Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31

Green Infrastructure

Retrofit Opportunities

May 13, 2010


Dallas, TX
Daniel P. Christian, PE, D.WRE
Tetra Tech
Dan.Christian@tetratech.com
1

Agenda

 Introduction – Why Retrofit?


 Retrofit Basics
• Objectives and criteria
• Desktop analysis
• Quantity estimation
• Field assessment and prioritization
 Ideas
 Case Examples
 Summary

1
Fix Past Mistakes & Solve Chronic
Maintenance Problems Flooding Problems

Demonstration & Reduce Pollutants of


Education Concern

3 3
Photos: CWP

Reduce Stormwater Trap Trash &


Runoff Volumes Floatables

Reduce Downstream Support Stream


Channel Erosion Restoration Projects

4 4
Photos: CWP

2
Retrofit verse New Development
Introduction

Retrofit New Development


 Higher costs  Designers seek least costly options
 Sized to meet restoration objectives  Sized to meet local design standards
 Typically installed on public land  Installed at new development projects
 Compacted soils  Soils are typically better
 Limited locations  More location flexibility
 Need neighborhood acceptance  More aesthetics flexibility
 Most are publicly maintained and the  More options on maintenance, often
public expects that they will be require private maintenance
 Not all candidate sites are feasible  Nearly all sites are made to work
 Often tied into existing stormwater  Usually creates the new stormwater
conveyance system conveyance system
 Public investment dollars  Private investment dollars
 Site visit is prerequisite for design  Design may occur without site visit

Agenda
 Introduction – Why Retrofit?
 Retrofit Basics
• Objectives and criteria
• Desktop analysis
• Quantity estimation
• Field assessment and prioritization
 Ideas
 Case Examples
 Summary

3
Define Objective
Retrofit Basics

 Clearly identify the overall objective, for example


• Store 1-inch of surface runoff and release over 24-hours
• Infiltrate the first 1-inch of rainfall
• Match natural hydrology
• Reduce TSS by 80 percent
• Capture 90% of trash and debris
 Objectives may come from
• Watershed or storm water management plans
• Permit requirements
• Modeling
 Define general locations
7

Desktop Analysis
Retrofit Basics

Prepare Look For


 Basemaps for field  Private land – willingness
assessment by property owners
Use  Roads (ROW)
 GIS  Open green spaces
• Topography  Existing BMPs that may be
• Hydrology modified
• Aerial photographs  In-line storage
• Utilities opportunities
• Soils  Large parking lots
• Parcel boundaries
 Hotspots
• Land use
8

4
Estimate Quantity
Retrofit Basics

 Estimate area or volume needed for retrofits


 Example
• Store the first 0.5-inches of runoff from a 1-acre parking lot
• Storage volume needed is 1,815 cubic feet
• Assume bioretention with 8-inches surface storage plus 4-foot of
engineered soil (25% void space)
• BMP yields 1.7 cubic feet of storage per square foot of area
• Therefore need = 1090 square feet or 2.5% of the parking area

9 9

Field Assessment and Prioritization


Retrofit Basics

 Ownership  Nearby vegetation


 Access  Photographs
 Utility conflicts (up and down)  Public acceptance
 Soils
 Topography – water flows
downhill
 Inline verse offline
 Existing stormwater BMPs
 Education opportunities
 Maintenance
 Brainstorming

10

5
Field Assessment and Prioritizing
Retrofit Basics

11

Field Assessment and Prioritization


Retrofit Basics

12

6
Agenda
 Introduction – Why Retrofit?
 Retrofit Basics
• Objectives and criteria
• Desktop analysis
• Quantity estimation
• Field assessment and prioritization
 Ideas
 Case Examples
 Summary

13

Green Roofs Individual Property


Ideas

14
14

7
Downspout Disconnect Individual Property
Ideas

15
15

Rain Barrel / Cistern Individual Property


Ideas

16
16

8
Rain Gardens Individual Property
Ideas

17
17
Photo: Ward Wilson Tt

Porous Pavement Impervious to Pervious


Ideas

18
18
Photo: Abby Hall USEPA

9
Porous Pavers Impervious to Pervious
Ideas

19
19
Photos: Abby Hall

Green Impervious to Pervious


Ideas

20
20

10
Parking Lots
Ideas

Photo: Abby Hall

Photo: LID Center

21
21
Photo: LID Center Photo: LID Center

Parking Lots
Ideas

Photo: Abby Hall USEPA

22
22
Photo: Abby Hall USEPA Photo: Abby Hall USEPA

11
Increased Infiltration
Specific Ideas

 Soil amendments
 Soil replacements
 Tilling/ripping
 Vegetation
 Increased residence time
• Longer flow path
• Increased storage
• Increased resistance

23
23
Photo: Ward Wilson

Between the curb


and the sidewalk

24
24
Photo: City of Vancouver Photo: Bob Domm Tt Photo: Abby Hall USEPA

12
Into the Street

25
25
Photo: Abby Hall USEPA

Swale Storage
Specific Ideas

Photo: Scott Struck Tt

26
26

13
Roadway Boulevard

27

Increased Local/Regional Storage


Photo: Abby Hall USEPA Specific Idea

28

14
Agenda
 Introduction – Why Retrofit?
 Retrofit Basics
• Objectives and criteria
• Desktop analysis
• Quantity estimation
• Field assessment and prioritization
 Ideas
 Case Examples
 Summary

29

Tetra Tech Lansing Office (2006)


Project by K&L Acquisitions, LLC and Tetra Tech

BEFORE

30

15
Tetra Tech Lansing, MI Office (2006)
Project by K&L Acquisitions, LLC and Tetra Tech

31

Tetra Tech Lansing Office (2006)


Project by K&L Acquisitions, LLC and Tetra Tech

32

16
NE Siskiyou Street (2003)
Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

BEFORE

33

NE Siskiyou Street (2003)


Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

34

17
NE Siskiyou Street (2003)
Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

35

NE Siskiyou Street (2003)


Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

36

18
NE Siskiyou Street (2003)
 Area Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry
• 10,000 square foot total drainage area
• 600 square foot landscaping area (6% of drainage area)
 Hydrology Modification (25-year flow test)
• 81% peak flow reduction
• 82% peak volume reduction
• 16 minute additional peak flow delay
 Cost $17,000
 Maintenance
• Semi-annual visits
• Neighbors help at will 0.40

0.35 Inlet

Successes
Outlet

 0.30

0.25

• Incredible community acceptance of project

Flow (cfs)
0.20

• Successful as a “catalyst” project for other green streets


0.15

0.10

Challenges
0.05

 0.00
09:30 09:45 10:00 10:15 10:30

• Juncus patens grows too tall, needs annual trimming


Tim e

• Unequal distribution of runoff due to crown of street 37

SW 12th Avenue (2005)


Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

BEFORE

38

19
SW 12th Avenue (2005)
Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

39

SW 12th Avenue (2005)


Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

40

20
SW 12th Avenue (2005)
Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

41

SW 12th Avenue (2005)


Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry

 Area
• 7,500 square foot total drainage area
• 300 square foot landscaping area
(4% of drainage area)
 Cost $35,000 ($117/sf)
 Maintenance - semi-annual visits
 Successes
• Successful as a “catalyst” project for other urban green streets
• Nobody has tripped yet (good to have 3’ egress zone and 2’
landscape buffer zone at carriage walks)
 Challenges
• Juncus patens grows too tall, needs annual trimming
• High loading of sediment requires more frequent cleaning
42

21
Michigan Avenue
Lansing MI, by Tetra Tech and C2AE

Before

43

Michigan Avenue
Lansing MI, by Tetra Tech and C2AE

44

22
Michigan
Avenue
Lansing MI
by Tetra Tech and C2AE

45

Michigan Avenue
Lansing MI, by Tetra Tech and C2AE

 4 city blocks, both sides


 Typical garden, no overflow for 1-
inch event
 600 block north side, no overflow for
4.1-inches (25-year event)
 $122/square foot 46

23
Sandy Boulevard (2007)
Project designed by Nevue Ngan Associates and URS

47

Sandy Boulevard (2007)


Project designed by Nevue Ngan Associates and URS

After

Before

15th Street and Sandy Blvd

After 48

24
Sandy Boulevard (2007)
Project designed by Nevue Ngan Associates and URS

After

Before

21st Street and Sandy Blvd

After 49

Sandy Boulevard (2007)


Project designed by Nevue Ngan Associates and URS

After

Before

22nd Street and Sandy Blvd

After 50

25
Sandy Boulevard (2007)
Project designed by Nevue Ngan Associates and URS

After

Before

39th Street and Sandy Blvd

After 51

Sandy Boulevard (2007)


Project designed by Nevue Ngan Associates and URS

After

Before

Harold Kelley Plaza and Sandy Blvd

After 52

26
Mount Tabor Middle School (2006)
Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry and Brandon Wilson

School Courtyard Entry

53

Mount Tabor Middle School (2006)


Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry and Brandon Wilson

54

27
Mount Tabor Middle School (2006)
Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry and Brandon Wilson

55

Mount Tabor Middle School (2006)


Portland OR, designed by Kevin Perry and Brandon Wilson

56

28
Mount Tabor Middle School (2006)
Project by the City of Portland, designed by Kevin Perry and Brandon Wilson

School Parking Lot


Before

57

Mount Tabor Middle


School (2006)
Project by the City of Portland,
designed by Kevin Perry and
Brandon Wilson

58

29
Agenda
 Introduction – Why Retrofit?
 Retrofit Basics
• Objectives and criteria
• Desktop analysis
• Quantity estimation
• Field assessment and prioritization
 Ideas
 Case Examples
 Summary

59

Summary
 Retrofits work to reduce problems in developed watersheds
 When identifying retrofits begin by:
• Clearly identifying the objective and criteria
• Start in the office gathering and organizing available information
• Walk the site and look for opportunities
 Think
• Reduce imperviousness
• Increase infiltration and water uptake by plants
• Provide storage
• Consider maintenance
 Communicate your ideas

60

30
Questions

61

31

You might also like