Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Measurements Delta To Determine Circulation: Acoustic
Measurements Delta To Determine Circulation: Acoustic
I. INTRODUCTION
This ultra sonic technique was combined with PSP meas-
The observations of the travel-time changes of ultrasonic urement [10], in this case with an inclined delta wing for in-
pulses passing through the vortices, generated by inclined vestigation of the interesting vortex breakdown phenomenon.
wing profiles in wind tunnels have provided information on For low speed it can be observed simultaneously, the vortex
the particular flow configurations (e.g., separated flow and breakdown in pressure distribution and circulation FO on the
related recirculating flow regions) and data on turbulence and wing surface before the point of vortex breakdown or direct
the circulation of vortices moving downstream [3] [4]. Based using the circulation meter i.e. Im behind the model. The
on the results of these experiments, an acoustical circulation main advantage is: no seeding particles destroy the paint and
meter has been created at the DLR Gottingen. This circulation therefore both techniques can be used simultaneously.
meter used in the low-speed wind tunnel regime measured
steady and periodic vortex fields in the wakes of various Nomenclature
wings. Data obtained from downstream vorticity measure- c sound velocity
ments were used to predict lift distributions. In order to evalu- a distance between sound beam and
ate the measured data, theoretical curves computed on the vortex center
basis of a Hamel-Oseen vortex model [1] were optimally fitted I depth of the wing
to the primary travel-time curves. Thus the most significant s length of integration path
parameters of the investigated vortices were obtained: vortex r = radius related to the center of the vortex
location, vortex core radius and circulation or the maximum ro = radius belonging to umax
circumferential velocity, respectively. A tw = flow induced difference in the traveling
For all these applications, the acoustical measuring technique time of ultra sonic pulses
provided the following capabilities: u = circumferential velocity of the vortex
1) The measured flow range of interest can be kept free from Umax = maximum circumferential velocity at ro
disturbances due to measuring probes [5]. The intensity of the Uo = velocity of the undisturbed test flow
sonic pulses is much too low as to have any influence on the a = angle of attack
flow processes. ho = total circulation
2) To determine, in particular, the parameters of vortices, x,y ,z= cartesian coordinates in relation to the
each measurement directly provides the required line integral vortex center
of the velocities. Compared to the method that produces this b = half wing span of model
integral by means of many local measurements along the path a = angle between the velocity vectors u and w
of integration (danger of an accumulation of systematic errors), p = absolute pressure
the present method is much more accurate.
3) In cases in which it is possible to use the ultrasonic II. TEST METHOD
method (true without significant problems in the velocity
range below approximately 50 m/s), this method leads to a The uses of the acoustical method discussed here to in-
substantial reduction (by usually more than a factor of 10) of vestigate flows all have, as shown in Figure 1, one principal
the required testing time compared to other flow field meas- test setup in common: a sonic signal propagating along a mea-
urement methods. suring sound beam is emitted by a transmitter that is located
4) No calibration is necessary. outside of the flow region under test. The travel time of this
signal is changed (reduced due to tailwind, enlarged due to
results with reduced travel times where c is the speed of sound, ro is the vortex core radius, umax
sound receiver is the maximum circumferential velocity of the vortex, y, z are
coordinates due to Fig. 1 with y = 0 at the sound beam axis
sound signal propagating and z = 0 midway between transmitter and receiver, s is the
along measuring sound beam distance between sound transmitter and receiver, and y* is
they coordinate of the vortex axis. Variation of y* produces
s/2 ye* - the profile pictured in Figure 2 of the corresponding travel
time Atw. As already mentioned in the introduction, the meas-
Umax
ured Atw profiles of actual vortices can, in many cases, be well
approximated by such a profile; the computer performing the
optimal approximation then yields the values of all vortex
parameters-location, vortex core radius r, maximum circum-
ferential velocity umax and, hence, the corresponding circu-
lation expressed by the relation:
s/2
FO = ( 1/0. 716) umax 2 S ro. (2)
-direction of sound beam shift
sound transmitter
Figure 1. Sketch showing the principle of the acoustical measurement
of flow velocity fields using a vortex as an example.
on the one side of the vortex axis and enlarged travel times on 2
the other. For a Hamel-Oseen vortex, which has proved useful
as a model of many actual vortex flows, the travel time over a
distance s between sound transmitter and receiver (both equi- I
distant to the vortex axis) can be calculated by equation (1) as
follow: y
-. -.-.-. _
A Attw
\ \t Umax
r, 1
-.ur
As shown in Figure 3 of the A tw-curve resulting from the
application of the two sound beam configuration with a dis-
, rm tance of 2a between both sound beams. Using this configura-
tion, two paths of the line integral for circulation measure-
ments are already realized. For an easy circulation measure-
ment only the path length s has to be large in comparison to
Figure 2. Characteristic shape of a travel-time profile obtained from the distance 2a to measure directly the complete circulation
shifting the measuring sound beam according to Figure 1 across a as:
Hamel-Oseen vortex. Here, rm is the radius for maximum
flow-induced travel-time difference A tw, ro is the radius for maxi- FO = v * ds. (3)
mum circumferential velocity Umax
136
7-3
CD 022
so
so
ro /I
0
0
ae
do
1- 'I
a* %a
-- 0
.
.
in" 018
* e 0 X X 4C
y [cm]
014
k. 0,0
6,o 5,
,
,-d:
y [cm]
r '10 -15 X/l
Figure 6. Core radius of the tip vortex versus downstream distance from
the wing. Data of the tests: 1 = 156.4 mm, UO= 20 mls.
137
7-3
0.24 4. I I~~~~~~~~~ a =
- 313 a=4 Atw [ps]
a:= 8- a 45cm
0.20 - 30cm
Umox A a -6.0cm aC=8
UO -._ r ........................-.....................--. ................_.......................................
o1 S
012
10 20~~~~~~..................................
0.08 -15
.......
:~ ~~ ~ spoiler position
y [cm]
0 5 -10 -15 /1 207 Figure 9. Plot of A tw data measured with spoiler configuration A
according to Fig. 8. For comparison, the broken line represents the
Figure 7. Maximum circumferential velocity of the tip vortex versus corresponding data measured without spoiler. Data of tests: a = 8;
distance downstream from the wing. Test data: same as in Fig. 6. x= -30 cm; U0= 20 mls; 2a= 6.0 cm.
SPOILER -4
tb
.n
tt
wing tip
111; Atw [bs] 1
A B 55
138
7-3
:I s
Yp2
yp
I. . . I. . .
I. . . I. . . EMU
sound signals
vI
position diode, measuring
laser beam deflection
ES3 - sound transmitter
-pulse generator Figure 15. Received sound signals from both laser beams shown in
Fig. 14. The travel time is obtained from cross correlation of both
Figure 13. Scheme of the measuring sound beam with laser beam, signals.
detecting variations of density.
single ultrasonic pulse. One can make the integration path set
An optical arrangement, as pictured in Figure 13, is appro- optically within the flow very short and thus take local veloc-
priate to record these density fluctuations: A continuous laser ity measurements practically punctiformly. Experiments were
beam crosses the sound beam, perpendicular to the direction performed with an array of integration paths of a distance of A
of propagation of the sound waves, and reacts to the density =10 mm, where the achieved accuracy of the At measurement
gradient caused by the passing sound wave with deflections in of < 0.4 10-8 s allows even the low flow velocity of 5 cm/s to
yp direction which, in the position sensitive detector, are trans- be detected. In addition, tests with an integration path of only
lated into proportional electrical voltages. With this method, 5 mm - and, hence, comparable with the magnitude of conven-
the arrival of ultrasonic pulses can be registered at practically tional pressure probes- confirmed the resolution of 10 cm/s to
any given point, even within the flow under investigation, be expected in this case.
without affecting the flow or the ultrasonic signal being af-
fected whatsoever.
139
7-3
IV. STRUCTURE AND BREAKDOWN OF VORTICES This apparatus enabled investigations some exemplary results,
ADJACENT TO A SLENDER DELTA WING which are presented in the following.
As is well-known, the vortices developing from the leading Atw
edge of an inclined slender delta wing are, in general, subject Measured
to the so-called vortex breakdown. This phenomenon by Pr umps in circulation al
j
1
V C
~~2 In(r/r0) (4)
Figure 16. Test setup for the investigation of vortices adjacent to an =
(O
K + 2-
inclined slender delta wing, using the non-disturbing optical ultra-
sonic-method of measurement after Fig. 14 to study their internal
structure and breakdown. where Vy is the tangential velocity component of the vortex at
radius r, ro the radius of the vortex core, and C an integration
transmitter and the optical arrangement needed to employ the constant. It states that when, advancing downstream, this pa-
two laser beam method of measurement as described before. rameter decreasingly reaches the value 1.16, one arrives at the
point where vortex break-down suddenly occurs.
140
7-3
2.0
K
1.5. ..
1.16
1 ,0 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Figure 20. Implementation of the PSP coated delta wing with me-
0.55 0.60 0.65 0.75 dium rounded edges in the black coated (anti-reflex coating) test
0.70 A section of the TWG at Gottingen.
breakdown point also
observed by laser sheet In such interesting cases Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV)
measurements must be performed after PSP measurements.
Figure 19. Acoustically measured values of the Ludwieg parameter But in such cases the wind tunnel cost are higher because a
K of vortex stability, confirming the theoretical prediction of vortex
breakdown at K = 1. 16. Here, x'l is dimensionless downstream dis- complete second run is necessary. For the test run special an-
tance of the plane of measurement from the tip of the delta wing (x'li gles of attack were selected to study aerodynamic effects ob-
1 at its trailing edge). tained with the ultra-sonic method and PSP as well PIV more
in detail.
A new PSP coating DLRO3 was developed at DLR in 2005
V. PSP INVESTIGATION ON A DELTA WING with a solvable reference component and a new arrangement
of pressure sensitive dyes [8]. A very uniform coating is the
As well-known, the process of vortex breakdown is mainly result and filtering for final images is not necessary. The PSP
a function of the aspect ratio and the angle of attack - and measurements shows in comparison to conventional PSI
slightly also by the Reynolds-Number for delta wings. There- measurement a very accurate agreement with parallel obtained
fore it's not highly important what flow speed was used for PSI measurements and all structures i.e. vortex suction along
vortex breakdown investigation. A different investigation on the vortex trajectory is excellent visible.
vortex development above delta wings shows mainly an emi-
141
7-3
Ma-=0.4
Re= 3 106
0n,.- 130
Ma 0.4
Re= 3 106 PSI
nx,, 25" 0 -2
M-1
4 __ 0 F *2 Figure 23. Visible structure change in the right vortex trajectory us-
ing the DLRO3 paint for Ma= 0.4 and a = 13.
. . P; 7u
I#-
6 e .1r;
S\b
Ma = 0.4
Reo-3 106 PSP
(Xnem, 1AOC
11~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7
Small pressure values can be detected also, extensive inde-
pendent of the vortex trajectory distance, because they are
already high above the wing surface and influence relatively
low the pressure distribution. Here the circulation using the
ultra-sonic method was also measured in a short distance be-
fore the vortex breakdown process and predicted for the vis-
cous core a vortex dz 2cm in diameter.
Since the PSP date exist, all the results were non easy predict-
able signals were obtained -depending on the angle of attack, Figure 24. Visible structure change in the left vortex trajectory mov-
typically around for a =120 - 15 are now important for a new ing upstream for higher angles of attack, in this case for Ma= 0.4 and
interpretation. The vortex breakdown for this delta wing at a = 14.
about x/l= 80% of the chord is at a = 24, so in both cases a
correct circulation Fo of a fully developed vortex is not ex- A first explanation leads to more than one vortex on both
pected behind the wing. wing sides - independent of the typically secondary vortex,
For a = 13 first of all unpredictable results in circulation because they create clear structures, with rotation in opposite
behind the wing were detected. To investigate these phenom- direction and are very different in circulation to each other. On
ena therefore also PIV tests after the PSP measurements were the other hand it's clear by Figure 25, both vortices have the
performed. In the PSP pressure distribution non symmetric same direction of rotation.
142
7-3
y [mm]
Figure 25. Travel time distribution using the ultra-sonic method at Figure 27. Calculated vortex structure (W. Fritz, EADS Mulnchen,
x/l1 0.8. The profile shows clear two vortices with the same direc- Germany) using the obtained PSP results as start conditions but with-
tion of rotation for UOO= 30m/s and = 14. The center of vortex 1 is
a
out knowledge of the PIV results for Ma= 0.4 and = 14.
a
located at positiony=0.
As visualized in Fig. 27 this phenomenon can be calculated
Hence, the two vortex structure with the same direction of numerically when a fine distributed pressure distribution from
rotation and same strength of circulation can be obtained from PSP is available. Just here we have a grandiose argument for
Fig. 25. In addition also the measurements using PIV shows a more interdisciplinary work between CFD and real experi-
clear answer for this before unknown effect. Figure 26 shows ments in wind tunnels, because this result could not be calcu-
the combined PSP and PIV result for the flow conditions Ma= lated without the information of measured experimental data.
0.4ando =14.
Figure 28. Position of the transition line along the rounded edge pro-
fileforMa= 0.4and a= 140.
143
7-3
the flow-induced running time difference of short ultrasonic [5] Engler, R.H. et al. Ultrasonic method for flow field meas-
pulses, propagating along one or more measuring sound urement in wind tunnel tests, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71(1),
beams, requiring no critical adjustment and no special calibra- 1982, pp. 42-50
tion. Especially for very sensitive measurements where al- [6] Hummel, D., Redeker, G. A new vortex flow experiment
ready very small probes disturb the flow phenomenon like the for computer code validation, RTO AVT Symposium on
vortex breakdown process the non-disturbing laser detection "Vortex Flow and High Angle of Attack Aerodynamics",
as sound receiver is very useful. From the computer-aided Loen, Norway, 7-11 May 2001, Meeting Proceedings
evaluation of the measured data all essential parameters of the RTO-NO-068 (1), 2003, SYA 8-1 to 8-3 1.
vortices under test (position in the flow, core diameter, maxi- [7] Chu, J., Luckring, J.M., Experimental surface pressure
mum circumferential velocity, and circulation) can be deter- data obtained on 65 delta wing across Reynolds number
mined accurately. The-method has been successfully em- and Mach number ranges, NASA TM 4645, 1996
ployed to steady and to unsteady vortices. In comparison to [8] Engler, R.H., Klein, Chr. First Results Using the New
the conventional method of point by point measurement using DLR PSP System -Intensity and Lifetime Measurements,
directional pressure probes are not possible to use for such Conference "Wind Tunnels and Wind Tunnel Test Tech-
sensitive processes. The fast ultra-sonic method allows reduc- niques", Cambridge LTK, ISBN 185768 0480, 1997
tion in wind tunnel costs, makes it especially valuable as a [9] Morris, M.J., Donovan, J.F., Kegelmann, J.T., Schwab,
quasi-real-time method for investigations concerning the in- S.D., Levy, R.L., Crites, R.C. Aerodynamic Applications
fluence of even small modifications of the model on the result- of Pressure Sensitive Paint, AIAA Journal, Vol. 3 1, No.3,
ing flow field. 1993, pp. 419-425.
A comparison using both, the PSP and PIV technique a [10]Engler, R. H., Hartmann, K., Troyanovski, 1., Vollan, A.
quite new vortex phenomenon could be detected for small Description and assessment of a new optical pressure
rounded edged delta wings in a small range of angle of attack measurement system (OPMS) demonstrated in the high
- not only depending on the used Mach Number. speed wind tunnel of DLR in Gottingen, 1992, DLR-FB
The fact, that also from the PSP pressure distribution a nu- 92-24.
merical solution can be found, encourage the future coopera- [11] Klein, C., Sachs, W.E., Henne, U., Engler, R. H.,
tive work between theory and experiment. It could be very Wiedemann, A., Konrath, R., International Vortex Flow
impressive shown, that not all aerodynamic problems are al- Experiment 2 (VFE-2) Experimental Pressure Distribu-
ready solved and new measurement techniques open an inter- tion on the 65 Delta Wing Configuration using PSP. (Pa-
esting area of discovering in aerodynamics. per in preparation for the 44i AIAA Congress, Reno,
USA, 2006)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
For the purpose of evaluation of measured data and by com-
puter-acquisition as well as for the final PSP calculation,
C. Klein, U. Henne and W.E. Sachs have performed excellent
work in programming and measurement tests. The author
would like here to express their sincere appreciation to them
for there valuable contribution to the success of the in-
vestigations. Thanks are also expressed to the PIV team of our
DLR division.
REFERENCES
144