Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Settlement Methods PDF
Settlement Methods PDF
Settlement Methods PDF
qB
pe = Ip
B Eu
H
Rough Surface
L2
For Saturated Soil
With =0.50
L0
0.8
Strip Loading(^)
Ip 0.75 AT
0.6
H/B =
0.4
Circular Loading(^^)
0.2
(^) From Poulos and Davis (1974), Figure 5.2 Note: 'vm = 'p
(^^) From Poulos and Davis (1974), Figure 5.32 & Cu = Su
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
H/B
Intial Settlement (p1/2)
2000
No. Decription Cu/`vc
Portsmouth
1 Sensitive CL Clay 0.20
1000 S1 > 10, LL = 35, I = 15
p
800
1 Boston CL Clay
2 0.20
600 LL = 41, Ip = 22
Bangkok CH Clay
3 0.27
400 LL = 65, Ip = 41
2
Eu Mane Organic
4 CH - CH Clay 0.285
Cu 3 LL = 65, Ip = 38
200
AGS CH Clay
5 0.255
4 LL = 71, Ip = 40
5 Atchafalaya
100
6 CH Clay 0.24
80 LL = 95, Ip = 75
(a) Normalized Secant Modulus vs. Stress Level for Normally Consolidated Soils
1000 500
800 400
At h/cu = 1/3 2 At h/cu = 2/3
3
600 4
300
Eu Eu 3
4
Cu 5 Cu
400 200
5
6
6
200 100
0 0
1 2 4 6 8 10 1 2 4 6 8 10
OCR = `
vm /`
vc
OCR = `
vm /`
vc
(b) Normalized Secant Modulus vs. Overconsolidation Ratio
1.0
0.8 0
.25
.5
SR = Re/Rl
0.6
f=
.75
0.4
H/B = 0.5
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Applied Stress Ratio, q/qu
1.0
0
0.8 .25
.5
SR = Re/Rl
0.6
f=
.75
0.4
H/B = 1.0
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Applied Stress Ratio, q/qu
1.0
-.25
0
0.8
.25
SR = Re/Rl
0.6 .5
f=
.75
0.4
H/B = 1.5
0.2
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Applied Stress Ratio, q/qu
Relationship between settlement ratio and applied stress ratio
for strip foundation on homogenous isotropic elastic layer.
Low IP
0.2
f=
High IP
1 2 4 6 8 10
OCR = 'vm /'vc
Intial Settlement (p 2/2)
Note : cu = 0.5(1 - 2)f from CKoU Triaxial or Plane
Strain Tests, Ko from Brooker and Ireland (1965)
for ME. Organic Clay.