SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SSS SPMS FORM 1

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM v.2016-08-02

For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions
(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)
NAME (Last name, First name Middle name Suffix) POSITION TITLE / DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable) EMPLOYEE ID NO.
JUANICH, MARIA TERESA SANCHEZ CORPORATE EXECUTIVE OFFICER II 851158
SECTION / TEAM (if applicable) BRANCH / DEPARTMENT / OFFICE / UNIT DIVISION / GROUP / SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME
MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS BRACH SOUTHERN MINDANAO 2 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM
COMMITMENT CONTRACT
I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment ( Part 1) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period JAN 2016 to JUNE 2016
01/04/2016
APPROVED BY: Signature of Ratee Date
JOVE L. COLASITO 01/04/2016 JOVE L. COLASITO 01/04/2016
Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date
PART I PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT PART II ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT AND RATING
WEIGHT MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI) % WEIGHTED REMARK
CATEGORY ALLOCATION ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT ACCOMPLISHED (Use separate sheet, if necessary. Indicate excess from %
(whole number only)
(MFO) (Target + Measure) (cannot exceed 100) SCORE ACCOMPLISHED if more than 100%)

Strategic Functions
Core Functions
Compliance to SLA 100 -Application reviewed Application/s reviewed within the approved 100.00% 100.00% 100.00
commited processing time for 2016

-Ers filing R3s electronically -Ers filing R3s electronically reviewed

reviewed

-Ers submitting ML2s electronically -Ers submitting ML2s electronically reviewed

reviewed

Support Functions
100 100.00% 0.00

Total Weight Allocation 100.00 Total Score 100.00

Numerical Rating 5
Adjectival Rating O
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES (Please see attached documents and/or additional sheets, if any.)

RATING APPROVAL
DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALE
The assessment of my performance in Part II has been shown and discussed with Score Numerical Adjectival
me by my immediate supervisor (please shade the appropriate box). REDENTOR S. VIOLA 08/09/16 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)
I agree with the Performance Rating. Signature over Printed Name of Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)
I disagree with the Performance Rating. Attached on a separate document Immediate Supervisor 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)
is/are the following reason/s. 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)
08/09/16 REDENTOR S. VIOLA 08/09/16 REDENTOR S. VIOLA 08/09/16 59.99-below 1 Poor (P)
Signature of Ratee Date Signature over Printed Name of Date Signature over Printed Name of Date Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS
Next Higher Supervisor Branch/Dept./Office/Unit Head PMT on 02 February 2016.