Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tangent Modulus Analysis
Tangent Modulus Analysis
DETERMINEDFROM
STRAINDATA
University of Ottawa
Bengt H. Felleniusl,
".ASCE
ABSTRACT: When evaluating measurements of strain or te1lCa1e
shortening of a pile subjected to loading teat, precise knowledge of
the "elastic" modulus is necessary. By means of plotting and
analyzing the increment of load (or stress) over the increment of
strain versus the strain, i. e., the tangent or chord modulus of the
stress-strain curve, the modulus can be determined. The paper
provides the nathematical background to the analysis and presents
examples of the method,
P R I N C I P L E S O F S T R E S S _ S T R A I NA N A L Y S I S
E
F
a-a PILE
U) COLUMN
S T R A N
z.
B
E
F
at1
E
C)
z. A
A
\ A 'A.
U''
tt1 a-
lrl \^
E A\^
--a-
F.
ta.
E
o
z.
S T R A N
FELLENIUS
AGTUAL TEST RESULTS
ENT (- -)
MOVEM
0 50 100 150 200
400
3000
vl
300
c z.
o
-.F 2000
\z
200 A
o
o A
A
o A o
A
10 0 0 J
J1 00 I
A
O-O HEAD
o-o ToE
A-A COMPRESSION
0 0
0 24 6 I
ENT (inches)
MOVEM
FELLENIUS
Fig. 3A shows the applied load at the pile head plotted against
measured strain (i. e., shortening divided by tellcale length) for
the upper and lower telltales and for the difference between the
telltales, i. e., the strain along the bottom 9.0 rn (29,7 feet) of
the pile.
400
A
3000
,^. 500 .o'o^.o'o
o oo^o&o'
c z.
o oog"o"&"
v olo'ooo&o
20005
200
o o
o o
J
J 100 O-O UPPER
TELLTALE 1000
O-O LOWER
TELLTALE
a-a LOWER-UPPER
0 0
0.0 o.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
(-.)
MILLISTRAIN
z 800 7000
E. 6000
t---
U'' 600
E
5000 ^
OG u,
z.E 4000 E
400 \
-rC 3000g
<e
ov
J 200 O-O
2000
U P P E RT E L L T A L E
v. O-O LOWERTELLTALE
O A-a LOWER-UPPER
1000
z.
0 0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
(rn.)
MILLISTRAIN
Figure 3. Load-strain and modulus diagrams for the pile data shown
in Fig. 2.
A, Load-strain diagram for two telltale lengchs and for
the difference between the two te1lta1e lengths.
B. TangenE nodulus diagram for the two telltale lengths
and for the difference between the two telltale
I engths.
4 FELLENIUS
i
It is very difficult to obtain anything quantitative from the
diagran in Fig. 3A. However, when studying che diagran in Fig. 38
showing the tangent modulus plot, it can easily be determined that
the curve for the upper teIltaIe indicates that a constant modulus
(a horizontal, straight line portion) develops at a value of
0.3 nillistrain, which occurred when the applied load was I,070 KN
(120 tons). For the lower telltale, a conatant modulus is indicated
for a strain of 0.8 nillistrain occurring when the applied load was
2,450 KN (275 tons). Finally, the curve for the telltale difference
(botton portion of the pite) indicates a constant modulus at a
strain of 0.5 nillistrain at the applied load of 2,490 KN
(280 tons).
The analysis of the tangent moduli for a range of applied load of
2,518 KN to 2,670 KN (283 to 300 tons) indicates a modulus for the
upper, lower, and bottom portion telltale lengths, of 2.776, 2.785,
and 2.847 MN,/strain (312, 313, and 320 ton/nillistrain). The
agreement between the upper and lower celltale valuee is excellent.
It is not surprising that the lower portion val.ue ie slightly off as
any inaccuracy in the telltale readings would be exaggerated when
taking the difference of them.
Thus, the evaluation indicates that the tangent modulus of the
pile cross section is equal to 2.78 MN/strain (312 ton/nillistrain).
By inserting this value into the conventional relation LOAD = AREA
t i n e s M O P U L U St i n g s S T R A I N l d i t h t h e c r o s s s e c t i o n a l area equal to
128.5 cn- (19.9 in-), an "elastic" modulus of 214 GPa (31,000 ksi)
is obtained. Inserting the usual nodulus ,va1ue of 207 GPa
(30,000 ksi), an area of 134.2 cm' (20.8 in') is calculared.
Obviously, in the continued evaluation of Ehe data, one has to live
with an inaccuracy of the ruodulus, or actual cross sectional area,
of about 4 % due to the uncertainty in the calculations. The Author
finds this more than acceptable for engineering purposes.
The analysis becones a 1ittle bit more difficult when evaluating
strain data fron other than steel piles, i. e., concrete piles or
concrete-fi11ed pipe piles. Contrary to compon belief, a concrete
column does not exhibit a linear stress-strain relation when loaded.
That is, the Young's modulus of concrete reduces with the applied
load. Fig. 4A illustrates an assumed stress-strain curve of a
column (lower line). It has been assumed that the line is a second
degree curve and that tbe final slope of the line is 30 % of the
initial slope. This reduction of the slope, i. e., the modulus, is
extreme, and has been chosen for reasons of insErucEion clarity.
(An example of an actual case will be given later).
The upper curve in Fig. 4A, the line with the data points, shows
the same column taken as a pile subjected to shaft resistance. As
in the case of the pile with the constant modulus illustrated in
Fig. l, as soon as alL the shaft resistance has been overcome, the
two lines are parallel. Due to the curving of the lines, it is very
difficult to teII when this occurs, however.
fn Fig. 48, the tangent nodulus of the column line is plotted
against the strain (solid line). Because the stress-strain relation
for the column has been assumed to follow a second degree equation,
the tangent modulus is a straight 1ine, and, as the modulus is not
FELLENIUS
constant but reducing, the line slopes downward wich increasing
strain. The line with the "data" p oints is the tangent modulus line
for che pile. It becomes p a r a l l e l with that of the column after the
shaft resietance has been overcone. As shown, it plots slightly
below che column line. Extrapolating the pile modulus line to the
y-axis and integracing it, would result in a "restored.column curve"
located marginally below the true colunn acress-strain curve in
Fig. 4A.
A
Irfl
U1
Ld
E.
Ao
F ao a-a PILE
ao
a COLUMN
STRAIN
z.
a B
E
F
q
(J
z 4
A
\ A
A
VI A
A
v1 A
A
IJ
E,
F
q
u.
c)
z.
STRAIN
Figure 4. Typical data from an instrumented static pile loading
test on a concrete pile with a modulus reducing with
increasing stress.
A. Stress-strain diagram of the pile head (uppercurve)
and of the corresponding free standing colunn.
B. Plot of tangent modulus against strain.
6 FELLENIUS
MATHEMATICALRELATIONS
q =+le2+B (2)
(3)
s
E=
s
*le+s (4)
EXAMPLE FROM A P I L E W I T H A N O N - C O N S T A N T
MODULUS
FELLENIUS
The question when seeing such curves is "are they curved becauee the
shaft resistance is not yec fully overcome, or because the modulus
is reducing with increasing load, or both"?
The ansvrer to the question is given in Fig.58, showing che
tangent modulus pLot of the daCa. Indeed, lhe tangent nodulus lines
are becoming straight at larger strains, which suggests a second
degree curve for the stress-strain relation.
600
A 5000
500
o 4000 ^
c 400 z.
o
v 50oo5
Joo o
o 2ooo6
5 2oo o-o TELLTALE#7 J
J ;-:;** o-o TELLTALE
A #9 1000
100 A. A-A #9 - #7
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5
(-.)
MILLISTRAIN
10 0 0
z
a B o-o TELLTALE
#7 8000
u. 800 o-o TELLTALE
#9
F A-A -
#9 #7
q A.
6000 u
x?
vc
-t-
-=\
\c
600 lo-
o. J E
4 0 0 0 z.
o9 400 \Z
<it
o
J
200 2000
E
O
z
0 0
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5
(-.)
MILLISTRAIN
FELLENIUS
Telltale 7 indicates a straight line at a strain of O,2 nil1i-
atrain, induced at an applied load of about 1070 KN (120 tons).
Telltale 9 indicates the aane at a strain of 0.4 nillistrain,
induced at an applied load of about 2000 KN (225 tons). The line
for the bottom portion indicates the straight line relation at a
strain of about 0.8 nillistrain, induced ac an applied load of about
3560 KN (400 tons).
The tangent modulus lineg are used to evaluate at what applied
load the shaft resistance along the pile was fully nobilized. As to
determining the load distribution for a particular applied 1oad,
knowledge is required of the secant "elastic" modulus for the 1oad.
Linear regression of the data points naking up the straight
portion of the three lines nay be used to provide the equation of
the modulus lines, i. .r to deternine the conatancs A and B in
Eq. l. Regression of the modulus line for Telltale 7 results in
that the constants A and B are equal to -2.I4 KN/nillistrain
(-0.240 ton/nillistrain) and 4,877 KN/millistrain (548.2 ton/ni11i-
strain), respectively, ltith a linear regression correlation
coefficienr of 0.9980.
Inserting the values of A and B into Eq. 2 gives the average load
in the pile over the length of a telltale as a function of induced
stra in:
a= - 1 . 0 7 e2 + 4880 KN (5a)
FELLENIUS
(rn-)
MovEMENT
0 20 40 60
400
A 5000
-q
? 300 -o'a
.o' a
c
o
OA
OA z
-
OA
oAo
O'O7O'O/O/"O
zooo5
zoo oa
oa
oa o'
o
o
o
o oa
oa o
o'
oao
oA o
o-o PILEHEAD o
J
9 1oo 60 A-A PILETOE 1000
60 O-O COMPRESSION
60
(A-o
ao
0 0
0 1 2 3
(inches)
MOVEMENT
z 800 7000
E. 1 B
F 6000
v) 600
\ 5000 ^
UP
\c-
O9
400 tn
\t""-"i \-"r."r"-",o-o.o_
4000 E
sooo=
\
U
5{,200
J
o iV 2000
\-/
E. 10 0 0
O
z 0 0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 .0 1.2
(-.)
MtLLtsrRAtN
l0 FELLENIUS
Strain measurements, using telltale data or strain gages direct-
ly, can be evaluated as to accuracy, at what applied load the shaft
resistance is fully rnobilized, and aa to what value of the secant
modulus to use for deternining the load distribucion in the pile in
the following analysis (which should consider factors such as the
residual strain in the pi1e, as well as variation between individual
gages).
To have any reasonable chance of obtaining data suitable for
analysis any analysis, in fact - the loading test must include
load measurements by means of a reliable load ce11 and the strain
data be obtained with an accuracy being about ten times greater than
the one usually applied in engineering practice. As to telltale
data, dial gages or LVDTs which give a precision of 0.0025 nn
(0.000I inch) are preferred over the comnonly used "standard" gages
having a gradation of 0.025 m (0.001 inch).
CONCLUSIONS
11 FELLENIUS