Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cheng 1986
Cheng 1986
00
Vol. 13, pp. 11-21, 1986 Pergamon Press Ltd. Printed in the United States
P. Cheng
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Honolulu, HI 96822
ABSTRACT
The nonuniform porosity effect (wall effect) on steady one-dimensional
heat conduction in a packed bed between parallel plates, concentric
cylinders and concentric spheres at different temperatures is consid-
ered in this paper. The heat conduction characteristics in the bed is
shown to be a function of Y (the ratio of particle diameter to the
characteristic length of the geometry) and X (the ratio of the thermal
conductivity of the fluid phase to that of the solid phase). Dimen-
sionless temperature distributions at different values of Y are
obtained for fluid-saturated porous media composed of water/glass-
beads, silicon oil/glass-beads, air/glass-beads and water/steel-balls.
Introduction
tion in porous media [1-5]. Some experimental results are shown to compare
favorably with theory; others are found to differ substantially from theoret-
In a recent paper, carton [5] has pointed out that a substantial error
(la)
or k~ = ~ k~ + (~-~)k~
* * =
kd/k f ~ + (I-~)/X (ib)
ii
12 P. Cheng Vol. 13, No. 1
where ~ is the porosity of the porous medium and i =k*/k* with k* and k*
~ s f s
denoting the thermal conductivities of the fluid phase and the solid phase of
the porous medium respectively. Catton [5] found the measured thermal conduc-
The fact that Eq. (i) is inaccurate for the evaluation of the stagnant
pointed out that the thermal conductivity of a packed bed can be evaluated
where B = 1 . 2 5 [ ~ ] I0/9 for a packed-sphere bed. Equation (2) has often been
used in the chemical engineering literature for the evaluation of the thermal
ratio where the wall effect is negligible. A comparison of Eqs. (Ib) and (2)
versus i/~ (i.e., k~/k~) for a packed bed with ~ = 0.4. It is shown that the
differences between the two computed thermal conductivities are small for the
water/glass-beads system with i ~ 0(i). For higher values of I/~ (or low
values of I), the values given by Eq. (Ib) are much higher than those given by
Eq. (2).
In a recent paper, Melanson and Dixon [7] measured the stagnant thermal
and glass hollow cylinders that were saturated with water. They found that
the non-uniform porosity distribution near the walls have a significant effect
I00 F ////"
50~ ,,,'"
30 //
20 . . . . . . Eq. (lb) //
Eq. ( 2 ) ,, , , / / / ~ "~"
5
3
2 Air/GIo$,Beads
1 ~/1 OdlGios$
Beads
0.5 - Woter/Gloss Beods
0.3
0.2
I | I I
O. 1.01 0.1 1.0 10 100 1000
s
ks/k f
FIG. 1
kdco/kf versus ks/k f given by Eqs. (Ib) and (2)
d is greater than the inner radius r~. They also observed large tempera-
p z
ture drops near the walls and that the temperature distribution is far from
on the stagnant thermal conductivity of a packed bed. To this end, the prob-
parallel plates, concentric cylinders and concentric spheres with wall effects
porous medium with I of 0(1), the wall effect on heat conduction is relatively
unimportant. For other systems with l < < i, the wall effect becomes increas-
ingly important as the value of Y is increased. For l < < I, the wall effect is
characterized by large temperature drops near the walls. The ratio of the
stagnant thermal conductivity with wall effects to those without wall effects
substantially from one at low values of i and high values of 7. The curvature
packed bed between parallel plates with temperatures T~ (at y*=0) and T~ (at
-N 1 (y-2)/y]
~(y) = ~ [i + Cle , 0 < y < 2 (3b)
d (k~ d T *
dy* d--~) = 0 (4)
where k* is the stagnant thermal conductivity of the packed bed given by Eqs.
d
(2) and (3). Equation (4) is to be solved subject to the boundary conditions
y* = 0: T* = T* (5a)
c
y* = 2H: T* = T* (5b)
h
The solution of Eq. (4) and (5) is given by
Y .. ,dy
@=
I0
1
k d (Y, ~, y)
, O<y<l (6)
2f 0 -kd (Y'
dyI'Y)
T*-T*
where @ = __~T~_T~ and k d = k*/k* with k* denoting the stagnant thermal conduc-
h c d d~ d
tivity given by Eq. (2) with ~ = 0 . 4 . Note that the dimensionless temperature
with respect to the centerline at y=l. Equation (6) shows that the dimension-
less temperature distributions in the packed bed between two parallel plates
is a function of I and Y.
Vol. 13, NO. 1 HEAT ~ G N IN A PACKED B E D 15
1.0
Y : 0.074
0.8
0.6
8
0.4
Ap'\\~x=o.s,~- wo.~G,o,,,.~,
0.2
//// "~x. 0.026-Ai,/C,~,,~,~,
~-),=0.01 - WoterlSteel Bolls
0% I
0.5
I
1.0
I
1.5 2.0
Y
1.0
y:0.
0.8
0.6
8
0.4
0% 05 ! .0 1.5 2.0
Y
FIG. 2
Dimensionless Temperature Distribution in a
Rectangular Packed Bed
Eq. (6) with > = 0.074 and y = 0.37 for four values of I. The values of ~ are
Schroeder, et al. [9] for the investigation of forced convective flow of water
TABLE 1
Thermal Conductivities
phases are listed in Table i. It is shown from Figs. 2 that for the water/
linear across the bed indicating that the wall effect is negligible. Large
air/glass-beads, and water/steel-balls systems with l < < I. The wall effect
k* = 2qH (8)
e (T~-T~)
k*
e 1
(9)
k~ [i dy
okd(Y,l,Y)
tially from one for the air/glass-beads and water/steel-balls systems even at
small values of y.
Vol. 13, NO. I HEAT ~ O N IN A P ~ B~D 17
1.0
- " "I/
gO.8
0.6
0.40 0 I l i i
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
FIG. 3
Effective Stagnant Thermal Conductivities of
Fluld-Saturated Porous Media Confined in Different Geometries
(at r*=r~) and T*. (at r*=r*). If d <<r*, the porosity in the packed bed
i i P i
can be approximated by
{ [ N1 (r'qo-rl)]1 ro+l
~(r) = ~ l+CleX p - Y ]j, ~ <r<r 0 (lOb)
r* = r*: T* = T* (12a)
1 i
r* *.
= r0. T* = T* (12b)
0
The solution to Eqs. (ii) and (12) is
Iirnkd dr
(r, ~,y)
8 = , i < r < r0 (13]
rO
T*-T*
f dr
1 r nkd (r '1,7)
where @ = l
T*-T* "
0 i
The dimensionless temperature distributions in an annular packed bed with
inner and outer radii of 0.011 m and 0.035 m (and with T * < T*) at y = 0.052,
i 0
0.25 and 0.464 for four different saturated porous media are displayed in
annular packed bed. It is shown from Pigs. 4 that for the water/glass-beads
cates the wall effect is negligible. From Figs. 4, it is shown that large
temperature drops near the walls do exist for smaller values of ~. For these
cases, the temperature drop is higher near the inner wall than that near the
outer wall. The magnitude of the temperature drop increases as the value of y
is increased.
ture is plotted against l/r. Again, it is shown that the temperature varia-
tions are linear for the water/glass-beads system indicating that the wall
effect is negligibly small. Large temperature drops near the walls are
8 8
0.4 0.4
0o 4
:0.026
0.2: 0.2 0.2
0.0
2 0.0 0.0
I I I I i i
2 3 2 2 3
r r r
FIG. 4
Dimensionless Temperature Distributions in an Annular P a c k e d Bed
Figs. 5, it is shown that the curvature of the wall enhances the wall effect,
resulting in a larger temperature drop for the case of the concentric spheres.
The heat fluxes at the inner surface of the concentric cylinder (n=l) and
r kd
1
while the effective thermal conductivity is given by
qi i
r* n r 0
(T*-T*) for concentric cylinders (15a)
~ u
k*
e qir~ (r0-1)
for concentric spheres (15b)
r 0 (T*-T*)
1 u
20 P. Cheng Vol. 13, No. 1
0.8 0.8
~ - k:O.01
\\~',q,, fx:o.o26
80.6 \~/x:o.o26 8 0.6
\'q-,~/-x:o.~36
0.4
~f:o.58 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 I. I l I I I 0.0
04 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
11r 11r
FIG. 5
Dimensionless Temperature Distribution in a Packed Bed
Between Concentric Spheres
Znr 0
t for concentric cylinders (16a)
I rO dr
k* 1 rkd
e
k~ (ro_l)
for concentric spheres (16b)
r0
ro[ .dr
)I r2kd
Equations (16a) and (16b) are plotted as dashed lines in Fig. 3. It is shown
that the value of k~/k~ decreases significantly from one for the air~glass-
beads and w a t e r / s t e e l - b a l l s systems with X << 1. Again, the wall e f f e c t is
References