Example:

Fall-off test analysis in a liquid filled reservoir. Unit mobility ratio reservoir
condition. Following an injection period of 240 hours, a fall-off test was conducted
on a brine disposal well using the data summarized below and in table to determine
K and S, where:

Tp=240 hr, qw=-807 STB/D, Pavg= 2788 psia, w= 1 cp. Bw=1 RB/STB, Ct =1.18 x
10-5 psi-1, =0.25, h=28 ft, depth = 4819 ft, A=20 acres =871200 ft2.

Sol.
t (hr) HTR Pressure (psia)
0.01 24001 3500
0.015 16001 3470
0.02 12001 3442
0.03 8001 3397
0.04 6001 3362
0.06 4001 3317
0.08 3001 3282
0.1 2401 3257
0.15 1600 3216
0.2 1200 3187
0.3 799.9 3155
0.401 600 3137
0.602 400 3112
0.803 300 3091
1.004 240 3075
2.017 120 3042
4.068 60 3007
6.154 40 2982
8.276 30 2972
10.44 24 2962

Slope of the curve m is:

Then permeability is :

,
Skin factor

We can consider the Pwf is 3500 (@ t=0.01) due to the short time since shutting in the
well.

[ ( ) ]

[ ]

Example :

Analyzing an injectivity test in a liquid-filled reservoir, unit mobility ratio reservoir

conditions. A constant-rate water injectivity well test was conducted in a water flooded
reservoir. Before the test, all other wells in the reservoir had been shut in for several
weeks and the reservoir had been stabilized. The table given below summarized
injectivity test data assuming a unit mobility ratio determine K and S:

Time (hr) Pressure (psi)

0.01 546.3
0.0159 587.3
0.0253 642.3
0.0403 711
0.0642 785.6
0.102 855.2
0.163 910.2
0.259 949.1
0.412 976.4
0.656 997.8
1.04 1016.5
1.66 1034.2
2.64 1051.2
4.21 1068
6.7 1084.5

K=11.9 mD, P1hr= 1014.633 psi,S=1.8859, damage