, 1/2011

343.143/.144

: , -

. -
, -
. -
.

: , , .

1
, , , -
. ( -
). , , -
, -
.
, , -

1

, -
.
, 1929.. -
, .

141
 , ... (. 141166)

, .
-
* 2 .

, -
.
(. ,
, , .). , , ,
.
. , -
,
. : , ,
, . -
, .

.

,-
, . -
, ,

*
1953. .
1977.. :
.
2001. ,
, .
2006. . ( 3.9.2009., .
72/2009).
2009. (. 72/2009),
: -
.
. ,
1953.. . .
.
, -
. , -
, , -
, . ,
,
. ,
, . -
. K die Vernehmung. -
.
2
Tremmel, F.-Fenyvesi ,Cs.- Herke,Cs., Kriminalisztika ,Tanknyv s atlasz, Budapest-
Pcs,2005. str. 339.

142
 , 1/2011

,
3.
, ,
,
.
, , -
,
. -
, 4 -
,
,
., -
.


, .

II

,
. -
. , -
, -
,
.

1.
a/ -
.
5, -
6, 7 8 3

3
, -
.
4

( ) : -
, , , . , -
, -
.
5
,., , ,2004. . 160-165.
6
,.-,., , , 2009. . 174.

143
 , ... (. 141166)

.
- . .



.

-
,
.
. -
.
,
. -
.
. Hellwig-
, ,
-
. , , -
. . -
.
( )

-

.
9, -
.
3 ,-
.
. -
. -
.
,
.

7
,., , III,, 1997. . 51, 62, 83
8
,., ,- , 2006. .277.
9
Vodineli,V, Kriminalistika , Beograd, 1996. . 217-227.

144
 , 1/2011

,

-
. ... .
?
-
.

.
:
-


, -

-


, -
. . -

,
.
, ,
, -
. ,
.
, -
. -
.
10, , -
:

, .

:
, -

10
, ., , , 2000. . 171.

145
 , ... (. 141166)

, -



-

.
-
.

. , -
, -
.
Pavii i saradnici11
.
,
.
. -
, , -
.

ad personam . -

.
. . -
.
-

.
,
. . -
, . -
. -
, , -
.
. , -
.
.

11
Pavii,B.-Modly,D.-Vei,P., Kriminalistika , Knjiga prva , Zagreb, 2006. . 403-405.

146
 , 1/2011

Horst Clages12 :

/

ad personam

.
....
,
.13
, -
( ).
.-
, 14.
Flrian Tremmel Csaba Fenyvesi- Csongor Herke 15 -

:





.




(, , , -
.)
,
. .-
,
.

12
Horst Clages (Hrsg.) , Der rote Faden ,Grundsaetze der Kriminalpraxis,Heidelberg ,
2004.,.199.
13
Horst Clages (Hrsg.) , Der rote Faden ,Grundsaetze der Kriminalpraxis,Heidelberg ,
2004.,.203.
14
Horst Clages (Hrsg.) , Der rote Faden ,Grundsaetze der Kriminalpraxis,Heidelberg ,
2004.,.207
15
Tremmel,F.- Fenyvesi, Cs.- Herke,Cs., Kriminalisztika ,Tanknyv s atlasz , Budapest-
Pcs, 2005..341-343.

147
 , ... (. 141166)

:


. -
.
(, ) .
. -
.
Endre Bcz i saradnici16 :





-
, ,
. -

,
, 17.
Friedrich Geerds18 . -
. .
, -
.
:
1. - -
() . -
-
, . -
.
2. - .
, . -
.
, .
3. - . -


. , .

16
Bcz,E.,(ur.) , Kriminalisztika ,Budapest ,2004. .772-783.
17
Bcz,E.(ur.), Kriminalisztika , Budapest ,2004. .759.
18
Geerds ,F., Kriminalistik , Luebeck ,1980. .212.

148
 , 1/2011

,
, -
. . -
, , -
, ,
(. ).
,
,
.
-
, -
19 , , -
, .

2. 20

, -
(. 85. . 5. . 320. . 4.).
200921 . -
, 2009.. .

, -
.103..1. . , ,
, 331. .1. , -
.
.
, . -
, ,
, . -
, ,
... -
. .
. 22 (
,
. ), . -

19
Geerds , F., Kriminalistik , Luebeck ,1980. .212.in fine
20
. .70/ 2001, 68/2002 . .58/2004, 85/2005, 115/2005,
49/2007,20/2009 72/ 2009
21
. 72/2009
22
Gruba, M., Krivino procesno pravo, Beograd, 2009..414.

149
 , ... (. 141166)

-
.., ,
. -
. , -,
, , -
. ,,
, . -
,
. , -
, -
23, . ,
, -
.
,
, . -
, , , -
, -
, ( ).,-
, -
-
., . -
...

. , -
. .

. 297 ,
-
. 331. .

, -
. ,
,
. .332. -
,
. ,
,
. -
, -

23
III/1

150
 , 1/2011

.
, .
, -

. ,
.
,
,
.
( 24) . -
, .
, .25
, -
-. , -
( ) .
( ) 26.
, -
. .27

III

,
, -
, -
.
.

1.
(, -
, .) , -

.

. -

24
.85.., .
25
.69..1..
26
.239.. 1..
27
Beulke,W., Strafprozessrecht,Heidelberg,2006..226.

151
 , ... (. 141166)

28. , -
86% . -
29.
, 1980- -
, SAD30,
1 .
, , , -
. ,-
, 7,5
. -

.
. -
. -
,
. -
-
, . , -
, , -
. ,
.
,
. -
,
. -
. -
,
. 31
.
3 24(!) 32

28
Sanders,G., The usefulness of eyewitness research from perspective of police investiga-
tors, Unpublished manuscript , State University of New York , 1986.
29
Kebbel,M.-Milne,R., Police officers perception of eyewitness factors of forensic investi-
gations. Journal of Social Psychology, 1998..138.
30
Fisher,R.-Geiselman,E.-Raymond,D., Critical analysis of police interviewing techniques,
Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1987/15
31
.
32
-
. .
-
. : Kube/Strzer/Timm(Hrsg.), Kriminalistik , I ,Stuttgart ,etc.1992.
.563.

152
 , 1/2011

. , -
1 -
. ,
. -
.
, ,
.
. ,

.
,
,, .
, , , -
., .
,33 -
5 . ,
,
( , ),
,, . -
, , -
. .
. .
, 34.-
,
. ,
, -
-
.
, -
. , -
.

.
. -

33
George,R., A field evaluation of the interview. Unpublished masters thesis. Polytechnic
of East London,1991.
34
, . -
,,, -
,
. .

153
 , ... (. 141166)

. , -
, -
.
,
-
.
. ,
, -
.
, , ,
-
. -
.(leading) . ,
, , -
.
.
,. .
, -
, , -
: ,
. .
,, , , 35.
-
, , -
. ,
. -
. , -
-
..
. . ? . -
, -
.
36.
, , ,
, .
,
.

35
Kube/Strzer/Timm (Hrsg.) ,Kriminalistik , I , Stuttgart ,etc.1992..str.589.
36
: Bender/Rder/Nack, Tatsachenfesstellug vor Gricht, I, Mchen, 1981.
. 8o-87.

154
 , 1/2011

.
37.

2. Reid- 38
John E.Reid -
. , -
. ,
, -
. ,
, . , -
,
. -
. -
. -
,
. -
-
, (
) , ,-
, ,
( )39.
,
.
,
, .

, .
, -
.
-
. . . -

- ( -
o)
-
( ).

37
Bcz,E.,(ur.), Kriminalisztika , Budapest, 2004. .774-775.
38
. Bcz,E.,(ur.), Kriminalisztika , Budapest ,2004. .859.
39
Inbau . -
.. Behaviour Analysis Majesky.

155
 , ... (. 141166)

-
. -
-
. -
. .
. -

. . -

(
). -
-
.
- -
, ,-
, -
.
(. ) .
,
Richard A.Leo40 25 -
. ,
, -
, -
. -
.
, ,
. -
-
. ,
.

3. 41 PACE
-
,
.

(The Cardiff Tree Case). -
, ,

40
Naved.prema Bcz,E.,(ur.) , Kriminalisztika , Budapest , 2004. .859.
41
. Bcz,E.,(ur.) , Kriminalisztika , Budapest , 2004. .860.

156
 , 1/2011

, -
. , -
, 1986 .. -
. , -
Planning and Preparation,Engage
and Explain,Account,Closure,Evaluate PEACE.
-
. ,
, , -
.
-
. -
:




,



,
. -


42. -
-
. , , -
, ,
.
.

4.

.
, Ron Fisher Ed Gei-
selman 1992. -

42
e John Baldwin, 600 -
, 20 . -
. Bcz, E., (ur.), Kriminalisztika, Budapest, 2004. . 859.

157
 , ... (. 141166)

43 -
.
-
. . -
, ( ).

44.
4
:
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. , -
. .
,
.
, -
.
.
, .
2. -
, . -
, -
. ,
. -
, ,
. ,

, -
. , .
, -
, .
.
, .
3. .
.

43
Fisher,R.,-Geiselman,E., Memory-enhencing techniques for inwestigative interviewing:
The cognitive interview,Springfield,IL.,1992.
44
Pavii,B.-Modly,D.-Vei,P., Kriminalistika, Knjiga prva , Zagreb , 2006. .4o8.

158
 , 1/2011

,
. ,
, . -
, .
.
4. -


.

. . -
. -
,
-
, -
.

7 . -
.
, -
,
, , .
,
.
.
. -
. . -
.
. .
.
, . -
,, -
. -

.
.
-
. -
.
,, . .
159
 , ... (. 141166)

. .-

.
, , .
.-
-
, , .

(, .)45.

.
. .
.
.

5.
-
. Frank Adler Max
Hermanutz46 , -
. ,
.
.-

. Adler Hermanutz
. -
, -
.
,
. , -
. -
, . -
. -
, -
. , -
.

45
Boros, J., Kriminalisztika s pszicholgia, in: Tanulmnyok Erdsy Emil professzor tis-
zteletre, Pcs, 2002. . 169.
46
Adler, F. - Hermanutz, M., Strukturierte vernehmen mit Vernehmungskarten, Kriminali-
stik , br. 8-9/2010, . 499-511.

160
 , 1/2011

.

.
-
. -
. -

.
-
. -
, . -
,
, .
, -
.
, -
.
.
, -
. -
-
(, ,) 13
.
-
, . , -

.
DIN 6 ( .1/4 4) -
. 28 .
.1: - , -
.
.2: - .
13 2 . -
. -
, . ,

. -
. .-

.
, .
161
 , ... (. 141166)

.2. :
2., 1.: . 6 -
: 1. ; 2. -
; ; 2. ; 3.-
; 4. o ; -
; 5. ; 6. -
.
.2., 2.: - 7 :
7. ; ; 8.
; 9. ;
10. ; 11. ; 12.-
; ; 13. .
.3 4: .-
.
. 3.: - -
. -
.
.4.: .
, .
-
() .
.5: - . ,
,
,
, - . ,
,
.
.baseline-. -
.
.6:- . -
, . ,
baseline. baseline- ,
-
. .
: -
. ,-
:
X.
-
. ,
162
 , 1/2011

,
.
. 7-12: - . -
, , -
, ,
. , -
. , -
,
. , , . -
. -
.
.13:- . -
-
.
.....
, .
.14-19:- .-
. .
-
: , -
., ,
,. ,, .
.20-23: - . -
, . .-
(.
?) -
. ,
( .2). -
.

.
, -
. -

.22.
.
23. -
(.-
) -
.
163
 , ... (. 141166)

24-25: - .
, .
.
26. 27. . -
.
28. .
.-
. ,
.
.
. -
.

IV

.
, -
.,
( ) -
/ . , -
.,
, / -
/ /. ,
, ,-
, ,
. ,
.
,

( , )47.
,
, -
. ,
,
. -
. , . , -

47
Gruba, M., Krivino procesno pravo, Beograd, 2009. . 204.

164
 , 1/2011

, -
. , -
-
. -
. ,
, / -
. ,
. ,
, -
. ,
, .
, -

, .
, , -
-
. , Geerds , -
,
. , -
48.
, , , -
.
, -
, -
. -
, .
, -
( , .)
. -

, -
.
.

48
Geerds , F., Kriminalistik, Luebeck , 1980, . 212.

165
 , ... (. 141166)

Itvan Feje, Ph.D., Full Professor

Faculty of Law Novi Sad

Interrogation Models in Contemporary Criminal Procedure

Abstract

The paper is divided onto four major parts.

In the introductory part the author states that personal evidence (state-
ments of whiteness, suspect, accused, convicted and expert) play still a very im-
portant role in collecting evidence in criminal procedure, even though the signi-
ficance of physical evidence is growing.
In the second part the classical model of interrogation is presented, which
is based on the division of interrogation onto three parts. This model is accepted
by majority of authors.
The third part is devoted to alternative models.
The fourth part contains concluding remarks. Here the author underlines
that scientific novelties are valuable only if they contribute to the practice, and
this contribution is only possible if the interrogators are trained adequately and
if objective conditions for the application of the novelties are provided.
Key words: Criminal Procedure, interrogation, models

166