Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article 78 Petition Under Duress
Article 78 Petition Under Duress
Article 78 Petition Under Duress
COUNSELORS:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE,that upon the annexed Petition of Michael Krichevsky, sui
juris, dated the 2"** day of December, 2016, and upon all the pleadings and proceedings
heretofore had herein, the undersigned will move this Court at a term thereof to be held at 45
Monroe Place, Brooklyn, New York, 11201,on the 20 day of March, 2016, at 9:30 o'clock in the
forenoon ofthat date, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard:
For an order and ajudgment pursuant to C.P.L.R. Article 78 for reliefs requested as
follows:
1 That the body or officer proceeded, is proceeding, or is about to proceed without or in
excess ofjurisdiction (prohibition).
2) Annulling the determination of Hearing Officers, John Fasone and fiction oflaw
MICHAEL MILSAP ofthe Kings County Family Court; on the ground that the body or officer
failed to perform a duty enjoined upon it by law (mandamus to compel)to determine jurisdiction,
and declaring this determination to be without jurisdiction, arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of
discretion due to bribery and covering up ofcorruption.
3)That a determination was made in violation of lawful procedure, was affected by an
error in law, contrary to established law and procedure, or was arbitrary and capricious or an
abuse of discretion, including an abuse of discretion as to the measure or mode of penalty or
discipline imposed (mandamus to review).
4) Whether determination made as a result ofa hearing held, and at which evidence was
taken, pursuant to direction by law is, on the entire record, supported by substantial evidence.
5)Declaratory relief pursuant to C.P.L.R. 3001 that Svenson does not deserve any
money from Krichevsky due to unclean hands; thatjudgments that she has are coram
nonjudice, and therefore she must return all payments as she did not suffer any loss, including
removing all judgments from Krichevsky's record.
6)And for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem just and proper
including referral to District Attorney for prosecution of Svenson's perjury, harassment, false
arrest and imprisonment.
This action is not on the trial calendar.
TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that all answering papers, if any, shall be served at least 20
days before the return date ofthis Petition. In case you failed to appear, the Judgment by default
will be taken against you for the relief demanded.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York
December 2,2016
V
Michael Krichcvsky,sui juris
4221 Atlantic Ave
Brooklyn, New York 11224
(718)687-2300
Judge Dean Kusakabe
Judge William Frank Perry
Judge Maria Arias
Judge Jeanette Ruiz
Judge Edwina Richardson-Mendelson
Support magistrate Michael Milsap
Support magistrate John Fasone
Clerk of court Robert Ratansky
Unknown clerks ofcourt
Kings County Family court
330 Jay Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Elena Svenson
2620 Ocean Pkwy, Apt. 3K
Brooklyn, NY 11224
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDUCIAL DEPARTMENT
Michael Krichevsky, sui juris, self-governed alive man under protest and duress; by
special appearance to challenge jurisdiction and authority of the State's run Family Court,
Attorney General, Judges and clerks; and acting under doctrine of necessity for self-defense says:
1. I am a live, physically disabled man,the Falsely Accused Claimant in the Appeal and
Article 78 action.
2. I make this affidavit in support of my petition under duress and no presumption exists
that I voluntarily submitted and consented to corporate jurisdiction ofTHE SATE OF NEW
3. The facts stated in this affidavit are within my first-hand knowledge, and if called on as a
INTRODUCTION
4. There is no other way to accuse a law-abiding man and caring father of wrongdoing, but
through creation of Theater of Absurdity, fabricating evidence and violating lawful procedure.
bribery, corruption, bias, and harassment; and without consent to any of its administrative
6. I am 61 years old, and per Federal ADA,disabled man. 1 became disabled in 2010 due to
stroke respondents caused me during harassment and their first failed attempt to jail me.
7. I am Falsely Accused victim in the within family court simulated, fictitious actions of
Barratry, Personage and Human Trafficking; and demand the STATE and its actors cease and
Federal Crimes of Treason and Misprision of Treason to the judge, as well as violations of Code
of Judicial Conduct and New York Rules of Professional Conduct to New York Tribunal per
numerous public fiduciaries, calling themselves court officers -support magistrates, court clerks,
judges and lawyers. It did not take me a long to realize that Svenson through her attorneys,
support magistrate John Fasone (Fasone)to extort money and railroad me for their profit.
10. What happened to me is systemic public corruption. The following events have happened
Gerald Garson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gerald Phillip "Gerry" Garson (born August 3, 1932)is a former New York Supreme Court
Justice who heard matrimonial divorce and child custody cases in Brooklyn.[5] He was
convicted in 2007 of accepting bribes to manipulate the outcomes of divorce
proceedings.[l][6][7] Garson was imprisoned from June 2007 until December 2009.[8] In the
bribery scheme, a "fixer" told people divorcing in Brooklyn that for a price he could steer their
case to a sympathetic judge.[9] After the fixer received a payment, he would refer the person to a
lawyer contact of his, who had given Garson drinks, meals, cigars, and cashaccepting(and
receiving) preferential treatment in retum.[9][10] The fixer and the lawyer would then bribe
court employees to override the court's computer system, which was programmed to ensure that
cases were assigned to judges randomly. Instead, they would have the case assigned to
Garson.[9][11] Garson, in turn, would then privately coach the lawyer. He would tell him
questions the lawyer should ask of witnesses in the case before Garson, and arguments that the
lawyer should make to Garson in court.[12][13] Garson would then rule in favor ofthe
lawyer.[12][13] Garson was indicted in 2003, on the basis of video surveillance of his judicial
chambers, and recordings made on a body wire worn by his "favored" lawyer. At his four week
trial in 2007, he was acquitted on four counts, but found guilty on one count of accepting bribes,
and on two lesser charges ofreceiving rewards for official misconduct.[6] He was sentenced in
June 2007 to three to ten years in prison. In December 2009, after 30 months in prison, he was
released for good behavior at the age of 77.[14]
The New York Times,commenting on Garson's conviction, observed:"It was news that
confirmed every sneaking suspicion, every paranoid fantasy of anyone who had ever felt
wronged in a divorce court."[15]
II. A year later, in Brooklyn Family Court, clerk(s) steered my case to magistrate John
Fasone, who in turn conspired with Yoram Nachimovsky, Esq. and Yonatan Levoritz, Esq. and
together repeated said crime ofcase fixing against me. I am too, not only feeling wronged by
family court actors, but was in 2010 and presently continue be systematically, physically
harassed and injured in this court and this state. In addition to the scheme described above, the
scheme that Respondents operated under and against me described in detail in the book "The
Chapter 31 on page 174 Professor relates,"In California, Judge Gregory Caskey was publicly
"I am considering summarily rejecting [opposing counsel's] requests. Do you want me to let
nm the risk [of] the [Court of Appeals] reversing? ... I say screw [the other party] and let's cut
[opposing counsel] off without hearing. O.K.? By the way, this message will self-destruct in five
seconds."
"Your Honor, I don't feel comfortable responding ex-parte [sic] on how you should rule on a
pending case."
12. I timely filed this Appeal and Petition in this court by RADl. Several clerks ofthis court
checked it on two occasions for any defects, filed it and therefore this appeal is timely.
13. Any respondent's claim ofstatute oflimitation run is false due to doctrine ofcontinuous
crime and injury and doctrine ofequitable tolling, since they are the ones who obstructed justice
14. This appeal is the direct attack on void judgments and orders, which every respondent
either illegally created, enforced or refused to review for validity, as 1 demanded from 2010-all
15. This court hasjurisdiction to determine validity of family court order of child support
16. 1 contend that this order was void as absurd and impossible to comply since it ordered me
to pay more than I was earning at that time or had available in cash - all without a hearing and
taking of evidence. It essentially ordered me 'to squeeze blood from the stone.'
17. It is also void due to the bribery and case fixing by magistrate John Fasone and attorney
Yonatan Levoritz.
18. This void order was set aside by Supervising judge Paula Hepner with orders to John
Fasone clearly telling what to do before starting a new trial. Since John Fasone in contempt of
Hepner's order refused to follow it, Fasone did not have authority to conduct a new trial,
19. 1 make this petition under duress, in self-defense and in fear for my life as my blood
pressure averages 95/150 after respondents overtly harassed me and collectively initiated false
arrest and imprisonment. These felonies continue until present by jailing me two times, by
unlawfully restricting my driver license, which in turn prevents me from leaving this state and
make a living somewhere else. As to the driver's license, I contend that I applied for it due to
fraud and deceit. I was led to believe that driver license is a safety issue challenging peoples'
mental and physical ability to navigate an automobile in order to protect public health and avoid
property damage. This state and its laws never disclosed to me that driver license is a trap, which
actually used to control and/or deny my inalienable rights to travel, make a living and pursue
happiness. As such, it is null and void for fraud in the inception and DMV laws unconstitutional
for this reason as well. I contend that no informed and voluntary nexus with this corporation
20. 1 contend that no jurisdiction existed, exists over me without due process, my voluntary
waiver or consent to participate infamily court's unlawful, kangaroo court procedure, which I
never made. To prove me wrong, 1 demand that the STATE finally enters evidence of
jurisdictional facts and elements on the record ofthis court or any other court.
21. Litigation Is War! Even though Svenson's lawyers had every stolen document they
needed for the child support proceedings, they failed to exhaust administrative remedy by failing
to verify by me Svenson's allegations and failing or attempting to settle with me out of court
22. Family Court Act(EGA)has a provision called 'Probation' to require meeting with me in
family court to settle or verify alleged controversy before letting a woman to start child support
foreclosure and condition precedent to litigation. In my case, probation never happened and
family court did not acquire jurisdiction according to its own statute by failing to meet condition
23. Instead, Nachimovsky and Svenson was allowed by the court's clerks to immediately file
false, frivolous actions and engage me in the harassment and abuse of process through vexatious
litigation, which consisted ofsimultaneously filing petitions for filiation, child support and order
of protection. Needles to say, that Nachimovsky, as attorney, knew about Probation and his duty
to follow family court's laws and procedures. Therefore, Nachimovsky and Svenson both knew
that Svenson's money given to him was actually bribe by Svenson for Nachimovsky to become a
mercenary to conduct a war against me. The evidence ofthis contention is the fact that they both
rejected my offer to mediate; and no attempt to resolve alleged controversies peacefully (out of
court) and/or lawfully was ever made and no court record of such attempt anywhere exists. This
refusal to attempt settle out ofcourt is acquiescence of their Guilt - not mine.
Family court started war against me per following legal maxim!"A mixed war is one which
is made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons." Black's
Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420
24. Let the State Attorney General Show Cause how and why this, fiction of law,corporation
THE STATE OF NEW YORK legally treats me,a live man with inalienable rights, as its chattel
and property. Why 1 have no rights and do not need to be treated with respect and due process.
unless Attorney General admits that family court actors commit felonies and admits to self-
25. Why Office of Attorney General systemically covers up family court's corruption instead
of prosecuting employees' felonies and removing them from the office? Are Attorney General's
26. Why acts of Office of Attorney General cover up corruption and are in conflict with
federal and constitutional law such as this eloquent explanation from United States v. Stewart,
"The officer may be sued only if he acts in excess of his statutory authority or in
violation ofthe Constitution for then he ceases to represent the Government."
27. Are felonies and intentional torts by state court actors are not acts in excess of their
28. This court has inherent jurisdiction over respondents in the interest of Justice to do Right
29. This court has inherent jurisdiction over respondents as a body admitting attomeys to
practice law in Second Department and as body policing attorney's misconduct that they
committed against me. As such, this court should revoke all respondents' licenses and
admissions to practice law in this state - or this court is failing to protect the public and joins
wrongdoers itself.
30. My legal research points to this court's Fiduciary Duties to provide remedy to the injured,
and by doing so, ability to convert any pleadings into any other form of pleading sua sponte in
the Interest ofJustice and under doctrine that substance trumps theform.
31. Family court's judiciary lost their integrity, obstructed justice and do not even pretend to
court employees with whom 1 had to deal within last 8 years of my Self Defense and Pursuit of
Justice. Obstruction ofjustice particularly in my case demonstrated in this affidavit even further
below.
32. I have a clear legal right to be left alone, to make a living and not be harassed by the
state; and to the relief requested as interested injured party whose rights violated and who is
prisoner ofthis state under color oflaw and color of office since 2008.
33. As taxpayer, I have a clear contractual and legal rights for protection by the state from
intentional torts and felonies committed by its agents. As such, state breached contractual and
fiduciary's duty to protect me from felonies ofits agents. State's law enforcement agencies are in
cahoots with family court's corruption and covering it up. The evidence to this charge is the
Corruption, together with my public testimony taken under oath, all ignored and the Governor
shut down Commission later. This is one more reason that State has no nexus and jurisdiction in
Rebuttal of false presumptions of court's regular due process, presumed correctness of the
denials,judgments or orders with implied "hearing held, evidence taken" with implied
"findings offact and conclusions of law"- all in violation of all five subsections of CPLR
7803
34. Respondents, overtly in concert, systemically harassed me and denied me rehearing and
review from 2008 until present- all in violation of their job description and ministerial duties to
perform.
35. This harassment, inter alia, manifested by kangaroo court's set up where every time 1
appeared in their court rooms in self defense, under duress and threat of arrest, I was surrounded
10
by 4-6 armed men getting ready to jump me while respondents would intentionally interrupt me,
irritate, switch the subject, etc.- all to prevent me from making a record for appeal and
documenting corruption.
36. None ofthe hearings where 1 was not a moving party conducted lawfully.
37. None ofthe hearings on my several petitions to modify and motions for relief went
through any kind offair hearing where I had an opportunity fully present my case to impartial
38. There are no findings of fact and conclusions oflaw, which is/are not intentionally false,
39. There is/are no findings of fact and conclusions of law, 1 could have taken on appeal and
in good faith and with straight face say,"the court erred ..." as I know it would be a perjury on
40. As such, I do not anymore believe in New York Justice System, CPLR,FCA and file this
petition imder duress, as in hostage situation with no expectation of getting any due process and
remedy, but to create a record ofexhausting administrative remedy and establish evidence of
corruption cover-up. My expectation of remedy and justice is on the borderline with miracle,
and, as one attorney told me,"an exercise in futility." Accordingly, no presumption that I
Bribery and fraud upon the court by officers of the court entirely divests family court of
jurisdiction
41. Respondents falsely claimed that 1 did not timely appeal their void orders, and therefore
these orders are valid since 2010-contrary to established precedent in Kamp v. Kamp,59 NY
212(1874)stating:
11
" that when the court is entirely without jurisdiction, "the whole proceeding,
including the order or judgment, is coram nonjudicc and void. One is not bound to
appeal from a void order or judgment, but may resist it, and assert its invalidity at all
times"[emphasis mine]
42. In addition, all these years 1 was guided by case law in Ross v. Eveready Ins. Co., 156
43. I asserted Fasone's order invalidity to him and to others countless times and nobody
nullity by silence.
44. Facts and dociunentary evidence I filed in family court demonstrate that respondents
never served me with February 3,2010 order. When 1 learned about it, 1 was unable to timely file
Objection and filed it only one day late. Notwithstanding the absurdity of this child support
order, violation of due process and Interest of Justice, Supervising judge Paula Hepner denied
review 'on procedural grounds' falsely creating presumption that family court followed lawful
procedure while I was not. This denial was not review on the merit and was absurd too. It
ignored the fact that I would be able to comply with Fasone's absurd order and knowingly set me
45. Thereafter, this court denied me poor person status on appeal where I planned to directly
attack validity ofthis order, while child support collection unit unlawfully seized my bank
account with my $150 in it- my last ditch of money to pay filing fees for an appeal.
12
46. During contempt proceeding against me,I claimed as my first line of defense against
harassment by contempt of court- the order is not lawful, and therefore void.
47. My second line of defense - the order was absurd and impossible to comply.
48. In reply, and to avoid my defenses and review on the merits, respondents falsely claimed
50. The bottom line, for almost 8 years, each ofthe respondents skillfully and corruptly
would find or create false excuses and/or engaged in overt judicial misconduct including felonies
to conspire and fabricate false affidavit(s) of service offinal order ofchild support on me- all to
plausibly avoid and deny knowledge of each other's corruption in present and future litigation.
51. This court has inherentjurisdiction and duty to police lower court's misconduct and
felonies of Respondents and over the claims brought pursuant to C.P.L.R. Article 78 and,
specifically, exclusive jurisdiction per C.P.L.R. Article 7804(g)- Where the substantial evidence
issue specified.
52. This appeal and petition is timely filed in this court on advise of licensed and employed
by New York State attorney from company called LIFT located in Kings County Family Court
"a proceeding against a justice ofthe Supreme Court or a judge of a county court...
shall be commenced in the appellate division of the judicial department where the
action, in the course of which the matter sought to be enforced or restrained originated,
is triable, unless the term ofthe appellate division in the department is not in session..."
[emphasis mine]
13
Can Petitioner trust the government who is in war with Petitioner?
53. On December 2,2016,1 came to this court to file instant petition and notarize my
affidavit supporting this petition. Upon looking up my case on the computer, clerk, Caterina
Madeffari, refused to notarize my affidavit and declared "1 am in the wrong court and should
54. When I asked why almost 2 years ago when I was filing my RADI and some supervising
clerk took considerable time for checking my filings, no one told me "I'm in the wrong court" so
that 1 could timely file this petition in the Supreme Court? She replied:"Now that you know
now, you cannot file it here"- admitting by acquiescence to obstruction ofJustice by this court's
55. Fact, this court's clerk(s) and attorney from LIFT are the state employees and actors.
They,therefore, are agents ofinterested in the negative for me outcome party to this case -THE
STATE OF NEW YORK. Now,it would appear that the attorney's advice and clerk's
my right for an appeal and unbiased tribunal. Who is responsible for attorney's malpractice, IF
ANY, now that I may lose my remedy? The same interested in the negative for me outcome -
56. There are numerous cases in New York and US Supreme Court holding that fraud and
deceit tolls the statute of limitation. If 1 indeed should have filed this petition in Kings County
Supreme Court, 1 was misled by intentionally, collective wrong state actors' advice and should
not be punished by withdrawal of remedy by appeal. Accordingly, if that is really the case, let
this court transfer or remand this appeal to Supreme Court with order tolling statute of limitation.
57. Alternatively arguing, even if, which is not admitted and stated only for the sake of
14
argument, I would have filed the instant petition in the Supreme Court in 2014-2015 - it would
have to be transferred back to Appellate Division per C.P.L.R. Article 7804(g):"Hearing and
determination; transfer to appellate division. Where the substantial evidence issue specified."
58. In my particular case, this petition came to Appellate Division by appeal, which
evidenced by my RADl form accepted by this court. If 1 would have filed this petition in
Supreme Court, it would have to be transferred to Appellate Division due to the fact that I
specify 'substantial evidence issue' in this petition's notice ^ 4. On the other hand, this court may
remit this proceeding if papers are insufficient to Supreme Court, which 1 contend are
insufficient. It appears to me that this court's clerks practice law without a license and try to lock
59. In conclusion, due to tolling of statute oflimitation, 1 would not care which court would
review this appeal as long as 1 would get unbiased, competent tribunal, which would not block
discovery and due process and in the end issue appealable findings of fact and conclusion oflaw,
60. This court hasjurisdiction over the claims for declaratory relief pursuant to C.P.L.R.
3001. Will this court declare right or wrong and do the right thing,thereby becoming
61. Will this court declare that orders and judgments offamily court are coram nonjudice ab
initio?
15
VENUE
62. This proceeding brought in the judiciary department where respondents' principal offices
PARTIES
gainfully employed while supporting his family from 1988 until 2010. He lost his federally
protected job due to bribery, corruption, conspiracy, criminal acts and torts committed by
STATE actors, officers ofthe court against his employer and him.
64. Judge Dean Kusakabe isjudge in part 16 of Kings County Family Court who conspired
with others to obstruct justice, refused and failed two times to perform a duty enjoined upon him
by law and issued fraudulent, void order (attached to RADI)to cover up corruption of his peers.
65. Judge William Frank Perry is judge in part 14 of Kings County Family Court who
conspired with others to obstructjustice, refused and failed two times to perform a duty enjoined
upon him by law and issued fraudulent, void order ofcommitment(attached to RADI)to cover
up corruption of his peers, harass and SLAP? Krichevsky for suing his peers.
66. Judge Maria Arias is judge in part 9 of Kings County Family Court who refused two
times perform her job, conspired with others to obstructjustice and failed to perform a duty
enjoined upon her by law and issued fraudulent, void order (attached to RADI)to cover up
67. Judge Jeanette Ruiz is Supervising Judge of Kings County Family Court who covered up
corruption of her peers and obstructed justice and failed two times to perform a duty enjoined
68. Support magistrate Michael Milsap is support magistrate in Kings County Family Court.
16
He was unlawfully appointed by Robert Ratansky to conspire with others to obstruct justice over
my petition to modify the child support amount and SLAPP me by contempt proceeding.
69. Support magistrate John Fasone is support magistrate in Kings County Family Court. He,
per circumstantial evidence, information and belief received a bribe from Nachimovsky and/or
Levoritz to fix the child support case against me,refused to recuse and refused to rule on my
motions and petitions. Thereafter, in contempt of higher court disobeyed LAWFULL ORDER
OF HIGHER COURT to issue findings offact and conclusions oflaw on my motions that he
ignored. He even disobeyed higher court's clear order to issue written denial on my motion to
71. Robert Ratansky and/or unknown clerks are clerks of Kings County Family Court. He
and/or other clerks collected bribes and steered my petitions, motions and objections to
72. Elena Svenson is other person whose action may be affected by a proceeding under this
article, CPLR 7802. She is ward of the Family Court, employee of THE STATE OF NEW
YORK and accomplice of all respondents who obstructed Justice to me and personally abused
73. This affidavit, if unrebutted point for point by each respondent will stand as Judgment
and admission of material facts."Assertions by affidavit... sufficient to make the prima facie
74. Above mentioned felonies and intentional torts started at the beginning of2008, when
17
while I was working 60- 80 hours a week at law office paralegal job, unemployed for life
Svenson,former girlfriend, was working hard at my home going through my personal tax
75. When she has stolen everything she needed to extort money from me,she, acting on
advice of her attorneys, quietly filed for an order of protection perjuriously claiming that she is
afraid of me. Immediately thereafter and before service oforder of protection, she attempted to
76. Upon information and belief, court employees directed her to avoid contact with places
and me where I could meet her and violate the order of protection.
77. Provoking violence has failed, but 1 was financially damaged when had to abandon my
apartment in order to avoid arrest by police when police came to arrest me, but missed me.
Thereafter, Nachimovsky withdrew her petition for order of protection as perjury before the
78. At the same time, Svenson brought stolen documents to her lawyers and filed for child
support.
79. Violating normal, court ordered discovery process where parties just exchange
documents and bills, having depositions, etc., another Svenson's attorney Yonatan Levoritz
refused to depose me and produce Svenson for deposition. Instead, he immediately started
broadcasting 16 non-party deposition subpoenas to every possible bank in New York and my
contractors who were doing renovation of my house - all in violation of Fasone's discovery
80. Because those were not information subpoenas, but deposition subpoenas, which my
18
attorney would have to attend - we knew that this was harassment and churning of Levoritz
81. Later on, I learned that order to conduct normal discovery was only made by Fasone to
bamboozle my attorney and me and 'to look pretty and unbiased' on the record as Levoritz, in
82. Additionally, Levoritz started demanding from me for the last 5 years the very same
documents that Svenson has stolen from me before litigation. Noticeably, Levoritz admitted on
the record that Svenson stole my documents. By demanding stolen documents and conveniently
'forgetting,' that they are stolen, Levoritz accused me in none-cooperation and hiding my assets.
If this is not attorney's misconduct and harassment in presence ofa member of Grievance
Committee,then 1 do not know what misconduct or harassment is. This boldness and fearless
83. In reply, on September 8,2009 my attorney filed an Order to Show Cause with TRO to
84. However, Fasone dismissed my attorney's OSC on February 3,2010 without a scheduled
hearing and no audio record of said hearing exists. So much for Fasone enforcing by contempt
his own order to Levoritz directing him conduct normal discovery and depose me first.
85. In Fasone's order of dismissal ofOSC he falsely wrote that there was a hearing.
87. 1 discovered it when I was checking the courts file in preparation for an appeal on or
88. Meanwhile, Svenson attempted extortion by blackmail using documents that she has
stolen from me, which is self evident from her blackmail note in my possession.
19
89. Fasone never gave me a chance to enter it into the evidence as well as other relevant,
material documents. In this note, Svenson writes in rusty Russian that she went to lawyers and
they told her that my employer and I doing money-laundering using law office - a felony charge
90. While I was waiting for decision on that OSC to continue normal discovery and
evidentiary hearing, Fasone scheduled a trial without any notice to parties. On February 3,2010,
Fasone convened a kangaroo court without parties present. Using above described by Professor
Lubet Judge's Trick, Fasone "screwed me by summarily cutting off the hearing on said OSC,my
discovery, evidentiary hearing and trial." After he created his void for fraud upon the court child
support order, he falsified the court's audio record by denying above said OSC and falsely
91. The audio record misleadingly created presumption that 1 was notified, but did not care to
show up. It stated,"...it's 10 minutes to five and no one is appearing..." Before 1 had a chance to
disobey Fasone's null and void order, on March 1,2010, child support collection unit seized all
92. The child support collection unit issued garnishment of my paycheck in the amount of
$3000 per month, while my gross check was $4000 per month.
93. Thereafter, in same 2010, Fasone and Levoritz started malicious prosecution against me
by accusing me to be in contempt of Fasone's child support order with the intent to incarcerate
me.
94. That order made me a slave by ordering to pay the child support collection unit more than
95. That order resulted in me being laid off due to harassment of my employer by the court
20
system and Svenson.
96. I was unable to comply with this order from day one, as it was absurd, and therefore null
and void on its face by operation of law. As such, I had perfect defense for non compliance and
97. After I lost my job in 2010,1 filed for unemployment insurance, which gave me a right to
a new trial and modify or annul said void order because my monthly payments became
substantially less and amounted to about $1600 gross per month, which further exposed the
98. To SLAPP (sensor, intimidate and silence) me for petition to modify, Fasone and
99. To avoid this obvious absurdity and lack of probable cause in my defenses, Fasone
falsely alleged on the audio record that petition for contempt states that I hide my assets.
100. Petition for contempt did not say anything about my hidden assets or that I "disobeyed
lawful order ofcourt" per Family Court Act(FCA),and therefore failed to state a claim because
101. My numerous motions for new trial were either ignored or denied by Fasone without a
hearing, written findings of fact and conclusions of law, or orders explaining the reason why.
102. Levoritz' and Fasone' persecution of me for unlawful and void order resulted in stroke to
me due to stress oflosing thejob, family, foreclosures and harassment by state actors. As direct
result, I became physically disabled and depressed. Until present, there is no recovery from
disability. My disability was largely untreated due to the lack of medical insurance and
103. That contempt petition was regretfully dismissed by Fasone due to the lack ofthe
21
evidence of hidden assets, which Levoritz never produced.
104. I conducted investigation of Levoritz' office and found by interviewing some people
that his paralegal and non-attorney partner, Viktor Katkalov, who is acting as runner and
steerer of cases, is spreading information in Russian community that they can fix cases in
their favor. I found that almost every case that they handled - handled by modus operandi
Grievance Committee.
105. I rebut presumption of correctness of Fasone's and other respondents' orders with
evidence oftheir conduct demonstrated by Exhibits and this affidavit that further demonstrate
106. In all court appearances where I tried to get a new fair trial, I was not allowed to make
an audio record for an appeal because Fasone would constantly interrupt me,talk over me and
switch subjects, all while four- six armed court officers intimidated me and were waiting to
jump me when I was trying to talk over Fasone "for the record."
107. This is why big portions of transcripts unclear or missing, which would impair appellate
108. When I asked why Fasone is interrupting me all the time, he replied,"because I can."
109. My petition to modify was denied by Fasone without a hearing or order with findings of
fact.
110. In 2011, Supervising Judge offamily court Paula Hepner finally set aside Fasone's void
order after I produced evidence that I was not served with February 3,2010 Fasone's order.
Hepner ordered Fasone to reply in writing to all motions that he ignored before; and set up a new
22
trial thereafter. Fasone refused to comply with her order and in contempt of it started new
trial, again without me present, and restored his void order with the same absurd amount
of child support.'* Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent
act.'* Trayner, Max.482. Maxims of Law,Black's Law Dictionary 9th Edition, page 1862
111. In Truax v. Corrigan, 257 US 312(1921), the court held,"the due process clause requires
that every man shall have the protection of his day in court and the benefit ofthe general law, a
law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds not arbitrary or capriciously but upon
inquiry and rendersjudgment only after trial so that every citizen shall hold his life, liberty,
property and immunities under the protection ofthe general rules which govern society.
Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 535. It, of course, tends to secure equality of law in the
sense that it makes a required minimum of protection for every one's right of life, liberty and
property, which the Congress or the legislature may not withhold. Our whole system of law is
predicated on the general, fundamental principle ofequality of application of the law."All men
are equal before the law,""This is a government oflaws and not of men,""No man is above the
law," are all maxims showing the spirit in which legislatures, executives and courts are expected
to make,execute and apply laws. But the framers and adopters ofthis Amendment were not
content to depend on a mere minimum secured by the due process clause, or upon the spirit of
equality, which might not be insisted on by local public opinion. They therefore embodied that
112. Accordingly, Fasone either did not have jurisdiction or have lost it due to the above-
113. "When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date, the
judge ofthe municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a judicial capacity;
23
courts administrating or enforcing statutes do not actjudicially, but merely ministerially....but
merely act as an extension as an agent for the involved agencybut only in a "ministerial" and
not a "discretionary capacity..." Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579, 583; Keller v. P.E., 261 US
114. When in 2012 Sandy disaster stroke, unemployment insurance terminated all payments to
me, which were $150 per week and kept me below federal poverty level. Before termination, my
favorite food store was "99c" at the corner of Avenue Z and Coney Island Avenue in Brooklyn.
115. My house was flooded and I became FEMA's client. They gave me a money grant and I
was physically working to restore my house using my car to buy materials and tools from Home
Depot. Precisely at that moment,support collection unit started harassing me with my driver
license suspension if I do not sign consentjudgment. 1 treated this act as their admission of
knowledge of nullity ofFasone's order and as acts of extortion, harassment and refused to sign.
116. During this period, I was a client of different charities and never asked for a dime from
corporate STATE OF NEW YORK welfare programs since the state was/is an interested party
against me - my enemy. THE STATE OF NEW YORK continues to be my enemy to this day
117. To preserve my right to modify my child support down to 0 or $25 per month, in the
beginning of2013,1 filed yet another petition under duress to modify. That petition required
Ratansky assign a judge because petition had issues of newly discovered fraud, child
emancipation by working full time, lack of visitation and child alienation by the mother.
However, once again, this petition was assigned to Fasone, who did not have authority to hear
118. In regards to fraud, I discovered from Svenson's bankruptcy court filings that she was
24
working in 2009, and therefore committed perjury in family court along with her attorney,
Levoritz, when they both testified on the record and by financial disclosure affidavit that
Svenson is unemployed and is looking for ajob. That alone gave me a right and Ratansky an
obligation to set a fair hearing by the Judge as per CPLR 5015 to void child support order on yet
another ground.
119. Once again, Ratansky assigned this case to Fasone, who SLAPP me on the audio record
by directing Svenson to go to family court clerk's office and file another petition for contempt.
120. Upon information and belief, some family court clerk(s) coached Svenson as to what to
allege in her contempt petition and concocted petition itself, which was not even notarized.
121. That petition contained peijurious statement that 1 willfully stopped child support
payments from 2013, when the record shows that I could never comply with this order due to
absurdity and did not make any payments myself. In addition, Svenson was on notice from my
petition to modify that unemployment insurance, and not me,terminated its payments to
Svenson.
122. Once again, contempt petition did not have FCA statutory prescribed statement that I
"disobeyed lawful order of court," and therefore was frivolous and did not state a claim.
123. By operation oflaw, absurd order cannot be lawful and every respondent knew it.
124. While Svenson's petition to hold me in contempt was pending, on July 17-18,2013,1
filed motion for Judicial notice and motion to hold Svenson in contempt ofcourt for perjury with
125. Yet, everything ended up at Fasone's part on July 19,2013 and denied on the same date
126. In reply to Fasone's denial, 1 filed timely Objection on August 26,2013, Exhibit C.
25
127. Fact, no review from the Judge, once again, even though my Objection is equivalent to
appeal.
128. Sometime in 2014, Fasone finally recused and Michael Millsap was assigned to second
129. Right from the beginning, Milsap began interrupting me essentially repeating Fasone's
conduct of obstruction ofjustice. 1 planned to fill Milsap in about case fixing and corruption that
has taken place before his assignment and expected that Milsap would hear me out and act
neutrally. 1 quickly realized that his goal was to cover up corruption of his peers and prevent me
131. To protect myself from harassment by Milsap and Svenson, I filed family offense petition
in September 2014, which ended up at part 9 with Judge Maria Arias. There was an initial
132. In Svenson's last contempt proceedings, she perjured herself by testifying under oath to
Fasone that she spoke with condominium Management Company and its manager told her that 1
133. The fact is, Svenson knew that 1 am suing that company for $3000 monthly loss ofrent,
while Svenson paid her lawyer to interfere against me. On another occasion, she testified under
oath that"I own two properties that could be sold to satisfy the child support obligation," thereby
trying to appear blissfully ignorant and taint a record for appeal while magistrate Michael Milsap
and she both knew that all my properties are in foreclosure and "under the water."
134. She also testified that her investigator or fnend saw me in numerous restaurants, which
shows that 1 have lavish lifestyle while the child is in dear need for money to treat severe
26
psychological disorder I caused him.
135. I had and have now a documentar>' evidence of her perjury and witnesses to impeach her,
but knew that Milsap will block me from making a record and presenting evidence or would
ignore altogether, as it happened before with Fasone. 1 knew that my attempt to argue before
Milsap would be treated by him and appellate court as my waiver and consent to participate in
kangaroo court contempt proceeding with presumption that 1 believed in Milsap's ability to be
136. In particular, I had evidence that 'child,' who at that time reached the age of majority is
working full time in company that required computer skills - contrary to Svenson's perjury that
'child' needs money to treat his psychological injuries caused by me. This evidence would show
the unbiased court criminality of Svenson's allegations against me and fraud upon the court by
137. In addition,I discovered that Svenson is not Svenson due to her false and/or stolen
identity through immigration marriage fraud to an alleged, non-existent, man named Sam
Svenson. This name is a fiction that never existed and her US citizenship is void for fraud
upon US Government. As such, ail her judgments against me from family court are void
due to fraud upon the court. My attorney and I raised this issue in 2009 on the record, but
were immediately bulldozed by Fasone and Levoritz through denial of discovery and rush
into judgment.
138. This fraud, upon the very willing court, resulted in about $140,000 in unlawful debt
and order finding me in willful violation ofthe court's order(never said "lawful"), which was
void to start with. In reply to my motion to dismiss contempt and motion to modify child support
amount, Milsap stated on the record,"I read your motion. Motion denied." Milsap issued no
27
written, appealable denial on my petition or motion to modify.
139. To get a fair trial and impeach perjury ofPetitioner, on or about November 17,2014,1
filed motion to consolidate contempt proceedings and motion to proceed as poor person. I
needed transcripts of Svenson's perjury to impeach her. 1 notified Judge Maria Arias of part 9 of
Family Court where order of protection against Svenson's harassment was pending that on
December 2,2014 there is hearing scheduled with support magistrate Milsap in part 24 at 11:00
AM and my motion to consolidate may become moot. Accordingly, on the record Arias
scheduled consolidation hearing for 9:30 AM for me to be able to attend both hearings and,
140. Due to my unemployment and disability, 1 was receiving Medicaid and $600 in rent for
one room of unfinished construction project where I lived as well. That $600 rent was disclosed
to Medicaid office and they still granted me status of poor person. 1 filed my proofof disability
and Medicaid as exhibits for my motion for poor person relief and expected this motion granted
141. On December 2,2014,suddenly at 11 o'clock law clerk ofthe part 9 called me in her
office and told me that my case is adjourned until January without explanation. 1 objected and
explained that my motion to consolidate is an emergency motion and that the whole point of
order of protection proceeding may become moot as been late. 1 suspected that all cases are
rigged against me. 1 entered in a state of mental shock and anger. 1 was experiencing terrible
headache and do not remember details of what happened to me in that court. I did not understand
what 1 was doing and do not remember exactly what Milsap was charging me with. In part 24,
Milsap offered me adjournment to hire a lawyer. 1 replied that I have no money and requested
28
part 9 and contempt proceedings suddenly adjourned until January 2015. Mr. Milsap told me,
"You can go to part 14 immediately and ask for consolidation there." In part 14, Judge William
Frank Perry's part, which is across the part 9,there was no people waiting for a hearing. 1
noticed that there were no people in part 9 either. 1 concluded that adjournment of motion to
consolidate was hoax. I asked a court officer of part 14 what this part is for and what is going to
happen at this proceeding. Court officer told me that someone would come out and explain it to
me. In about 30 minutes, that court officer called me inside the courtroom. 1 came in the
courtroom with an expectation that 1 am going to ask for fair hearing by the neutral judge, not
magistrate Milsap, whom I was trying to recuse to no avail. I was going to explain that I need to
consolidate order of protection with this contempt proceeding. However, Judge Perry started
reading to me something along the absurd lines of what magistrate Milsap accused me. I sought
that the judge wanted to get more details and factual history as well as my version ofthe case
directly from me when he gave me the floor. However, when 1 just started explanation of my
side ofthe case and Petitioner's perjury, the judge suddenly run out of the courtroom and 1 could
not make my record. Officers told me to leave and wait in the hallway to be called back. I
142. Now I believe that Judge Perry was calling Assistant Attorney General, Mr. Sanders to
ask him whether he can go ahead and bulldoze me as Mr. Sanders presumably was investigating
143. When 1 came back hoping to continue argument and impeachment of Svenson's perjury,
Judge Perry started reading his order of commitment(attached to RADl)into the record and
court officers jump me. What adds more insult to the injury is the fact that Svenson, starting
from 2010 never replied, denied or rebutted any of my numerous affidavits while magistrates and
29
judges been willfully blind, consciously, in deliberate disregard of my constitutional rights and
due process, continued harassment, obstruction ofJustice and perjury of their officer's oaths.
144. Upon information, belief and circumstantial, logical evidence, 1 aver that on December 2,
2014 morning "some wizard(s) behind the curtain" was/were coordinating conspiracy between
judge Arias and her clerk of part 9 to adjourn its hearing for Milsap and his clerk of part 24 to
bait, switch and lure me to judge Perry and clerk of part 14 where court security ambushed and
kidnapped me. I have spent about six hours without any food or water in family court's jail.
There, 1 was threatened to be shipped at Rikers Island if 1 do not sign some paper, which I later
145. When at about 9 PM,same day, I entered emergency room of Coney Island Hospital, my
blood pressure was 158 per 100, whereas my usual documented readings were 120 per 80. As of
146. On December 15,2014,1 filed Emergency OSC to set aside Perry's order, which was
assigned to part 16, Judge Kusakabe, Exhibit D. After waiting for about four hours to be called
for a hearing, Kusakabe's court attorney came out of courtroom and told me thatjudge Kusakabe
refuses to hear that motion and that I should go at part 14 to Judge Perry. Perry, in turn denied
this OSC without a written order. Apparently, Judge Kusakabe decided to cover up Judge Perry's
corruption by turning a blind eye to it. Had Kusakabe signed that OSC,order would direct me to
serve it on Svenson and file a proof of service. That way, Kusakabe would be giving me a
remedy and fair trial, but he deliberately refiised to perform a duty to review enjoined upon him
by law.
30
147. My Objection to Milsap's final order was assigned to Judge Kusakabe as well after he
refused to schedule me a fair hearing on my OSC. My Objection had substantially similar issues
of pequry, corruption and denial ofdue process as in my OSC. This time, Kusakabe really
showed his intention to deny me a fair hearing by creating factually false denial of my Objection
(attached to RADl)calling it not revieM'ahle. In this denial, Kusakabe wrote that Svenson did not
reply to my objection, thereby creating silent presumption andfindingfact that I did not serve
my objection on Svenson and that she did not object due to lack of service. Further, he accuses
me of not filing a proofof service of my objection on Svenson. Exhibit E,clearly shows that 1
served my Objection on Svenson and filed proofofservice with the court on November 12,
2014. As such, Svenson continued her years' long (from 2010) pattern of default, which would
serve as circumstantial evidence that she was controlled and/or advised by some corrupt family
court actor of positive for her outcome in default. This time, she knowingly and strategically
failed to rebut my Objection to give Kusakabe convenient excuse of been blissfully ignorant of
my proofofservice on her. Had Svenson replied to my Objection, there would be no false issue
of me not filing a proofof service. In addition, Kusakabe's pattern of refusal to review clearly
shows that he did not want that outcome as he would be faced to deal with my Objection on the
merit, to wit:
ii) Systemic harassment, pattern of obstruction of Justice and denial of Due Process
by every court employee since 2009 making all orders void ab initio and
Committee.
31
148. My Objection contained the following:"OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE MILSAP'S
N.Y.C. Family Court administrative Judge Edwina Richardson-Mendelson, Exhibit F,and filed
a copy with supervising judge of Kings County Family Court Jeanette Ruiz,.
149. In reply, I received a letter from Ruiz' court attorney, Michele Rubin, Exhibit G. She
deliberately calls my officially filed complaint-'letter' and writes only about Fasone, falsely
and misleadingly not mentioning magistrate Milsap even though I complained on him and served
him with my complaint. I expected a reply from him and that my complaint would be handled by
administrativejudge with a fair hearing with Milsap and I present according to New York State
150. The will to obstruct justice overtly shown on the record as pattern and practice of
said pattern and practice, which clearly emerges as evidence that they denied me relief by
pretended blissful ignorance of underling facts, exhibits and false, creative excuses like "where is
affidavit ofservice" totally ignoring averred facts and exhibited evidence - all together with their
duty to Administer Justice. Evidently, none of the judges and supervisors of Fasone and Milsap
ever ordered them to stop their criminal activity. Nobody contacted me to ask whether I served
my Objection on Svenson, but forgot to file affidavit ofservice in order to resolve my complaints
on the merit, if only affidavit of service was the issue. All of them would find some technicality
or false, creative excuse to avoid review on the merits and provide remedy.
32
151. There are few possibilities in regards to "where is affidavit of service," to wit;
152. In any case, since 1 did serve Svenson,she knew that she must reply to Objection or she
would lose by default. Was she told by some 'wizard behind the curtain' that the case is fixed
and by not replying she would actually win, which is exactly what happened - contrary to what
should have happened? I say,"yes the case was fixed" and the pattern ofjudicial and attorney's
misconduct since 2008 is an admissible evidence together with intentionally false, fabricated by
Levoritz and Katkalov peijurious Svenson's 2009 financial disclosure affidavit,(Exhibit 5)and
153. In Affidavit(Exhibit 5), Svenson avers that she is not working, has no income or cash,
yet she,for example, pays $2600 monthly in rent or mortgage and $10,000 for household repairs.
There, she also claims that I was buying herjewelry every month for years, but on cross-
examination by my attorney denies my averment that she has about $50,000 in jewelry in safe
deposit box. She claims having no cash and borrowing money for attorney's fees while Fasone is
interfering and interrupting. Then, Fasone suddenly adjourns the hearing, which never resumed
and impeachment of Svenson's perjury, as result, obstructed by Fasone. This is just one episode
154. Here is unrebutted facts that show what family court respondents did to me collectively:
155. They deliberately brought up false charges that 1 refused to pay the child support in
33
violation of state and federal criminal laws.
157. These bogus orders were tossed in the courtjacket with deliberately created false
affidavits ofservice and presumptions that they were timely sent to me, but 1 did not appeal.
159. In these bogus orders, they deliberately wrote about facts and evidence that never existed
160. In these bogus orders, they deliberately wrote about papers that were never filed.
163. They deliberately made absurd and/or deliberately misleading conclusions from above-
164. They deliberately created false findings of facts without conclusions oflaw as no law
latest example ofthe false, misleading findings of facts and deliberately absurd conclusion of
law with deliberately resulted recommendation to jail me. Below is excerpt from that kangaroo
violation ofFCA directing contempt proceeding to be done within 60 days without any
adjournments:
"Elena Svenson filed a petition in this Court on July 19,2013 seeking to modify an
order, dated July 6,2011, made by the Kings'County Family Court which granted
support for: David Svenson"
And there has been a change ofcircumstances since the entry ofthe order which makes
the modification ofthe order necessary and proper;
NOW,after examination and inquiry into the facts and circumstances of the case, and
34
after hearing the proofs and testimony offered in relation thereto, the court finds that
Michael Krichevsky is responsible under this order for the support of: David Svenson
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent declines to avail himself of
representation by 18b. Willfulness found,[bold is in original]
Order of support is continued at $2,045.00 per month thru SCU. Next
payment is due 10/15/2014. Arrears are set and a money judgment is entered
for $124,079.38. Prior money judgment dated 07/06/2011 is vacated and
replaced by instant money judgment.
Respondent is to pay $10,000.00 thru SCU to purge himself of the Court's
finding of willfulness contempt to avoid a recommendation for incarceration:
said payment to be made by the adjourn date.
165. Fact, Svenson never ever filed petition to modify the child support order.
167. Accordingly, my "circumstances were changed which makes the modification ofthe
order necessary and proper," which is why I filed for modification, but hearing never took place.
168. After I filed my petition to modify under duress, in retaliation and harassment, Fasone
directed Svenson to cross-file contempt petition for the second time (first one was in 2010).
169. Essentially, Fasone converted civil matter where 1 was Plaintiff into criminal where I
became Defendant with presumption of guilt, thereby indicating that fair hearing and Justice
170. Fact, Svenson was in contempt of Fasone's order to file Financial Disclosure Affidavit
171. Fact, Svenson never pleaded and showed the court how she was harmed by my inability
(since 2010)to comply with absurd order, which is necessary element to accuse me ofcontempt.
172. Besides the fact that Svenson in contempt ofcourt did not submit Financial Disclosure
Affidavit, she did not submit any proofofanything, as she had nothing negative, except the spite
against me.
173. Being under duress, and seen that Fasone and Milsap simultaneously acting as
35
prosecutors,judges and juries in conflict of interest and tyranny, I informed Fasone and later
Milsap that pursuant to my right to remain silent in criminal prosecutions, 1 was not answering
174. However, Milsap with a straight face writes,"NOW,after examination and inquiry into
the facts and circumstances ofthe case, and after hearing the proofs and testimony offered in
175. The court could notfind anything, even ordered by Fasone to Svenson production of
mandatory financial disclosure affidavit on the file. What they found in file is UNREBUTTED
by Svenson my Affidavits and Exhibits in support of petition to modify and motion to dismiss
176. Other than that, the court file was empty and there was nothing for Fasone and Milsap to
find there, examine and inquire, except to figure out from my pounds of prior numerous ignored
petitions and motions that support order was void for absurdity, corruption and that this caused
words, sounds as if it written by mentally retarded person in gibberish. As such, this order is void
178. 1 did not testify, objected to jurisdiction and attended kangaroo court hearing under
duress for the fear for my life due to threat to be assaulted and kidnapped if I do not show up.
Fasone and Milsap refused to recuse, thereby indicating their intention to prevent me from
36
Fasone's and Milsap's refusals to recuse is circumstantial evidence of bribery and
Obstruction of Justice.
179. This court's record is replete with evidence that Fasone gave me 'a hard time.' In self-
defense and fight for survival, I gave 'a hard time' to Fasone too. I demanded his recusal, but
he refused. I accused him of not having jurisdiction as impersonator of public officer and
demanded production of his constitutional oath of office. He told me that he filed it in the
Office of Court Administration(OCA). I discovered from OCA that he did not file his oath of
office and he later admitted this fact on the record. As such, he admitted that he lied to me
during the hearing of my motion to recuse him, which is fraud upon the court by officer ofthe
court. By operation of law, Fasone was not lawfully public officer, but in fact was
180. I forced Fasone to bend backwards in order to accommodate Levoritz and Svenson with
fi-aud and to cover up their perjury. I forced him to apply extra effort and do extra activities,
which were notjudicial in nature, and which any party would not expect a disinterested judge
to do. Upon information and belief, I forced Fasone and Levoritz to have ex parte
motions. I forced Fasone to fabricate false denials, etc. Finally, I forced Supervising Judge
Hepner to admit on the record that Fasone was not doing hisjob and ordered him to review
my motions that he refused to review and issue written appealable orders for me to bring them
181. Notwithstanding, Fasone refused to comply with Hepner's order. Now,the question is:
"Why after so many years of my resistance, would Fasone continue to 'string along and jump
through so many hoops' to obstruct justice and falsify court record knowing I would not be
bamboozled and would push back? Is he mentally ill and that is why he does not recognize
37
and tolerates a hard time from me for nothing?" The answer is simple- he was bribed to
Obstruct Justice and made a chose to continue 'having a hard time' from me.
182. Even if, which is not admitted and stated only for the sake of argument, I was difficult to
deal with pro se party who knows nothing about law, any disinterested magistrate would be
motivated by now to follow a human nature and go in the path of least resistance.
Disinterested magistrate would have recused and tossed my case as a hot potato with a stance
such as,"knock yourself out, Mr. Krichevsky, go away from me. Let's see how other
disinterested magistrate would act differently on your case." However, he knows that as any
contractual 'assassin' who fails to perform and quits, Fasone would have to return the money
to 'customer,' which his greed did not let him do. This is why he would not recuse! In
addition, Fasone was afraid that if he recused and I would have a neutral, disinterested judge
handling of my case. He was also afraid that if he recuses and his order set aside, that would
expose him to the world. He actually painted himself in the comer and likely split his bribe
with Milsap who continued 'assassination' and covered up Fasone with Milsap's void and
Theater of Absurd style order with gibberish findings of fact and conclusion of law 1 rebutted
CONCLUSION
183. To stay alive and out ofjail, 1 had to borrow $10,000 from friends and family and give
check to collection unit. By operation of law, this is FELONY extortion and $10,000 is
ransom for my life as 1 still ended up in the hospital permanently injured by the state actors. Is
this how New York Judiciary serves Public? 1 think so. Is this how service should be done? 1
do not think this is service. In fact, I think this is treason, piracy and homegrown.
38
domestic terrorism.
184. One previous application has been made in 2010-2011 for the relief requested in this
court, but due to obstruction ofjustice, no review on the merits was ever made.
WHEREFORE,I move this court to review this Appeal and Petition on the merits in its entirety, and
for such other and further relief as to this Court seems Just and proper.
39
STATE OF NEW YORK)
)ss. VERIFICATION
COUNTY OF KINGS )
MIRA ZYBINA
Notary Public - State of New York
Nr> ni7YR9Afi3P1