SARBANES-OXLEY IMPLEMENTATION: A CASE STUDY

Melanie R. Stiggers, PricewaterhouseCoopers

Jeffrey E. Michelman & Bobby E. Waldrup, University of North Florida

Case Objectives and Use

The case exposes students to the impact of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Moreover, this objective should help students to gain a better understanding of the impact of
change on the profession of accounting/auditing and on the organizations that these functions
operate within. These concepts are extended by examining the importance of audit
documentation. This includes the overall concept of re-performance in audit work, as well as
the newly established requirements of PCAOB AS 3: Audit Documentation. Further, the case
deals with the role of mentors in a organization. This deals more specifically with a mentors
role in the efficient acclimation of new staff in an organization. Finally, the case addresses
several organizational behaviour issues. In particular, the need and ability to enact change in an
organization; written vs. oral Communication; managements role in facilitating organizational
change and communication. In addition, this would be a important time to discuss the impact of
SOX on non-covered organizations and the impact of rating agencies, state regulators and
boards of directors on internal control system development and compliance. This case can be
used to facilitate learning as well as supplement a test and in class discussions in an
undergraduate or graduate auditing or internal audit class.

Case Synopsis

Since its passing, no legislation has had a more profound impact on the business community in
the past seventy years than the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Criticized tremendously for its
significant requirements on an organization, this paper explores those requirements from the
trenches of an implementation effort. Additionally, it takes the perspective of an intern newly
inducted into an organization, and her efforts to navigate her matriculation through a 404
implementation.

The authors developed the case for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling
of the situation. The case, instructors manual, and synopsis were anonymously peer reviewed and accepted by the
North American Case Research Association (NACRA) for its annual meeting, October 27-29, 2005, North
Falmouth, MA. All rights are reserved to the authors and NACRA. 2005 Melanie R. Stiggers, Jeffrey E.
Michelman and Bobby E. Waldrup. Contact person: Jeffrey E. Michelman, Coggin College of Business, University
of North Florida, 4567 St. Johns Bluff Rd., Jacksonville, FL, 32224, 904-620-1541, jmichelm@unf.edu