Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Genre Analysis
Genre Analysis
Genre Analysis
Introduction
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, this quote from the constitution is
what artists from the Metal genre of music and fans were basing their fight against censorship
on. The content of the lyrics, cover artwork, videos, and concert performances in the Metal genre
has been a hot topic with perceived references to Satanism, sadomasochism, suicide, rape,
sexism, and murder, among any other ideals one may get from their own interpretations. This
was especially true during the 1980s with the Satanic Panic. The typography VH1 article 6.66
Hot Points of the 80s Heavy Metal Satanic Panic by Mike McPadden gives a brief explanation
on various events that contributed to the involvement of Metal music in the Satanic Panic and
some of the songs and artists that followed along. The iconography video Dee Sniders PMRC
Senate Hearing Speech (Full) uploaded by Douglas Stewart is an outsourced video from the
previous article that showed the testimony of Dee Snider, the singer of Twisted Sister, and his
thoughts on the PMRC, Parents Music Resource Center, and the calling out of his songs Under
the Knife and Were Not Going to Take it by placing it on their list of The Filthy Fifteen and the
want to label music as explicit under the determination of the PMRC. The iconography was the
most effective source of obtaining understanding of the want to censor specific music of Metal
The article, 6.66 Hot Points of the 80s Heavy Metal Satanic Panic, was structured very
differently than what is common for an article, it was written in list organization. Being in the
form of a list it helps the reader understand the information much easier by there being a clear
separation of the different events that occurred and allowing easy access to look at the different
Running Head: BANNING METAL MUSIC 3
points and see how they all relate to each other by being able to look back at each one. It gave
6.66 Hot Points that helped to explain some events that occurred during the Satanic Panic.
Each point has an accompanying video that gives greater understanding from the description of
the background. The points included are PMRC hearings, an NBC special by Geraldo Rivera
named Devil Worship: Exposing Satans Underground, Judas Priests backward message trial,
Richard Ramirez, aka the Night Stalker, the Ricky Kasso Say you love Satan murder, the
Mazes and Monsters TV movie, and satanic messages in the Mr. Ed Theme song. Some of the
links provided have been taken down, so the reader must then find them on their own. But
because it is an online article this can be done easily and one is able to find more information
quickly by searching the titles of each point in any search engine if one wanted to.
The video, Dee Sniders PMRC Senate Hearing Speech (Full), began by Dee Snider
going to a Senate hearing and giving a testimony on his thoughts about PMRCs demands and
how they affect him personally by giving his thoughts of being a musician and a father. After his
testimony he then gets questioned by different senators based on his testimony and different
court rulings. He then answers the questions by referring back to his original testimony and
giving deeper insight into his answers. With this being a hearing the viewer can easily see how
both sides are reacting to the same topics. They are also able to see how musicians are affected
on a personal, not just an economical, level. Because this is a video it is limited to how the
viewer may interact with this genre compared to the article. But that inhibition is unimportant as
The articles intended audience is people who read VH1 articles or watch VH1, fans of
the metal genre, or researchers of the Satanic Panic that want to be informed. Before readers get
Running Head: BANNING METAL MUSIC 4
the article they have an idea about what the Satanic Panic is. They will also go into it knowing
what type of content the Metal genre contains, such as its themes of sexuality and Satanism. But
they will be wondering what court cases caused Metal to be a target and how did people make
that determination. With the article having 6.66 points and having related videos a reader
should be prepared to take around an hour and thirty minutes, or more, inspecting everything.
The language of the article in formal when the author gives the explanation of each circumstance
with specialized vocabulary of band names and song lyrics, such as, Tipper Gores record-
labeling political group the Parents Music Resource Center immediately targeted AC/DC, and
several venues cancelled the bands concerts, but very informal when he gives his opinion on
what the Metal genre was treated, as evidenced by He probably sold more top hats that night
than won over souls to the dark lord, but either way, the whole thing was entertaining as Hell.
Meanwhile in the video the intended audience is that of people who are studying court
cases, and studying PMRC or the hearings, and the fans of Dee Snider. People going into the
research know that there is an explicit label on music today, and they will be wanting to know
what were the reasons behind it. They may also know about the PMRC, and would like to
understand how the different musicians affected by them reacted. Because of this it can be said
that the audience of the video will be more enlightened in the sense of knowing the law,
compared to the audience of the article. The time with this genre will be the length of the video,
which is thirty minutes and twenty-nine seconds. Although this is just one musicians testimony
and there are various others if a viewer would like to research more. The purpose of publishing
the video is to inform the audience about this hearing, while Dee Snider is trying to persuade the
senators and the public to change the ruling of putting a label on explicit music based on the
PMRCs ideas on what explicative means. With this being in a court the language is very formal
Running Head: BANNING METAL MUSIC 5
by Dee Snider and the Senators. The specialized vocabulary is the PMRC demands from the law
that Snider points out and the lyrics from his songs. There are no language visuals like in the
Rhetorical Issues
The article can receive praise with its credibility by the publisher of the article being
VH1, which is a music company similar to MTV. The writer is also credible by him being an
author with a published book about metal, allowing the reader to know that he understands the
genre of Metal. There is also the telling of real court cases that are used in the article. The main
purpose of the article is to have the audience be intrigued by what caused the Satanic Panic and
be bewildered at the reasons behind why people found the Metal genre to be offensive. The
evidence used to support his claims are that of real court cases, videos and photos of the court
The video establishes its credibility by being a hearing at the Capitol and Dee Snider
being an accredited artist in the Metal genre. Snider attempts to bring sympathy and
understanding to the listeners by involving his personal life into his testimony. His evidence is
his personal claims and an explanation behind the true meaning of his song lyrics. This pathos
helps the viewer really connect to the video and connect with what Dee Snider is saying or what
Conclusion
Both articles attack the same topic with different strategic points on how to conquer the
audiences thoughts. The article uses various points to give a bigger picture on what occurred
during the Satanic Panic, while the video got personal by using one mans personal experience
Running Head: BANNING METAL MUSIC 6
with being targeted. At times less is more, and quality over quantity wins over when one speaks
References
6.66 Hot Points of the 80s Heavy Metal Satanic Panic. (2015, February 11). VH1. Retrieved
from http://www.vh1.com/news/54726/remembering-the-80s-heavy-metal-satanic-panic/
[Douglas Stewart]. (2012, May 4). Dee Sniders PMRC Senate Hearing Speech (Full). [Video
File]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/S0Vyr1TylTE