http://bpmsg.

com AHP 05/13/2017

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (EVM multiple inputs)

K. D. Goepel Version 04.05.2016 Free web based AHP software on: http://bpmsg.com
Only input data in the light green fields and worksheets!
n= 2 Number of criteria (2 to 10) Scale: 1 AHP 1-9

N= 1 Number of Participants (1 to 20) : 0.1 Consensus: n/a

p= 0 selected Participant (0=consol.) 2 7 Consolidated

Objective

Author
Date Thresh: 1E-07 Iterations: 13 EVM check: 1.5E-07

Table Criterion Comment Weights Rk

1 Criterion 1 50.0% 1
2 Criterion 2 50.0% 1
3 Criterion 3 0.0%
4 Criterion 4 0.0%
5 Criterion 5 0.0%
6 Criterion 6 0.0%
7 Criterion 7 0.0%
8 Criterion 8 0.0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0.0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0.0%

Result Eigenvalue lambda: 1.999

Consistency Ratio 0.37 GCI: n/a CR: 0.1%
Criterion 1

Criterion 2

Criterion 3

Criterion 4

Criterion 5

Criterion 6

Criterion 7

Criterion 8

Matrix normalized
principal
Eigenvector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Criterion 1 1 1
- - - - - - - - 49.98%
Criterion 2 2 1
- - - - - - - - 49.98%
Criterion 3 3
- - - - - - - - - 0.01%
Criterion 4 4
- - - - - - - - - 0.01%
Criterion 5 5
- - - - - - - - - 0.01%
Criterion 6 6
- - - - - - - - - 0.01%
Criterion 7
7 - - - - - - - - - 0.01%
Criterion 8
8 - - - - - - - - - 0.01%

9 - - - - - - - - - 0.01%

10 - - - - - - - - - 0.01%

by K. Goepel 354836462.xlsx-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 1
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 1 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0

354836462.xlsx-In1
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 2
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 2 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In2
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 3
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 3 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In3
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 4
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 4 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In4
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 5
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 5 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In5
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 6
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 6 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In6
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 7
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 7 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In7
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 8
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 8 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In8
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 9
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 9 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In9
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 10
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 10 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In10
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 11
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 11 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In11
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 12
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 12 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In12
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 13
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 13 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In13
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 14
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 14 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In14
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 15
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 15 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In15
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 16
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 16 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In16
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 17
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 17 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In17
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 18
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 18 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In18
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 19
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 19 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In19
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 2 Input 20
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Criterion 1 50%
2 Criterion 2 50%
3 Criterion 3 ###
4 Criterion 4 ###
5 Criterion 5 ###
6 Criterion 6 ###
7 Criterion 7 ###
8 Criterion 8 ###
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the ###
10 question section ("+" in row 66) ###
Participant 20 1 : 0.1 CR: ### 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio Scale
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Criterion 1 Criterion 2 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 1 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 3 Criterion 3 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 2 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 4 Criterion 4 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 3 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 5 Criterion 5 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 4 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 6 Criterion 6 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 5 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 7 Criterion 7 ### Err:518 1.00
0 6 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 7 8 Criterion 8 ### Err:518 1.00
0 0
of
importanc
Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

3 Moderate importance Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance possible order of affirmation

2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

354836462.xlsx-In20
http://bpmsg.com AHP 05/13/2017
Multiple Input Sheet
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process
bpmsg.com Multiple Input Summary Sheet

1 = k number of participants
Consolidated = Weighted geometric mean off participants 2 = n number of criteria

C Consolidated 1 Participant 1 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 Participant 2 1 12/30/1899 3 Participant 3 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

4 Participant 4 1 12/30/1899 5 Participant 5 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 Participant 6 1 12/30/1899 7 Participant 7 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

8 Participant 8 1 12/30/1899 9 Participant 9 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

10 Participant 10 1 12/30/1899 11 Participant 11 1 12/30/1899

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

22 of 24 354836462.xlsx-multInp
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (10x10 Matrix) 2
Power Method (Dominant Eigenvalue)
Iterations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 010 12
1 1.00 1.00 - - - - - - - 0.20 -2.00
2 1.00 1.00 - - - - - - - 0.20 -2.00
3 - -
1.00 - - - - - - 0.10 -0.00
4 - - - 1.00 - - - - - 0.10 -0.00
5 - - - - 1.00 - - - - 0.10 -0.00
6 - - - - - 1.00 - - - 0.10 -0.00
7 - - - - - - 1.00 - - 0.10 -0.00
8 - - - - - - - 1.00 - 0.10 -0.00
9 - - - - - - - - 1.00 0.10 -0.00
10 - - - - - - - - - 0.101.000.00
Sum (col) 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scaling 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0.50 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.50 0.00
0.50 0.00
6.00 2.00
Normalization
0.50 0.50 - - - - - - - - 0.1667 0.49976
0.50 0.50 - - - - - - - - 0.1667 0.49976
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
- - - - - - - - - - 0.0833 6E-005
Eigenvalue: 1.99902
Check ### err: 1.0E-07 1E-007
1.999 Iterations: 1.3E+01 6E-008
1.999 check: 1E-007 6E-008
1.999 4E-009
I*I 1.999 4E-009
1.999 4E-009
1.999 4E-009
1.999 4E-009
1.999 4E-009
1.999 4E-009
1.999 4E-009

-1 1.00 - - - - - - - -
1.00 -1 - - - - - - - -
Convergence
- - -1 - - - - - - -
A-I*I - - - -1.00 - - - - - - 1.E-02
- - - - -1.00 - - - - -
1.E-04
- - - - - -1.00 - - - -
- - - - - - -1.00 - - - 1.E-06
- - - - - - - -1 - - 1.E-08
- - - - - - - - -1 -
1.E-10
- - - - - - - - - -1
1.E-12
(A-I*I)x 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 1.E-14
1.E-16
12

Iterations
http://bpmsg.com

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial

3.0 Singapore License.
(You need to give credit to the author)
To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/sg/
or send a letter to Creative Commons,
171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

Author: Klaus D. Goepel

http://bpmsg.com
Revisions
Date Comment
3/5/2012 1st draft based on AHPcalc vers 27.8.11 (single input);
allows input from max. 7 participants

11.12.2012 Algorithm of Power Method to solve Eigenvalue was modified

released (new sheet 8x8) resulting in much higher accuracy. By
default 12 iterations
08.02.2013
released final tests
2/19/2013 corrected formatting problem of weights in summary sheet
5/7/2013 Introduced weights for individual participants (weighted
geometric mean) in sheet multInp
Extend to 20 participants
12/24/2013 For the 3 most inconsistent judgments the ideal judgment
resulting in lowest inconsistency is displayed
5/9/2014 Change of check for convergence of power method
7/26/2014 corrected wrong ref in multInp (Matrix13)
4/9/2015 changed name of consol. Matrix from MatrixC to m_p0
CHOOSE in Summary sheet now p_sel+1 and m_p0 included
(IF cond removed)
changed the min of 3 to 2 criteria
6/7/2015 correction for 2 criteria: sheet 10x10 Cell M41 limit to 12
CGI in summary sheet to "n/a" for n=2, text (2 - 10)
5/4/2016 Corrected display of the selected scale in the summary sheet