Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Developments in Steel Cables
Developments in Steel Cables
Developments in Steel Cables
3-29, 1996
Copyright 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
PII: S0143-947X(96)00027-2 0143-974X/96 $15.00 + 0.00
ELSEVIER
J. M. Walton
ABSTRACT
This paper traces the development of steel cables over recent years, and
describes how the Wire Rope industry has responded to the needs of the
Construction industry. There is now a wider choice of products available
than ever before, both in terms of size and (axial) stiffness, and this has led to
corresponding developments in the requisite end fittings. New and improved
methods of cable corrosion protection have also gained widespread accept-
ance. The purpose of this paper is to alert designers to the major advances
that have been made in the design and manufacture of steel structural ten-
dons. R~ference is made to the requirements of both on- and off-shore appli-
cations, and to the increasing demands of ever larger structures. Experience
on the largest structural projects has shown that in addition to optimising
the usual cable performance parameters, careful consideration must be given
to logistical factors. It is important that all these options are not only under-
stood bn:t are evaluated at a sufficiently early stage of the structural design
process to be effective. Copyright 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
1 INTRODUCTION
Over the last decade there has been a rapid growth in the diversity of steel
cable products being offered to the market to meet the requirements of 'Ten-
sion Structures'. This development has encompassed both the traditional types
of cable: spJLral strands, stranded ropes and locked-coil ropes, as well as introd-
ucing more radical design solutions which include: parallel wire bundles
(PWB); parallel wire strands (PWS); parallel strand bundles (PSB); parallel
strand cable, s. Together they have resulted in a considerable expansion of the
performance envelope available from flexible steel tendons, as outlined below.
Historica][ly, small differences in cable construction often owed more to an
inclination on the part of the rope manufacturer to differentiate his products,
than any serious consideration of design optimisation. However, the recent
4 J.M. Walton
2 TRADITIONAL PRODUCTS
design, the diameter of the individual wires was also increased substantially,
to 6.5 mm. Despite this and the move to an equal-lay centre, a total of eight
separate stranding operations are involved in producing a strand of this size,
as illustrated on the cross-section given in Fig. 1.
An associated design revision of considerable significance was a move to
shorter lays (9-10 lay factor) for these much larger strands as it became appar-
ent that strand coherence and integrity would otherwise suffer, especially for
the outer cover of (54) wires.
The guiding principle for this design change was the relative curvature of
the wire helix, and a set of design rules were established empirically linking
the number of wires in a layer to a recommended lay angle, based on a limiting
bend ratio. This technology has since been successfully extended to spiral
strands of up to 164 mm, as used for example on the Queen Elizabeth II cable-
stayed bridge over the River Thames at Dartford. Here on the largest cables
an outer cover of 72 wires was used with a total of 13 spinning operations
involving almost 500 wires. The breaking strength of these largest ever pro-
duction cables was in excess of 22.5 MN.
Meanwhile back in the research laboratory, experimental lengths of spiral
strand have been produced in sizes up to 240 nun diameter, using 7 mm diam-
eter outer wires, and the breaking strength efficiency of such products has
been demonstrated within the limit of the available testing capability (30 MN);
a breaking load of 27.4 MN being achieved from a 185 mm diameter test
piece in resin cone terminations. ~ Despite the very high level of confidence
CONSTRUCTION
54 x ~ Round VI~
48 x 6.611m Round II1~
42 x ~ Round VI~
SIT x 6.~Omm Round VIr~
31 x 6.Sam Raund VIr~
i
25 x ~ Round WI~
19 x ~ B ~ m Round iJl~
14 x 6.~ Round I/IrB
7 x 3.~ Round Vires
7 x 5.111m Round Vk-w
7 x S.2Olm Round Vlrml
! x 7.~ Round Wires
Although there is a long tradition of using simple wire rope constructions for
bridge hangers and mast stay cables, these applications have not seen the same
escalation in demand for larger and more sophisticated tendons as referred
to earlier.
One reason for this is that the stretch characteristics of large stranded ropes
are not so attractive as those offered by the spiral strand. Offshore however,
particularly in applications where stretch is non-critical, as for example in
catenary mooring systems, the demand for large mooring lines has broken
new ground in terms of both product size and rope construction. Six-strand
ropes of up to 193 mm diameter have been supplied, although currently rope
diameters <100 m m are more typical.
The design approach in the larger sizes has been to move from the usual
single stranding operation, to multi-operation stranding once the practical limit
of wire size has been reached. This trend is reflected in table 1 of ISO 8369-
1986, which projects ropes of up to 205 mm diameter. The introduction of
more complex strand constructions has been shown to result in a significant
fall-off in the tensile efficiency of the rope, as evidenced by the empirical
breaking load factors given in clause 5.7 of ISO 8369-1986.
There is strong evidence to suggest that this pattern of behaviour may well
be correlated with the inter-wire contact stresses, which tend to increase more
or less in proportion to the number of outer wires in each strand and are
demonstrably very much higher than would be encountered in a spiral strand.
Whilst much work has been done to try to mitigate the effects of these stresses
on rope efficiency by careful attention to design criteria, it remains a critical
aspect of the breaking load performance, closely linked to considerations of
wire ductility. Efforts have therefore been made to manufacture wires which
Developments in steel cables 7
are better able to withstand localised contact stresses through wire process
development (see also Section 6.1), which have resulted in a much more con-
sistent leve,1 of performance. Nevertheless, it does appear that there is a funda-
mental constraint here that will inhibit the achievement of very high unit
breaking strengths from stranded ropes.
Other considerations that may influence the specification of stranded ropes
are: (a) the ability of rope constructions to accept more severe bending than
spiral strands where coiling is a prerequisite, and (b) the inherent retention of
broken outer wires since they are entrapped by adjacent strands, but also (c)
that they a~re more difficult to protect against corrosion due to the more open
form of construction and the greater ease of penetration of corrosive media.
CONSTRUCTION
54 x 7.88.m Ful t Look I/Ires
48 x 7 . 8 1 ~ Fut t Lock Wires
4B x 7.118m Fut t Look Wires
41 x 7.Hmm Fu|| Look Wires
4e x 6.BSmm Fut t L t ~ k Vires
40 x 5 . 8 ~ m Fut t Look Wire/
33 x S.6emm Fu(l Look Wires:
~: x 4@'. FuLL Lc~'k Wire.
x 36Bmm Ful t Lock Wires
t4 x 4 5 @ 1 Round t/Ires
? x 285mm Round Wires
7 x 3.78== Round Wires
? x 3.gemm Round Wires
I x 545mm Round tllres
3 PARALLEL PRODUCTS
3.1 Parallel bundles
This section refers to tension members in which the individual elements (wires
or strands) are laid straight and parallel to one another, usually within a jacket
Developments in steel cables 9
which both protects the elements and provides the necessary integrity for
handling purposes. Alternatively, if a number of the bundles are to be sub-
sequently amalgamated together into a larger cable, then discrete wrappings
may be used to bind the elements together temporarily during the transpor-
tation and assembly operations.
The factory operation also allows the bundles to be sheathed and blocked,
preferably with a non-rigid semisolid material that is impervious to moisture.
This represents a major step forward in terms of both ease of introduction
and weight saving, when compared with the traditional practice of using a
cement grout, which could only be pumped in after the stays had been erected
and tensioned, as well as other performance-related benefits (see also Table 1).
TABLE 1
Typical Tension Member Properties (based on products of 127 mm nominal diameter)
date has been to winch the strands up individually into a pre-erected tubular
outer stay casing, and then to separately tension each one to the structure, a
practice wlhich ensures uniform load sharing between strands. The resulting
cable there,fore has no inherent structural integrity as each of the strands is
anchored independently. However, the use of a rigid filler such as a cement
grout will provide a potential load transfer mechanism between strands
because of the ribbed helical surface of the component strands.
There is no obvious limit to the size of cable that could be produced in
this way, although the problems of in-situ grouting may be expected to
increase with diameter. The prefabricated route may avoid these problems and
offer greater security of strand positioning and initial alignment, but not with-
out subsequent handling and logistical difficulties, which perhaps serves to
explain wily there has been little commercial interest to date in factory-
made units.
The key development that is needed for stay cable purposes is a switch to
galvanised strands for their corrosion protection advantage, whereas histori-
cally prestressing strand has mostly been preferred in the bright condition.
For factory-made cables, galvanising is viewed as a desirable additional fea-
ture, but if site-fabrication is being contemplated then galvanising may be
considered essential to avoid deterioration during assembly.
From a property point of view it is again expected that the cable will
develop the full aggregate strength (and stiffness) of the constituent strands,
although on the largest cables this may be impossible to demonstrate, if only
because the cost of full-scale testing would be prohibitively expensive (see
also Table 1 for illustrative data).
of the capstan effect, but this will be at a substantially lower level than in a
conventional strand because of the reduced contact stresses. This feature and
the general handling characteristics, could be enhanced by moving to shorter
lays, but not without introducing design complications and prejudicing the
conversion efficiency.
(wires in the) strands to be opposite to the lay direction of the (strands in the)
cable, so that their respective torsional moments counterbalance one another.
Further enhancement may be gained by using compacted (or DYFORM )
strands. This makes for a more compact cable cross-section and not only
reduces the cable diameter for a given strength requirement, but also greatly
improves the contact conditions between the strands, as illustrated in Fig. 5.
This BRISTAY product seems to offer the ultimate solution to most struc-
tural tendon requirements, offering the following unique combination of attri-
butes:
4 CORROSION PROTECTION
TABLE 2
DYFORM Strand Properties
TABLE 3
BRISTAY Cable Properties
Ref No. Nominal No. of unit Steel area Steel weight Breaking
cable strands ( cm 2) (kg/m ) strength
diameter (MN)
(mm)
the corrosion rate is heavily dependent upon the water flow velocity, as this
has a controlling influence on the dissolution of corrosion products.
Samples o f unsheathed galvanised 127 m m diameter spiral strand were
recovered from the North Sea after 13 years of constant immersion in a tidal
flow. Superficial examination revealed no traces of zinc and significant rusting
o f the exposed outer wire crowns, but when the strand was stripped down,
all the internal wire surfaces were found to be in excellent condition with the
zinc coating still very much in evidence. Despite the visual indications, the
loss in strength of the corroded outer wires was only about 50 MPa, which
represents a strength reduction of less than 1% for the strand as a whole.
Identical samples of strand that had been fitted with an extruded plastics jacket
containing small windows to simulate sheathing damage, were similarly
exposed. However, examination of the outer wire surfaces through the win-
dows showed that the zinc coating was still intact despite the penetration of
Developments in steel cables 17
the jacket. This demonstrates that even an imperfect jacket is beneficial, and
that quite a limited shrouding effect can significantly retard the rate of cor-
rosion.
The level of corrosion resistance can also be considerably enhanced by
cathodic protection (CP) means. One approach that has been successfully
employed is to incorporate continuous anodic elements, such as zinc or alu-
minium alloys, into an exposed position in the cable, where they can sacri-
ficially protect the outer wire surfaces and substantially delay the onset of
corrosion to the steel substrate. The alternative impressed current systems are
only effective when the cable is fully immersed and covered with an insulating
jacket. In this situation the CP will only operate when the sheathing is dam-
aged, and consequently the current flow is likely to be too low for voltage
drop to become a problem, even over relatively long lengths of tether. The
corollary to this is that if the connecting termination or structure has no protec-
tion system, then there is a risk of the galvanic coating on the cable being
depleted more rapidly as it attempts to protect the structure.
An improved form of galvanic protection known as GALFAN has been
finding commercial application in wire ropes. The coating, which is applied
by the hot-dip method, comprises a zinc-aluminium alloy (with 5% wt. A1)
instead of pure zinc. This alloy has been shown to have a substantially greater
passive resi,;tance to corrosion in simulated industrial and marine environ-
ments, so that it is depleted less rapidly. 5 This is proving particularly attractive
for stay cables which have no other form of protection such as mast stays, as
a longer life can be expected to first corrosion of the substrate. However, once
corrosion of the steel has initiated and the coating is required to protect in
the active mode, there may be no further advantage, as the electrochemical
capacity of GALFAN is not dissimilar to that of pure zinc.
It should be noted here that for deep-sea mooring cables, the blocking material
has an important secondary role in transmitting the hydrostatic pressure
throughout the cross-section. If the cable is not fully blocked with a substan-
tially incompressible fluid, then at depth the hydrostatic pressure will exert
undesirable compressive forces on the cable with deleterious effects on the
cable stiffness and fatigue performance, as predicted by Raoof, 2"6 as well as
introducing a potentially harmful pressure differential across the sheathing.
The solid paint-type coatings such as the traditional red lead or the more
recent aluminium-based BRIDON METALCOAT compound, offer a much
greater resistance to displacement and are therefore more appropriate for
unsheathed cables. Their limitation is that once set, they have no ability to
flow and should not therefore be used for applications where significant flexing
is likely.
This disadvantage is usually overcome by installing and tensioning the
cables before the final dressing of the coating material is applied. For similar
reasons the use of solid blocking materials inside sheathed cables has little to
commend it from a corrosion viewpoint, as their long-term integrity is more
difficult to ensure and the additional stiffness serves no useful purpose.
developed which grip the wires. The attraction of this mechanism is that it is
self-regulating, the gripping forces increasing in proportion to the applied axial
load, with an additional initial bond coming from the shrinkage of the casting
medium on to the wires.
In simple terms then, providing that the cone angle, the cone length and
the other relevant factors are correctly chosen, the terminations should be safe
and reliable over the entire load spectrum. A key parameter here is the number
of wires in the stay, since this controls the relative surface area that is available
for gripping purposes. Gripping problems are likely to be most acute when
the stay comprises few wires, as recognised in DIN.3092 (for N < 50). The
corollary to this is that cables having a large number of wires will be relatively
easy to terminate, and therefore upward extrapolation to the larger sizes should
not present any fundamental difficulties. For example 'cone length = 5 cable
diameter' is a well established rule of thumb which is widely adopted for
socket design purposes. The weakness of this approach if taken in isolation
is that it takes no account of the number of wires involved (and hence the
relative wire sizes). It may therefore prove to be conservative and result in
an over-designed socket in the larger cable sizes, but conversely may be inad-
equate for the simple cable constructions.
Efforts have been made to develop a more sophisticated analysis of socket
gripping mechanisms, with valuable results. For example Gabriel & Heimes 7
of Stuttgart University refer to their study of zinc alloy cast cones using a
Finite Element model, which emphasises inter alia the importance of the fric-
tional bond, and in particular draws attention to a wire surface roughness
effect which may well have wire size implications. This reference serves to
demonstrate the complexity of the socketing problem from an analytical point
of view unless gross simplifying assumptions are made.
Ideally, the designer would have a simulation model incorporating all the
relevant factors, but modelling techniques which can simultaneously accom-
modate: (a) frictional sliding, (b) plastic yielding, and (c) residual stresses
(from the solidification, cooling or curing process), within a complex three-
dimensional composite matrix, are not yet well developed. For the present,
therefore, terminations tend to be based on proven design parameters, and
to err on the side of caution when extrapolating above the normal range of
product size.
For the multi-strand type of stay cables referred to earlier (PSB and
BRISTAY) the usual brushing and casting method can be used very effectively
because of the large wire surface area available. However, alternative solutions
incorporating proprietary wedge-type strand grips 8 can also be considered
where appropriate.
Developments in steel cables 21
when specifying the socket length, attention is paid not only to the cable
diame,ter but also to the diameter of the constituent wires (e.g. DIN.3092
recommends that the cone length should be not less than 70 times
wire diameter);
the conical bore of the socket must be smooth and free from any signifi-
cant impediment to the wedging action;
--when the end of the cable is splayed out into a conical brush, a spacer
plate is introduced to separate the wires and provide a totally controlled
brush formation;
- - the wire surfaces in the area of the brush must be scrupulously cleaned
to ensure good bond strength;
- - w h e r e v e r possible the cone should be withdrawn from the socket after
casting and inspected to verify the quality of fill.
One embellishment that has been extensively adopted for PWB and more
recently for PWS, is button-heading of the wire ends, as propounded, for
example, by BBRV in their HiAm anchorage system. Details of this and other
similar systems have already been widely published, e.g. Ref. 8, and are not
repeated here. This technique may be used to advantage with tendons which
have no StlaJctural integrity and especially those comprising small numbers of
wires, but is arguably less effective on larger stays, where button-heading
becomes redundant if used in conjunction with a conical socket. Also this
method is not applicable to traditional products due to the difficulty of access
to the wire ends, and in any event is unnecessary because of the high level
of inter-wire friction and load sharing in the cable.
22 ]. M. Walton
The use of both resin and zinc-based capping systems has continued with
neither showing a decisive lead, and for most applications either material could
provide a viable termination solution. Nevertheless, there are a number of
distinguishing features which may lead to one system being favoured over the
other, for some situations. These are discussed below.
Zinc is the traditional casting material and given the experience of more
than 100 years successful use in structural applications, there is a high level
of confidence in its long-term performance. It has the benefit of being simple
to use without any significant control or shelf-life problems. It offers an
inherent cathodic protection capability in the critical area at the neck of the
socket. However, it is sometimes criticised, e.g. Ref. 8, for impairing the
fatigue performance of the stay in this same region, because of thermal effects
on the wire properties during casting. Whilst this may be a valid argument
for some sensitive wire products, it should not be held to apply to the vast
majority of structural stay products which are specified in final galvanised
finish, since this material has already been exposed to the same thermal treat-
ment (i.e. heating to 450C), during the galvanising process.
More importantly, it has been found that in heavily stressed terminations
which are subjected to sustained loading, the traditional pure zinc cones are
prone to long-term creep effects. Although the rate of creep is not normally
sufficient to give cause for concern, there is nevertheless growing support for
a move to more creep-resistant materials. Zinc alloys containing copper and/or
aluminium are therefore being widely specified in preference to pure zinc.
These can be cast with the same facility as pure zinc and at more or less the
same pouring temperature, whilst offering a dramatic improvement in yield
strength. 7
Resin filled sockets have been in use now for about 30 years, and although
the experience on major structural projects is rather more recent, there have
been no identified concerns regarding its long-term stability under normal
environmental conditions, and there is no reason to expect that it will not
perform satisfactorily for much longer periods. Long-term accelerated testing
carried out in the laboratory has shown that resin terminations have a very
much better creep resistance than the creep-resistant zinc alloys.
There are several proprietary resin materials available to suit the socketing
application. Most are based on a two-pack filled polyester resin system,
although epoxy resin is also used by some manufacturers. Obviously care
must be taken to ensure that the resin has cured properly. This is assured with
some resin systems by observing a colour change during hardening. Where a
quantitative check is required, hardness measurements can be carded out on
Developments in steel cables 23
either sample tablets or on the cone itself, after the recommended curing
regime.
It has be,en noted that resin cones (against steel sockets) have a substantially
greater coefficient of friction than zinc against steel (namely 0.40 and 0.25,
respectively). This is particularly relevant to the cone wedging action referred
to earlier, since the increased frictional resistance between the resin cone and
the steel socket will effectively reduce the radial stresses that are generated
in the termination. When taken in isolation this does not necessarily impair
the efficiency of resin-filled sockets as there is a corresponding enhancement
at the resin to wire interface. However, some difficulties have been experi-
enced when resin has been used in conjunction with locking grooves, which
have for many years been a feature of general purpose sockets especially in
the U S A , 9 and other impedimenta that have combined to prevent the cone
pulling in effectively under load. The resulting view is that where resin is
used, then greater care must be taken in specifying the socket bore profile
and condition.
For applications where there is a significant risk of cable bending at the ter-
mination, .devices have been fitted to the neck of the socket to control the
local deflection. The design of these restrictors recognises that very high bend-
ing stresses can be induced in the section of cable immediately adjacent to
the termination, but these can be mitigated by providing transitional support
over quite a short axial length. This situation is more likely to arise in offshore
moorings lhan on bridge cables because of the different levels of structural
excursion and mean tension that are commonly found. However, bridge cable
excitation from vibrational sources alone may warrant a socket bend restrictor,
as in the case of the replacement hangers on the Sevem Bridge l where rubber-
lined coll~trs were introduced at the socket neck.
For offs]~ore platform tethers the support collar concept has been extended
into a tape,red 'boot' of elastomeric material to allow a gradual change of
stiffness as illustrated for example in Fig. 6, with the objective of controlling
the strand deflection to a minimum radius of bend. In this instance the steel
cable was sheathed with a plastics jacket for corrosion protection purposes,
and the boot served the dual purpose of providing both additional flexural
support and a means of sealing the jacket to the termination, to prevent the
ingress of corrosive media.
The difficulty here from the design point of view is that the inherent cable
stiffness is highly dependent upon the axial load level. At zero tension the
flexural behaviour is essentially elastic and can be predicted from the cable
design data. As axial tension is applied the bending resistance increases rapidly
24 J. M. Walton
,_-S
/
Fig. 6. Cross-sectionof socket boot.
6 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
2500
_ J - - t l l
j 4 1 - -
j . . . . - J -
2000
~- 1500
~E
~1000
500
I I I I I I I I
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9O
Axial Strain, %
istics of steel confer a remarkable ability to diffuse the effect of local stress
concentrations in a way that ensures a consistently high level of tensile
efficiency and reliability. When viewed in this light the advanced composite
materials, with their almost totally elastic behaviour to failure, appear com-
paratively brittle.
Despite this outstanding advantage of the traditional steel wire material,
there will of course be situations where the weight savings associated with
advanced composite materials more than outweigh any toughness consider-
ations. For example, in structures where very long lengths of cable are
involved, the load due to self-weight alone may mitigate against a steel tendon,
and dictate that composites are the preferred solution.
Destruction testing facilities for tension members are now available with
capacities of up to 30 MN, both in the UK and in continental Europe. Details
of these and other large machines are given in Table 4. This represents a major
investment by European countries in cable proving facilities, which have con-
tributed materially to the recent development activity on large structural ten-
dons. The NEL facilities in particular, in addition to the normal commercial
testing work, have provided the basis for a series of Joint Industry Studies 16
Developments in steel cables 27
TABLE 4
Large Tensile Testing Machines
6.3 Logistics
structions that they can accommodate, but within a fixed length limitation.
Transportation considerations may also impose constraints on the size of pack-
age that can be contemplated, and this has implications for both the size and
length of cable. For example, the traditional 'rule of thumb' for spiral strands
is that the bending diameter should be not less than 25 strand diameter, so
that a 160 mm strand requires a 4 m diameter drum barrel etc. Other products
may require an even larger bending ratio, depending on the constructional
details and their sensitivity to bending. Fortunately sheathed cables can with-
stand more severe bending without detriment, as the jacket inhibits wire dis-
placement.
REFERENCES
1. Magazine article, High Strength Spiral Strand Breaks Record. Wire Industry,
1986, p. 686.
2. Raoof, M., Design recommendations for steel cables. Struct. Engng Rev., 4 (1992)
223-233.
3. Westerhoff, D., Freeman, R. A. & Kuwabara, K., Dao Khanong cable stayed
Developments in steel cables 29
bridge, manufacture and erection of large diameter full locked coil bridge ropes,
Int. Corf Cable-stayed Bridges, Bangkok, 1987.
4. Magazine article, Of the Galvanisation used for the Protection of Bridge Stay
Cables, Freyssinet Magazine, September 1990.
5. Apel, G., Nunninghoff, R. & Sczepanski, K., Galfan--a new corrosion protection
for wire rope. WIRE, 40 (1990) 641-646.
6. Raoof, M., Cable fatigue prediction in offshore applications. Proc. lOth Int. Conf.
Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Stavanger, Norway, 1991,
pp. 403--411.
7. Gabriel, K. & Heimes, F., The Mechanics of Socketing--The Zinc Alloy Cones
as a Special Compound Structure. University of Stuttgart, Germany.
8. Walther, R., Houriet, B., Isler, W. & Moia, P., Cable Stayed Bridges. Thomas
Telford, London, 1988, pp. 79-92.
9. United States Federal Specification, Sockets. Wire Rope. Reference RR-S-
550D, 1989.
10. Flint, A. R. & Smith, B. W., Strengthening and refurbishment of Severn Crossing
Part 5: other background R&D. Proc. Inst. Civil Engrs Structs & Blgs. 1992,
Vol. 94, pp. 51-60.
11. Raoof, IVl. & Huang, Y. P., Bending stiffness and hysteresis of sheathed spiral
strands. Proc. of 2nd Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., San Francisco,
June 19!)2.
12. Stephen:son, A., Timiney, P. & Walton, J. M., Strain ageing in high tensile carbon
steel wire for roping purposes. Metals Society Conf. on Developments in the
Drawing of Metals, London, 1983.
13. Cordon, B. W., Timiney, P., Mottishaw, T. D. & Smith, G. D. W., Developments
of microalloyed pearlitic steels for wire drawing applications. Metals Society
Conf. on Developments in the Drawing of Metals, London, 1983.
14. Walton, J. M. & Yeung, C. T. Y., Flexible tension members from composite
materials. Proc. of the Sixth Int. OMAE Syrup., American Society of Mechanical
Enginee:rs, 1987, Vol. 3.
15. Walton, J. M., Contact Stresses in Wire Ropes, M. Phil. Thesis, Department of
MechanJLcal Engineering, University of Leeds, 1987.
16. Chaplin, C. R. & Potts, A. E., Wire Rope Offshore. Health and Safety Executive,
Offshore Technology Report OTH 91341, 1991.