Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Editedgeorgec Wallaceessay
Editedgeorgec Wallaceessay
Riley Strathmann
AP Language 4th
Cooper
3/5/17
George C. Wallaces Segregated South
More Americans died in the Civil War than in World War I, World War II, and Vietnam
combined. Yet a century later, people like George C. Wallace still promoted racism, segregation,
and the return of the South. In fact, in his inaugural address in 1963, Alabama Governor
George C. Wallace argued his highly controversial beliefs with the slogan, segregation now...
segregation tomorrow...segregation forever to help him gain southern support (Wallace 2).
Wallace backed his ideas with rhetorical devices that both helped and prevented him from
accomplishing his goal of maintaining separation of the races. Specifically, he used metaphors,
repetition, and symbolism to generate logical and emotional connections from segregation to
One of Wallaces strategies to win southern support was equating an unsegregated society
to communism with metaphors. Specifically, he says, if we amalgamate into the one unit as
advocated by the communist philosophers. Then the enrichment of our lives...the freedom for our
development...is gone forever. We become, therefore, a mongrel unit of one under a single all
powerful government and we stand for everything and for nothing (Wallace 9). Here,
Wallace calls an unsegregated society a mongrel, a dog of no specific breed because it is a cross
of two others, to show that if everyone is represented equally, then society will be devoid of a
superior belief, which from a racists point of view is not good. Wallace employs logos because
he is making logical sense to his white audience. On the other hand, he avoids citing any
evidence to support his assertion that equality is bad, making his logos less persuasive from all
other perspective. Additionally, the definition of communism never even mentions the necessity
Strathmann 2
common ownership of all land...withering away of the coercive power of the state making all
social relations ...regulated on the fairest of all principles (Communism). From this
definition one can see that there is no mentioning of segregation and that communism is even
depicted as fair, giving the opposite connotation of Wallaces intent. Overall Wallaces use of a
metaphor did not succeed as a logical appeal because he lacked strong supporting evidence.
However, Wallace was able to make an emotional appeal with the connection he made between
desegregation and communism, one of the things Americans feared the most at the time (Wall 1).
pride, saying I stand ashamed of the fat, well-fed whiners who say that it is inevitable...that our
cause is lost. I am ashamed of them and I am ashamed for them...We remind all within hearing
of this Southland that a Southerner, Randolph, presided over the Continental Congress in our
nations beginning that a Southerner, Thomas Jefferson, wrote that a Southerner, George
Washington, is the, that a Southerner etc (Wallace 11). Here, Wallace repeats southerner
to remind his audience, the South, that they have a common bond and identity. Wallace cites
famous southerners to evoke pride by emphasizing what southerners have accomplished and
contributed to their country. Wallaces argument is effective here because he is using both pathos
and logos successfully. Specifically, he taps into the souths recovering depression from their
lost cause and nostalgia of past glory by referencing several past strengths of the South (The
Lost Cause). By doing this, Wallace uses pathos successfully because he makes an emotional
appeal to the souths nostalgia. Also, he uses logos correctly as he referenced historically
accurate events in the proper context. Wallace effectively used repetition to persuade his
Strathmann 3
audience to take control and promote their common beliefs, which includes his desire for
Wallace was able to argue many of his points with strong rhetoric, however he lacked
essential evidence and analyses to prove his claims. According to the Toulmin method, an outline
for the essential elements needed to make a valid argument, one must support all of his/her
assertions with evidence that can be analyzed in favor of the claim. Therefore, Wallaces pro-
Works Cited
1963,
Wall, Wendy. Anti-Communism in the 1950s. The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American
History,
www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/fifties/essays/anti-communism-1950s.