Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Pearls in Clinical Neuroscience

Inattention and Hyperactivity-


Impulsivity: Psychobiological and
Evolutionary Underpinnings of
ADHD
By Dan J. Stein, MD, PhD, Jin Fan, PhD, John Fossella, PhD, and Vivienne Russell, PhD

ABSTRACT difficulties, but he had a good memory, spoke


articulately, contributed to group work, and so
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is a
had managed to pull through. However, his col-
prevalent and disabling disorder that is char- lege assignments required him to read more
acterized by inattention and/or hyperactivity- broadly, to write more extensively, and to work
more independently. A closer history revealed
impulsivity, impairment in executive functions, difficulties with attention and symptoms of
structural and functional abnormalities in fron- hyperactivity that dated back to childhood. Even
during the interview, he fidgeted a good deal and
tal-striatal circuitry, associations with particular often interrupted questions. There was no psychi-
catecholamine gene variants, and responsive- atric comorbidity, and he was in good physical
health. Methylphenidate [AU: DOSAGE?] proved
ness to dopaminergic and noradrenergic agents.
helpful to him, allowing him to study in a more
There is a growing integration of findings from disciplined way.
basic and clinical studies, of data from differ-
ent methods (eg, genetics and imaging), and COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
of empirical data with hypotheses drawn from Neuroanatomy/Neurochemistry
evolutionary thinking. Here we briefly summa- Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
is characterized by impairments in executive func-
rize work on the cognitive-affective neurosci-
tions, such as self-regulation of affect-motiva-
ence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. tion-arousal, abnormalities in the frontal-striatal
circuits that mediate these functions, and associa-
CASE REPORT tions with variants in genes that play an important
Ned is an 18-year-old man who was referred role in these circuits.1,2 Animal models3,4 demon-
for assessment due to difficulties at college. strate elegantly that lesions in this neurocircuitry,
High-school assignments had caused him some or targeted disruption of such genes, produce

Dr. Stein is professor and chair of the Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, and is
also on faculty at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. Drs. Fan and Fossella are assistant professors in the Department
of Psychiatry at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Dr. Russell is professor in the Department of Human Biology at the University of Cape
Town.
Disclosures: Dr. Stein receives grant support/honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Lundbeck A/S, Orion, Pfizer, Pharmacia,
Roche, Servier, Solvay, Sumitomo, and Wyeth. [AU: PROVIDE DISCLOSURES FOR ALL CO-AUTHORS.]
Funding/Support: Dr. Stein receives support from the Medical Research Council of South Africa.
Authors’ note: This case is based on an amalgam of the authors’ experience.
CNS Spectr 12:3 19 March 2007
Pearls in Clinical Neuroscience

behavioral and cognitive deficits analogous to activation, 17 involvement of other regions 18,19
those seen in the clinic. (Figure 2), and increased saliency20 or functional
These clinical and basic findings are consistent normalization21 (Figure 3) after pharmacotherapy.
with a view that ADHD is characterized by a defi- Molecular imaging data have been somewhat
cit in inhibitory control or less signaling to con- inconsistent to date,22 but electroencephalogram
trol systems.5-8 The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a and magnetic resonance spectrography studies
critical role in sustained attention and behavioral are consistent with delayed or impaired myelina-
inhibition, while more posterior cortical regions tion of neuronal axons.23
are important for perception and the allocation of
attentional resources.4 Norepinephrine modulates Gene/Environment
cortical and cerebellar processing, while dopa- Twin and adoption studies show high heritabil-
mine modulates cortical and striatal processing; ity estimates for ADHD, but obstetric complica-
more specifically, norepinephrine α−2A receptor tions, such as maternal smoking, may also be
stimulation enhances PFC “signal” and dopamine relevant.24 Associations have been found between
(D)1 receptor stimulation helps reduce PFC “noise” specific gene variants, particularly in the dopa-
(optimizing sustained attention), while other cat- minergic and noradrenergic systems and ADHD
echolamine conditions instead take the PFC “off- in general,24-30 and impairment on attention tasks
line” and enhance posterior cortical or subcortical in particular.31,32 Fan and colleagues33 found that
processing (eg, during drowsiness or stress).4 alleles of two genes related to dopamine signal-
Impairments in executive function in ADHD ing (D4 receptor and monoamine oxidase A) were
are seen in tasks that require cognitive, or inhib- associated with increased activation of anterior
itory control, such as no-go, stop- and Stroop cingulate gyrus. In subjects with ADHD, unaf-
paradigms.9-11 Structural imaging studies show fected siblings, and healthy controls, D4 recep-
smaller volumes in prefrontal cortex, caudate, tor (expressed predominantly in PFC) influences
splenium of corpus callosum, and cerebellum, prefrontal gray matter volume, while dopamine 1
as well as smaller total cerebral volume,12,13 and transporter (expressed predominantly in the basal
there is some work correlating neuropsychologi- ganglia) influences caudate volume.34 dopamine 1
cal and volumetric findings.14 Functional imaging transporter has also been linked with rCBF and
studies often show prefrontal hypofrontality15,16 treatment outcome.35 Further work is, however,
(Figure 1), but also demonstrate compensatory needed to replicate and extend such findings.36

FIGURE 1.
Time-series plots of BOLD signal changes
in prefrontal cortex in children with ADHD FIGURE 2.
and controls during the Stop Signal task16 Healthy subjects had significantly more
Children with
ADHD (n=17)
Healthy
Children (n=15) Successful Inhibition
activation than the ADHD group in bilat-
1.50 Anterior cingulate cortex Unsuccessful Inhibition eral parietal association cortex, as well
1.00
as right precuneus/cuneus and thalamus/
0.50
mid-cingulate, during an fMRI of a visual
% Signal Change

0.00

–0.50
oddball task19
1.50 Left ventrolateral
prefrontal cortex
1.00

0.50

0.00

–0.50
0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12
Time (seconds)

Pliszka SR, Glahn DC, Semrud-Clikeman M, et al. Neuroimaging of inhibi-


tory control areas in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
who were treatment naive or in long-term treatment. Am J Psychiatry. Tamm L, Menon V, Reiss AL. Parietal attentional system aberrations during
2006;163:1052-1060. target detection in adolescents with attention deficity hyperactivity disorder:
event-related fMRI evidence. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1033-1043.
BOLD=blood-oxygen level dependent; ADHD=attention-deficit/hyperactivity
disorder. ADHD=attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Stein DJ, Fan J, Fossell J, Russell V. CNS Spectr. Vol 12, No 3. 2007. Stein DJ, Fan J, Fossell J, Russell V. CNS Spectr. Vol 12, No 3. 2007.

CNS Spectr 12:3 20 March 2007


Pearls in Clinical Neuroscience

Evolutionary Approaches als (who are hypervigilant, rapid-scanning, quick


Executive functions can be examined from to pounce (or flee), and motorically hyperactive)
an evolutionary perspective, with one hypoth- over “problem-solvers”.38 Other researchers44-46
esis arguing that interpersonal competition have, however, argued that ADHD is best under-
helped drive a shift from the control of behav- stood as a maladaptation.
ior by immediate context (overt) to self-regula-
tion (covert).37 Some authors38-43 have argued that
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
ADHD and impulsive symptoms can be under-
stood in adapative terms; for example, particular
DSM-IV-TR Diagnosis
environments favor “response-ready” individu-
There is growing recognition of the prevalence
of ADHD in children and adults, and its associated
morbidity.47 In view of the evolutionary debate
described above, it is notable that ADHD symp-
toms do not necessarily imply impairment.48 There
are ongoing attempts to improve ADHD diagnostic
criteria and subtyping (eg the requirement that
FIGURE 3. ADHD have an onset prior to 7 years of age may
fMRI activation during response inhibition not be valid),49 and an improved understanding of
for an ADHD child and a control child. the cognitive-affective neuroscience of ADHD may
Yellow squares highlight the resonance of well contribute to this effort.
MPH in the head of the caudate and puta-
men in the ADHD and control child21 Assessment/Evaluation
Standardized scales for the assessment of
ADHD are readily available and useful for moni-
toring the effects of treatment. 50,51 Collateral
Off–MPH On–MPH information is particularly useful. Although
symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity-
impulsivity may well have a genetic component,
ADHD
and may well be due to general medical disor-
ders, in patients with a psychiatric diagnosis of
ADHD and normal intelligence, it is thought that
extensive genetic investigation (eg cytogenetics)
has a low yield.52

Pharmacotherapy/Psychotherapy
Although expert guidelines have emphasized
Control the value of pharmacotherapy and psychother-
apy in ADHD, pharmacotherapy plays a partic-
ularly crucial role. 53-57 Despite concerns about
the use of psychostimulants in children,58 meta-
analyses reinforce the enormously useful con-
tribution of psychostimulants, particularly in the
short-term.59 There is also a growing database
of studies of other agents53,60,61 and on genetic
predictors of treatment response. 30 The litera-
P<.05 P<.001
ture on the pharmacotherapy of adult ADHD is
smaller, 62,63 but consistent with findings from
Vaidya CJ, Austin G, Kirkorian G, et al. Selective effects of methylphenidate children and adolescents.
in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance
study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14494-14499.

fMRI=functional magnetic resonace imaging; ADHD=attention-deficit/hyper- CONCLUSION


activity disorder; MPH=methylphenidate. A rich body of data informs the cognitive-affec-
Stein DJ, Fan J, Fossell J, Russell V. CNS Spectr. Vol 12, No 3 tive neuroscience of ADHD. Work on the proximal
mechanisms underlying ADHD supports the cen-

CNS Spectr 12:3 21 March 2007


Pearls in Clinical Neuroscience

trality of inhibitory dysfunction in ADHD, and the and drug naive adults with ADHD. Neuroimage. 2007;34:1182-1190.
23. Russell VA, Oades RD, Tannock R, et al. Response variability in attention-deficit/hyperac-
neuronal and molecular basis of such dysfunction tivity disorder: a neuronal and glial energetics hypothesis. Behav Brain Funct. 2006;2:30.
is increasingly understood. Speculations on the 24. Thapar A, Holmes J, Poulton K, and Harrington R. Genetic basis of attention deficit and
hyperactivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;174:105-111.
distal, evolutionary mechanisms underlying ADHD
25. Maher BS, Marazita ML, Ferrell RE, Vanyukov MM. Dopamine system genes and atten-
have suggested that there are different ways-of- tion deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis. Psychiatr Genet. 2002;12:207-215.
being in the world (“response-ready” vs “problem- 26. Faraone SV, Doyle AE, Mick E, Biederman J. Meta-analysis of the association between
the 7-repeat allele of the dopamine D(4) receptor gene and attention deficit hyperac-
solving”), the value of which changes depending tivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:1052-1057.
on environmental context. More careful character- 27. Lowe N, Kirley A, Hawi Z, et al. Joint analysis of DRD5 marker concludes association
with ADHD confined to the predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes. Am J
ization of ADHD heterogeneity and variability,23,64,65 Hum Genet. 2004;74:348-356.
as well as work on relevant endophenotypes,66,67 is 28. Purper-Ouakil D, Wohl M, Mouren MC, Verpillat P, Ades J, and Gorwood P. Meta-analysis
likely to lead to further advances. CNS of family-based association studies between the dopamine transporter gene and atten-
tion deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 2005;15:53-59.
29. Schmitz M, Denardin D, Silva TL, et al. Association between alpha-2a-adrenergic recep-
tor gene and ADHD inattentive type. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:1028-1033.
REFERENCES 30. Faraone SV, Khan SA. Candidate gene studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
1. Durston S. A review of the biological bases of ADHD: what have we learned from imag- J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:13-20.
ing studies? Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9:184-195. 31. Kieling C, Roman T, Doyle AE, Hutz MH, Rohde LA. Association between DRD4 gene
2. Faraone S. Advances in the genetics and neurobiology of attention deficity hyperactivity and performance of children with ADHD in a test of sustained attention. Biol Psychiatry.
disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:1025-1027. 2006;60:1163-1165.
3. Sagvolden T, Russell V, Aase H, Johansen E, and Farshbaf M. Rodent models of atten- 32. Bellgrove MA, Mattingley JB, Hawi Z, et al. Impaired temporal resolution of visual atten-
tion-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1239-1247. tion and dopamine beta hydroxylase genotype in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
4. Arnsten AF. Fundamentals of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Circuits and path- Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:1039-1045
ways. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(suppl 8):7-12. 33. Fan J, Fossella J, Sommer T, Wu Y, Poser M. Mapping the genetic variation of executive
5. Schachar RJ, Tannock R, Logan G. Inhibitory control, impulsiveness, and attention deficit attention onto brain activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:7406-7411.
hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Psychology Review. 1993;13:721-739. 34. Durston S, Fossella JA, Casey BJ, et al. Differential effects of DRD4 and DAT1 genotype
6. Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: con- on fronto-striatal gray matter volumes in a sample of subjects with attention deficit
structing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121: 65-94. hyperactivity disorder and their unaffected siblings. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10: 678-685.
7. Aron AR, Poldrack RA. The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: relevance for 35. Rohde LA. Dopamine transporter gene, response to methylphenidate and cerebral blood
genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1285- flow in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a pilot study. Synapse. 2003;48:87-89.
1292. 36. Castellanos FX, Lau E, Tayebi N, et al. Lack of an association between a dopamine-4
8. Nigg JT, Casey BJ. An integrative theory of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder receptor polymorphism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: genetic and brain
based on the cognitive and affective neurosciences. Dev Psychopathol. 2005;17:785- morphometric analyses. Mol Psychiatry . 1998;3:431-434.
806. 37. Barkley RA. The executive functions and self-regulation: an evolutionary neuropsycho-
9. Lijffijt M, Kenemans J, Verbaten M, et al. A meta-analytic review of stopping perfor- logical perspective. Neuropsychol Rev. 2001;11:1-29.
mance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: deficient inhibitory motor control? J 38. Jensen PS, Mrazek D, Knapp PK, et al. Evolution and revolution in child psychiatry: ADHD
Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114:216-222 as a disorder of adaptation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:1672-1679.
10. Schoechlin C, Engel RR. Neuropsychological performance in adult attention-deficit hyper- 39. Shelley-Tremblay JF, Rosen LA. Attention deficity hyperactivity disorder: an evolutionary
activity disorder: meta-analysis of empirical data. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:727- perspective. J Genet Psychol. 1996;157:443-453.
744. 40. Vas J, Topal J, Pech E, et al. Measuring attention deficit and activity in dogs: a new
11. Willcutt EG, Doyle AE, Nigg JT, Faraone SV, Pennington BF. Validity of the executive application and validation of a human ADHD questionnaire. Appl Anim Behav Sci.
function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Biol 2007;103:105-117.
Psychiatry. 2005;57:1336-1346. 41. Panksepp J, Burgdorf J. “Laughing” rats and the evolutionary antecedents of human joy?
12. Castellanos F, Xavier L, Patti P, et al. Developmental trajectories of brain volume Physiol Behav. 2003;79:533-547.
abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder 42. Fairbanks LA, Jorgensen MJ, Huff A, Blau K, Hung Y-Y, Mann JJ. Adolescent impulsivity
[abstract]. JAMA. 2002;288:1740-1748. predicts adult dominance attainment in male vervet monkeys. Am J Primatol. 2004;64:1-
13. Valera EM, Faraone SV, Murray KE, Seidman LJ. Meta-analysis of structural imaging 17.
findings in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry. In press. 43. Williams J, Taylor E. The evolution of hyperactivity, impulsivity and cognitive diversity. J
14. Casey BJ, Taintor RJ, Orendi JL, et al. A developmental functionalMRI study of prefrontal R Soc Interface. 2007;3:399-413.
activation during performance of a go-nogo task. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997;9:835-847. 44. Brody JF. Evolutionary recasting: ADHD, mania and its variants. J Affect Disord.
15. Bush G, Valera EM, Seidman LJ. Functional neuroimaging of attention-deficit/hyperactiv- 2001;65:197-215.
ity disorder: a review and suggested future directions. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1273- 45. Baird J, Stevenson JC, Williams CC. The evolution of ADHD: a disorder of communica-
1284. tion? Q Rev Biol. 2000;75:17-35.
16. Pliszka SR, Glahn DC, Semrud-Clikeman M, et al. Neuroimaging of inhibitory control 46. Mategcek Z. Is ADHD adaptive or non-adaptive behavior? Neuroendocrinology letters.
areas in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder who were treatment naive 2003;24:148-150. 2003.
or in long-term treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1052-1060. 46. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Barkley R, et al. Patterns and predictors of attention-deficit/hyper-
17. Fassbender C, Schweitzer JB. Is there evidence for neural compensation in attention activity disorder persistence into adulthood: results from the national comorbidity survey
deficit/hyperactivity disorder? A review of the functional neuroimaging literature. Clin replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1442-1451.
Psychol Rev. 2006;26:445-465. 47. Gordon M, Antshel K, Faraone S, et al. Symptoms versus impairment: the case for
18. Dickstein SG,Bannon K, Xavier Castellanos F, Milham MP. The neural correlates of atten- respecting DSM-IV’s criterion D. J Atten Disord. 2006;9:465-475.
tion deficit hyperactivity disorder: an ALE meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 48. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Doyle A, et al. Neuropsychological studies of late onset and
2006;47:1051-1062. subthreshold diagnoses of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry.
19. Tamm L, Menon V, Reiss AL. Parietal attentional system aberrations during target detec- 2006;60:1081-1087.
tion in adolescents with attention deficity hyperactivity disorder: event-related fMRI 49. Snyder SM, Drozd F, Xenakis SN. Validation of ADHD rating scales. J Am Acad Child
evidence. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1033-1043. Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43:1189-1190.
20. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, et al. Imaging the effects of methylphenidate on brain 50. Evans SW, Youngstrom E. Evidence-based assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactiv-
dopamine: new model on its therapeutic actions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disor- ity disorder: measuring outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:1132-
der. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1410-1415. 1137.
21. Vaidya CJ, Austin G, Kirkorian G, et al. Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention 51. Stephen E, Kindley AD. Should children with ADHD and normal intelligence be routinely
deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study. Proc Natl Acad Sci screened for underlying cytogenetic abnormalities? Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:860-861.
U S A. 1998;95:14494-14499. 52. Pliszka SR, Crismon ML, Hughes CW, et al. The Texas Children’s Medication Algorithm
22. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Newcorn J, et al. Brain dopamine transporter levels in treatment Project: revision of the algorithm for pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity

CNS Spectr 12:3 22 March 2007


Pearls in Clinical Neuroscience

disorde. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;45:642-657.


53. The MTA Cooperative Group. A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strate-
gies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:1073-
1086.
54. Safren SA. Cognitive-behavioral approaches to ADHD treatment in adulthood. J Clin
Psychiatry. 2007;67(S8):46-50.
55. Bjornstad G, Montgomery P. Family therapy for attention-deficit disorder or attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2005;(2):CD005042.
56. Chronis AM, Jones HA, Raggi VL. Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for chil-
dren and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Psychol Rev.
2006;26:486-502
57. Diller LH. The run on Ritalin: attention deficit disorder and stimulant treatment in the
1990’s. Hastings Cent Rep. 1996;26:12-18.
58. Jadad AR, Boyle M, Cunningham C, Kim M, Schachar R. Treatment of attention-deficity/
hyperactivity disorder. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999;11:1-341.
59. Faraone SV. Spencer T, Aleardi M, Pagano C, Biederman J. Meta-analysis of the effi-
cacy of methylphenidate for treating adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J
Psychopharmacol. 2004;24:24-29.
60. Silva RR, Munoz DM, Alpert M. Carbamazepine use in children and adolescents with
features of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35:352-358.
61. Maidment, Ian D. The use of antidepressants to treat attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder in adults. J Psychopharmacol. 2003;17:332-336.
62. Nutt DJ, Fone K, Asherson P. Evidence-based guidelines for management of atten-
tion-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescents in transition to adult services and
in adults: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J
Psychopharmacol. 2007;21:10-41.
63. Castellanos FX, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Milham MP, Tannock R. Characterizing cognition in
ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:117-123.
64. Doyle AE. Executive functions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry.
2006;67(suppl 8):21-26.
65. Castellanos FX, Tannock R. Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the
search for endophenotypes. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:617-628.
66. Doyle AE, Willcutt EG, Seidman LJ, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder endo-
phenotypes. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1324-1335.

CNS Spectr 12:3 23 March 2007

You might also like