This chapter analyzes how Romantic poets like Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Lord Byron portrayed London in their works. While William Blake offered a familiar modern London, these poets depicted a London that was evolving and distinct from earlier representations. Their language and images of the city invite the reader to return to contemplating London repeatedly, as its portrayal seems comprehensible yet complex. Earlier writers felt they could fully depict London's crowded and busy scenes, but these Romantic poets captured a capital that was chaotic, sprawling and difficult to fully comprehend.
This chapter analyzes how Romantic poets like Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Lord Byron portrayed London in their works. While William Blake offered a familiar modern London, these poets depicted a London that was evolving and distinct from earlier representations. Their language and images of the city invite the reader to return to contemplating London repeatedly, as its portrayal seems comprehensible yet complex. Earlier writers felt they could fully depict London's crowded and busy scenes, but these Romantic poets captured a capital that was chaotic, sprawling and difficult to fully comprehend.
This chapter analyzes how Romantic poets like Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Lord Byron portrayed London in their works. While William Blake offered a familiar modern London, these poets depicted a London that was evolving and distinct from earlier representations. Their language and images of the city invite the reader to return to contemplating London repeatedly, as its portrayal seems comprehensible yet complex. Earlier writers felt they could fully depict London's crowded and busy scenes, but these Romantic poets captured a capital that was chaotic, sprawling and difficult to fully comprehend.
envisioning London or, Romantic poetry's Capital snapshots This then, is the obscure, city hardly - to-be~thollght- of Geoffrey Fletcher
INTRODUCTION
If William Blake offers us a strangely familiar, modern London,
then the texts of Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Lord Byron offer us also a peculiarly recognisable London . Theirs is a London - and a language with which to describe London - partly separated if not wholly divorced from ea rlier writers, and, once again, distinctly modern. The discourse of the city to be found in the Romantic poe ts considered in this chap- ter invites us to return to the figure of London repeatedly, because the image with which we are presented is so strikingly compre- hensible, even though what is not available is an uncomplicated image of the city. From Shakespeare and 10nson to Johnson, Field- ing, and Richardson, we encounter a London which the writers in question feel can be depicted, given a common image to be shared by writer, reader and audience alike. Despite i ts crowdedness, its busy-ness (a nd its business), there seems 10 be the belief tha t the entire scene can be shown. This London is a 'Rabelaisian' or carnivalesque capital city, a city at once chaotic, sprawling, excessive, bustling and grotesque. Bu t it is still a city wi th a smile (albeit on occasions a vicious one), a city engendered from drink, eructation and the eruptions