JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY

Volume 26, Number 8, 2016

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Pp. 727732
DOI: 10.1089/cap.2015.0147

The Relationship Between Plasma Cytokine Levels

and Response to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor
Treatment in Children and Adolescents with Depression
and/or Anxiety Disorders

Maya Amitai, MD,1,2,3 Michal Taler, PhD,2,4 Miri Carmel, PhD,2,4 Elena Michaelovsky, PhD,2,4
Tamar Eilat, MA,1 Maya Yablonski, MA,5 Naama Orpaz, MD,6 Alon Chen, PhD,3,7
Alan Apter, MD,1,2 Abraham Weizman, MD,2,4.8 and Silvana Fennig, MD1,2

Abstract
Objective: In adults there is growing evidence that antidepressant (AD) treatment results in a decline in inflammatory
cytokines. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of the relationship between response to selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitor (SSRI) treatment for anxiety and/or depression and cytokine levels in children and adolescents.
Methods: Forty-one patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) criteria for
major depressive disorder (MDD) or anxiety disorders participated in study. Their ages ranged from 9 to 18 (14.12 2.30)
years. The patients were treated with fluoxetine for 8 weeks. Plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a,
interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1b were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) before and after fluoxetine
treatment. Clinical response was measured with several scales, including the Childrens Depression Rating ScaleRevised
(CDRS-R), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED)
Results: The overall response rate was 56%. Antidepressant treatment significantly reduced TNF-a levels ( p = 0.037), with no
significant changes in the levels of IL-6 and IL-1b. All three proinflammatory cytokines were significantly ( p < 0.05) higher in
SSRI-refractory than in SSRI-responsive patients.
Conclusions: Higher levels of TNF-a, IL-6, and IL-1b might predict nonresponse to fluoxetine treatment in children.

Keywords: children and adolescent, SSRI, cytokines, depression, anxiety

Introduction orders, especially depression (Dantzer et al. 2008; Miller et al.

2009; Kim et al. 2014; Rosenblat et al. 2014). In adults, accumu-

A ffective and anxiety disorders are among the most

common childhood psychiatric disorders (Ipser et al. 2009;
Mills et al. 2013). Despite the high percentage of these debilitating
lating evidence suggests that major depressive disorder (MDD)
may be associated with immune system dysregulation (Miller et al.
2009; Kim et al. 2014). There are a limited number of studies on the
disorders, their pathogenesis is incompletely understood. Selective association between inflammatory processes and neuropsychiatric
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are generally considered first- disorders in children and adolescents, with the highest correlation
line treatment for both depression and anxiety in this age group. demonstrated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (Mitchell and
However, it has been reported that 3040% of all patients who Goldstein 2014). Previous studies investigating inflammatory ab-
receive a sufficient dose and duration of treatment fail to respond normalities related to depression and anxiety in this special popu-
(Maalouf and Brent 2012). Currently there is no way of knowing in lation have yielded conflicting and inconclusive results (Mills et al.
advance which of the patients will respond. This means that many 2013; Kim et al. 2014).
young people are being exposed to an agent that will not be useful There is growing evidence that antidepressant (AD) treatment
and may have serious adverse events. may influence the production of pro-and anti-inflammatory cyto-
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the kines. Recent findings in adult patients indicate that there may be
relationship between inflammatory processes and psychiatric dis- attenuation/normalization of overactive inflammatory processes
1
Department of Psychological Medicine, Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel.
2
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
3
The Ruhman Family Laboratory for Research on the Neurobiology of Stress, Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
4
Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
5
The Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
6
Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tikva, Israel.
7
Department of Stress Neurobiology and Neurogenetics, Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
8
Research Unit, Geha Mental Health Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.

727
728 AMITAI ET AL.

following AD treatment (Miller et al. 2009; Hannestad et al. 2011; Cytokine analysis
Hodes et al. 2015). To date, reports regarding the effects of SSRIs
Blood samples were collected from all subjects prior to starting
on cytokine levels are inconsistent in adults, and do not exist in the
treatment and after 8 weeks of fluoxetine treatment. From each
pediatric population.
participant in the research, blood samples were collected between 9
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether
a.m. and 11 a.m. and plasma was separated for determination of
plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines can predict response to
tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1b.
treatment and/or altered after fluoxetine treatment in children and
Measurements of the cytokines for all participants were conducted
adolescents with depression and/or anxiety disorders. Our hy-
in duplicate by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA)
potheses, based on adult literature, were that fluoxetine will dem-
in the same run, to avoid interassay variability. All cytokines
onstrate anti-inflammatory properties as reflected by a decrease in
were assessed with a sandwich ELISA based on a monoclonal-
proinflammatory cytokines, and that such effect will be associated
monoclonal antibody pair and a biotin-streptavidin amplification
with a favorable treatment response. Moreover, we hypothesized
system (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Los Angeles,
that depressed and anxious patients with increased inflammatory
CA), following the manufacturers protocol. The laboratory staff
cytokines will exhibit treatment resistance.
was blinded to the clinical data, and the clinician team was blinded
to the laboratory data.
Methods
Study design Statistics

Our inclusion criteria included: Age between 7 and 18 years,
and a diagnosis of major depression or anxiety disorder according
to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th
ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) (American Psychiatric Asso-
ciation 2000). Anxiety disorders included generalized anxiety
disorder (GAD), separation anxiety disorder (SAD), social anxi-
ety disorder, panic disorder (PD), and specific phobia (SP). The
diagnosis of major depression or anxiety disorder had to be of at
least moderate severity, with a Clinical Global Impressions
Severity (GCI-S) score of 4 (a level consistent with accepted
guidelines for the use of antidepressants in children and adoles-
cents) (Bernstein and Shaw 1997; Birmaher et al. 1998). Exclu-
sion criteria included mental retardation, organic brain syndrome,
ASD, history of hypomania or mania, psychosis, eating disorder,
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use. Subjects
with a major neurological disorder or a major medical illness were
excluded. We included treatment-nave subjects because the
likelihood of response declines with the number of previous
treatment trials.
Paired t test, MannWhitney test, and general linear model with
repeated measures were used as appropriate. Associations between
laboratory values and demographic and clinical variables were an-
alyzed using Spearman correlation or v2 test, as appropriate. The
level of significance was set at 5%. All analyses were two tailed. All
results are expressed as mean SD. The Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences was used to create a database and perform the sta-
tistical analyses (SPPS, version 17 for Windows Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
Subjects
Forty-one subjects (22 [54%] males and 19 [46%] females, age
14.12 2.30 years) were included in the analysis. Of the 41 sub-
jects, 24 (59%) had a diagnosis of MDD. The other 17 (41%) had a
diagnosis of anxiety disorder (GAD [n = 13], social anxiety disorder
[n = 6], PD [n = 6], SAD [n = 8], SP [n = 11]; some of the subjects
had more than one anxiety disorder). Nine (22%) had a combined
diagnosis of depressive disorder and anxiety disorder.

Evaluation Table 1. Comparison of Demographic/Clinical Variables

of Responders and Nonresponders to Fluoxetine
Subjects were assessed at intake, and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks.
Diagnostic evaluation was conducted using the Hebrew version p value
of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for (v2, t test or
School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL) Responders Nonresponders MannWhitney
(Kaufman et al. 1997; Shanee et al. 1997). Overall clinical Characteristics (n = 23) (n = 18) test)
severity and improvement were assessed using the CGI-S and Gender (male) 14 (61%) 8 (44%) v2 = 1.10
CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) subscales, respectively (Guy 1976). p = 0.30
Continuous measures of depression and anxiety were obtained Age (years) 13.70 2.43 14.67 2.20 p = 0.17
using the Childrens Depression Rating ScaleRevised (CDRS-R) BMI (kg/m2) 21.10 4.14 21.37 4.07 p = 0.90
(Poznanski et al. 1984), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
DSM-IV-TR diagnosis (n)
(Smucker et al. 1986), and the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Anxiety 9 (39%) 8 (44%) v2 = 7.74
Emotional Disorders (SCARED) (Birmaher et al. 1997, 1999). Depression 12 (52%) 3 (17%) p = 0.02
Comorbid 2 (9%) 7 (39%)
Procedure CGI-S 5.22 0.39 5.00 0.69 p = 0.24
The study was approved by the Schneider Childrens Hospital BDI 16.80 8.28 20.33 11.50 p = 0.39
Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained by CDRS-R 59.17 20.63 55.06 20.10 p = 0.49
the subjects and their parents. After a confirmatory diagnostic as- SCARED 26.90 10.19 33.61 14.26 p = 0.14
sessment, all subjects received fluoxetine. Starting dosage for all
patients was 10 mg/day for 1 week, which then was increased to BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BMI, body mass index; CDRS-R,
Childrens Depression Rating Scale Revised; CGI, Clinical Global
20 mg/day through week 4. If the degree of improvement was Impressions Severity; Comorbid, depression and anxiety disorder; DSM-
minimal (CGI-I 3) then the dosage of fluoxetine was increased IV-TR, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., Text
from 20 to 40 mg/day on week 5. Revision; SCARED, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders.
CYTOKINES AND RESPONSE TO SSRIS IN CHILDREN 729

Table 2. Pre- and Posttreatment Cytokine Levels scores (see Table 1). Pretreatment cytokines were significantly
in the Whole Sample (n = 41) higher in the nonresponse groups in all the three cytokines mea-
sured (Table 3 and Fig. 1).
p value
Posttreatment cytokine levels remained higher in the nonre-
Pretreatment Posttreatment (paired t test)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD sponse group; however, this difference was significant only in

TNF-a (pg/mL) 5.58 6.51 3.55 3.07 t = 2.13

df = 40
p = 0.037
IL-6 (pg/mL) 0.35 0.17 0.31 0.12 t = 1.26
df = 40
p = NS
IL-1b (pg/mL) 0.62 0.34 0.76 1.08 t = -1.00
df = 37
p = NS

Boldface is statistically significant.

IL-1b, interleukin 1b ; IL-6, interleukin 6; TNF-a, tumor necrosis factor a.

Clinical response
Twenty-three subjects (56%) received a rating of very much
improved or much improved on the CGI-I, and were identified
as responders. The demographic and clinical data of the responders
and nonresponders are shown in Table 1. Eight of the responders
were treated with a dose of 40 mg/day. The mean CDRS decreased
from 59.17 (SD = 20.63) to 34.93 (SD = 14.34) (paired t = 7.07,
df = 40, p < 0.0001), and mean BDI score decreased from 18.50
(SD = 9.85) to 10.10 (SD = 10.42) after the treatment period (paired
t = 6.10, df = 40, p < 0.0001). Mean SCARED score decreased from
29.83 (SD = 12.50) to 21.49 (SD = 15.61) after the treatment period
(paired t = 4.07, df = 40, p < 0.0001).

Cytokines
Levels of TNF-a significantly decreased following SSRI treat-
ment (paired t: 5.58 6.51 vs. 3.55 3.07, t = 2.13, df = 40,
p = 0.037). No significant differences were observed in the levels of
IL-6 and IL-1b (Table 2). No correlation was found between pre-
treatment cytokine levels and age, gender, diagnosis, or body mass
index (BMI) (data not shown). There was also no correlation be-
tween pretreatment cytokine levels and levels of anxiety or de-
pression as measured by the scales scores (data not shown).

Responders versus nonresponders

There were no significant difference in baseline characteristics,
including age ( p = 0.17), gender ( p = 0.30), and BMI ( p = 0.90)
between the responder and nonresponder groups. With regard to
diagnosis, a more favorable response rate was observed in the de-
pressed group than in the anxiety group (see Table 1). Also, no
significant difference was found regarding the pretreatment scales

Table 3. Pretreatment Cytokine Levels

in the Responders versus Nonresponders

p value
MannWhitney
Characteristics Responders Nonresponders test

TNF-a (pg/mL) 3.81 3.04 7.85 8.84 p = 0.04

IL-6 (pg/mL) 0.28 0.10 0.42 0.20 p = 0.006
IL-1b (pg/mL) 0.51 0.23 0.76 0.40 p = 0.007
FIG. 1. Pretreatment cytokine levels in the responders versus
Boldface is statistically significant. nonresponders: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a levels; Interleukin
IL-1b, interleukin 1b; IL-6, interleukin 6; TNF-a, tumor necrosis factor a. (IL)-6 levels; IL-1b levels. *p < 0.05.
730 AMITAI ET AL.

Table 4. Comparison of Responders and Nonresponders in the Alterations (D) of the Various
Variables Following Fluoxetine Treatment
p
Responders Nonresponders
p Time p p Time
Week 0 8 D 0 8 D effect Response by response

BDI 16.80 8.28 4.70 3.55 -12.11 8.09 20.33 11.50 17.00 12.23 -3.33 6.80 <0.001 0.005 0.001
CDRS-R 59.17 20.63 29.96 7.83 -29.22 18.80 55.06 20.10 41.28 18.11 -13.78 19.29 <0.001 0.43 0.01
SCARED 26.90 10.19 14.61 10.03 -12.26 10.19 33.61 14.26 30.28 17.24 -3.33 14.92 <0.001 0.003 0.02
TNF-a (pg/mL) 3.81 3.04 2.33 1.20 -1.48 3.02 7.85 8.84 5.10 3.97 -2.75 8.67 0.03 0.006 0.51
IL-6 (pg/mL) 0.28 0.10 0.28 0.13 -0.003 0.18 0.42 0.20 0.34 0.11 -0.8 0.20 0.16 0.003 0.20
IL-1b (pg/mL) 0.51 0.23 0.61 0.54 0.10 0.35 0.76 0.40 0.96 1.54 0.20 1.32 0.31 0.17 0.76

Boldface is statistically significant.

BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; CDRS-R, Childrens Depression Rating Scale Revised; IL-1b, interleukin 1b; IL-6, interleukin 6; SCARED,
Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders; TNF-a, tumor necrosis factor a.

TNF-a and IL-6 (Table 4). No significant difference in the changes
in cytokine levels before and after treatment was found between
responders and nonresponders to the fluoxetine treatment (see
Table 4).
Discussion
This is the first study demonstrating that SSRI therapy is asso-
ciated with cytokine changes in depressed and/or anxious children
and adolescents (n = 41). In this study, we excluded subjects with
medical conditions that can affect inflammatory pathways. We also
excluded subjects with a history of trauma, because of recent re-
ports on the modulatory effect of trauma on the immune system
(Bucker et al. 2015). Our main results demonstrate that after
8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine, the levels of the proin-
flammatory cytokine TNF-a significantly decreased, whereas there
was no significant change in the levels of IL-6 and IL-1b.
In adults, there is conflicting evidence regarding cytokine levels
after treatment with AD (Kim et al. 2014). Previous studies in MDD
in adults report that treatment with AD significantly reduced plasma
levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Eller et al (2008) suggested that
proinflammatory cytokines might induce depressive symptoms, and
that this increase may be attenuated by ADs (Eller et al. 2008). In
2009, Yoshimura et al showed that treatment with ADs significantly
reduced plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF-a. (Yoshimura et al. 2009).
However, in 2013, the same author suggested that pretreatment
plasma levels of IL-6 were significantly higher in the SSRI re-
sponders than in the nonresponders (Yoshimura et al. 2013). A meta-
analysis by Hannestad et al. (2011) showed that SSRIs may reduce
the levels of IL-6 and TNF-a (Hannestad et al. 2011). Another meta-
analysis showed a significant decrease in IL-6 after treatment (Hiles
et al. 2012). Therefore, our findings are in accord with the majority of
evidence in adults suggesting that treatment with SSRIs reduces
proinflammatory cytokine levels.
Another finding of our study was that patients with higher pre-
treatment cytokine levels failed to respond to treatment with SSRIs.
We found that all the levels of the three cytokines predicted treat-
ment response, but were significantly lower at baseline in responders
than in nonresponders (see Fig. 1). These results suggest that higher
cytokine levels are associated with refractoriness of depression and
anxiety to treatment, and that plasma proinflammatory cytokine
levels might be a predictor for response to SSRIs.
This finding is in accordance with other studies finding a similar
effect of ADs in depressed adults. Yoshimura et al (2009) found
that plasma IL-6 level, but not plasma TNF-a level, was higher in
SSRI-refractory than in SSRI-responsive depressed patients
(Yoshimura et al. 2009). OBrien et al. (2007) reported that pa-
tients with SSRI-resistant depression had significantly higher pro-
duction of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-a than did
normal controls, and assumed that suppression of proinflammatory
cytokine expression did not occur in depressed patients who failed
to respond to SSRIs, and is necessary for clinical remission and
recovery (OBrien et al. 2007). Eller et al. (2008) reported that a
higher level of TNF-a might predict a nonresponse to treatment
with escitalopram (Eller et al. 2008). However, other studies failed
to find such effect. The reason for the discrepancy between these
studies is unclear, and may be related to the numerous methodo-
logical dissimilarities among studies.
As mentioned, numerous studies in adults have suggested that
major depression is accompanied by immune dysregulation
(Dantzer et al. 2008; Dowlati et al. 2010). In children and adoles-
cents there are fewer studies but accumulating data indicate a re-
lationship between inflammatory markers and depression (Mills
et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2014). There are a number of reasons why
studies regarding the relationship between the immune system and
depression/anxiety disorders should be conducted in pediatric
populations. There may be differences in the neurobiology of ad-
olescent MDD and anxiety disorders compared with that in adults.
Increased understanding of the role of cytokines may lead to new
therapeutic targets with improved outcomes in pediatric MDD and
anxiety disorders. In adults, the relationship between depression
and inflammatory markers is confounded by obesity, smoking, and
other lifestyle factors that can have a strong effect on both de-
pressive/anxiety presentation and inflammatory response, factors
that are less common in children.
Although changes in cytokine levels following SSRI treatment
have not been studied in depressed children and adolescents, one
study found that unmedicated depressed adolescents have higher
IL-6 levels than medicated adolescents (Henje Blom et al. 2012).
Our study is the first, to our knowledge, to show the effect of SSRI
treatment on proinflammatory cytokine levels in children and ado-
lescents. As in adults, our findings suggest that fluoxetine appears to
have some suppressive activity on proinflammatory cytokine ex-
pression. Our results suggest that the role of cytokines in AD treat-
ment in youth is similar to that in adults. However, depression in
children and adolescents is associated with different immune and
inflammatory changes than those seen in adult depression, with
contradictory findings of natural killer (NK) cell activity, and dif-
ferences in proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1b and TNF-a
(Mills et al. 2013). An improved understanding of the role of
CYTOKINES AND RESPONSE TO SSRIS IN CHILDREN
cytokines in pediatric MDD and anxiety disorders and in response to
SSRI treatment may lead to a better understanding of the patho-
physiology and treatment options in depressed/anxious children and
adolescents.
Limitations
There were some limitations and weakness in this study. First
and foremost, our treatment group consisted of children and ado-
lescents with depression and/or anxiety disorders. Even though the
pharmacological treatment for these disorders is the same (usually
SSRIs), there might be different neurobiological mechanisms re-
sponsible for the different clinical phenotypes, which may con-
found our findings. Second, our study lacks a corresponding group
of control subjects, such as an untreated depressed/anxiety group
or a nondepressed/unanxious healthy cohort. Third, the sample
size was small and heterogeneous, which may have restricted
the statistical power and have the potential for a type I error. Fourth,
we lacked important information such as the length of the episode
and whether the episodes duration predicted response. Finally,
there are numerous other cytokines of interest that were not
investigated in our study (e.g., anti-inflammatory cytokines).
Therefore, further research is needed to test the preliminary results
achieved in this study.
However, the strength in our study lies in the fact the all the
subjects were drug nave, and treated with the same protocol.
Conclusions
Together, our data suggest that similarly to in adults, inflam-
matory processes may play a role in response to AD treatment in
children and adolescents. Our findings suggest that high levels of
TNF-a, IL-6, and IL-1b may be involved in the refractoriness to
treatment of anxiety and depression, and that plasma levels of these
proinflammatory cytokines might serve as biological markers for
prediction of response to SSRIs. Further research in larger samples
is needed to confirm our preliminary results.
Clinical Significance
Current best practice for AD treatment in depressed and anx-
ious children and adolescents involves trial and error, and it can
take months to identify an effective AD for the 3040% of chil-
dren and adolescents who do not respond to an initial AD. Iden-
tifying biomarkers to predict early response could be of high
impact on the treatment of depressed and anxious children and
adolescents. Our findings suggest that proinflammatory cytokines
may predict response to treatment with fluoxetine, and, therefore,
may serve as possible biomarkers that would be early predictors of
response and could help to maximize the benefitrisk ratio for the
use of SSRIs, and speed the matching of treatment to patient.
Currently, cytokine levels are not used as potential predictors of
response to antidepressants. Further research is warranted to ex-
plore the role of cytokines in the response of pediatric population
to SSRIs. One hopes that the expansion of the current state of
knowledge regarding the involvement of cytokines in the patho-
physiology and pharmacotherapy of pediatric depression will lead
to progression in the field, and eventually to the inclusion of
circulating cytokine levels as putative biomarkers of treatment
response.
Disclosures
No competing financial interests exist.
731
References
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision. Washington, DC:
American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
Bernstein GA Shaw K: Practice parameters for the assessment and
treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36(10 Suppl):69S84S, 1997.
Birmaher B, Brent D, Benson RS: Summary of the practice parameters for
the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with depressive
disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 37:12341238, 1998.
Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M:
Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related
Emotional Disorders (SCARED): A replication study. J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38:12301236, 1999.
Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent DA, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J,
Neer SM: The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional
Disorders (SCARED): Scale construction and psychometric
characteristics. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:545
553, 1997.
Bucker J, Fries GR, Kapczinski F, Post RM, Yatham LN, Vianna P,
Bogo Chies JA, Gama CS, Magalhaes PV, Aguiar BW, Pfaffen-
seller B, .KauerSantAnna M: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
and inflammatory markers in school-aged children with early
trauma. Acta Psychiatr Scand 131:360368, 2015.
Dantzer R, OConnor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW: From
inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system
subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:4656, 2008.
Dowlati Y, Herrmann N, Swardfager W, Liu H, Sham L, Reim EK,
Lanctot KL: A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression. Biol
Psychiatry 67:446457, 2010.
Eller T, Vasar V, Shlik J, Maron E: Pro-inflammatory cytokines and
treatment response to escitalopram in major depressive disorder.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32:445450, 2008.
Guy W: Clinical Global Improvement Scale. Assessment Manual of
Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental
Health; 1976.
Hannestad J, DellaGioia N, Bloch M: The effect of antidepressant
medication treatment on serum levels of inflammatory cytokines: A
meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:24522459, 2011.
Henje Blom E, Lekander M, Ingvar M, Asberg M, Mobarrez F, Ser-
lachius EE: Pro-inflammatory cytokines are elevated in adolescent
females with emotional disorders not treated with SSRIs. J Affect
Disord 136:716723, 2012.
Hiles SA, Baker AL, de Malmanche T, Attia, J: Interleukin-6, C-reactive
protein and interleukin-10 after antidepressant treatment in people
with depression: A meta-analysis. Psychol Med 42:20152026, 2012.
Ipser JC, Stein DJ, Hawkridge S, Hoppe L: Pharmacotherapy for
anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev:CD005170, 2009.
Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Wil-
liamson D, Ryan N: Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schi-
zophrenia for School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime Version
(K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child
Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980988, 1997.
Kim JW, Szigethy EM, Melhem NM, Saghafi EM, Brent DA: In-
flammatory markers and the pathogenesis of pediatric depression
and suicide: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Psychiatry
75:12421253, 2014.
Maalouf FT, Brent DA: Child and adolescent depression intervention
overview: What works, for whom and how well? Child Adolesc
Psychiatr Clin N Am 21:299312, 2012.
Miller AH, Maletic V, Raison CL: Inflammation and its discontents:
The role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression.
Biol Psychiatry 65:732741, 2009.
732
Mills NT, Scott JG, Wray NR, CohenWoods S, Baune BT: Research
review. The role of cytokines in depression in adolescents: A sys-
tematic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54:816835, 2013.
Mitchell RH, Goldstein BI: Inflammation in children and adolescents
with neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review. J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry 53:274296, 2014.
OBrien SM, Scully P, Fitzgerald P, Scott LV, Dinan TG: Plasma cytokine
profiles in depressed patients who fail to respond to selective serotonin
reuptake inhibitor therapy. J Psychiatr Res 41: 326331, 2007.
Poznanski EO, Grossman JA, Buchsbaum Y, Banegas M, Freeman L,
Gibbons R: Preliminary studies of the reliability and validity of the
childrens depression rating scale. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry
23:191197, 1984.
Rosenblat JD, Cha DS, Mansur RB, McIntyre RS: Inflamed moods:
a review of the interactions between inflammation and mood
disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 53:2334,
2014.
Shanee N, Apter A, Weizman A: Psychometric properties of the K-
SADS-PL in an Israeli adolescent clinical population. Isr J Psy-
chiatry Relat Sci 34:179186, 1997.
AMITAI ET AL.
Smucker MR, Craighead WE, Craighead LW, Green, BJ: Normative
and reliability data for the Childrens Depression Inventory. J
Abnorm Child Psychol 14:2539, 1986.
Yoshimura R, Hori H, IkenouchiSugita A, UmeneNakano W, Kat-
suki A, Atake K, Nakamura J: Plasma levels of interleukin-6 and
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor response in patients with major
depressive disorder. Hum Psychopharmacol 28:466470, 2013.
Yoshimura R, Hori H, IkenouchiSugita A, UmeneNakano W, Ueda
N, Nakamura J: Higher plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) level is asso-
ciated with SSRI- or SNRI-refractory depression. Prog Neu-
ropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33:722726, 2009.
Address correspondence to:
Maya Amitai, MD
Department of Psychological Medicine
Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel
Petach Tikva
Israel
E-mail: maya.amitai@weizmann.ac.il
This article has been cited by:

1. Zhewu Wang, M. Rita I. Young. 2016. PTSD, a Disorder with an Immunological Component. Frontiers in Immunology 7. .
[CrossRef]