Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 13
CAA CONSULTATIVE DRAFT CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY JOINT AVIATION REQUIREMENTS igi PAPER NO. 25¢-282 JAR-25 Origin Large ae ISSUE 1 Structures Aeroplanes study Grou 7 P 24th December 1996 NPA _25C-282; DISCRETE GUST RULE CHANGES TO ALIGN JAR-25 T_25 INTRODUCTION This NPA is sponsored by the JAA Structures Study Group. It proposes a number of changes to SubPart C of JAR-25, to align JAR-25 with FAR Part 25, following agreements which have been made under the JAA/FAA Harmonisation Work Programme. PROPOSAL Please see attached NPA. ‘Davesit-13 CAA CONSULTATIVE DRAFT NeA 25c - 292 JAR 25305 Strength and deformation (@) ~~ [ReservedRevoked ] JAR 25.321. General (©) Enough points on and within the boundaries of the design envelope must be investigated to ensure that the maximum load for each part of the aeroplane structure is obtained. (@) The significant forces acting on the aeroplane must be placed in equilibrium in a rational or conservative manner. The linear inertia forces must be considered in equilibrium with the thrust and all aerodynamic loads, while the angular (pitching) inertia forces must be considered in equilibrium with thrust and all aerodynamic moments, including moments due to loads on components such as tail surfaces and nacelles. Critical thrust values in the range from zero to maximum continuous thrust must be considered, JAR 25.331 Symmetric manoeuvring conditions (2) Procedure. For the analysis of the manoeuvring flight conditions specified in sub-paragraphs (b) and (c) of this paragraph, the following provisions apply: (1) Where sudden displacement of a control is specified, the assumed rate of control surface displacement may not be less than the rate that could be applied by the pilot through the control system. (2) In determining elevator angles and chordwise load distribution fin the manoeuvring conditions of sub-paragraphs (b) and (c) of this paragraph} in-tums-and pullups, the effect of corresponding pitching velocities must be taken into account. The in-trim and out-of-trim flight conditions specified in JAR 25.255 must be considered. es 8 ee . JAR 25.333 Flight manoeuvring envelope (@) General, _ The strength requirements must be met at each combination of airspeed and load factor on and within the boundaries of the representative manoeuvring envelope (V-n diagram) of sub-paragraph (b) of this paragraph. This envelope must also be used in determining the aeroplane structural operating limitations as specified in JAR 25.1501 DS1/86/2-13 soe . . . JAR 25.335 Design airspeeds (® Design speed for maximum gust intensity, Vp (1) Vp may not be less than % Vs1 [ 1+ KeUrefVe 2] 498w where — Vsl= the 1-g stalling speed based on Cyan With the flaps retracted at the particular weight under consideration; | ve= design cruise speed (knots equivalent airspeed); | Uret= the reference gust velocity (feet per second equivalent airspeed) from JAR 25.341(a)(5)(i); we average wing loading (pounds per square foot) at the particular weight under consideration. Kg= 2w pe 2e peag p= density of air (slugs/ft*); c= mean geometric chord of the wing (feet); a= slope of the aeroplane normal force coefficient curve, Cy, per radian; 2) Ataltitudes where V¢ is limited by Mach number— (Vp may be chosen to provide an optimum margin between low and high speed buffet boundaries; and, Gi) Vg need not be greater than Vo. D41/86/3-13 CAA CONSULTATIVE DRAFT JAR 25341 Gust and turbulence loads (@) Discrete Gust Design Criteria. The aeroplane is assumed to be subjected to symmetrical vertical and lateral gusts in level flight. Limit gust loads must be determined in accordance with the following provisions: D41/86/4-13 (1) Loads on each part of the structure must be determined by dynamic analysis. The analysis must take into account efunsteady aerodynamic characteristics and all significant structural degrees of freedom including rigid body motions. (2) The shape of the gust must be taken as follows: ve Bf] for 0

You might also like