Inditex's financial results are most comparable to H&M and Benetton as they have similar business structures. Comparisons show Inditex has better operating economics than Benetton but lags behind H&M and Gap. Inditex also has more stores and employees than H&M but generates less sales and has a lower financial position.
Zara's business model of quick response manufacturing internally and direct shipping to stores allows it to eliminate warehouses and keep low inventories. This shortens the design-to-store cycle, reduces working capital needs, and facilitates continuous new product manufacturing. Traditional retailers have longer 6 month design to 3 month production cycles.
Inditex's financial results are most comparable to H&M and Benetton as they have similar business structures. Comparisons show Inditex has better operating economics than Benetton but lags behind H&M and Gap. Inditex also has more stores and employees than H&M but generates less sales and has a lower financial position.
Zara's business model of quick response manufacturing internally and direct shipping to stores allows it to eliminate warehouses and keep low inventories. This shortens the design-to-store cycle, reduces working capital needs, and facilitates continuous new product manufacturing. Traditional retailers have longer 6 month design to 3 month production cycles.
Inditex's financial results are most comparable to H&M and Benetton as they have similar business structures. Comparisons show Inditex has better operating economics than Benetton but lags behind H&M and Gap. Inditex also has more stores and employees than H&M but generates less sales and has a lower financial position.
Zara's business model of quick response manufacturing internally and direct shipping to stores allows it to eliminate warehouses and keep low inventories. This shortens the design-to-store cycle, reduces working capital needs, and facilitates continuous new product manufacturing. Traditional retailers have longer 6 month design to 3 month production cycles.
Inditex's financial results are most comparable to H&M and Benetton as they have similar business structures. Comparisons show Inditex has better operating economics than Benetton but lags behind H&M and Gap. Inditex also has more stores and employees than H&M but generates less sales and has a lower financial position.
Zara's business model of quick response manufacturing internally and direct shipping to stores allows it to eliminate warehouses and keep low inventories. This shortens the design-to-store cycle, reduces working capital needs, and facilitates continuous new product manufacturing. Traditional retailers have longer 6 month design to 3 month production cycles.
With which of the international competitors listed in the case is it most
interesting to compare Inditexs financial results? Why? What do comparisons indicate about Inditexs relative operating economics? Its relative capital efficiency? With H&M and Benetton due that they have a more similar financial structure with inditex than gap does. It only surpases Benetton on the operating economic aspect and it is below gap and H&M, It has more stores and employees than H&M but still has less sells and a lower financial position than them. 2. How specifically do the distinctive features of Zaras business model affect its operating economics? Specifically, compare Zara with an average retailer with similar posted prices. [In order to express all advantages / disadvantages on a common basis, you may find it convenient to assume that on average, retail selling prices are about twice as high as manufacturers selling prices]. Distinctive features: manufactured its most fashion-sensitive products internally. The designers tracked customer preferences and placed orders with internal and external supliers They eliminated the need of warehouses and keeping inventories low by shipping directly from the central distribution center to the stores. The short cycle time reduced working capital intensity and facilitated continuous manufacture of new merchandise. Vertical integration helped reduce the bullwhip effect. Traditional industry models involve cycles that can last from 6 months to design and 3 months to manufacture. 3. Can you graph the linkages among Zaras choices about how to compete, particularly ones connected to its quick-response capability, and the ways in which they create competitive advantage? What does the exercise suggest about such capabilities as bases for competitive advantage?