MAINTENANCE PT.

GS BATTERY
VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR SERVICES & PRODUCT
ALL FIELDS ARE MANDATORY
Vendor Name : Contract Title and Number :

Purchae Order Number : Contract Period :

From : To:
Contract Value : Department :

Performance Evaluation Interval:

Six (6) Month Interval
Contract Closeout
EXCEPTIONAL (7)
Meets contractual requirements and result
exceeds many of user expectation. The
scope of services was accomplished.
Corrective actions taken by the contractor
were highly effective.
Others .
PERFORMANCE
VERY GOOD (5) SATISAFCTORY (3)
Meets contractual requirements and result sometimes Meets contractual requirements. The sc
exceeds of user expectation. The scope of services was of services was accomplished with min
accomplished with minor problem. Corrective actions taken problem. Corrective actions taken by th
by the contractor were effective. contractor were satisfactory.

All job carried out in time and adaptive to All job carried out in time and adaptive to sudden All job carried out in time.
sudden customer request. customer request

MARGINAL (2) UNSATISFACTORY (0) N/A INSUFFICIENT IN

Does not meets few contractual requirements. The scope Does not meet most Not Applicable There is not sufficient
of services was not accomplished. Corrective actions taken contractual requirements, information to rate
by the contractor were only marginally effective or were And the scope of service was performance
not implemented. not accomplished

Most job carried in time. No Job carried in time

PERFORMANCE RATING SCORE (0,2,3,5,7) COMMENTS

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Service / Product Quality Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Execution / Delivery
Marginal
(On time with schedule)
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
 Sheet 1

PERFORMANCE RATING SCORE (0,2,3,5,7) COMMENTS

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
COST Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
Exceptional
Very Good
Safety (reporting of accident, Satisfactory
using proper APD, ensure
Marginal
workers following safety work
procedures) Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Following SOP Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
Exceptional
Very Good
Documentation records Satisfactory
(reports, receipts, invoices) are Marginal
given in timely manner Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Technical assistance Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Handling of Complaints Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A
Insufficient Info
Would you recommend this
Yes No
vendor again ?

Sheet 2

OVERALL ASSESSMENT Exceptional ( 46 - 56 )

Total score out 56 Very Good ( 35 - 45 )
Satisfactory ( 23 - 34 )
Marginal ( 11 - 22 )
Unsatisfactory ( < 11 )

Comments :

Name of Evaluator : Signature :

NPK : Date :

Title / Position :

Dept. / Section :
Sheet 3
ORY (3)
ements. The scope
shed with minor
ns taken by the
ory.

FICIENT INFO

ot sufficient
n to rate
nce

NTS
 Sheet 1 of 3

NTS
Sheet 2 of 3
Sheet 3 of 3