Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biopharm Lab Report
Biopharm Lab Report
RESULTS
The addition of eserine, as indicated by the vertical black dotted line seen in
Figure 1, produced a steady increase in contraction force. In the control baths, there was
no observed change in contraction force.
insert tracing
Figure 1. The change in contraction force over time after the addition of eserine.
insert tracing
Figure 4. The change in contraction force over time after the addition of isoproterenol on
tissues that were either pretreated with propranolol or not pretreated with propranolol.
Figure 5. The effects of isoproterenol (1x10-6 M) and propranolol (1x10-6 M) on the
concentration-effect curve of carbachol. In both conditions, n=4. All data is displayed as
mean standard deviation.
The direct effects of propranolol and its interaction with isoproterenol on detrusor
contractility can be observed in Figures 4 and 5. The addition of isoproterenol produced a
gradual decrease in contraction. This effect was then cancelled out upon the addition of
propranolol (Figure 4). The tissues that were pretreated with solely isoproterenol were
found to have a greater pEC50 value (-6.080.03) than those treated with both
isoproterenol and propranolol (-6.260.04). Across all treatments, there were no
significant differences in pEC50 values. The maximal contractile response for tissues
treated with only isoproterenol differed by only 0.19% when compared to tissues that
were treated with both isoproterenol and propranolol.
Figure 6. The effects of increasing concentrations of atropine (n=1, 1x10-9 to 3x10-7 M)
on carbachols concentration-effect curve. For the control, n=2. All data is displayed as
mean standard deviation.
A schild plot based on the results of the experiment on the effect of atropine on
the contractile response of porcine urinary bladder to carbachol is shown in Figure 7. The
slope was determined to be 4.64, with an R2 value of 0.93. This slope is therefore
considered to not be close to unity due to its large deviation from 1. Through
interpretation of the x-axis on the Schild plot, the pA2 value was determined to be 8.92.
DISCUSSION
Smooth muscle activity in the porcine urinary bladder is controlled by different
mechanisms; many of which can be manipulated pharmacologically. Through
interference with the signal transduction of receptors found on the smooth muscle, we
were able to explore the effects that various drugs had on contractility. Atropine was
found to produce an insurmountable antagonistic effect, whereas, phenoxybenzamine
produced a surmountable antagonistic effect. The application of eserine displayed
inhibition of agonist breakdown, allowing for increased action of acetylcholine. Also
studied was functional antagonism through use of isoproterenol, which was then
interfered with through use of propranolol. Through analysis of concentration-effect
curves, these different phenomena were observed.
The urinary bladder exhibits a heterogeneous population of muscarinic receptors;
most notably M2 and M3 subtypes (Yamanishi, 2000). Acetylcholine, an endogenous
neurotransmitter, acts as an agonist to both M2 and M3 subtypes in order to produce an
overall net effect of contraction. Activation of phospholipase C, with the subsequent
formation of inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) to release calcium from
intracellular stores and activate a protein kinase C, is the prototypical signalling pathway
of M3 receptors. M3 activation occurs via the alpha-subunits of Gq G-proteins, whereas
M2 activation occurs via the Gi G-proteins. Stimulation of M2 receptors inhibits adenylate
cyclase (AC) and therefore the formation of cyclic-AMP, producing an inhibition of the
relaxation that would normally be caused by beta-adrenergic receptors (Frazier, 2007).
After eserine was administered to the baths, there was a noticeable increase in
contraction (Figure 1). Eserine is an acetylcholineseterase inhibitor, which prevents the
hydrolysis of acetylcholine to acetate and choline. Addition of eserine permits the local
concentration of acetylcholine to rise and overstimulate receptors, leading to a steady
increase in contractility (OBrien, 2013). Consistent with these findings was the work
done by Bell (1966) on the smooth muscle of a toad. From this study, it was concluded
that in the presence of eserine, the contractions that were produced by acetylcholine were
greatly increased. This was attributed to an atropinic action of eserine at muscarinic
receptors on the muscle cell and an enhanced release of acetylcholine from nerve
endings.
There were differences and similarities noted when comparing the effects of
acetylcholine on muscle contraction to the effects of both acetylcholine and eserine on
muscle contraction. One of the major differences was a decrease in pEC50 when
acetylcholine acted alone (Figure 2). This decrease signifies that a certain level of
contraction can be obtained at a lower concentration of acetylcholine when eserine is
present, comparative to when eserine is not present. A striking similarity can be drawn
when looking at the efficacy of both trials. It was noted that the addition of eserine did
not alter the maximal response obtained, which seemingly coincides with previous
published literature on cholinesterase inhibitor drugs, specifically eserine. Nizobe and
Livett (1982) concluded that there was no observed decrease or increase in the efficacy of
nicotine in the absence or presence of eserine.
When a receptor has been activated, there are many mechanisms that limit
overstimulation of a receptors signalling pathway. These mechanisms serve to regulate
the density of functional receptors on the cell surface. Upon consistent activation,
phosphorylation of receptors by second-messenger dependent protein kinases occurs.
This receptor phosphorylation leads to receptor desensitization through inhibition of G-
protein coupling and promotion of receptor internalization. Receptor desensitization can
be defined as the tendency of a response to wane, despite the presence of a stimulus of
constant intensity (Foreman et al., 2011). This phenomenon was observed after repeating
the experiment once more and can be signified by the slight decrease seen in both
maximal response and pEC50 in Figure 3.
Since carbachol is not easily metabolized by cholinesterase, it was used in this
experiment to examine different types of antagonism. Phenoxybenzamine is classified as
an irreversible non-surmountable antagonist. This irreversible antagonist effectively
reduces the number of receptors that are available for agonist binding. With this
knowledge, it was expected that phenoxybenzamine would reduce the maximal efficacy
of carbachol, which is signified as a downward shift in its concentration-effect curve. In
the both the first and second trial, the addition of phenoxybenzamine exhibited effects on
carbachols potency as well as maximal efficacy (Figure 3a and b). The decrease in
potency observed in the these trials could be attributed to the concept of spare receptors.
As described by Konno and Takayanagi (1985), receptors may be considered spare when
the maximal response is elicited by an agonist at a concentration that does not produce
full occupancy of the available receptors. When testing on guinea-pig ileal strips,
McPherson et al. (1985) also observed rightward parallel shifts in their concentration-
effect curves for carbachol upon the addition of phenoxybenzamine. They suspected that
the actions of phenoxybenzamine may have reflected an interaction of the antagonist with
receptor-operated calcium channels.
The addition of isoproterenol, a nonselective adrenergic agonist, induced muscle
relaxation. Based on the second messenger theory of Sutherland and Rall (1960), the
beta-adrenergic agonist binds to a receptor, forming a complex, which in turn activates
the enzyme adenylate cyclase on the inner surface of the cell membrane. This leads to
accelerated conversion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to cyclic AMP (cAMP). The
increase in cAMP is postulated in turn to lead to an uptake of calcium into intracellular
storage sites, resulting in the relaxation of smooth muscle. Isoproterenol and
acetylcholine have opposite pharmacological effects, where acetylcholine induces
contraction and isoproterenol induces relaxation. This phenomenon of opposing effects
has been termed as functional antagonism and was dually noted upon the addition of
propranolol. The presence of propranolol effectively diminished the effects of
isoproterenol. This functional antagonism can be recognized in Figure 4. An increasing
amount of isoproterenol led to a downward shift of carbachols concentration-effect
curve, which was then disrupted upon the addition of propranolol. Across all eight
treatments, there was no significant observed change in pEC50 values. In a study done by
Fernandes et al. (1992), the investigators further illustrate that stimulation of M2
muscarinic receptors in smooth muscle plays an important role in functional antagonism
by reducing the relaxation caused by agents such as isoproterenol.
In a study done by Konno and Takayanagi (1985), the addition of atropine, a
competitive antagonist of muscarinic receptors, produced a parallel shift to the right in
the concentration-response curves for carbachol. These results were consistent with the
results that were produced in this experiment (Figure 6). Atropines competitive
antagonistic properties were also reflected in the linearity of the obtained Schild plot
(Figure 7). The results of this experiment described the pA2 value of atropine to be 8.92,
which is consistent with the findings of Konno and Takayanagi (1985), who concluded
that the pA2 value of atropine, derived from experiments performed on rabbit smooth
muscle, was 8.97 +/- 0.25. insert concluding statements about atropine
The results of this experiment successfully demonstrated how various drugs
influence different receptor subtypes on the porcine urinary bladder and ultimately, alter
the final response of the tissue. This experiment was a fairly quick and easy approach to
assessing the physiology and pharmacology of bladder tissue in a well controlled
environment. Finally, ______.
References:
Fernandes LB, Fryer AD, and Hirshman CA (1992) M2 muscarinic receptors inhibit
isoproterenol-induced relaxation of canine airway smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
1: 119-126.
Foreman JC, Johansen T, and Gibb AJ (2011) Receptor desensitization in, Textbook of
Receptor Pharmacology (Brown DA and Haylett DG eds) pp 85-88, CRC Press, London.
Frazier EP, Peters SL, Braverman AS, Ruggieri MR, and Michel MC (2007) Signal
transduction underlying the control of urinary bladder smooth muscle tone by muscarinic
receptors and beta-adrenoreceptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 377: 449-
462.
Konno F and Takayanagi I (1985) Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the rabbit ciliary
body smooth muscle: spare receptors and threshold phenomenon. Jpn J Pharmacol 38:
91-99.
OBrien (2013) Effects on isolated whole tissues in, Toxic Phosphorous Esters:
Chemistry, Metabolism and Biological Effects (Heath D and Johnson GA eds) pp 88-91,
Elsevier, New York.
Yamanishi T, Chapple CR, Yasuda K, and Chess-Williams R (2000) The role of M2-
muscarinic receptors in mediating contraction of the pig urinary bladder in vitro. Br J
Pharmacol 131: 1482-1488.