Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 46 views

    MTH 252 Section 5.2 Exercise 48: Justin Drawbert June 30, 2010

    Uploaded by

    Justin Drawbert
    MTH 252 Section 5.2 Exercise 48 Justin Drawbert June 30, 2010 In James Stewart’s Calculus: Concepts and Contexts, 4th Edition, Section 5.2, Exercise 48, we x are asked to consider the function F (x) = 2 f (t)dt, for which we are given the graph for f . We are then asked whether F is larger at F (0), F (1), F (2), F (3), or F (4). This is pretty straight forward. The fact that F (x) = 2 f (t)dt tells us that F (x) isn’t defined until f (2), so we need not consider F (0) or F (1). We next notice t

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike (BY-NC-SA)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    MTH 252 Section 5.2 Exercise 48: Justin Drawbert June 30, 2010

    Uploaded by

    Justin Drawbert
    46 views1 page
    MTH 252 Section 5.2 Exercise 48 Justin Drawbert June 30, 2010 In James Stewart’s Calculus: Concepts and Contexts, 4th Edition, Section 5.2, Exercise 48, we x are asked to consider the function F (x) = 2 f (t)dt, for which we are given the graph for f . We are then asked whether F is larger at F (0), F (1), F (2), F (3), or F (4). This is pretty straight forward. The fact that F (x) = 2 f (t)dt tells us that F (x) isn’t defined until f (2), so we need not consider F (0) or F (1). We next notice t

    Original Title

    5.2 ex 48

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike (BY-NC-SA)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    MTH 252 Section 5.2 Exercise 48 Justin Drawbert June 30, 2010 In James Stewart’s Calculus: Concepts and Contexts, 4th Edition, Section 5.2, Exercise 48, we x are asked to consider the function F (x) = 2 f (t)dt, for which we are given the graph for f . We are then asked whether F is larger at F (0), F (1), F (2), F (3), or F (4). This is pretty straight forward. The fact that F (x) = 2 f (t)dt tells us that F (x) isn’t defined until f (2), so we need not consider F (0) or F (1). We next notice t

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike (BY-NC-SA)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    46 views1 page

    MTH 252 Section 5.2 Exercise 48: Justin Drawbert June 30, 2010

    Uploaded by

    Justin Drawbert
    MTH 252 Section 5.2 Exercise 48 Justin Drawbert June 30, 2010 In James Stewart’s Calculus: Concepts and Contexts, 4th Edition, Section 5.2, Exercise 48, we x are asked to consider the function F (x) = 2 f (t)dt, for which we are given the graph for f . We are then asked whether F is larger at F (0), F (1), F (2), F (3), or F (4). This is pretty straight forward. The fact that F (x) = 2 f (t)dt tells us that F (x) isn’t defined until f (2), so we need not consider F (0) or F (1). We next notice t

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike (BY-NC-SA)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    MTH 252

    Section 5.2
    Exercise 48
    Justin Drawbert
    June 30, 2010

    In James Stewart’s Calculus: Concepts andR x Contexts, 4th Edition, Section 5.2, Exercise 48, we
    are asked to consider the function F (x) = 2 f (t)dt, for which we are given the graph for f . We
    are then asked whether F is larger at F (0), F (1), F (2), F (3), or F (4).

    Rx
    This is pretty straight forward. The fact that F (x) = 2 f (t)dt tells us that F (x) isn’t defined
    until f (2), so we need not consider F (0) or F (1). We next notice that f is negative over (2, 5), thus
    F is decreasing over (2, 5). So F must be largest at F (2). That’s all there is to it.

    You might also like