Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TARGT Gene Therapy Platform For Correction of Anemia in End-Stage Renal Disease
TARGT Gene Therapy Platform For Correction of Anemia in End-Stage Renal Disease
normal prenatal diagnosis. We received no no- Supported by Quest Diagnostics, which provided salary sup-
port and editorial assistance in the preparation of this letter.
tice from any delivering physician or neonatolo- Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with
gist of the birth of an affected infant. Because the full text of this letter at NEJM.org.
there were no known infants with trisomy 13 or
18, we calculated a negative predictive value of 1. Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, et al. DNA sequencing
versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med
100%. One baby was born with trisomy 21, which 2014;370:799-808.
resulted in a negative predictive value of greater 2. Wang JC, Sahoo T, Schonberg S, et al. Discordant noninva-
than 99.9%. sive prenatal testing and cytogenetic results: a study of 109 con-
secutive cases. Genet Med 2015;17:234-6.
CharlesM. Strom, M.D., Ph.D. 3. Snyder MW, Simmons LE, Kitzman JO, et al. Copy-number
MeganD. Maxwell, M.D. variation and false positive prenatal aneuploidy screening re-
Renius Owen, Ph.D. sults. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1639-45.
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1604205
San Juan Capistrano, CA
charles.m.strom@questdiagnostics.com
A
35
Patient 1
B
14
Mean Plasma Hemoglobin (g/dl)
Patient 1
13 Patient 2
Patient 3
12
Patient 4
11 Patient 5
Patient 6
10 Patient 8
Patient 9
9
Patient 10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Months after Implantation
Figure 1. Levels of Erythropoietin and Hemoglobin after Implantation in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.
Shown is the monthly plasma concentration of erythropoietin (Panel A) and hemoglobin (Panel B) after TARGTEPO
implantation in 9 of the 10 patients (the erythropoietin concentration in Patient 7 stayed above baseline for only 2
weeks). The gray area in Panel B indicates the desired hemoglobin range according to clinical guidelines4 (the darker
gray area indicates the most desirable range; the lighter gray area [between 11 and 12 g per deciliter] indicates an
adequate range that does not require intervention).
tients who underwent implantation, erythropoi- tions of TARGTs excised from patients or assays
etin and hemoglobin levels were maintained in of antierythropoietin antibodies, of immunoge-
the desired range for a period of at least 5 months nicity to either TARGT or the erythropoietin se-
without the need for injections of recombinant creted from the TARGTEPO.
human erythropoietin. These sustained levels of This early study does not allow us to assess
erythropoietin and hemoglobin after TARGTEPO the risk or benefit of TARGTEPO as compared
implantation were achieved with a maximum with administration of recombinant erythropoi-
plasma level of erythropoietin that was approxi- etin injections. Such an assessment would re-
mately one hundredth the maximum level mea- quire a prospective, randomized trial.
sured in these patients when they received re-
Shany Blum, M.D., Ph.D.
combinant human erythropoietin by injection
Nir Shapir, Ph.D.
during the run-in phase of the study, and with
Reem Miari, M.Sc.
exposure to erythropoietin (measured as the
Benny Lerner, B.Sc.
area under the concentrationtime curve) that
was one tenth that obtained during administration Belly Koren, M.Sc.
of recombinant human erythropoietin by injection. Medgenics Medical Israel
Misgav, Israel
There were no serious adverse events related to blum.shany@gmail.com
TARGTEPO, and no signs, on either histologic sec-
To the Editor: Inhibition of immune check- the recipient and the graft. The patient received
points with the use of antibodies targeting pro- basiliximab (an antiinterleukin-2 receptor anti-
grammed cell death 1 (PD-1) or monoclonal anti- body) and glucocorticoid induction followed by
bodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated initial immunosuppression that included a gluco-
antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has been used clinically in corticoid, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil.
patients with various types of cancer. In the In early 2015, the patient received a diagnosis
limited number of reported cases in which these of microsatellite-stable metastatic adenocarci-
antibodies have been used in patients who have noma of the duodenum with intestinal obstruc-
undergone kidney transplantation,1 these agents
have been associated with cell-mediated and Table 1. Immunosuppressive Regimen in a Patient Who Had Undergone Kidney
antibody-mediated rejection (see Table S2 in the Transplantation.
Supplementary Appendix, available with the full Timing* Drug and Dosage
text of this letter at NEJM.org). 1 Wk before Prednisone 40 mg daily
We report on a patient who received a renal
Concurrent Prednisone 20 mg daily; sirolimus target goal,
transplant from a living related donor. In this 46 ng per milliliter
patient, a regimen of a preemptive glucocorti- 1 Wk after Prednisone 20 mg
coid and sirolimus (a mammalian target of ra-
>2 Wk and 6 mo after Prednisone 10 mg/day; sirolimus target goal,
pamycin [mTOR] inhibitor) may have prevented 1012 ng per milliliter
the adverse immune response of nivolumab in
>6 Mo after Glucocorticoid gradually decreased to 5 mg/day;
the kidney transplant. sirolimus continued to maintain goal of
A 70-year-old man with end-stage kidney dis- 1012 ng per milliliter
ease after bilateral nephrectomies for renal-cell
* Timing represents the initiation of the immunosuppressive regimen in relation
cancer underwent a kidney transplantation in to the administration of nivolumab.
2010, with one of six HLA mismatches between