. Pourcher E., Barbeau A. Field testing of an ataxia scoring
and standing system / E. Pourcher, A. Barbeau // Can. J. Ne-
urol. Sci. 1980. Vol. 7. 4. P. 339347.
29. Preparatory postural adjustments in parkinsons patients
with postural instability / R.G. Lee, I. Tonolli, F. Viallet et
al. // Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1995. Vol. 22. P. 126135.
30. Prospective assessment of falls in Parkinsons disease / B.R.
Bloem, Y.A. Grimbergen, M. Cramer et al. // J. Neurol.
2001. Vol. 248. 11. P. 950958.
31. Rogers M.W. Disordes of posture, balance and gait in Par-
kinsons disease / M.W. Rogers // Clin. Geriatr. Med. 1996.
Vol. 12. 4. P. 825845.
32. Schieppati M. Free and supported stance in Parkinsons di-
sease. The effect of posture and postural set on leg muscle
responses to perturbation, and its relation to the severity of
the disease / M. Schieppati, A. Nardone // Brain. 1991. Vol.
114. P. 12271244.
33. Shumway-Cook A. Postural sway biofeedback: its effect on
reestablishing stance stability in hemiplegic patients / A.
Shumway-Cook, D. Anson, S. Haller // Arch. Phys. Med.
Rehabil. 1998. Vol. 69. 6. P. 395400.
34. The post-stroke hemiparetic patient. I. A method for evalua-
tion of physical performance / A.R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jaasko,
L. Leyman et al. // Scand. J. Rehab. Med. 1975. Vol. 7. P.
1331.