Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Progres Report 2005
Progres Report 2005
2005
1. CDR.
There are 267 leprosy new cases were found during 2005 (CDR: 14 per 100.000
populations). It increased 62 % (102 cases) to compare the previous year. There are
. HCs that was no leprosy patient before were report the new cases in this year.
Even thought leprosy program activities was not optimal due to limitation of resource
but it seem that leprosy cases in South East SUlawesi is still high. Several possibility
why CDR was increased during this year are as increase the trained HC staff, Health
education activity through radio spot, operational fund for HC staff was available and
improve the supervision from district wasor.
2. PREVALENS
Prevalence Rate on 31 December 2005 was 1.44 per 10.000 populations (276
cases); It is increase 42 % to compare with the previous year. The reason for
increasing the register prevalence is the same with CDR. The number of register
prevalence is more than the number of new case mean that some leprosy cases
from 2004 is still in register until the end of 2005 due to irregular taking MDT
3. Case Finding
During January December 2005, we found 267 leprosy new cases, among
them, 73% were found by voluntary reporting, 9% by contact examine. The
child proportion 9.4% and disability grade 2 proportion 8.2 %.
4. Case Holding
The RFT Rate in the entire province for PB cases in cohort 2004 was 100 %
and for MB cases in cohort 2003 was 93%.
5. Prevention of Disability
There was no patient both PB cases in cohort 2004 and MB cases in cohort
2003 was increase disability during treatment.
Year in which NLR became involved in the 1991, stopped in 2001 and started
Leprosy Control Program again 2002 but only 2 district. All
districts were supported again in
2004
Total Number
number trained
Provincial Wasors
involved in Leprosy 2 2
Control Program
District Wasors
involved in Leprosy 16 16
Control Program
Total Number
number trained
In Puskesmas with In Puskesmas with NO
registered leprosy registered leprosy
patients patients
HC Doctors 140 32 6
HC Jurus + 2 159 59 11
Hospital
1.2 RVS for 20 villages Was not done The approved fund was re
allocate for contacts
examination and training
for HCs jurus
2.6 Training
6.5 2 batch training for HCs 1 batch training for HCs Sharing budget that was
2.8 Supervision
8.7 Supervision in high 96 HCs was supervise by Some part of budget was
endemic district by wasor district wasor in 384 days from district meeting
to 69 HCs for 276 days
11.5 2 times monev meeting 2 times monev meeting The budget is from NLR
with district wasors in have been conducted, and APBN.
province and attended by prov The main topic in both
team and all district meeting is program
wasors evaluation, supervision,
refreshing.
Prevalence Rate on 31 December 2005 was 1.44 per 10.000 populations (276 cases); It
is increase 42 % to compare with the previous year. The reason for increasing the
register prevalence is the same with CDR. The number of register prevalence is more
than the number of new case mean that some leprosy cases from 2004 is still in register
until the end of 2005 due to irregular taking MDT
The year of 2005 there are 5 district which reporting that there arent patient is commit of
disability GR.2 but according to result of supervision thet is still a lot of jurus doest do
the assessment disability level so thet disability number reported isnt accurate yet.
New patient invention number of age faction under 15 years old still be high enough in
Soth east provinsce, that wakatobi distict 40%, Bau-bau- 15.8%, Muna 12% Kendari
12%, Konawe Selatan 10.5%, buton 7,2% and Kolaka 2.4%, while 2 district ( Bombana
and Konawe) there are not child patient.
Proportion of leprosy patients MB type is still very high. This matter is possibility caused
by a lot of jurus arent got training yet so that wrong grouping the leprosy type or
hesitating they are direct group as MB.
Indicators 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Total 1,532 1,632 1.673 1,689 1,690 1,815 1,815 1,825 1,874 1,915
population x
1000
Registered 36 74 20 44 29 27 13 20 13 11
cases PB
Registered 321 216 195 221 225 191 179 208 181 265
cases MB
Total 357 290 215 265 254 218 192 228 194 276
Prevalence 2.33 1.78 1.29 1.57 1.50 1.20 1.06 1.25 1.04 1.44
per 10.000
New detected 50 92 40 63 55 42 29 22 18 34
cases PB
CDR per 14 19 12 15 15 12 10 10 9 14
100.000
% disability 10 6.3 9.2 5.5 4.3 12.5 7.2 4.2 7.3 8.2
grade 2 in
new cases
% children < 15.4 15.1 7.1 11.0 0.8 4.2 7.2 8.9 9.7 9.4
15yr in new
cases
Case finding
method
Passive Case 199 181 139 187 125 167 134 140 121 189
Finding
Contact 19 29 103 7 7 13 9 14 11 25
Examination
School 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Survey
Other 3 94 55 60 59 0 0 4 1 1
Surveys
In generally child and disability proportion is still between 5-10 % during the last 4 years
and it seem that there is no significant changes during the last 10 years
This activity is not walked in an optimal yet, treatmen only at patients that knew by
jurus in its job region but this year of 2006 it has been planned to do commit the
monitoring to all patients of RFT.
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
INTERPRETATION
Commit of leprosy program activity in south east province is better than previous
year.
CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS
6 Successes