Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Program Evaluation Tool-Entered into Assist

Provide a detailed description of the strategy/ program/ initiative being evaluated.


The Fountas & Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervention System (LLI) is a small-group,
supplementary literacy intervention designed to provide powerful, daily, small-group instruction
for the lowest achieving students in need of intensive support to achieve grade-level competency
in reading and writing. Through systematically designed lessons and original, engaging leveled
books, LLI supports learning, helps students expand their knowledge of language and words and
how they work. The K-5 students that have been identified for Tier II supplemental intervention
based on multiple metrics (DRA, M-STEP, NWEA, etc.) are eligible for the LLI program.
The number of students that are receiving LLI are as follows:
Grade 1- 22 students
Grade 2- 32 students
Grade 3- 23 students
Grade 4- 27 students
Grade 5- 15 students
Total of 131 students have received LLI instruction. The Intervention Team (Elementary
Instructional Specialist (EIS) and Highly Qualified para-educators) provide the LLI Tier II
supplemental instruction during What I Need (WIN) time, four times each week for 30-45
minutes, depending on the grade level. The support began September 14, 2015 and will be
completed when the student reaches grade level expectations (it is possible for a student to exit
during the school year). Reading Records, DRAs, DRA Progress Monitoring, Fountas and
Pinnell Benchmark Assessments and NWEA have been used to measure growth
What does the evidence show regarding structures being in place to collect and review
implementation data?
The structure of Tier II Intervention (BIT meetings, WIN time, weekly/monthly common
planning/professional learning, data analysis, collaboration, etc.) provides the opportunity collect
and review progress monitoring data and determine the effectiveness of the LLI program. Each
year, beginning and end of the year data is compared and analyzed to determine the growth of
each student, the building and district and is shared at the building and district level.
87% of Heritage Elementary LLI students K-5 have increased their RIT scores on the NWEA
from fall to spring.
K= 67% of students using LLI increased RIT scores from fall to spring as measured on the
NWEA Grade 1= 100% of students using LLI increased RIT scores from fall to spring as
measured on the NWEA
Grade 2= 81% of students using LLI increased RIT scores from fall to spring as measured on the
NWEA
Grade 3= 90% of students using LLI increased RIT scores from fall to spring as measured on the
NWEA
Grade 4= 74% of students using LLI increased RIT scores from fall to spring as measured on the
NWEA
Grade 5= 100% of students using LLI increased RIT scores from fall to spring as measured on
the NWEA
Our district goal was to have 90% of our students increase their personal RIT score from fall to
spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. Our measurable objective: A 3 % increase of
students in identified subgroups (i.e. lowest 30%, Economically Disadvantaged, Limited English
Proficient and Students with Disabilities) will demonstrate proficiency on state standards in
Reading by June 15, 2016 as measured by multiple metrics. 85% of students of students will
demonstrate a proficiency in Reading by June 30, 2022. This year, in reading, 83% of our
Heritage students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as shown on the
NWEA/MAP testing. This year, in reading, 87% of our Heritage LLI students increased their
personal RIT score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. The impact LLI had
on our students' achievement is as follows:
Kindergarten-- 90% of Heritage students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as
shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. 67% of Heritage LLI students increased their personal RIT
score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP testing.
Grade 1-- 95% of Heritage students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as
shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. 100% of Heritage LLI students increased their personal RIT
score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. Grade 2-- 87% of Heritage
students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP
testing. 81% of Heritage LLI students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as
shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. Grade 3-- 85% of Heritage students increased their personal
RIT score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. 90% of Heritage LLI
students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP
testing. Grade 4-- 74% of Heritage students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring
as shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. 74% of Heritage LLI students increased their personal
RIT score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. Grade 5-- 70% of Heritage
students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as shown on the NWEA/MAP
testing. 100% of Heritage LLI students increased their personal RIT score from fall to spring as
shown on the NWEA/MAP testing. Although the LLI program had an impact on student
achievement, each grade level reported growth, there is still an achievement gap for our targeted
students. We continue to strive for all students to meet grade level expectations.
When looking at the impact LLI had on our subgroups achievement, the following is:
The data for these subgroups are as follows: Economically Disadvantaged: Kindergarten:
Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage students grew 91% in RIT scores from fall to
spring, Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage using LLI grew 83% in RIT scores
from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 1: Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage grew
100% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage using
LLI grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 2: Economically
disadvantaged students at Heritage grew 89% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Economically
disadvantaged students at Heritage using LLI grew 86% in RIT scores from fall to spring using
LLI. Grade 3: Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage grew 88% in RIT scores from
fall to spring, Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage using LLI grew 92% in RIT
scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 4: Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage
grew 44% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Economically disadvantaged students at Heritage
using LLI grew 38% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 5: Economically
disadvantaged students at Heritage grew 66% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Economically
disadvantaged students at Heritage using LLI grew 75% in RIT scores from fall to spring using
LLI. Special Education Students: Kindergarten: Special Education students at Heritage grew
67% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Special Education students at Heritage using LLI grew
50% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 1: Special Education students at Heritage
grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Special Education students at Heritage using LLI
grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 2: Special Education students at
Heritage grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Special Education students at Heritage
using LLI grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 3: Special Education
students at Heritage grew 67% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Special Education students at
Heritage using LLI grew 75% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 4: Special
Education students at Heritage grew 64% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Special Education
students at Heritage using LLI grew 0% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI. Grade 5:
Special Education students at Heritage grew 57% in RIT scores from fall to spring, Special
Education students at Heritage using LLI grew 0% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI.
English Learners: Kindergarten: There were no English Learners at Heritage in Kindergarten
Grade 1: English Learning students at Heritage grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to
spring,English Learning students at Heritage using LLI grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to
spring using LLI. Grade 2: English Learning students at Heritage grew 100% in RIT scores from
fall to spring,English Learning students at Heritage using LLI grew 100% in RIT scores from fall
to spring using LLI. Grade 3: English Learning students at Heritage grew 100% in RIT scores
from fall to spring,there were no English Learning students at Heritage using LLI grade 3. Grade
4: English Learning students at Heritage grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to spring,English
Learning students at Heritage using LLI grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to spring using LLI.
Grade 5: English Learning students at Heritage grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to
spring,English Learning students at Heritage using LLI grew 100% in RIT scores from fall to
spring using LLI. 80% of Heritage Elementary economically disadvantaged students grew in
Reading from Fall to Spring RIT scores. 79% of Heritage Elementary economically
disadvantaged students using the LLI program grew in Reading from Fall to Spring RIT scores.
76% of Heritage Elementary special education students grew in Reading from Fall to Spring RIT
scores. 54% of Heritage Elementary special education students using the LLI program grew in
Reading from Fall to Spring RIT scores. 100% of Heritage Elementary ELL students grew in
Reading from Fall to Spring RIT scores. 100% of Heritage Elementary ELL students using the
LLI program grew in Reading from Fall to Spring RIT scores. In conclusion: 80% of Heritage
Elementary subgroup students grew in Reading from Fall to Spring RIT scores. 78% of Heritage
Elementary subgroup students using the LLI program grew in Reading from Fall to Spring RIT
scores.

You might also like