Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design Package
Design Package
We believe that we have already met the expectation as inside the clients brief.
In such, we proudly present to you this document with all the information included,
including the Tender Evaluation Criteria, Risk Management Plan, and also the
construction method. We have fully confidence that this design package is without any
plagiarism. If there is any enquiry, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Regards,
i
List of Table and Figure
ii
1.0
Drawing Package
1
Table of Drawings
Number Description Page
mr_01 3D Projection 3
mr_02 Explosion of Rover 4
mr_03 Front View of Rover 5
mr_04 Side View of Rover 6
mr_05 Plan View of Rover 7
mr_06 Detailed View of Main Body 8
mr_07 Detailed View of Wheel 9
mr_08 Wheel of Rover 10
Table 1.1: Table of Drawings
2
3D Projection of Rover
D Egg Carton
G Newspapers
B Compact Disk
C Bottle Cap
E Flagstick
F Polystyrene
11
2.1 Materials to construct Mars Rover
All the materials required to construct the Mars Rover is listed in Table 2.1 below.
All the tools required for Mars Rover construction is listed in Table 2.2 below.
6 Hot glue gun Enable the uses of hot glue for sticking Supplied by designers
materials.
Table 2.2 List of tools for Mars Lander construction
12
2.3 Construction Method of Rover
The designs of mr_03, mr_04, mr_05 provide dimensions of the whole Mars Rover.
The building of the Mars Rover must follow the dimension provided to obtain an accurate
result.
Further detail construction of the individual parts can be found in following sections.
Reference of design mr_01 and mr_02 is needed to assembly the individual parts into a
complete product.
13
3.0
Tender Evaluation
Criteria
14
Introduction
This document contains the criteria that will be used to evaluate other companies for
the manufacture of a prototype Mars Lander/Rover. The winning tenderer for the
manufacture will be the group that most successfully satisfies the criteria that are laid out
below.
3.1 Marking Criteria and Explanation in Depth
Responsible is the most important value that everyone must be instilled since
young especially for engineers. In A&M Consultancy, we require contractors who has
strong responsibility and able to make a model out successfully even after several
times of failing. The contractors must ensure that the Rovers model has reached the
level of expectation of the designers and meet the clients criteria.
Criteria Marks
The model is not completed and does not follow the drawing design of the 0
designers.
The model is completed and followed the drawing design of the designers 1
but does not satisfied by the designers.
The model is completed and followed the drawing design of the designers 2
but considers as acceptable only for designers.
The model is nicely completed and followed the drawing design of the 3
designers. The model reaches the level of expectation of the designers.
Table 3.1.1: Marking Criteria for Responsibility and Quality for Work.
3.1.2 Experience
Experience is very important in every project. Everyone who had experienced
in that particular field which related to the project got the priority to finish their works.
Experience can help engineers to improve the way of solving problems.
Criteria Marks
Involved in events that help to gain experience but does not participate in 1
the events to gain the experience.
Involved in events that help to gain experience but does not get the 2
certificates.
Involved in events that help to gain experience and get the certificates. 3
Table 3.1.2: Marking Criteria for Experience.
15
3.1.3 Communication
It is a way for member to relate and communicate each other in purpose to
discuss and improve the project. Communication is also the first necessity in the
group to start from brainstorming until working in the process of the whole project
event. The communication can be done through social media or face-to-face (meeting).
Criteria Marks
Each member do not have any communication at all through social media 0
or by meeting face-to-face.
Each member at least gather to discuss about the project once a week and 1
able to provide minutes of meeting.
Group members having discussion about the project at least two times a 2
week and able to provide minutes of meeting.
Group members having discussion about the project at least three times a 3
week and able to provide minutes of meeting.
Table 3.1.3: Marking Criteria for Communication.
Criteria Marks
16
3.1.5 Cost Management
A & M Consultancy required a project that will minimise company budget
while remain the same project outcomes. This will also encourage the uses of recycled
materials as they are cheaper compare to new materials. Creativity of designers can
also be tested as they try to design a Mars Rover with lower construction cost while
maintaining the quality.
Criteria Marks
Project over-costed. 0
17
4.0
Risk Management
Plan
18
Introduction
In every project, there must have some risks that we might not expect and foresee. Every risk we must take it seriously so that will not
become dangerous to everyone. To avoid all the risks in a project, a risk management plan must carry out to let all the team members know
about the risks.
19
Contractor cannot analyse The prototype built Possible Moderate Contractors need to consult none
the drawing of designer will not be same as the designers frequently to make
precisely. design and may failed sure the model made is according
to sustain the impact to the design. Designers can also
after drop. guide the contractors during
construction.
Contractor get hurt by Constructor will Likely Moderate Read the tools manual and safety Some minor injury
tools when building mars injured and cannot gear before constructing the such as scratch may
rover prototype. complete the prototype. occur because safety
prototype on time. gear cannot fully
protect contractor from
injuries.
Performance Testing Stage
Prototype does not finish Project cannot be Possible Critical Designers must sign agreement Some contractors may
on time. done. with contractors and always keep not follow the
in touch with the progress. agreement when doing
project.
Team members late for Marks will be Likely Moderate Always remind team members Team members may
prototype testing deducted for being the date and time for prototype ignore the reminder.
unpunctual. testing especially a day before
testing.
The prototype of mars Marks will be Possible Major Modify and test for the prototype none
landers cannot sustain the deducted by the client during construction stage to
impact after the drop and according to marking construct a better prototype
break apart. criteria.
Table 4.0: Risk Management Plan
20
4.2 Explanation on Risk Management Plan Table
Design package is mainly based on the ideas of designers and contractors, but
plagiarism may still happen because team members may make use of online or
friends resources when they lack of ideas. Plagiarism may also happen
unintentionally when team members using others ideas without knowing it. Marks
will be deducted when get caught in plagiarism or get a zero mark and failed the
subject in serious case. Team members can try to brainstorming for new ideas or
doing citation and references when refer to others works.
21
In the construction of prototype, contractor may get hurt by tools such as blade
and scissors when misuse the tools. In this case, contractors will get injured and will
slow down the construction progress. This causes the prototype cannot be completed
on time and hand in to designers. The risk matrix is consider high so contractors have
to read tools manual before using it and wear safety gear such as gloves to protect
from injuries. Although safety gear is wear, contractor may still be hurt by tools
cause by human errors and safety gear will not fully protect contractor from injuries.
Team members may be late during the prototype testing. This will causes
marks to be deducted and given a bad impression to client for being unpunctual. In
order to minimize the risk, team leader or members should always remind each other
the date and time for prototype testing. Various ways can be used to remind team
members such as texting, phone calls and emails to reduce residual risks as members
will be informed all the time.
Mars lander prototype may not be able to sustain the impact after drop from
the ram and break apart. This will causes loss of marks according to marking criteria.
The prototype should be modified and tested during construction stage to confirm
that it can sustain the impact and remain unbroken. In order to come out a prototype
with good sustainability, contractors and designers should work together to come out
with a better design of prototype. After the test, the prototype built will able to
survive the drop and remain unbroken.
22
5.0
Gantt Chart
23
5.1 Stage 1
Contractors decide on which materials that are suitable for the Mars Rover
Contractors figure out the prices and sources to get all the materials
Contractors finalise the materials list with price, dimensions and source
Designers draw the sides view, front and back view and 3D projection of the Rover
using Skect-up
24
Discuss and complete the Tender Evaluation Criteria
Upload the final Design Package to Turnitin and Company Wiki before deadline
Table 5.1: Gannt Chart for Stage 1.
5.2 Stage 2
25
Contractors understand the requirements and drawings design of the designers'
company before tender
Contractors collect all the supporting evidences to meet the requirements of the
Tender Evaluation Criteria of the designers' company
Contractors summarise all the key selling points of their company and purposes of
the tender application in order persuade the designing company to pair up with the
contractors' company
Organise meetings between full design team and full contractor team
Each contractor prepare one set of Tender Application and after that submit it to
company's wiki and email it to the allocated designing company
Designers read and analyse the tender applications that submitted by contractors
26
5.3 Stage 3
Designers prepare the handover paper work and present to the Client to acknowledge the
complete of prototype
5.4 Stage 4
27
Complete engineering identity feedback
28
6.0 Reference List
29