316.472(497.

11)

:
:
.
.
. , -
, .
-
, -
. -
, -
, .
: , ,
, .

-
. ,
.
,
-
.

, , -
-
. ,
, -
(, 1966: 135).

,
(, 1982: 92).
-
(...) -

. 149005 (-
), -
.
62
:

(-, 2007:193).
. ,

. ,
. -
, -
. ,
.
, -
.

.
.
, , ,
. , ,
, , ().
.
,
. ,
.

.
-
(, , )
.


(, 1984: 104; 1295).
,
,
(Ma 1985: II, 231).


, , (
1993: 46; To 1872/I: 41; 64; 1874/II: 51; 181; Mill, 1958:
230).
, -
. ,
,
 63

" " (government

by discussion).
. ,
, ,
, (
).
, , . ,
,

(Mill, 1958: 230).

. ,
.
(primordial loyalities) .
,
, .

? ? (.
; , 1991),
.

.
114
,
(polyarchies, )
, 15%
(Dahl, 1971: 110-111;
homogeneous - plural, homogeneous -
heterogeneous). ,
. ,
,
,
.
. ,
, , ,
, .
" " (segmental cleavages; Eckstein, 1966: 34;
Lijphart, 1977: 3). ,
, , ,
, , .
64
:

,
(,
,
), (Lijphart, 1977: 4).

-
? -
.
. ,
, , -
, .
, ,
, . -
. -
-
, , -
, .
-
. , -

( : , 2006).
:
1. ;
, ;
,
; -
.
2. (, -
, , , , -
, , ),
;
-
;
3. ; -
,
-
, -
, -
 65

, ;
, ;
-
;
4. ,
, -
;
;
, -
; -
, ,
, -
; ,

.
-
. , , -
, .
, , -
, . -
-
. .
58% 30% . -
(
). 1998.
.
,
.
.
.
,
- -
. -
,
.
, -
-
.
, -
.
66
:

,
, -
. -
(, 2005).
,
. ,
,
(
).
,
.
,

. , ,

,
. , ,
, -
.
.

, ,
,
.
17%.
. , 20% 30%
, , ,
, , 30-40% ,
, 40-50% ,

(Brunner, 1994: 10-11).
,
1999. , ,
34%.
-
. -
, , 17,1%

 67

.
, 26-30. 1991. ,

, , ,
(, 1995:
273).

. ,
,
, , ,
, , , ,
, , ...
1991.

.
1998.
,
(Ushtria lirimtare e Kosovs)
.
(24.
1999)
( 1244, 10. 1999)

, , (-
2006) .
,
, ,

. ,
, ,
.
, , ,
,
, ,
. ,
, 1995. ,


. ,
? 80%
68
:

, 74%
, 60% 36%
. 80%
, 71% , 64%
33% .
(
81% , 71%,
66% 42%), (
72%, 63%, 64%
40%) (
65% , 57%, 49%
34%; , 1997: 183-185).
,
2002.
(2005), -
,
. -
, -
, , .

.
. , 16%
, 41%
. , -

, ,
-
.
, -
,

(state-seeking; : Tilly, 1994: 133),

. 1991.
,



(, ,
:
 69

,
,
1995. ;

,
, 1999. ).

, .


,
.

( ,
1997: 57; 169-170).
,

( ).
,

. 1991-1998
2.018 128
199 ,

.
,
,

(, 1998-1999 ,

). ,
.
-
-
- . ,
, , ( -
) . ,
.
,
.
70
:

, -
. -
,
( 4% 14%
), -
, -
, , ?
-
: -
.
-
, .
, , -
. -
, -
. , (, ,
) -
.

. , -
.
-
.
( ) ( )
-
.

. -

( -
- . ) . ,
, -
,
(, 2002: 118).
, , -
.
-, -
-
. ,
.
 71

1. (1984): . : .
2. , (2006): Vindicae contra tyrannos:
,

, . , . 50-80.
: .
3. Brunner, Georg (1994): Nation-States and Minorities in
the Eastern Part of Europe, Regio: A Review of Minority
and Ethnic Studies, pp. 5-38. Budapest.
4. , (2002):
, , , , . 105-
130, . . : .
5. -, (2007): ,
,
, . 193, :
.
6. Dahl, Robert A. (1971): Polyarchy: Participation and
Opposition. Nenj Haven: Yale University Press.
7. , (1966): , :
.
8. Eckstein H. (1966): Division and Cohesion in Democracy:
A Study of Norvey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. , (1997):
. :
.
10. , (1991):
?, , . XXXIII, . 3-
4, . 38-42.
11. , (2005):
, , . 39,
. 3, . 251-264.
12. Lijphart, Arend (1977): Democracy in Plural Societies: A
Comparative Exploration. New Haven and London: Yale
University Press.
13. , (1985): . :
.
72
:

14. , (1995): :
,
, . 263-279, .
: .
15. Mill, John Stuart (1958): Considerations on Representative
Goverment. New York: Liberal Arts Press.
16. , (2005):
, ,
1, . 41-93. :
.
17. (1993): . :

18. , (1982): ,
, .
, . 92. : .
19. (1872, 1874):
. : .
20. Tilly, Charles (1994): States and Nationalism in Europe
1492-1992, Theory and Society, Vol. 23, pp. 131-146.

Slobodan Antoni
 73

NATION AND INTEGRATION: THE CASE OF SERBIA

Summary

Integration of society is essential for his efficiency. Degree

of integration is visible by self-identification of its members with
community. Main agent of social integration is a state. In the case
of Serbia, there is insufficient integration, cause by weaknesses of
the state. Collective right conception for national minority could
produce ethnical reservation, completely un-integrated, inside the
Serbian society. Therefore in the article is emphasized that rights
always come together with duties, and that special rights have to
be accompanied with special duties in this case with duty of in-
tegration in Serbian society.
Key words: social integration, nation-state, democracy,
ethnical minority.