Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alex Jacobo Y Sementela, Petitioner, vs. Court of Appeals and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents

    Uploaded by

    Venus-Dominic CuetoandUntalasco
    15 views1 page
    The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner Alex Jacobo y Sementela against the Court of Appeals and People of the Philippines. The Court of Appeals had affirmed the conviction of the petitioner for illegal possession of firearms despite inconsistencies in the testimonies of prosecution witnesses. The Supreme Court found reasonable doubt in the case and reversed the conviction due to conflicting statements that cast doubt on the veracity of the prosecution's allegations against the petitioner.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    jacobo.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner Alex Jacobo y Sementela against the Court of Appeals and People of the Philippines. The Court of Appeals had affirmed the conviction of the petitioner for illegal possession of firearms despite inconsistencies in the testimonies of prosecution witnesses. The Supreme Court found reasonable doubt in the case and reversed the conviction due to conflicting statements that cast doubt on the veracity of the prosecution's allegations against the petitioner.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    15 views1 page

    Alex Jacobo Y Sementela, Petitioner, vs. Court of Appeals and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents

    Uploaded by

    Venus-Dominic CuetoandUntalasco
    The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner Alex Jacobo y Sementela against the Court of Appeals and People of the Philippines. The Court of Appeals had affirmed the conviction of the petitioner for illegal possession of firearms despite inconsistencies in the testimonies of prosecution witnesses. The Supreme Court found reasonable doubt in the case and reversed the conviction due to conflicting statements that cast doubt on the veracity of the prosecution's allegations against the petitioner.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    [G.R. No. 107699.

    March 21, 1997]

    ALEX JACOBO y SEMENTELA, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS


    and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, respondents.

    You might also like