Page 1

The Dean of Melbourne Law School, Professor Carolyn Evans 18-5-2017

Email: c.evans@unimelb.edu.au
5
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Ref: 20170518-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to The Dean of Melbourne Law School,
Professor Carolyn Evans
10 Madam,
I am concerned about reports that you may be involved in issues that I view are deceptive
to others. I am referring to an alleged goal of certain characters to amend the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) as to have the Commonwealth of Australia provided for
Aboriginals in a certain manner.
15 Our constitution within which the states are created in section 106 subject to this constitution
is a federal compact for a political union that cannot be transformed into some independent
country (as the High Court of Australia purported in Sue v Hill.
Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
20 QUOTE
Mr. SYMON ( South Australia ).-
In the preamble honorable members will find that what we desire to do is to unite in one indissoluble Federal
Commonwealth -that is the political Union-"under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland , and under the Constitution hereby established." Honorable members will therefore see that the
25 application of the word Commonwealth is to the political Union which is sought to be established. It is not
intended there to have any relation whatever to the name of the country or nation which we are going to create
under that Union . The second part of the preamble goes on to say that it is expedient to make provision for
the admission of other colonies into the Commonwealth. That is, for admission into this political Union,
which is not a republic, which is not to be called a dominion, kingdom, or empire, but is to be a Union
30 by the name of "Commonwealth," and I do not propose to interfere with that in the slightest degree.
END QUOTE

Section 128 is to provide for referendums to amend the constitution that is part 9 of the act and
not the first 8 parts of this Act, and can only be used for purposes that do not unilaterally
35 override the sovereignty of the States.
I therefore see no possibility for any Section 128 referendum to make inroads upon States
sovereignties by the constitution allegedly to be amended to allow local Aboriginals in States to
somehow have their own kind of governance.
QUOTE
40
Hi Gerrit this may interest you - Recognition of Aboriginal Peoples
People

healthachievers - <healthachievers@hotmail.com>

45 16 May at 12:26 AM (16-5-2017)

To

Page 1 18-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com
 Page 2
Gerrit
Les Macdonald
HelenR

Message body
5
https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/recognising-australias-indigenous-voices-
tickets-34063148795?aff=ebdsorderfblightb

Recognising Australia's Indigenous Voices

www.eventbrite.com.au

Join Nyunggai Warren Mundine AO, Noel Pearson, Tim Wilson MP, and Professor Adrienne Stone
for an exclusive discussion on the recognition of Indigenous peoples in the Australian Constitution.
The Dean of Melbourne Law School, Professor Carolyn Evans, will chair a panel discussion on
Warren Mundine's Practical Recognition from the Mob's Perspective: Enabling Our Mobs to Speak
for Country. In this essay, Mr Mundine argues that the Australian Constitution can best recognise
Indigenous Australians by stipulating that the Australian Parliament shall establish local Indigenous
bodies. In this way, he argues there will be a guarantee that traditional owners will always be able
to speak for their country. Mr Mundine's essay develops the proposal for an Indigenous voice to
federal Parliament, one of the several options being discussed by Indigenous leaders around the
country at the Referendum Councils historic regional dialogues. This will be a thought-provoking
discussion on law, politics and innovative
END QUOTE

10 While I hold the 1968 ss51(xxvi) was a con-job referendum nevertheless because it was
successful Aboriginals were delegated to be equally as inferior alien races this as ss51(xxvi) can
only have one particular meaning and as it was not amended by successful referendum to alter
the meaning regarding inferior coloured races then the inclusion of Aboriginals means they are
now like them and in fact have no right to be Members of Parliament nor any right to be electors.
15 Subsection 51(xxvi) was inserted to ensure that any legislation enacted within this subsection
would cause the race against whom the legislation related to automatically lose their citizenship,
meaning their political rights to vote, etc, nothing to do with nationality.
I on 19 July 2006 successfully appealed against compulsory voting being unconstitutional with
the court upholding both appeals, and despite that I had filed and served an s78B NOTICE OF
20 CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS not a single Attorney-General challenged my extensive
written submissions in my ADDRESS TO THE COURT! See also my published books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI series on certain constitutional and other legal issues.
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
25 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

(Our name is our motto!)

Page 2 18-5-2017 G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by making a reservation, by fax
0011-61-3-94577209 or E-mail admin@inspector-rikati.com