This document provides details for an academic task assignment in a Private International Law course. It lists the objectives, topic, and evaluation parameters for a situation based problem solving activity. Students will be divided into groups to discuss a provided topic from different perspectives. They will be evaluated on their initiative, communication skills, participation, quality of content, and conclusion with a maximum of 30 marks.
This document provides details for an academic task assignment in a Private International Law course. It lists the objectives, topic, and evaluation parameters for a situation based problem solving activity. Students will be divided into groups to discuss a provided topic from different perspectives. They will be evaluated on their initiative, communication skills, participation, quality of content, and conclusion with a maximum of 30 marks.
This document provides details for an academic task assignment in a Private International Law course. It lists the objectives, topic, and evaluation parameters for a situation based problem solving activity. Students will be divided into groups to discuss a provided topic from different perspectives. They will be evaluated on their initiative, communication skills, participation, quality of content, and conclusion with a maximum of 30 marks.
Test- Situation Based Problem Solving School of Law
Name of the faculty: Dr. Jane Eyre Mathew
Course Code: LAW 308 Course Title: Private International Law
Class: BBA B.Com LLB (III Year) Term: 2016-17 Session II
Section: L1404 & L1405 Batch: 16172 Max. Marks: 30 Date of Submission: 3rd -13th April 2017 S. Name / Roll Objectives of Topic Evaluation Parameters No No. Academic Activity 1. All Students To develop the Topic will be The students will be divided into speaking skills provided groups who will discuss on any and initiate given topic, for or against or take students to a neutral outlook towards the discuss topics of topic. The parameters for relevance evaluation is as follows: 1) thereby gaining Initiative - 5 marks; confidence and 2) Communication skills - 5 knowledge marks; 3) Participation in discussion - 5 marks; 4) Quality of content - 10 marks; 5) Conclusion - 5 marks