Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Traditional Family vs. The Modern Family
The Traditional Family vs. The Modern Family
t h e M o d e r n F a m i l y | 1
July 8, 2013
Abstract
We commonly think that the family has always consisted of a father, a mother, and the
children. However, have families always been structured that way? We have come to call it the
nuclear family. Many people feel threaten by changing this model of the family. However,
throughout history the family has not always been just a father, a mother, and the children. This
paper will explore what the traditional family really looked like and what changes brought us to
the many different types of families we see today. Though these families may have existed
The traditional family has typically been represented as a father, mother, and one or more
children. In this traditional structure, the father was usually the breadwinner, meaning he would
be the familys primary source of income. The mother, on the other hand, was usually the
caretaker of the household, in that she would mind the children, the cooking, cleaning, and so on.
The traditional family model is often seen in older TV shows, particularly shows from the
50s. In one such show, Leave it to Beaver, Ward Cleaver goes to work every day so he can
bring home the bacon, as it were. In this show, the wife June Cleaver stays home and takes
care of the house and children. Many people consider Leave it to Beaver a strong model of the
family from that time period, and they may wish for a return to that family scenario. Should this
Before the First and Second Revolutions, communities in the USA tended towards
agriculture, and farming tasks had to be done manually rather than with machines (Carlson,
2001). Many families ran their own artisan shops during this period. The wealthier families
would own plantations. As an example of the agricultural families, during the 1800s many
families in the south would own family farms (Carlson, 2001). These farms would be passed
down over generations and the children were the key in keeping these farms producing additional
goods. Thus, in these families, procreation took a special meaning in that the offspring could be
trusted as new community members who would become responsible farmers also. These
children would be trained well by their parents and would require little instruction from the
These agricultural families had a family structure which could solve the problems which
are facing many modern families. Our society is constantly looking for methods of better care
for the young, the old, the weak, and the infirm. Before the industrial revolution, families could
take care of their own members who had these issues, because they worked together as a unit and
were not as individualistic. The traditional family did not always consist only of the mother,
father, and children. It would also sometimes include grandparents, uncles, and aunts. These
families would stay together and share their problems and responsibilities together. However, in
time the families would drift apart, because of technological intervention within their
As time progressed, technology made work easier, including farming work. For this
reason, Artisans became hobbyists. Traditional methods of agriculture were shunned in favor of
mechanical solutions. A tractor was able to do the work of several farmers by itself in just a few
hours. Fathers, instead of helping with farming, would work in factories away from the home.
Mothers would stay at home and continue their domestic duties. Children, instead of helping
with farming or business after they grew up, would leave the home and create their own families.
Up until that point, children would grow into adults and would assume responsibility for
the older adults who had taken care of these offspring when they were younger. This was
considered a duty of the offspring, because the older adults had cared enough to work hard to
love and take care of them. The older adults were no longer able to take care of themselves once
they aged, it was assumed that their next of kin would love and care for them in the same way.
In modern families, these older adults are instead turned over to nursing homes, where their
offspring are able to shun their debt to their parents, believing that the nursing homes will be
T h e Tr a d i t i o n a l F a m i l y v s . t h e M o d e r n F a m i l y | 4
sufficient care. This trend towards nursing home use is a growing one nowadays; and public
During the Great Depression, the elderly had no choice but to keep working until death.
The government claimed to have a solution in the form of Social Security. The Social Security
Act was passed with the promise of providing retirement funds for the elderly (Social Security).
It was a good idea in the beginning, but the idea had problems. Social Security is funded via a
tax that one pays when they are younger and working, the tax accumulates within the Social
Security fund, and when one reaches a certain age those funds are expected to be available for a
comfortable and easy retirement (Social Security). This is the theory regarding Social Security,
however the system has evolved such that now an employee pays a Social Security tax which
goes into a big pot that the government is in control of. The government now decides how much
of ones own funds that are paid into Social Security that they will get back. The government
tends to also access these Social Security funds for its own benefit. The government use of these
funds creates a problem, in that the younger generation of workers is expected to replenish them
so that the funds will be still available for the elder workers when needed. The problems of this
system will be discussed later. With the government providing for the elderly, families would
begin to consist only of a father, mother, and children. Grandparents, aunts, and uncles would
live separately from their younger kin, and the traditional family was now damaged somewhat.
By the 1950s, technology was providing great innovations that would assist a mother
with her household chores. The mother would use these innovations such that she would have
more time for her own desires. The feminist movement, which began before the 50s, began to
encourage women away from the home and towards careers or jobs (Carlson, 2012). Women
began greatly following this trend, leaving one to wonder whom was responsible for childcare.
T h e Tr a d i t i o n a l F a m i l y v s . t h e M o d e r n F a m i l y | 5
A new structure was starting to develop within the family, in that both the father and
mother were working, and care of the offspring was shunned. The childcare issue was then
assumed by schools and then daycare centers (Carlson, 2001). The children would be watched
over by these institutions until their parents were home. At this point, the home was a resting
place for the adults rather than a rich center of daily activity for the family. In the words of
Christopher Lasch, the home was becoming a home in a heartless world (Lasch, 1977). The
home at this point where a family would consume food together, share a few hours together
watching TV or listening to radio, and would sleep under the same roof. This situation
Materialism has also created problems for the family. For the sake of gaining wealth,
families have been willing to work longer hours and odd schedules. In the past, with the
exception of a few jobs, most jobs had folks working weekdays from 9 to 5, and parents would
have only a few hours together in the evening. In more recent times, however, businesses are
staying open later, with some even being open 24 hours per day and 7 days per week. This can
cause parents to have little or no time together, and divorce can be a result. Even if a married
couple has greatly loved each other in the past when they were seeing each other daily, if they are
separated for several weeks by their jobs they can grow apart (Swan, 2009). This separation can
also lead to affairs, since these married adults are looking for others to fill the gap which is left
by the absence of their spouse. Affairs also lead to divorce. When divorce happens, single
parent families result, since the children tend to be granted to either their father or mother via the
government.
Before 1963, the government offered Federal Tax incentives that encouraged marriages
and childbirth (Carlson, 2001). The Tax Reform act was passed in 1963, it dismantled these
T h e Tr a d i t i o n a l F a m i l y v s . t h e M o d e r n F a m i l y | 6
incentives (Carlson, 2001). Because of this, the birth rate has been in decline, and less people
are paying into Social Security. As mentioned earlier, the young people have provided the tax
funds for Social Security when they work, since the government has been taking money from
Social Security beforehand. With the birth rate in decline, there were and are less people in the
work force following the Baby Boomers, which means funds are not being replenished to Social
Security. With this trend, Social Security will go bankrupt. The elderly will no longer be able to
Another trend that is occurring in very recent times is homosexual couples. Homosexuals
are usually criticized for being different, as they are different; but they are capable of providing a
two-parent home. Children are better off in life with two parents, and a homosexual couple can
provide more financial and emotional support for children than a single parent household.
However, homosexual couples are seen as taboo by society, and some states do not recognize
these couples (Fagan, 2010). How can we judge these couples, however, if we are not creating
In the past, families collectively took care of themselves. In more recent times and
nowadays, individualism has become the norm. This will continue unless we all go back to the
multigenerational family unit from beforehand (Bengtson, 2010). If we did this, so many of our
problems would be solved. How can we criticize single-parent families when the conditions that
References
Carlson, A. (2012). The Fifties Illusion: The Cultural Dry Rot that Doomed the Postwar Era. The
Family in America, 26(2), 127-137.
Carlson, A. C. (2001.). The Howard Center: The Family in America. The Radical Change in
American Culture-How Did We Get to This Point? Retrieved July 5, 2013, from
http://profam.org/pub/fia/fia_1512.htm
Christensen, B. (n.d.). The Howard Center: The Family in America. Why Homosexuals Want
What Marriage Has Now Become. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from
http://www.profam.org/pub/fia/fia_1804.htm
Fagan, P. (2010). The Family GDP: How Marriage and Fertility Drive the Economy. The Family
in America, 24(2), 135-149.
Social Security History. (n.d.). The United States Social Security Administration. Retrieved July
8, 2013, from http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/ssb36.html
Swan, G. (2009). 15 The Deconstruction of Marriage, Part 1: The Law and Economics of
Unilateral No-Fault Divorce. The Family in America, 23(3), 16-34.
Lasch, C. (1977). Haven in a heartless world: the family besieged. New York: Basic Books.