This document discusses analyzing Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy as an early example of autofiction. It defines autofiction as a work where the author projects themselves into an imaginary situation. While previously analyzed as a form of "fantastic autofiction", the document proposes analyzing the Divine Comedy simply as autofiction - as the first example of the author making themselves the protagonist to explore issues of their time. It will use the theoretical frameworks of autofiction scholars like Colonna, Gasparini, and Klinger to analyze how Dante, as a character and poet, represents both the medieval man and a precursor of the modern in synthesizing his real experiences into a surreal story traversing the afterlife
Original Description:
Texto para apresentação em evento da Universidade de Leeds
This document discusses analyzing Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy as an early example of autofiction. It defines autofiction as a work where the author projects themselves into an imaginary situation. While previously analyzed as a form of "fantastic autofiction", the document proposes analyzing the Divine Comedy simply as autofiction - as the first example of the author making themselves the protagonist to explore issues of their time. It will use the theoretical frameworks of autofiction scholars like Colonna, Gasparini, and Klinger to analyze how Dante, as a character and poet, represents both the medieval man and a precursor of the modern in synthesizing his real experiences into a surreal story traversing the afterlife
This document discusses analyzing Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy as an early example of autofiction. It defines autofiction as a work where the author projects themselves into an imaginary situation. While previously analyzed as a form of "fantastic autofiction", the document proposes analyzing the Divine Comedy simply as autofiction - as the first example of the author making themselves the protagonist to explore issues of their time. It will use the theoretical frameworks of autofiction scholars like Colonna, Gasparini, and Klinger to analyze how Dante, as a character and poet, represents both the medieval man and a precursor of the modern in synthesizing his real experiences into a surreal story traversing the afterlife
Dante Alighieri and autofiction: the hero poet in the Commedia
Abstract: When Serge Doubrovski employed the term autofiction in an exercise
in response to Philippe Lejeune, he established that autofiction refers to the fact of talking about yourself, be it a memory or not, as a fictional being. The term, currently present in the Larousse and Robert dictionaries, is widely used to describe several contemporary works. However, Vincent Colonna, in his doctorate thesis, created a new acception for the term created by Doubrovski. According to Colonna, autofiction is a projection of the author in an imaginary situation, creating four types of autofiction: fantastic, biographic, speculative, and intrusive. In the fantastic, he considers the work of il sommo poeta, Dante Alighieri, Commedia, once the florentine writer uses himself as a hero to walk through the realms beyond death, transforming his existence and his identity in a surreal story. Dante, a poet, remembering his trip to the three worlds beyond, created Dante, character and poet, synthesis of the medieval man, but also a precursor of the modern man. Thus, we intend to treat the florentine poet's magnum opus not as fantastic autofiction, as Colonna put it, but only as autofiction, the first in the perspective of bringing the writer as the protagonist of their own work, exploring correlate matters of his time and pointing to other common themes in contemporaneity, such as metafiction and the work of the writer. To perform this analysis, we shall utilize the theoretical framework of Diana Klinger, Vicent Colonna, Philippe Gasparini, when it comes to autofiction; Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht for a comprehension of the movement in contemporaneity, as well as other theoreticians, and also works relating to the study of hermeneutics, in the search for symbolic understanding of the figure of the author, and authorial.
The Innateness of Myth: A New Interpretation of Joseph Campbell's Reception of C.G. Jungnateness of Myth - A New Interpretation of Joseph Campbells Reception of C.G. Jung (2010)