Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jet Control: 3.1 Classification of Control Methods
Jet Control: 3.1 Classification of Control Methods
JET CONTROL
There are numerous applications where the ability to enhance the mixing of a jet
will greatly improve their performance. For example, by increasing the rate of
mixing between air and fuel, the efficiency of a combustion cycle can be
improved. Applications requiring the control of mixing in compressible flows
include thrust augmenting ejectors, thrust vector control, metal deposition and
gas dynamic lasers. The diverse nature of applicability of jets demands that they
be made suitable for a specific application by controlling them.
Jet control can be classified into active and passive controls. In active control,
an auxiliary power source (like micro jets) is used to control the jet
characteristics. In passive control the controlling energy is drawn directly from
the flow to be controlled. Both the controls mainly aim at modifying the flow
and noise characteristics.
When a jet issuing from a nozzle propagates into the stagnant air, at the jet
boundary, vortices are generated because of the shear between the fluid
elements of the atmosphere. These vortices entrain the stagnant air mass into the
jet. Thus an active shear zone is established at the jet boundary in the proximity
of the nozzle exit. The shear propagates towards the jet exit and reaches the axis
at some downstream distance. From this location onwards the viscous action
dominates the entire jet field.
Bradbury and Khadem were among the first to document the effect of tabs in a
low speed jet. With two square tabs placed normal to the flow at the nozzle exit,
they observed a significant increase in the centreline velocity decay caused by
the tabs and the potential core length was reduced to about two diameters. They
considered the stirring action of trailing vortex motions shed from the tabs as a
possible mechanism for the observed effect.
Ahuja and Brown reported that, for a round jet flow of Mach number 1.12 and
total temperature 664 K, the potential core length of the jet flow could be
reduced from six diameters to under two diameters by using two diametrically
opposed mechanical tabs. The tabs reduces the temperature to about 472 K at a
distance of five jet diameters and the low frequency noise by up to 5 or 6 dB.
3.4 Summary
Several studies have reported results with variations in flow field conditions as
well as tab shape, size, number and angle.
1. Appreciably faster decay of the centreline velocity for one, two, four and six
tab cases, relative to the reference case.
3. Heating the jet provides no significant change in the effectiveness of the tabs.
4. Smaller tabs have less effect in distorting the jet tab width is more critical
than tab height.
5. A tab height greater than the boundary layer thickness is required, to be
effective.
8. Orientation or angle of the tab is more critical than shape; triangular tab
leaning 45o downstream, referred to as a delta tab, has the greatest effect.