ENGINEERING FIRST YEAR

ENGINEERING FOUNDATION PRINCIPLES

& COMMUNICATIONS 100

GROUP 5B

TONDA MOBIL SDN. BHD.

Company Designers :

Name Miri Student ID Perth Student ID

Mohamad Syazwan Bin 700022875 19220428
Abdul Salim
Chin Jiun Youn 700015284 18962884
Company Contractors :

Name Miri Student ID Perth Student ID

Oge Emekwue 700021538 19201834
Wan Chai Lee 700018459 19217912
Reaz Uddin 700016045 19107369

DESIGN PACKAGE - 2ND APRIL 2017.

1.0 Design Drawing ......................................................................................................................... 1

2.0: Design Specifications ............................................................................................................... 3

2.1: Parts Lists.............................................................................................................................. 3

2.1.1: Basic Information........................................................................................................... 3

2.1.2: Material List ................................................................................................................... 4

2.1.3: Tool List.......................................................................................................................... 5

2.1.4: Costing Table ................................................................................................................. 6

2.2: Construction Procedure ....................................................................................................... 7

2.2.1: Side Part Of The Car....................................................................................................... 7

2.2.2: Front Part of the Car ...................................................................................................... 8

2.2.3: Back Part of the Car ....................................................................................................... 8

2.2.4: Cargo Holder .................................................................................................................. 9

2.2.5: Balsa Wood .................................................................................................................. 10

2.2.6: Connections of Cardboard and Balsa Wood ............................................................... 11

2.2.7: Connections of Cardboard, Wood and Shoe Box ........................................................ 12

2.2.8: Wheels ......................................................................................................................... 13

2.2.9: Connections of Wheels and Axles ............................................................................... 14

2.2.10: Connections of Wheels, Axles and the Shoe Box ...................................................... 15

3.0: Risk Management Plan .......................................................................................................... 17

4.0: Tender Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 22

4.1: Tender Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................. 22

4.1.1: COST EFFECTIVENESS................................................................................................... 22

i
 4.1.2: COMMUNICATION ....................................................................................................... 23

4.1.3: TIME MANAGEMENT AND PUNCTUALITY ................................................................... 23

4.1.4: PROFESSIONALISM ...................................................................................................... 24

4.1.5: SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS ............................................................................................. 24

4.2: Tender Evaluation Marking Summary................................................................................ 25

4.3: Tender Evaluation Marking Sheet ...................................................................................... 27

4.3.1: COMPANY A ................................................................................................................. 27

4.3.2: COMPANY B ................................................................................................................. 28

4.3.3: COMPANY C ................................................................................................................. 29

5.0: Gantt Chart ............................................................................................................................ 31

6.0: Reference ............................................................................................................................... 33

ii
 1.0 Design
Drawing

*"(How to Create Your First 3D Model in SketchUp: A Beginner-Friendly Introduction",2016)

1
 Material List
Item No Part Description Default/Qty.
Number
1 Water Bottle Cargo 1
2 Cardboard Cargo Holder 1
3 Balsa Wood Base for 1
Cargo Holder
4 Shoe Box Body of Mars 1
Lander
5 Chopstick Axle Rod 2
6 Bottle Cap Connection 8
for Wheel
and Axle
7 Cardboard* Connection 4
for the Disc
8 CD/DVD Disc As Wheels 8

*Small cardboard with dimension 20mm*20mm

ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS

TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Exploded View

DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A1 SIZE
A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 1 PAGE 2
0
ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS
TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Front View

DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A2 SIZE

A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 2 PAGE 3
1
ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS
TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Back View

DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A3 SIZE

A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 3 PAGE 4
2
ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS
TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Top View

DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A4 SIZE

A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 4 PAGE 5
3
ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS
TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Bottom View

DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A5 SIZE

A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 5 PAGE 6
4
ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS
TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Right View

DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A6 SIZE

A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 6 PAGE 7
5
ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS
TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Left View

DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A7 SIZE

A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 7 PAGE 8
6
ALL DIMENSION IN MILIMETERS
TOLERANCE 0.0 MM TONDA MOBIL SDN BHD
PROJECTION

DO NOT SCALE Mars Landers- Iso View

N
DRAWN BY CHIN JIUN YOUN AS 1100 A8 SIZE
A3
CHECK BY MOHAMAD SYAZWAN SCALE 1:1 SHEET 8 PAGE 9
7
 2.0 Design
Specifications

2
2.0: Design Specifications
2.1: Parts Lists
2.1.1: Basic Information
Below are some basic information about the car project.

Car Dimension

Top length of the car: 239mm

Bottom length of the car: 332mm

Width of the car: 170mm

Height of the car: 120mm

Wheels Dimension

Compact Discs: 120mm (8 discs required)

Static Load

The model car must convey a static load that is put on the car. This model is known as a Mars
Lander/Rover. This vehicle is to be developed to such an extent that it is fit for being tested by
moving down an inclined plane of 2 meters, set at nothing less than 30 degrees and falling
through a vertical drop of 1 meter without maintaining any critical harm.

After the drop, the car will and should land and remain on its wheels.

3
2.1.2: Material List
Table 2.1.2

No. Material Supplier Cost (Rm) Per Dimension Amount

Unit
1) Shoe Box Curtin 332mm x 1
University (recycled) 170mm x
120mm
2) Sponge Nam Leong, RM1.00(recycled) 100mm x 1
Lutong 70mm x
50mm
3) Balsa Wood NG SIANG RM9.00 260mm x 1
HAP TRADING 130mm x
SDN BHD 5mm
4) Compact Discs IT Superstore, RM0.80 120mm 8
Boulevard diameter

5) Chopsticks Nam Leong, RM0.50 2

Lutong -

6) Cardboard Supersave, RM2.00 240mm x 2

Lutong 70mm x
70mm
7) Cotton Wool Nam Leong, Rm0.05 30g
Lutong -

8) Plastic Bottle Cap Nam Leong, RM0.10 33mm 8

Lutong diameter

4
2.1.3: Tool List
Table 2.1.3

No. Tools Picture Supplier Amount Cost

(RM) Per
Unit
1) Coping Saw Curtin 1 -
University

Figure 1

2) Small Curtin 1 -
Hammer University

Figure 2

3) 500mm Ruler Curtin 1 -

University

Figure 3

4) Nails Supersave, 4 RM0.10

Lutong

Figure 4

5
 5) Hot Glue Gun Curtin 1 -
(sticks) University

Figure 5

6) Drill Curtin 1 -
University

Figure 6

2.1.4: Costing Table

Table 2.1.4

Item Raw Material Cost/

Purpose Qty Subtotal
Order Description Unit
1 Shoe Box As body of the car - 1 -
2 Balsa Wood As base of the cargo holder 9.00 1 RM 9.00
3 Compact Discs As Wheels 0.80 8 RM 6.40
4 Chopsticks As Axle 0.50 2 RM 1.00
As a cargo holder, connections of the
5 Cardboard 2.00 2 RM 4.00
wheels
6 Cotton Wool As a cushion for the load 0.05 30 RM 1.50
7 Sponge As a cushion for the impact 0.50 1 RM0.50
As a connection for the wheel and
8 Plastic Bottle Cap 0.10 4 RM 0.40
axle
To attach the cargo holder and the
9 Nails 0.10 4 RM0.40
wood
Cost of
RM 23.20
Materials

6
2.2: Construction Procedure
2.2.1: Side Part Of The Car

Figure 2.2.1

1. The side measurements of the box originally will be 332mm x 120mm.

2. The height of the box will be 120mm. Measure 60mm which is half of the original height
with a 500mm ruler as mentioned in table 2.1.3 (figure 3) and mark the point for both
sides of the box using a pen.
3. Then cut the both sides of the box 110mm from the marked point to another point using
a coping saw.
4. Therefore, the top length of the box will be 239mm after discarding the edge.

7
2.2.2: Front Part of the Car

Figure 2.2.2

1. The length of the front part of the box will be 170mm which is the original length.
2. After discarding the edge, the height of the front part of the box will be 60mm.
3. Therefore, it will be 170mm x 60mm dimension.

2.2.3: Back Part of the Car

Figure 2.2.3

1. For the back part of the car, the dimensions will remain as 170mm x 120mm.

8
2.2.4: Cargo Holder

Figure 2.2.4

1. Measure and cut the cardboard with the dimensions 240mm x 70mm x 70mm utilizing a
coping saw as mentioned in table 2.1.3 (figure 1).
2. The cargo which is the 600ml water bottle will be loaded inside the cardboard.
3. This cardboard will hold the cargo on place.

9
2.2.5: Balsa Wood

Figure 2.2.5

1. Measure the dimensions of the wood of the specifications 260mm x 130mm x 5mm using
a 500mm ruler.
2. Then, carve the wood using a coping saw.

10
2.2.6: Connections of Cardboard and Balsa Wood

Figure 2.2.6

1. Utilizing a small hammer (figure 2, table 2.1.3), hammer 4 nails (figure 4, table 2.1.3) at
the respective corners of the cardboard passing through the balsa wood as shown in the
figure above.
2. Make sure the cardboard is placed in the middle of the wood before hammering the nails.
To be precise, measure 30mm from each side of the edge of the wood to the cardboard
on both sides.

11
2.2.7: Connections of Cardboard, Wood and Shoe Box

Figure 2.2.7

1. Place the balsa wood 20mm from the back of the shoe box and 20mm from the sides of
the shoe box.
2. Attach the balsa wood on the shoe box using a hot glue gun (figure 5, table 2.1.3). Make
sure the glue is spread throughout the surface of the balsa wood.

12
2.2.8: Wheels

Figure 2.2.8

1. The discs will have a 120mm diameter. The hole at the center of the disc has a 16mm
diameter.
2. Measure 20mm x 20mm x 4mm cardboard and place it in between the 2 discs.
3. Attach the discs and the cardboard utilizing a hot glue gun.
4. Next, attach a bottle cap at each side of the disc using a hot glue gun. As shown in the
picture above.

13
2.2.9: Connections of Wheels and Axles

Figure 2.2.9

1. Using a drill, drill a hole through the bottle caps. Make sure the holes are aligned.
2. Then, place the chopstick through the hole.
3. Repeat this steps for the other axle.

14
2.2.10: Connections of Wheels, Axles and the Shoe Box

Figure 2.2.10

1. Place the wheels and axles through the shoe box as shown in the picture above.
2. The front wheels must be placed 85mm from the front part of the box.
3. The back wheels must be placed 20mm from the rear part of the car.
4. Both wheels must be at 25mm above the surface of the shoe box.

15
 3.0 Risk
Management
Plan

16
 3.0: Risk Management Plan
A risk management plan can be defined as a set out plan that is drawn up by a company, so as to
for see any risks that will or might be involved in a project. It helps the company prepare for
possible outcomes and how to avoid or mitigate them.

Table 3.0

Residual
Outcom Risk
e (Sloop,
Likelihoo (likeliho Evaluation of
STAGE Hazards Risks Severity Mitigation 2013)
d od x Residual Risk
severity
)

Likelihood(pos
sible) =3
Severity(mode
rate) =3
Lack of
Loss of Use hard Misplacem Outcome =9
proper 3 4 (3x4=12)
important drives or ent of the (High)
storage of Possible Major Extreme
files pen drives drives.
files
This can be due
to carelessness
of team
members.
Likelihood(unli
kely) =2
DESIGN Severity(mode
rate) =3
STAGE Outcome =6
(Moderate)
The drugs
Designer Going to the The team
Delay of prescribed
may come 3 4 (3x4=12) hospital to member might
submission might take
down with Possible Major Extreme get take more time
of project time to kick
an illness treatment before getting
in.
cured, as
everyone has
different
response times
to different
drugs.

17
 Likelihood(unli
kely) =2
Severity(mode
rate) =3
The Outcome =6
designers (Moderate)
should have
their full The team
Lack of
knowledge members
Insufficient constant
Drawback of 4 4 and might not have
knowledge (4x4=16) access to
the project Likely Major understandi personal
and training Extreme the
ng of the computers and
software.
software may not always
before they be free during
start the all access
designing. time to the
schools lab to
use the
computers
there.
Likelihood(pos
sible) =3
Severity(minor
) =2
Use of
Outcome =6
Contractor protective
(Moderate)
may get gear such as The wood
injured while gloves, may still
Wood 4 4 Gloves are
handling the (4x4=16) when pierce
splinter Likely Major usually made
wood and Extreme handling the through the
of rubber or
result in a wood and gloves.
latex and a
splinter. other
result of this,
materials.
sharp pins and
CONSTRUCTIO edges can still
N STAGE pierce through.

Likelihood(unli
There
kely) =2
The budget might be
Severity(minor
should be some last-
The team ) =2
evenly split minute
members Outcome =4
Conflict amongst the expenses
might fight 3 4 (3x4=12) (Low)
over team and the
over who will Possible Major Extreme
finances members team might
buy certain There might be
before still fight
materials. some materials
construction over who
that were not
begins. will buy the
initially added
materials.
to the list of

18
 materials and
will play a vital
role in the
construction of
the car.

Likelihood(unli
kely) =2
The stores Severity(minor
The team Find in the ) =2
might not be materials environme Outcome =4
able to buy 3 4 (3x4=12) before time nt might (Low)
Material
the materials Possible Major Extreme and check a not have This might be
access
due to lack of variety of the because the
stock stores. materials person is living
available. far away from
the store with
the materials.
Likelihood(pos
sible) =3
Severity(mode
The team
Materials rate) =3
has to select
with low Outcome =9
good quality Improper
quality might (High)
Low quality 3 5 (3x5=15) materials assembling
break or This might be
materials Possible Critical Extreme from trusted of the
dismantle because the
and well materials.
during the contractors
known
testing stage. misunderstand
suppliers.
the drawings
and
specifications.
Likelihood(unli
TESTING
kely) =2
STAGE The car Severity(mode
might have rate) =3
a higher Outcome= 6
Tie the load chance to (Moderate)
The load may
to the car dismantle This might be
be dropped 3
Inclined 4 (4x3=12) with the use as the the fault of the
out of the car Moderat
plane force Likely High of rubber rubber designers who
if the impact e
band and band/string did not design
is hard.
string. might be the car
tied onto a properly, or
weak spot the
of the car. contractors
who built the
car incorrectly.

19
 Likelihood(unli
kely) =2
Severity(minor
External
The car's )=2
High impact forces such
axle should Outcome =4
rate that can 5 as air and
Over 5 (5x5=25) have (Low)
cause the car Almost wind might
speeding Critical Extreme resistance to This might be
to crash and certain still lead the
control over because of the
fall apart. car to
speeding. windy
overspeed.
atmosphere
around the
testing area.

20
4.0 Tender
Evaluation

21
4.0: Tender Evaluation
4.1: Tender Evaluation Criteria
The tender evaluation criteria is a document and a section of the design package that entails a
list of criteria set for a partnering team to fulfil to get the contract being offered. The TEC should
be feasible and appropriate so the other teams can provide the required evidence. The
expectations are supposed to be SMART- Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time
Controlled.

We as Tonda Mobil SDN BHD, will like to work with contractors who share like views and goals
as we do. We believe that the criteria listed below is what is needed for the smooth operation of
the project. Below are a list of our criteria.

4.1.1: COST EFFECTIVENESS

The team should be to know how to manage cost and still be able to get the best possible
outcome.

Table 4.1.1

EXPECTATION EVIDENCE

The team is expected to try to use least cost The costing table of the team.
as possible.

The team should also be able to use a

reasonable number of recyclable materials.

22
4.1.2: COMMUNICATION
The team should be able to be reached at any point in time in case of any crucial changes that
could be made regarding the design.

Table 4.1.2

EXPECTATION EVIDENCE

Able to reply messages or emails within a By checking the chat history.

certain time range.

4.1.3: TIME MANAGEMENT AND PUNCTUALITY

The team should know how to manage their time properly and optimally. As time is one of the
most crucial thing involved in every project. As the famous saying goes, Time is money. (Kocher,
& Sutter, 2006)

Table 4.1.3

EXPECTATION EVIDENCE

Attend project meetings on time. By noting the times the team attends each
meeting.

By checking if the team were consistent in

Should be able to complete the project
early submission of their minutes of
before time.
meetings and weekly progress reports.

23
4.1.4: PROFESSIONALISM
The partnering team should have basic knowledge on construction techniques so as to ensure
smooth operation during the construction stage.

Table 4.1.4

EXPECTATION EVIDENCE

The team should be able to have basic Results from a short quiz (each question
knowledge of dimensions and some carrying 2 marks) that will be carried out
technical skills. during one of the weekly project meetings.

4.1.5: SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS

Table 4.1.5

EXPECTATION EVIDENCE

The partnering team should know some basic Results from a test on safety procedures,
safety procedures to avoid any accidents. This techniques and awareness which will be
will help prevent any unnecessary costs to be carried out during one of the weekly project
incurred during the project. meetings.

24
 4.2: Tender Evaluation Marking Summary

Table 4.2

CRITERIA DISTRIBUTION OF MARKS

0 5 10 15 20

COST Budget Budget greater Budget greater Budget greater Budget within or
EFFECTIVENESS greater than than 23 but less than 20 but less than 15 but less less than 15 RM.
29 RM. than or 27 RM. than or 23RM. than or 20RM.

COMMUNICATION Reply Reply messages Reply messages Reply messages Reply messages
messages within a day. within 4-6 hours within 2-4 hours within 1-2 hour.
after one
day.

TIME Does not Does not attend Attends the Attends the Attends all
MANAGEMENT attend meetings but meetings, meetings, meetings and is
AND PUNCTUALITY meetings and notifies to however late by however late by punctual.
does not give indicate the 15 minutes. 5 minutes.
reasons for reasons.
not
attending.

PROFESSIONALISM Scores a 2/10 Scores a total Scores a total of Scores a total of Scores a total of
or 0 on the 4/10 on the test 6/10 on the test 8/10 on the test 10/10 on the
test performed in performed in performed in test performed
performed in one of the one of the one of the in one of the
one of the meetings. meetings. meeting. meetings.
meetings.

25
SAFETY Scores 2/10 or Scores 4/10 on the test that will Scores 6/10 on Scores 8/10 on Scores all
CONSCIOUSNESS 0 on the test be conducted in one of the the test that the test that the answers
that will be meetings. will be will be right in the
conducted in conducted in conducted in test that will
one of the one of the one of the be
meetings. meetings. meetings. conducted
in one of the
meetings.

26
 4.3: Tender Evaluation Marking Sheet
4.3.1: COMPANY A
Table 4.3.1

CRITERIA Contractor A Contractor B Contractor C

Cost Effectiveness

Communication

Time Management and

Punctuality

Professionalism

Safety Consciousness

TOTAL

27
 4.3.2: COMPANY B

Table 4.3.2

CRITERIA Contractor A Contractor B Contractor C

Cost Effectiveness

Communication

Time Management and

Punctuality

Professionalism

Safety Consciousness

TOTAL

28
 4.3.3: COMPANY C
Table 4.3.3

CRITERIA Contractor A Contractor B Contractor C

Cost Effectiveness

Communication

Time Management and

Punctuality

Professionalism

Safety Consciousness

TOTAL

29
5.0 Gantt Chart

30
 5.0: Gantt Chart

20-Mar 27-Mar 3-Apr 10-Apr 17-Apr 24-Apr 1-May 8-May 15-May 22-May 29-May 5-Jun 12-Jun
Design Package

Contractor's Tender Application

Handovers

Prototype Testing

Engineering Identity Reflection

Oral Presentation

Calculus Oral Test 1

Calculus Oral Test 2

Calculus Mid Semester Test

Engineering Mechanics Quiz

Engineering Foundation and Principles Calculus For Engineers Engineering Materials Engineering Mechanics

31
6.0 Reference

32
6.0: Reference
How to Create Your First 3D Model in SketchUp: A Beginner-Friendly Introduction.
(2016). 3D Printing Blog | i.materialise. Retrieved 25 March 2017, from
https://i.materialise.com/blog/first-3d-model-in-sketchup-tutorial/
Kocher, M., & Sutter, M. (2006). Time is money - Time pressure, incentives, and the
quality of decision-making. Econpapers.repec.org. Retrieved 29 March 2017,
from http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lmu:muenar:18184
Sloop, M. (2013). R3 Process Training. Presentation,
https://www.slideshare.net/mikesloop/r3-process-training-
slideshare?qid=a9dc1df5-4a8c-4de4-85a1-
ad0ab84e8458&v=&b=&from_search=1.

33