Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Specification of Project: Project Title Digital Piracy Era: A Need For An Innovative Approach Project Members
Specification of Project: Project Title Digital Piracy Era: A Need For An Innovative Approach Project Members
Andrei C APASTRU
Project Title
Digital Piracy Era: A Need for an Innovative Approach
Project Members
Authors: Andrei Capastru
Supervisor: Jenny Lagsten
Overall aim
The aim of this study is to find the reasons why piracy is still increasing and also get
insights why some companies succeed to combat it and others do not. One goal is to identify
the approaches that work and flaws in the anti-piracy established systems at software and
organizational level.
Specified objectives
to determine the need of pirating (survey pirates);
to identify companies measures against piracy;
to asses the effectiveness of the measures;
to establish the best measures against digital piracy.
1
Stakeholders and their roles
digital content producers subjects of the research, provide information about their
measures and tactics against piracy, interested in the result of the research;
Requirements
This research requires a gathering, analysis of the existing research and online pub-
lished data about digital piracy. It will involve scientific and journalistic articles about digital
piracy trends and diminishing approaches.
Constraints / delimitations
This research is limited in time and framed by the availability of the companies and
users that will participate in the survey, and will depend by their numbers.
The objectives were reduced to a number of four in order to carry a meaningful answer
to the research question and a respectable fulfillment of the general aim.
Proposed approach
The research will employ both quantitative and qualitative research in order to convey
the answers to the questions. I will try to quantify the Likert/multiple choice answers to the
survey and also to qualitatively analyze the open questions.
The paper will be presented in form of a literature review and secondary research, the
review being conducted following the guidelines by Webster and Watson (2002). Data col-
lection is performed according to Doolan and Froelicher (2009) suggestions about how to
use an existing data set to answer the research questions. The provisional list of sources:
If you think piracy is decreasing, you havent looked at the data...(Steele, 2016)
2
Digital Piracy Stronger than Ever
Internet piracy falls to record lows amid rise of Spotify and Netflix
6. Analyze the gathered information and survey results according to specified methods.
3
Time schedule
Specification
April 7
Start Finish gathering phase Submission
April 1 April 15 April 30 May 26
Day 1 4 7 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Gathering 29 days
Define research means 9 days
Time schedule definition 3 day
Survey consumers 23 days ...
Literature resources gathering 25 days ...
Phase 2 25
Define conceptual framework 10 days
Analyze the gathered information 17 days 2 days
Aggregate everything into a research paper 10 days
Risks
Risks list:
not enough survey results in time;
concept of value stays undefined;
inapplicable conceptual framework to the researched material;
no pattern identified among anti-piracy approaches;
An thorough analysis of risks will be made further and the needed mitigation meth-
ods will be applied for each risk, depending on where it lays on the risk matrix (intrinsic,
extrinsic | high impact, low impact).
References
Brown, S. C. (2014). Approaches to digital piracy research. Convergence, 20(2), 129-
139. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354856513517470 doi:
10.1177/1354856513517470
Danaher, B., & Waldfogel, J. (n.d.). Reel piracy: The effect of online film piracy on interna-
tional box office sales. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1986299
Steele, R. (2016, Feb). If you think piracy is decreasing, you havent looked at the data...
Retrieved from http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2015/07/16/if-you
-think-piracy-is-decreasing-you-havent-looked-at-the-data-2/