Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 35

FUNDAMENTALSOF

FINITEELEMENTMETHOD:
VARIATIONALANDWEIGHTED
RESIDUALAPPOACHES
WinterAcademy2008
Guide:Prof.S.MiGal
AmitAgrawal
DepartmentofChemicalEngineering
IITBombay
1
2
OUTLINE

IntroducPontoFEM
WeakFormofProblem
ProcessofFEM
MethodofWeightedResidual
PieceWisetrialFuncPons
InterpolaPonFuncPons
NumericalIntegraPon
VariaPonalPrinciples
RayleighRitzMethod
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
3
INTRODUCTIONTOFINITEELEMENT
METHOD(FEM)
STARTED:Forsolvinglinearprobleminsolidmechanics
CURRENT:Forsolvingnonlinear,dynamic,transientproblems.
PiecewiseapplicaPonofavariaPonalandweightedresidualmethod
DomaindiscrePziedintoniteelements
DierenPalEquaPonconvertedintoalgebraicequaPonsusingintegral
approximaPons

Analy6calApproach FEMApproach
GoverningEquaPon DierenPal DierenPal
Element DierenPal Finite
SoluPon Exact Approximate
LimitaPons Geometry,B.C. ElementType

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
4
WEAKFORMOFAPROBLEM
IntegraPonby
DierenPalEquaPonWeakorvariaPonalEquaPon
Parts
ConsiderthedierenPalequaPon:

for0<x<L

BoundaryCondiPons:

MulPplyingtheDierenPalequaPonwithatestfuncPon:v
TwiceDierenPable
whichsaPses
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
5
WEAKFORMOFAPROBLEM

IntegraPngequaPonstwicebyparts:

WeakForm
ConPnuityrequirementofsoluPonweakened
BoundarycondiPonatx=LincludedinthevariaPonalequaPon
BoundarycondiPon@x=LNaturalBoundaryCondiPon
BoundarycondiPon@x=0EssenPalBoundaryCondiPon
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
6
GENERALPROCESS

GoverningDierenPalequaPonisknown
a) AssumeatrialsoluPon
1. DiscrePzethedomainintodierentelements
2. Approximatetheeldvariableoverthedomain(InterpolaPonfuncPons)
b) SaPsfytheBoundaryCondiPons
c) SaPsfythedierenPalequaPonwiththetrialsoluPon
(Errorisknownastheresidual)
d) Minimizetheresidualoverthewholedomaintoobtain
setofalgebraicequaPons

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
7
UNIFORMROD,UNIFORMAXIALLOAD
GoverningDierenPalEquaPon:

Figure1:UniformRodSubjectedtoAxialLoad

BoundaryCondiPon:u(0)=0&
a)TrialSoluPon:u=c1+c2x+c3x2
b)SaPsfyB.C.s:c1=0;c2+2c3L=0
c)Residual:2AEC3+q
d)MinimizeResidual:C3=q/2AE
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
8
HEATCONDUCTIONINASOLID
GoverningDierenPalEquaPon:
WithQ=1for0<x<L/2&Q=0forL/2<x<L
B.C.:T=0x=0
T=0x=L
a) TrialSoluPon:
b) B.C.:SaPsed
c) Residual:
d) Minimizetheresidual
R(x)=0??????
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
METHODOFWEIGHTEDRESIDUAL(MWR) 9

Residualmadezeroinanaveragesense
Weightedaverageofresidualiszero

TrialSoluPon=Cifiwherefisareknown
WjarearbitrarynonzerointegrablefuncPons
SelectasmanyweighPngfuncPonstogetenough
equaPons
ExactsoluPonsaPseseachandeveryweight.

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
10
METHODOFWEIGHTEDRESIDUAL
Colloca&onMethod
DiracDeltaweightfuncPons
Wj=(xxj)
R(xj)=0
Residualmadezeroatnitenumberofpoints
OrthogonalCollocaPon
SubdomainMethod
Domaindividedintosubdomain
Wj=1in
=0elsewhere

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
11
METHODOFWEIGHTEDRESIDUAL
LeastSquaresMethod
Wj=

ImpliesminimizingwithrespecttoCi

MethodofMoments
Wj=1,x,x2,x3..

i.e.

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
12
METHODOFWEIGHTEDRESIDUAL
GalerkinsMethod

WeighPngfuncPonsdonothaveanyconstraint(degreewise)
Wj=fjwherefjsarethetrialfuncPon

Residualmadezeroby
makingorthogonaltothetrialfuncPons

E.g.:W1=W2=

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
13
METHODOFWEIGHTEDRESIDUAL
Subdomain:Integral
oftheresidualinthe
subdomainmade
zero
PointColloca6on:
Residualmadezeroat
par6cularpoints
Galerkins:Residual
madeorthogonalto
completeset

Figure2:SoluPonofD.E.withdierentM.W.R.(ZienkiewiczO.C.,TaylorR.L.)

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
14
GALERKINSMETHOD
DISADVANTAGES
DicultyinchoosingthetrialfuncPons
SelecPonoftrialfuncPonswhengeometryiscomplex
HighcomputaPonPme

CANBEOVERCOMEBYUSINGWEAKFORMANDFEM

DierenPabilityofsoluPonloweredusingweakform
NeedtosaPsfytheessenPalboundarycondiPons
SystemaPcderivaPonofapproximaPonfuncPons

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
15
ANEXAMPLE:
GoverningEquaPon:

Wherea(x)=1+x
g(x)=1+4x
BoundaryCondiPons:u(0)=0
u(1)=0

WeightedResidual:

WeakForm:

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
16
PIECEWISECONTINUOUSTRIALFUNCTIONS
a) TrialSoluPon
1)DiscrePzingthedomainintoelements
Divide0toLintoNparts
Chart1:VariaPonofshapefuncPonsindomain
1

0,8
ShapeFuncPon

0,6 W1
W2
W3
0,4
W4
W5
0,2 W6

0
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1

Domain
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
17
PIECEWISECONTINUOUSTRIALFUNCTIONS
2)ApproximaPonoveranelement

UsingLineartrialfuncPons

Foranyelemente

,areshapefuncPons

ShapefuncPonsareconPnuous,linearlyindependent

SoluPonconPnuityatsubdomainendpointsguaranteed

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
18
PIECEWISECONTINUOUSTRIALFUNCTIONS
b)Applyingtheweakformattheethelement
EquaPonswithweightfuncPonsWeandWe+1wouldbenonzero
WritetheequaPonsinformof[k]{F}={c}
[k]knownastheelementmatrix,symmetricinnature

c)AssemblyofelementequaPons
Combinealltheelementmatrices
Finalform[A]{F}={b}
[A]:sPnessmatrix,sparsematrix
{F}:displacementvector
{b}:forcevector

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
19
PIECEWISECONTINUOUSTRIALFUNCTIONS

SoluPonobtainedusinglineartrialfuncPons
Toimproveaccuracyincreaseno.ofelements.

Figure3:SoluPonusingpiece
wiseconPnuoustrialfuncPon
(ReddyJ.N.)

x
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
20
PIECEWISECONTINUOUSTRIALFUNCTIONS
DerivaPvesofsoluPonareimportant
InformaPonaboutphysicalvariablesofinterest:heatux,stress

Figure4:DerivaPveofthe
soluPon(ReddyJ.N.)

SoluPoncanbeimprovedusingmoreno.ofelementsor
higherordertrialfuncPons
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
21
NATURALCOORDINATES
Coordinatesystemtransformedfromglobal(x)
tolocal()
Originatcentreofelement
1atle{endnodeand1atrightendnode

Convenientin
ConstrucPngInterpolaPon/ShapefuncPon
NumericalIntegraPon
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
22
INTERPOLATIONFUNCTIONS

DependsonGeometry&NumberofNodes
Independentoftheproblem
HavefollowingproperPes

i.

ii.

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
23
INTERPOLATIONFUNCTIONS

Numberofnodes=n
=NumberoffuncPons

OrderoffuncPon:n1

InterpolaPonfuncPonfornodei:

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
24
NUMERICALINTEGRATION
NewtonCotesQuadrature

Evaluatedatn+1equispacedpoints
nthorderpolynomialevaluatedexactlybychoosingn+1points
TrapezoidalRule
n=1

SimpsonsRule
n=2

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
25
NUMERICALINTEGRATION

GaussLegendreQuadrature

Evaluatesnthorderpolynomialexactlyat(n+1)/2points

RequireslesserbasepointsascomparedtoNewtoncotes
forsameaccuracy.

WhereiaretherootsofLegendrepolynomialPn+1()

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
26
VARIATIONALPRINCIPLES
MinimumPotenPalEnergy,LeastEnergyDissipaPon

TotalPotenPalEnergy(I)staPonarywithrespecttoanysmalldisplacements
(statevariable{u})
uforwhichIisstaPonaryissoluPon
i.e.I=0foreveryu

FormulPpledegreefreedomsystemgiveniaredisplacements

fori=1,2,3n

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
STRINGPROBLEM 27

EnergyEquaPon(VariaPon)=ForceEquilibriumEquaPon(D.E.)
Figure5:Stretchingof
stringunderconstant
force

ForceEquilibrium:
EnergyConcept:
StrainEnergy:
PotenPalEnergy:
TotalEnergy:

MinimizeI

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
28
VARIATIONALPRINCIPLES

ForxedxvalueofuwhichminimizesI(u)

ForutobesoluPonIshouldbezero

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
29
VARIATIONALPRINCIPLES
I=0isvalidforeveryu

BoundaryCondiPons:

E.B.C.
NaturalB.C.

EulerLagrangeEquaPon

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
30
VARIATIONALPRINCIPLES

EulerLagrangeEquaPon:

WeakForm:

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
31
VARIATIONALPRINCIPLES

WHENAVARIATIONALPRINCIPLE
EXIST,
MWRANDVARIATIONAL
APPROACHARETHESAME
BOTHBOILDOWNTOTHESAME
WEAKFORMOFEQUATION
FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
32
RAYLEIGHRITZMETHOD

AssumeatrialsoluPon
SaPsfytheEssenPalBoundaryCondiPons
EvaluatethetotalpotenPalwiththetrialsoluPon

SetupequaPonsby=0fori=1,2,3N
(VariaPonindisplacementisduetochangeincoecients)

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
33
SUMMARYANDCONCLUSIONS
FEMapproximatesthesoluPonusingdiscrete
elementsandfuncPons.

GalerkinsMethodonFiniteElementusestheweak
formulaPontogeneratesetofalgebraicequaPons.

EasilyprogrammableusinginterpolaPonfuncPons
andnumericalintegraPon.

VariaPonalMethodsmakesthefuncPonalstaPonary
withrespecttothedependentvariable.

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
34

REFERENCES
FiniteElementMethodZienkiewiczO.C.,
TaylorR.L.,1989
ThemethodofweightedResidualsand
VariaPonalPrinciples,FinlaysonB.A.,1972
IntroducPontoniteelementMethod,
ReddyJ.N.

FUNDAMENTALSOFFINITEELEMENTMETHOD:VariaPonalandWeightedResidualapproaches
AmitAgrawal,IITBombayWinterAcademy2008,IITMadras
35

QUESTIONS
???

You might also like