-

- 2017

2017
:
:

- 2713 - -

ansaq@qu.edu.qa :
www.qu.edu.qa/ansaq :
Online-ISSN:2520-7148 :

Print-ISSN:2520-713X :

+ 974-4403-4823 + 974-4403-6441 :

+ 974-4403-4501 :
445/2016 :

-

. . .

()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
)Eric Gautier (France
)Luc Deheuvels (France

.1 .
.2 .
.3 4000 8000.
.4 .
.5 :




( ).
( )
.6 :




( ).
( )
.7 .
.
.8 .
.9 :
( . :
/ ).
.10 .

5
2017


15 :

33 ( : : )

53

75

93

117

133 ( )

151

171 :

7
2017

187

207
( - -)

229

247

269

291

8
2017


/





.



()

. .
() -
-
.
.

()

. .

11
2017

 :

. .
.
muhassebe@hotmail.com

2017 /04/12 :
2017 /04 /28 :
:


.
- -(
) (= )
.cognitive
( )

.
:
- - -
- .

15
2017
 The cognitive approach to sound symbolism:
The etymological poetics in Amal Dunkul's experience

Mohie Eldine Muhasseb

Minia University. Egypt
muhassebe@hotmail.com

Abstract:
The relationship between the sound of a word and its meaning, or what we may
call (sound-meaning mappings), has long been proposed to be critically important for
language evolution, or for its epistemological status. This article tries to investigate the
cognitive dimensions and semantic features which are evoked by the perceived qualities
of the linguistic sounds in their concentrations at varying frequencies or modulations. In
Cognitive linguistics, sound symbolism is dealt with according to the perspective that
some phonological features are correlated dirictly with some semantic and cognitive
variables. Some of poetic texts of the Egyptian poet (Amal Dunqul), and some of his
critical writings, are put in the light of this investigation. In our discussion of what
we have called his (etymological poetics) we have mentioned to sound symbolism roots
inancient philosophy, and we haveexamined its significance and effects in the cognitive
reactions of some prominent literary figures in their approaches to Dunqul`s poetry.

Keywords:
Sound-meaning mappings- language evolution- Semantic features- linguistic sounds-
Sound symbolism- Phonological features- Cognitive linguistics- literary figures

16
2017
 ((( . :
:


.
((( :
. 1993( Sean A Day) :
.Synesthesia bibliography :
)(http://home.comcast.net/~sean.day/syn-bibliography. htm .
Iconicity in Language and
1997( Literature ):
.Iconicity in language: Bibliography
:
(http://esdev.uzh.ch/en/iconicity/index.php?subaction=showf

)&ull&id=1197027659&archive=&start_from=&ucat=2 .
() ( 2500):
Institute of Linguistics, University of Graz

:
.Bibliography of reduplication :
(427
(http://reduplication.uni-graz.at/).

1997-2001( M. Magnus): 450

.Bibliography of phonosemantics )
:
(http://www.trismegistos.com/MagicalLetterPage/
( )Grard Genette 1930
)Bibliography.html
()Mimologiques: voyage en Cratylie
1983( John J. Ohala) : :
Bibliography on Sound Symbolism
1976
: Taeth Morgan 1995
Phonology Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley
( .((()Mimologics
. & - Voeltz, Friedrich
2001( K. Erhard, and Christa Kilian-Hatz) : Magaret Magnus
Bibliography of ideophone research:
Friedrich K. Erhard Voeltz and Christa Kilian-Hatz, eds.,
(((.
Ideophones, pp407-423. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John
Benjamins.

& Wynecoop, Shelly, and Golan

1996( Levin):
. :
_(http://www.flong.com/texts/lists/list_synesthesia )(University of Nebraska Press (( (
)bibliography/ http://www.trismegistos.com : (((

17
2017
 ( )(((phonosemantics
(((. ( )990 (((
:

.
():


( ) - -
: (((
((( .
(( ( :
() ( 347 - 429.) " "mimologique
sound symbolism : l""phonetic symbo
.ism [ Wescott : Wescott,

: Roger W Sound and

Sense: Linguistic Essays on Phonosemic Subjects, (1980),

((( . ] Jupiter Press, Lake Bluff " ."phonosemics

""linguistic iconism
- : " "ideophones
.
((( - [ ] o"ph
nosemantics" Stanislav
- - [ Voronin Voronin, :
Stanislav V. (1982), Fundamentals of Phonosemantics. (in
protea phonai )Russian: Osnovy fonosemantiki - monograph), Leningrad.

((( . . ( )
( C.S. Peirce " )"icon
phusei ( " .)"symbol
( ) . ( )1
Gods of the Word: Archetypes in the Consonants
:
((( . ttp://www.trismegistos.com/MagicalLetterPag

( " )"natural expressiveness
( ) () ::
Robin Allott. 1995: Sound Symbolism. In Language in the
. (( ( Wrm Glaciation. ed. by Udo L.Figge, 15-38. Bochum:
: . : . ((( ]Brockmeyer.
. ((( http://www.percepp.com/soundsmb.htm :
: . .26 ((( ((( :
.26 (( ( http://www.trismegistos.com/MagicalLetterPage/
. (( ( ((( : .

18
2017

.
(((.
. etymo
((( .
(= ) etymological theory
-
. -
((( .




(((.








.
((( .

:

(((

(
Overview of the Phonosemantics
((( .
.((()Literature ( 392)
.

.26 (( (
((( Lyons, J, 1968, Introduction To Theoretical Linguistics.
((( Land, S., 1974, from Signs To Propositions: The Concept Of
Form In Eighteenth Century Semantic Theory, pp20-30. : ( ) : (((
(7) Magnus, Margaret (1998), The Gods of the Word: Archetypes : .
in the Consonants, Thomas Jefferson. . (( (
((( . . (( (

19
2017
 ) ( ((( .
:) 1960 ( .
((()phonaesthemes(
) phonaesthetics ( -


-(((
:(((
- Beneveniste, Emile (1971a), The Nature of the Linguistic
Sign, Acta Linguistica 1: 43-48. Bloomfield, Leonard (1909-
- 1910), A Semasiological Differentiation in Germanic Second-
ary Ablaut, Modern Philology 7: 245-288, 345-382, partially
. reprinted in Charles F. Hockett, (ed.), A Leonard Bloomfield
Anthology, Bloomington Indiana U. Press.Bolinger, Dwight
(1949), The Sign is not Arbitrary, Boletn del Instituto Caro
: y Cuervo 5: 56-62. Bolinger, Dwight (1985), The Inherent
Iconism of Intonation in John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in
Syntax, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Eco, Umberto (1972),
Introduction to a Semiotics of Iconic Signs, Versus 2.Firth,
John Rupert (1935), The Use and Distribution of Certain
English Sounds, English Studies, 17: 8-18. Hymes, Dell H.
: (1960), Phonological Aspects of Style: Some English Son-
nets, in T.A. Sebeok, (ed.), Style in Language, MIT Press,
((( -1 Cambridge.Jakobson, Roman (1978a), Sound and Meaning,
MIT Press, London. Jakobson, Roman (1968), Agreement
. between the Systems of Sound and Color, Child Language,
Aphasia and Psychological Universals, Janua Linguarum,
- - Mouton, The Hague.Jakobson, Roman (1978b), Sound Sym-
bolism and Distinctive Features, unpublished ms. presented
.((( at the Conference on Semiotics and the Arts, University of
Michigan.Jespersen, Otto (1933b), The Symbolic Value of
) phonaesthemes( ((( the Vowel i, Linguistica, College Park, MD, or in Selected
Papers of O. Jespersen in English French and German, Levin
Firth: Speech. : .
and Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 283-303, or (1922c), Philo-
: In The tongues of men and Speech (1930: 184)
Scott Drellishak (2006): Statistical Techniques for Detect- logica 1: 1-19.Lakoff, George (1986), Systematic Sound
ing and Validating Phonesthemes. On:depts.washington.edu/ Symbolism: the Semantic Side, paper presented at the
uwcl/matrix/sfd/Drellishak%20-%20Phon esthem es.pdf Berkeley Conference on Sound Symbolism. Sapir, Edward
((( Chapman, S. & Routledge, P. (eds.) (2005): Key Thinkers in (1911), Diminutive and augmentative consonant symbolism
Linguistics and the Philosophy ofLanguage, p86. in Wishram, Handbook of American Indian Languages Bu-
cognitive linguistics ((( reau of American Indian Ethnography, Washington, D.C. Bul-
letin 40(1): 638-646. Sapir, Edward (1929), A Study in Pho-
netic Symbolism, Journal of Experimental Psychology 12:
:( ) 225-239. Sapir, Edward (1933), La ralit psychologique des
Mihailo Antovi: Half a Century of Generative Linguistics phonmes, Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique
What Has the Paradigm Given to Social Science?. p37. In: 30: 247-265.Todorov, T. (1972), Le sense des sons, Po-
Series: Linguistics and Literature Vol. 5, No 1, 2007, pp31-46.
tique 11: 446-462Ullman, Stephen (1949), Word Form and
On: facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/lal/lal2007/lal2007-04.pdf
Word Meaning, Archivum Linguisticum 1: 126. Tsur, Re-
((( Vladan Pavlovi: Cognitive Linguistics and English Language
uven. 1992. What makes sound patterns expressive? Duke
Teaching at English Departments. P. 80. Series: Linguistics and
Literature Vol. 8, No 1, 2010, pp79-90. On: facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/ University Press.Tsur, Reuven, 2006. Size-sound symbolism
lal/lal201001/lal201001-07.pdf revisited. Journal of Pragmatics. 38: 905-924.

20
2017
primary -1 -2 modules
symbolism :
( ) connectionism
() phonesthemes - -
(
)...
()
( ) corporeal .
.symbolism -3
-2 secondary
.symbolism

: .
( )
() :
() .

((( (((

.universal
(((.

-
9% -cognitive semantics
((( . (
( )fictive words .)sound symbolism
:
((( : ((( :
)Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols, and John, J.Ohala (eds. Aniruddh D. Patel & Joseph R. Daniele: An empirical
1994: Sound Symbolism. comparison of rhythm in language and Music. P. B43. In:
(( ( : Cognition 87 (2003) B35B45. On: www.elsevier.com/locate/
Frawley, William J. (ed.) 2003: International Encyclopedia cognit
of Linguistics, 2d edition. V4. (( ( .

21
2017
 expressive .
animism 95%
. bouba
kiki
((( ((( .

- Chapman
(
Oliver : ( ping :))

( ( bong)) .
. .


: /r/ /s/
,(((/ /
-1 /gl/
/fl/
/cr/ .(((...
.
-2
stress length
tone ....intonation (((.

.
: ((( :
Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlativ (2010): Cross- Modal Iconic-
ity: A Cognitive Semiotic Approach to Soundsymbolism.
- - In: Sign Systems Studies 38. on: https://www.ceeol.com/
content-files/document-9736.pdf
. ((( M. Clymer (2008): Sound Patterns and Meaning in Cat -
... lan Poetry: A Literature Review on Cognitive Poetics.
On:Clymer_thesis_2008.pdf, Thesis, 4.653Mb,PDF
((( Scott Drellishak. Op cit.
((( sa Abelin (1999):Studies inSound Symbolism. Doctoral Di -
sertation, in: Department of Linguistics, Gteborg University,
(( ( : . . Sweden. www.ling.gu.se /~ abelin/ny%20inlaga.pdf

22
2017
(((
(((. (((.
/
:

((( .
((( - -
(((
:
((( .
:
( ((1 l :
(.((1 .
l :
.
( .((1 .

.


- -
( .((1 ((( - -
...

((( : .
((( .
(((
((( . : 19 - -
((( 20
((( 19
((( 22
( ((1 21
( ((1 21 . : 33 (((
( ((1 : .271224 154 87 (( ( .
( ((1 . : 56 (( ( . : 17

23
2017

.
.
(((. .(((...



:
: .
.
.


/

. .

( ) .


.
:

.
.




.
. ( ) ( ).
.

((( : . ( ) 47 :
. : 86 -85 (( ( .

24
2017
 (((.
((( :
((( .
(((.

.

...

.


. .
...
. .


:
((( .

.
((( . - -

() ((( .

. : (((

.400
( ) : (((
.10 ((( .
.27 (( (
: .. . : ((( (( ( : :
161 . 10149
. . : .56 (( ( (( ( . . :
. : .191 ((( .31

25
2017

. ()
(((: (((.
-1

. (((
( - -
)
. ((( .
-2
(((
( ...)

.
.
-3



(((.
.

( )CVCC
. (((

-4
:


( )8
. . .38 (( (
(((
. : :
http://www.jehat.com/ar/amal/page-9.htm () :
(((
8 / : 445 .
- -6 1985 (((
( :)2009 47 (( (
.khartoumspace.uofk.edu:8080 :
( ) (( (
((( . .

26
2017
 .
/ / .


.
.
/ /

((( .
.
( :
. .
) :
// (
) ( )
( :
) . ( ) :

(((:
( )( :
.
.

. . ) ..
()


.
.

.

!
()
: / ///
(((: :

.
() ()
(( ( ()
.154
((( . (
) .472 ((( () .311

27
2017
 ( .6
.7 )
.8
/ / []

[ ]
.9 .. !
/ / [ ] ] [
.10 .. !
/ / [ ]
.11 .. ..

.12
] [
:
/ / [ ].
.1
.2

/ /
.3 - - //
.4




.5

( .6 .
.7 )
.8

.9 .. ! / /
.10 .. ! !
.11 .. () :
..
(((:
.12 .1
.2

.3 - -
.
.4

(4 1
.5
.)12
( .)3 2 ((( () .351 -350

28
2017
 ( .)8 7 6 5
. ( .)10 9
/ / ( )11 .
( :
) .

12
10

1
5
8
7
6

4
3
2

..

.
:
l



.


.

( )11 / /
! [.]CVC
!
l
( ...
.. ) . [ ] ()10 9

! (.)23
l / / ( - )5-8
. ()CVVC
() -
()
( )!
!

29
2017
 ((( :


: :
.
:
:
:

( /) .
.
( )
( )
.... .

. .
.
:
.

... - -
... .
:

(((.
.
!!
: - -
:
[] .
(( ( .. . : 282

(( ( . . : : .
.17

30
2017

1972 .
1996 .
2004 -. 17 524
- 1977.
(.). ()
1998 .
1998 .
49 1 2005.
1 2000. :
:
1998.
2008 :
1985 .
1974 3 / 250772.
(http://esdev.uzh.ch/en/iconicity/index.php?sub
1998 .
&=action=showfull&id=1197027659&archive
)&start_from=&ucat=2 ( ) :
(http://home.comcast.net/~sean.day/syn- :
)bibliography. htm 2003.
(http://reduplication.uni-graz.at/).
_ ( h t t p : / / w w w. fl o n g . c o m / t e x t s / l i s t s / l i s t () 5 1983.
)synesthesia_bibliography/

(http://www.trismegistos.com MagicalLetterP-
)age/Bibliography.html 1988.
Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlativ (2010): Cross- :
Modal Iconicity: A Cognitive Semiotic () 11996.
Approach to Soundsymbolism. In: Sign Systems
Studies 38. on: https://www.ceeol.com/content-
files/document-9736.pdf ( .).
Aniruddh D. Patel & Joseph R. Daniele: An
empirical comparison of rhythm in language

)and Music. P. B43. In: Cognition 87 (2003
B35B45. On: www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit
sa Abelin (1999):Studies inSound Symbolism.
2009.

31
2017
 Doctoral Dissertation, in: Department of
Linguistics, Gteborg University, Sweden.
www.ling.gu.se /~ abelin/ny%20inlaga.pdf
depts.washington.edu/uwcl/matrix/sfd/
Drellishak%20-%20Phon esthem es.pdf
Frawley,
William J. (ed.) 2003: International
Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2d edition. V4.
Oxford University Press. (Sound Symbolism)
Hinton,
Leanne, Johanna Nichols, and John,
J. Ohala (eds.) 1994: Sound Symbolism.
Cambridge University Press.
http://www.jehat.com/ar/amal/page-9.htm

http://www.percepp.com/soundsmb.htm

http://www.trismegistos.com

http://www.trismegistos.com/MagicalLetterP-
age
khartoumspace.uofk.edu:8080

Land,
S., 1974, from Signs To Propositions:
The Concept Of Form In Eighteenth Century
Semantic Theory, pp20-30. Longman Group,
London
Lyons, J, 1968,: Introduction To Theoretical
Linguistics, Cambridge.
M. Clymer (2008): Sound Patterns and Meaning
in Catalan Poetry: A Literature Review on
Cognitive Poetics. On: Clymer_thesis_2008.
pdf, Thesis, 4.653Mb,PDF
Magnus, Margaret (1998), The Gods of the
Word: Archetypes in the Consonants, Thomas
Jefferson University Press, Kirksville, MO.
Mihailo Antovi: Half a Century of Generative
Linguistics What Has the Paradigm Given
to Social Science?. In: Series: Linguistics and
Literature Vol. 5, No 1, 2007, pp31-46. On:
facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/lal/lal2007/lal2007-04.pdf
Vladan Pavlovi: Cognitive Linguistics
and English Language Teaching at English
Departments. P. 80. Series: Linguistics and
Literature Vol. 8, No 1, 2010, pp79-90. On: facta.
junis.ni.ac.rs/lal/lal201001/lal201001-07.pdf

32
2017

: )
(
.
.
ehsansadiq@hotmail.com

2017 /03/03 :
2017 /04/05 :
:
( ) ( )
( 19191982 1925)
. .

.
: :
.
:
( ) 1961.


.
:
- - - - - - - -.

33
2017
 Emission in Khalil Hawey 's Poetry
(A study of "Naher al-Rimad" and "Al-Nayee wa Al-Reeh")

Ehsan Sadiq Allawati

Sultan Qaboos University- Muscat- Sultanate of Oman
ehsansadiq@hotmail.com

Abstract:
This study attempts to focus closely on (Naher Al-Rimad) and the other (Al-Nayee
wa Al-Reeh) of the distinguished poet KHALIL Haweey (1919 or 1925 - 1982), by
throwing light objectively on the principles which his poetry became known of and he
became affiliated to.
Al-Haweey was known for his profound belief in the capabilities of the Arabs to rise
up from their long coma to concentrate on their vast commitments and responsibilities
notably in the scope of the Arab unity not only politically but in all areas.
This phenomenon and/or reality was considerably visible in two stages. Firstly, in his
pottery in which he beautifully illustrated his views on the pan-Arab unity. This trend
procured him a distinctive position in the modern Arabic pottery.
Secondly, his belief (in the pan-Arab unity) was not constant and stabilized and was
subject to a down turn at first instance. His position was quite stable and remained steadfast
in his first and second pottery but it took a round turn and stumbled at the beginning of his
third pottery (Bayader Al-Jooe) which he published soon after the collapse of the unity
between Egypt and Syria in 1961.
These two versions in the position of the poet made the study to focus upon the first
and second poems which were, nonetheless, beautifully and objectively versed.
Key Words:
Emission- Death- Civilization- East- Myth- Fairytales- Past- Future.

34
2017
 :
((( . :

(((

:

(((



(((.

(((.
.




:
((( (((.

((( .22
(( (
.79
(( ( :
( ( 19191925
.)26
((( : )1982

: (

.)55
:

( :
.)9 (( ( .38
((( .29 (( ( .97

35
2017
 .

(((



.

1958
.

((( .


(((
: ((( .


- -

(((.
(((.
1961
: 1967
1975
.1982

.
.29 (( ( (( (
.115 ((( .102
.91 (( ( (( ( : .33
.67 ((( .

36
2017
 .


(((.

.
:



. (((
:

.




.
. 1962




((( .
. :


.
.



:


.
(( ( .98-99

: : 14-
.20
((( .27 ((( .131

37
2017


.


:

. (((.


( ). :



. .

.
.


!
:





.

(((
.

118-119 ((( (( ( ( ) .43-44

38
2017



:



(((.



.
(((.


.
:

.


.



.

.
.

(((
.

(( ( .57
((( .98 -97 (( ( .58

39
2017

.


. .


. .


:


.
:
:


(((


(((
..
.


.

.




((( .264 -263 (( ( .89

40
2017


. .


.

:
.


:



:





:

(((






(((.
:

. .


((( .
(( ( .189 -188
((( .45 ((( .21

41
2017
 (((


.
.
()
:
.
.

:

.
:
.




(((
:


:
(((






.

(((
:

..
.

(( ( .111 -110
((( .160
((( .127 -126 (( ( .42

42
2017
 :
:


.




.
(((


:




(((

: :

(((


(((

:




(((
. :

.

. (((.

(( ( .70 -69 (( ( .225 -224

(( ( .101 (( ( .209
(( ( .124 (( ( .55

43
2017
 (((

:

:

(((

(((






:
:





(((





(((

: .
-

-
. :

()

...
(((:
.134 -133 (( (
.165 ((( (( ( .246 :
.169 -168 ((( .
: .38 ((( (( ( .252

44
2017

(((

:





:

(((

(((

:
(((

((( (((
. (((





(((. .

:


.155 -154 (( (
.208 (( (

.43 (((
.221 (((
.77 ((( (( ( .171
.49 (( ( (( ( .166

45
2017

(((



(((


:

((( .

.

(((




:

.
:




.

(((

. :



(( ( .167
((( .15 (( ( .43
((( .266 -265 (( ( .299

46
2017
 .

:

(((
-

. (((


: :


(((



.
.



.


.
.





. :


.



(((.
:

(( ( .150 -149
(( ( : (( ( .135
.153 -152 (( ( .126

47
2017



.

(((

(((

(((
:


(((
(((


.

: .




.:







-
- :



(( ( .221
(( ( .214 -213 ((( .43
((( .259 (( ( .219

48
2017

.
(((




(((.
()






:

- -
: .
: ...(((.

.
.
:



.


:

(((


: .
.

.


(( ( .159 -158
. :
(( ( .42 .66
((( .188 (( ( .160

49
2017
 .


((( .
! :

:
. .
.
.
(((.
:




.


(((

: (
)
.
:
.


:

.

(( ( .21
((( : .153 (( ( .120 -119

50
2017

.
.

.

.

:

.. .
:
.1986
.1993 .


.1994


.1997


.
.1978
2 .
.1992



- -
.1995 .

(..).

.1979
2 .
.1984

51
2017

149 150 ..
.1983 :
.1996
:
. ..1968
:

30 .1984

.1958

.1961

26 .1983
:
6 .1992

155 156
.1984

.1981
:
26 .1983


.1961

.
6 .1992
:
6 .1992

52
2017


.
.
frh99123@hotmail.com

2017 /02/20 :
2017 /04/01 :

:




:
:
:
-1 .
-2
.
:
- - - -

53
2017
 Character Semiotics in the novel of butterfly kingdom

Mofareh Shabaan Asiri

King Khalid University. Saudi Arabia
frh99123@hotmail.com

Abstract:
This study discusses a characters semiotics in the novel of the butterfly kingdom by
the Algerian writer Waciny Laredj. I initiated my research with an introduction in which
I indicated the characters importance as it is a central element in the whole narration,
and as a fundamental pillar in the formation of the novel, as well. Then I discussed the
concept of alienation as an ensured theme which has directly influenced the characters
formation of a novel. Therefore, the notion of this study came from alienation. The study
included two sections: First, the structure of characters where I explained and the effect
of alienation on its composition.
The second topic, is about the languages impact on deeping the concept of alienation
among the characters of the novel. Then the study came to a set of important results
which are:
(1) The concept of alienation with its different elements has a strong presence in the
novels characters formation.
(2) The language of novel contributed to deepen the concept of alienation among its
characters which resulted in reaching the extreme case of fragmentation and
decomposition.

Keywords:
Character Semiotics- butterfly kingdom- formation of the novel- novels characters
formation.

54
2017


(((. ()(((
() (((
()
(((
-


(((










() (((.



(((.
((( ( 8 1954 -
)
.
.https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki :
((( .
((( : .39
(((
( )
. : .
.25
((( : ( ) .45 ((( :
((( : .27 : - - .70

55
2017
 :

((( .
( )philippe Hammon

:


- 1 :
.
- 2 : .





((( .
(((.






. .
- -





:
.
: .
/ :
(((. .
((( : .244 ((( : .22
((( : ( ..) .89 ((( ( ) .45

56
2017
 :
.
:
- - -
- -.
(((

:






.
((( .
l : .
-

((( :
. (((.
(
... )


()



.79

((( .
(((
.

.91- 90
((( : .138 ((( .57
((( :. . ((( : .54 53 :
.81 . .

57
2017
 .
.100


:


...
.
.
- - . .

:
(((. . 99

:
...
- .-
.

.




.

.
.78
.
((( : 122 121
.123

58
2017

:

.

78

12-11



.
.


:



.
.78







} :



(((.

{ ()13 :

((( : .90

59
2017
 . 34

.





.96
(((.



.
(((
101



17

96


.21
.



.97
((( : .293
((( : ( ) .33

60
2017
 l :


.93



.


.

- -
(((
: 30% (((.

.

. :
. .
... .


:

.
((( -
sstram of consciou - .16
.ness




. : ((( : :
.59 .53

61
2017
 l :




: (((
.81
.



.16

:



.



.144

. 16

. :
117
. .57
.16


((( :
.
.
- :

.
. .5

62
2017

:
.

.
.
.
. . .

.
-- . ..
() -- .
. --

. -- .
() ..154
()


.

.
:
()
() . ...

()
. ((( . :
().

1958

((( .22

63
2017



.160
...
90 .
.
. 154
.160
.



((( .

.




. .137
.


250
.250 ...
.245-244
l :

((( :
.

64
2017
 :
104
.252
. l :
104
.105
.
.
(((
[ ]... .
. 105
.
.
.107

:

.

.110 82
. 101


.82
.107

:

: .82

: .
.
((( http://www.almaany.com/ar/name

65
2017

l :

. .
.



.98

(
) ..
...
(((. .



...

.
.114

-

....37 (((

. :

117 24 .
-
. -
.87
(((
. :
((( . https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/.

66
2017





( )





. .
l :


.
.



.
:


.
:



... - -

67
2017


. (((.

. ..

(((.
: - -
.
. .24 :
:

-- . .




.. 25 (((
--
.
.
((( . - -
.
((( : .113
((( .40
..26 ((( : .33
((( : 115 114 .

68
2017
 -- .
-- : ... ......
. . ... ... ... ......
. ..36
--
-- .



...

--
.
--
. .
.
.
-- .
:
--
-- .
.
--
-- ..
: --
. ... .
. .
.313-312-311




-- . .

....

69
2017
 . :
.




.10

(((.














((( .
((( .
:
(((

.
(((





.

:
((( :.

104 .
((( () ((( : .32
( ) . ((( :
((( 1.193 .174-175

70
2017
 ()




.
(((.









.

.






:
: .
.
: (((.


Bar Le Marquis de Sad
.
: . 201

((( : :
. . .
((( : :
: .42

71
2017

::
2013 . .
:: :

: 2

2004.
.

2009 2. (
: ( ) ).
12 46
2002.
/ :
.
.

2011 2.

1436 1.
(
. .)
.

1985 .

2008 .

1
1411.

1437 1.

72
2017
 :

2013 2.

2009 1.

2002 1.

2008 1.

2010 1.

2008 1.

: -
1994 2.
1

1980 2.

1992 .

1987 .

.
( )

2011 1.

https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
http://www.almaany.com/ar/name

73
2017






.
-

2017 /02/24 :
2017 /03/26 :
:




.





.
:
- - - - - -.

75
2017
 Silence in dialogue: Tayeb Saleh s Season of
Migration to the North.

Zouhaier Elguesmi
University of arts and humain sciences Sousse-Tunisia
zouhaierabouamine@gmail.com

Abstract:
The study of silence in the Taieb Salehs Season of migration the north aims at
unveiling another side of the novel that has long failed to fall under scrutiny inside
and outside language. We tried in the theoretical outset to highlight its connection with
verbal communication, to show it status in linguistics, and to demarcate its position in
literature.
Silence has huge expressive potentials for it accommodates what we dont know, what
we fail to perceive and what we are unable to express. In fact, silence voices what our
verbal language tries to destroy and unveils what speech tries to obscure.
At the practical level, we examined the textual distribution of silence at the level of
the narrative structure of the novel.We highlighted its patterns and the explicit indices in
speech interactions. We came to the conclusion that silence has a huge role in elucidating
general discourse , notably recital one ;it looks as though it were a process of conscious
and unconscious interlocution.It is considered as a form of verbal deviation in the
dialogues of the novel.Accordingly, it is its eloquent silence thats open to explanation
and interpretation.It has connotations, meanings and pragmatic , expressive and aesthetic
functions according to the aims of the interlocutors and their intentions.

Keywords:
Silence- dialogue- novel- Tayeb Saleh- Season of Migration to the North- verbal
deviation

76
2017
 ((( :
((( .


(((
((( .

.

(((
) )Pierre Van Den Heuvel
((( . :
.
.:
Pierre Van Den Heuvel Parole, mot, silence (pour une po-
tique de lnonciation) Librairie, Jos, Corti1985, p65.

:

[ ]...

- -
:
(((

:

Pierre Van Den Heuvel, Parole, mot, silence, p65.

((( (
): .
- .4-16
( )
.13
.
)1969(Blanchot
.1988-1989 )1971(Pierre Macherey
) )Dire ou ne pas Dire Ducrot
Lucien Dallinbach
( )66
. : IBLA.67-68



:
: . :
) (Pour unethorie de la production littraire:
) (Dire ou ne pas dire
: . . .:
((( Pierre Van Den Heuvel, Parole, mot, silence, p66-67. Pierre Macherey, Pour une thorie de la production littraire,
((( . p105.

77
2017
 change verbal

(((.


(/) (/)



(((
:
(((
. (((.
Parole parle Parole
-1

(parlante )M.-Ponty


. .


.

((( .

((( .66-67
((( .68
(((

.
.

.
.
.


...
. . . :
70.
((( Lducation
(((Pour plus de dtails voir: Z. Timenova Valtcheva: Le silence sentimental :
littraire et ses formes dans loeuvre romanesque de Marguerite
Duras (doctoral dissertation), Universidade de Coimbra, .
.
Faculdade de Letras, 2008. : .

78
2017

: -2
.


.


.
.

:
.
(
-3 : )
Non-parole
Non-mot


[ ]...
(((.
.
(((Arnaud Rykner
((( .



(((



(((.



.
((( Pierre Van Den Heuvel Parole, mot, silence (pour une po -
tique de lenonciation) p67.
((( .65
((( Zlatka Timenova Valtcheva, Les silences du dialogues
((( Rykner, A: Paroles perdues, faillite du langage et represent - romanesque dans Moderato Cantabile de Marguirite, p98.
tion, p49. ((( .99

79
2017
 ..
.




.
(((.



:


.





((( . (((.


.
.


. .
: -4







.



((( :
.: ((( Ibid, p99.
Pierre Van Den Heuvel, Parole, mot, silence, p66. ((( Barthes, R, Le bruissement de la langue, p279.

80
2017


:
((( :
. ((( .
: .
((( .

.



.


:

.


( )Dviation de linteraction
((( .

(

)



.
.



.

.
. (((

-5
:




.
.77
(((
((( .29

((( Pierre Van Den Heuvel, Parole, mot, silence, p110.
((( :
((( .156 . : .75

81
2017
 .
.(((...
(((. .

(((.



.







(((. :



:


((( .


!


:
((( .

.
(((.



((( .43
((( .35
((( .46 :

((( .48
((( .
.78
((( ((( .29

82
2017


(((


: :
( ) .
( )... :
. .

: ... .... ...

(((
... . :
((( .





.


-6
((( :

:
) (Le Marque Graphique ( )




. :
(((
.
: ) (Le Silence de la Voix
(((
( ).



((( .100-101
... : .50 (((
: ((( .
IBLA .82-83
((( .35 72 .

83
2017

.



.
()


[]

.





:
: : :
...
: (((.


:







((( .









((( .58-59 ((( .58

84
2017
 : .


((( .



((( .


:

((( .

((( .





(((.
(((.








((( .
((( .
((( .31 ((( .
((( .163 ((( .

85
2017





.




: .

. .
:
:

:

:

. :


.

....

:
((( .








: :

(((

((( .93-94 ((( .41

86
2017



(((






: ...
-
- ..
: . (((.
.




:

((( .







:
.

:
.
: ((( .
.
((( . :
... ...

(((
:

: : .116
((( . ((( .105
((( .119 ((( .115-116

87
2017

(((.
:


: (((.









(((.



. .
.
-7 :

. Non-savoir


. :
.
(((


:
((( .119-120
((( .120
((( ZlatkaTimenova Valtcheva, Les silences du dialogues r -
((( .53 manesque dans Moderato Cantabile de Marguirite.

88
2017


(((
:

(((.
((( .



.


. (((



(
) ((( .



(((

:

: .
:
((( .
...


.


. ((( .88
((( .89
((( ((( .89
.118 ((( .87
((( Francois Armengo, La pragmatique, p69. ((( .

89
2017
 : :
:
()
.1992
:
()
.
.1993

:
()

.

.1993


) : (
1999 .
( )

.1992 143
()
.
.1999 ( IBLA) 184
()
2000
.214-215
:

Armengo Franois, La pragmatique, Ed, Puf,
.
1985.
Auchlin Antoine et (Zenone) Anna, .
Conversations, Actions, Actes de langage:
Elments dun systme danalyse,in,cahiers de
linguistique franaise, n1, 1980.
Barthes, R, Le bruissement de la langue. Paris
Essais, Seuil1984.
Durrer, Sylvie, Le dialogue romanesque, Style
et structure, Libraire droz, geneve, 1994.
Durrer, Sylvie, Le dialogue dans le roman
NATHAN, universit,1999.
Macherey Pierre, Pour une thorie de la

90
2017
 production littraire, Franois Maspro, Paris,
1966.
Rosier, Laurence, Le Discours Rapport,
Histoire, thories, pratiques, Paris, Bruxelles,
1999.
Rullier-Theuret, Franoise, ledialogue dans le
romans,Hachette, Paris,2000.
Rykner, A, Paroles perdues, faillite du langage
et reprsentation. Paris: Jos Corti. (2000).
Timenova Valtcheva Zlatka, Le silence littraire
et ses formes dans loeuvre romanesque de
Marguerite Duras (doctoral dissertation),
Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade de Letras,
2008.
Timenova Valtcheva, Zlatka, Les silences du
dialogues romanesque dans Moderato Cantabile
de Marguirite, Universida de Lusfona de
Lisboa P. O. Box 1664 1016-001 Lisboa
Portugal ztimenova@netcabo.pt,
Van Den Heuvel Pierre, Parole, mot, silence
(pour unepotique de lnonciation) -Librairie,

Jos, Corti1985.

91
2017
 :


.
.
adnanimohammed@gmail.com

2017 /03/5 :
2017 /03/27 :
:
:


.
- - .

.


.
.

93
2017
 Memory and creativity in the two Groups story
Siratou Na3l and Min Ahadith oum Alkoura

Mohammed Adnani
Abu Dhabi. Emirates
adnanimohammed@gmail.com

Abstract:
This paper is studying two groups of the story: in titled: Biography of Na>al and
From the Sayings of the Villages written by Saudi author Abdulla Mohammed Elnasser.
The paper is approaching textual analysis to detected distinctive features but this required
focusing on the context elements of creating these two groups of stories. The memory in
the title of this research work as a framework. Thus it is a motive. The creation process
one of the manifestations of memory in time and place that totally differenced of their
first appearance.
The memory required to analyse stories to find out the memory of the author, that
consists two memories: Anxiety and satisfaction.
Memory role as a factor of creating or writing lead us to explore aspects of this process.
Memory work as a bridge and this required to investigate features language, style, and
meaning epically in last part to find out the creation distinction and the reference of this
process through the Intertextuality technic.

Keywords:
Approaching textual- context elements- Memory- investigate features language

94
2017
 -1
- -





.
.

- - .
. /

.



. .
(((.

.
.




. ...

.

.
(((
...
.

95
2017
 :
.
(((.
. /

.
.

.

.
(((.

-2
.





. (((.

.
.
.
.

...
.
() .

((( 2.22
((( 6.249 ((( .16

96
2017

(((
!


.

.
.
.
.
.
... .

(((.
(((.

.

/

... (((.
-1-2
:
:



.


.
: ((( .144
((( .27
((( .119 ((( .17

97
2017
 1-2-2



.





.


.

.
( )


.




(((. .
:


...


. ...
( ((( .
)
.

.

(.)... .

((( .21 ((( .14

98
2017
 ((( .

. !!


...
...
.

(((.

.

:
... ...
(((.

(
...
) ...
... ...


((( .
: .


.
.
.

!
(((.

. .
((( .62
((( .97/98
((( :
(( ( .99
c c c
((( .100

c c c

99
2017
 ...
(((.
(((.


.


. .
:



. .


:







.
.



.



.

(( ( .53 ((( .40

100
2017

.

.


.


:

(((.

.

.

.

.


:
!
(((.
.

.
.

.


.


.

((( .90 ((( .59

101
2017
 .


:
.

.

(((.

.
. .

.


.

.



.
.


.
: :

(((. - -
.





(( ( .29
((( .41

102
2017
 .
:
.


!

.

.



(((.

((( .


. .
()
.


.

....

.
((( .139
(((
...
... :
. a a a

103
2017




.


.

.!!...


.

.
.
.
.

.
.


(
) .
:

.

(((.
.

((( .79

104
2017

/ . .

.
. .

:


.
() []...
...
.

. ...
...
(((.
. -
.
-
:

((( .

.
.

(((.

...
(((.

!...

((( .21

((( .20
((( : .20 ((( .45-46

105
2017
 .
:
. . .
.
.
.




.
.
(((.




.

.
((( .



:
.







((( .

.
.

.
(( ( .19
((( .19 ((( .18

106
2017
 .

((( .
.
.
.
.

. :
.
.
.
. .
((( . : !

(((.
(((.

:


.
: .
. . .
. : (((.


:
.
(( ( .102
((( .103
.
(((
. (( ( .101
. ((( .102

107
2017


.

.


:


.
(((.
.

:
.
... (((.

.
. :




. !
!
. : .
(((.
(((.
.

(( ( .94 (( ( .26
((( .37 ((( .25

108
2017
 -2-2



.


. .


.

.
.






: .
( ) .


.
.

.
.
.:
.. ..
..

. (((.

. ((( .51

109
2017
 .. (((.

.

.


.
.
()


. .




:

( )...

.
((( .

:
:

-1 ...
( .)...



...
:
(((.

} :





{(((. .
.

(( ( .39
((( .23
((( .53 ((( .109-110

110
2017

.
.
:
: .



} :

.


{((( .

} :



.



.

{(((.

.
:











}:


. (((
{ .

(((:
:




: :
.

(( ( .18
((( .49 .141
((( .95/96/67 ((( .25

111
2017
 :
. .
:
-
. - :
.
.
- : .
.

.
.
- :

.

- :
. .
-2
.





.


.


...

.
. :

.





.
.

112
2017

.
:




.
.



:
.
:




.
.


.

.


. ((( .
:





((( a a a

a a a

113
2017
 : .
:






.



.

:
(((:
1980/.

2004 .

2007 . .


1429 .


2010 . .

2007 .

.
2010.



.
((( .141

114
2017



.

ridhalibi@gmail.com

2017 /02/13 :
2017 /03/20 :

:

.

.


. .


.



.
.
:


.

117
2017
 Argumentation in the rhetoric of Jarir, the complainer

Ridha Abdallah Alibi

Manouba University. Tunisia
ridhalibi@gmail.com
Abstract:
This study aims at digging deep in the poetry of Jarir to scrutinize the traces of
argumentative rhetoric in eulogizing and , notably, in lamenting.
The study is essentially meant to peruse the structural aspects of his poetry,
focusing on the styles , the structures and the themes he used .
In Jarirs verse , we came across a persona addressing others, complaining about its
penury in an attempt to stir the compassion of a flattered addressee , emotionally and
persuading him rationally to consider uncertain conditions .Hence, Jarir had recourse
to implicit argumentations at times and explicit ones at other times. Thus, from rhetoric,
Jarir made use of various devices to describe and portray.
Apart from that, Jarir selected the right stylistic devices to bolster his speech strategies
.In his magnificent verse, Jarir made an abundant use of the imperative and the conditional
modes. He did exploit them skillfully without affecting the overall format of his eulogy
poems and their corresponding meanings. Jarir switched from one part of his poems to
another ,and from one message to another ,preserving the harmony of the parts of his
poems that deal with eulogy.
We managed to touch the well knit fabric of Jarirs verse at the levels of structure
and meaning and his ability to compose poetry.

Keywords:
Implicit argumentation- explicit argumentation- influence- persuade- lament-
eloquence- stylistic devices.

118
2017



.



.
((( .
- -

( )
. (((.
(((

-
.
-
.







.

(((.

.

. :
:
. (((.





. : .161 (((
: .117 (( (
((( : .230 (((
51 . .8/231 (((

119
2017

:

(((.




.







.

.
:
:
-2
-1

:






.
( )Perelman .


.

(((


...
.

(( ( 1.21 20
..
Perelman (ch), Article Argumentation, p638
((( : ()

120
2017



(((.
.

-
-
.
. .
.

. -3 :

[]






(((
( )Thme Majeur
[] ( )Thmes Mineurs


(((

.




.
.
.


(((
.67
((( .73
((( 12 .33

11[ 344]

121
2017


.
(((
.
.




.
.
[]
.




(((



.
(((

[] .




(((
.

. .
.
.
(( ( .45
((( 18 17 16.87
(((
((( 6.84 4.65

122
2017



[]

.




(((
.


[]


.


(((

.


.

[] .


(((



(( ( 17 16.289
(((.
((( 14 13 .27 .
((( 22.24 ((( John Searle, Sens et expression, p7

123
2017
 . .
- -
.
.


(((
[]
.

.


(((


[]


((( .



.



(((





. (((.

1-2 .291 3288 (((
[]




(( ( 31 30 .25
11-23 [ 84] (( ( .154
(((Perelma (chaim) Enyclopeadia Universalis, p937.
((( .388

124
2017


( :) (
[] ) .


(((
.

(((
.


.
(((
()Philippe Hamon

()J.M.Adam
( . ((()A.Petit.Jean

[]

(((











.
(((






(( ( .154
((( Philippe Hamon, Du descriptif, p51.
(( ( 9 8.72 ((( J.M.Adam, A .petit Jean, Le texte descriptif, p1177
((( 4 -3 -2.23 ((( : .32

125
2017

.



.
.
(((
.
.
(((
( .)Thomas scheidel :

.
.
.

.

.





[]

:
(((
..
.
(((

(( (



. .



.

(((
.6
((( 9.23 ((( .20

126
2017
 []

(((


(((




[]


(((
.
.


(((
.
(((.


[]
.



(((



[]
( ) .

(((

[]

8.26 (((
(( ( 27.25 .76 (( (
((( 8.23 26.41 (((
((( Perelman Tytca, Trait de largumentation, p357. 6.86 (((

127
2017
 .
.
.
.



.



. La prsence

(((.
((( . - -


.
.
()
.
.

.
.
. La prsentation



Modalit dexpression
.
.

. .



(( ( : .36 ((( : .31

128
2017
 ((( . (((
(((
(((
((( .
Le choix des qualifications






(((
(((.
.



. .Classification






.


.


.



.


: .38 (( (
(( ( : 19 32 .41 : 13.27 (((
((( : 13.27 : 8.23 (((
. : 8.26 (((
21 233 () 39 (((


.167

129
2017
 : .
1


.2003 .



( )
1
.1996
( ) 1 ((( .
( ).

( )

( ). .
( )
1

.1997
.
()
.
. 2010 55
( )

1 .
.2010
() .

(((
1 .2010
( )
1 .1997

() .
.1986
( )
1 (( ( : .15
(((
.2011 .473

130
2017
 ( )

.2015
( )

28 3 .2000
( )

( )

Adam (J.M), A.petit Jean, Le texte descriptif,
Nathan 1989.
chaim (Perelman) Article Argumentation, in
Encyclopadia Universalis, corpus 2, Paris
1990.
Chaim (Perelman) Tytca, Trait de
largumentation, Presses Universitaires de Lyon
1981.
Chaim (Perelman), Enyclopadia Universalis,
corpus 2, Edition Paris 1996.
Hamon (Philippe), Du descriptif, Hachette,
1993.
John (r.Searle), Sens et expression, Ed Minuit,
1979.

131
2017

( )
.
.
afsk70@yahoo.com

2017 /03/04 :
2017 /04/12 :

:




.




.. .

:
- - - - - -..

133
2017
 The structure of the argument and the mechanisms
of her statement
in the naba(An Applied Study)

Dr. Amir Fadel Saad Al Abdali

Yemen, Hodeidah
Hodeidah University
afsk70@yahoo.com
Abstract
The research examines the structure of the pilgrims and the mechanisms of her
manifestation in Surah Al-Nabaa. The research looks at the word potentials and the
strength of her influence, and then rises in the analysis and looks to greater and greater
levels. Jalal reveals the idea, the beauty of the phrase, the possibilities of methods, then
the relations that combine and form the components, this linguistic data from real facts
connected to a logical relationship, then this is achieved by all of the strength of the
impact of the speech involved in this Surah, and convince them the idea that target Sura
statement, and urging them to take it ..
The logical relationships in the given linguistic structure connected with the universe
and the human in real life is a major component in the pilgrims of the Sura and the
mental persuasion; then the world of the text relates to the world of life, its conditions
and its mechanisms, relate to introductions to the news Sura their results, and indications
of looting in the opening lines with negative results at the end, and these meanings and
conditions attached to the practices of human in his life .. in the near and long-range

Keyword
pilgrims- argument- proof- statement- eloquence- the

134
2017
 - - :
:

(((
: - -



((( :

(((.
( ) : (((


..


- :
. - -
:


: :
(((

- .
- -
(((

((( .
66(((
4 ((( ((( : 33
((( ( ) 123 ((( : ( ) : :
((( : 142 : ( )
.476 ((( : : 482

135
2017

.


((( -
((( () :
(((


-
-
(((

.
: . .((( ..

:
-
-
} ..







()








.(((..

((( :

329



((( : 177
((( .7
((( : (
((( : ) 68
81 ((( : 9

136
2017










..




( :) ()

() () () ()

() ..

:


:











:




[ {] - :






:

:


(
)Ducrot :

137
2017




:
-

((( .
-
.
: (((..


.
-
-

:
{ :
}
! !.

-
!
- -
.
! ..
..

-
:



: (((.
.
((( 30.9
((( 6 : ((( 26 30.3803

138
2017
 - -
. :
-


:
:
.. () (((
() ( )Perelman
(((

(((..
:
(((.
!:
-




(((
.. :
...
-
!.



(((. :
:
((( 110
(((
75
((( .66 ((( : .50
((( 2873 ((( .94

139
2017


:
((( -
:


(((. ..
- -
: .(((..
-

- -



: ..

-



()

- ..
- -



(:) ()(((.
( ) ..

.. :



:

((( 30.12
((( .255
((( : : .75 ((( : .257

140
2017
 ()
((( ..
:
(((

:
.
: .. :

: :

( ) :



(((
:
} :
:

:




.{
:

. :
-
. (((
((( : .47
((( : 6 30 .3808-3809 ((( :
((( 232 4.27

141
2017
 -
:
- .
-

(((.


()
. ( )70%
- :

.
- ..
:

:


: ..
-
(((.


(((


((( : 3.20-21
.. ((( .279
((( .78

142
2017
 :
:


:

:
()1


: (((
- : :
((( :



:











( : -) (-
) ( -) (-) (
.. . -) ( -) ( -)
- : ( -) ( -) (
-)..


: 118(((
((( : 158

143
2017

:










. (((.



" "
(((
""
" "
"

:
" -

() .

-


(((.

- .

- :
:



((( .97
((( 6 30.3806 ((( .28

144
2017

..

:


.
() ...
- :


:
- :
() ()
:
.



:
: :
.




..

..
-

145
2017
 :
:
- :


: (((

- :

():

{ ():
}

} { (((.

- :



..
-
: :


{ }
: .. :
()} : !{.. { }

: :

}


.. {

..

} :




.{

() .. ((( .15
((( .

146
2017

{



: :

-
. .
- ( )



.
-

.

-



( :
)

..
: .
- :
- :

- :
:
!


((( :


} } :





((( 26 30.3802

147
2017





{













{


(((



{. } : .
- :



((( } :




{
+


(((.

-:




}:







((( 2.46
((( 6 30.3804 ((( .86

148
2017
 :
..
- ..

- :

1 1991 ( ).



1278 .

:
1959 .

:
..
1988 1 . .
(

.

.7



:
2009 .
..
- -
: :
1426.
-
( .)2000 .

2010 1 .

302001 1 .





121997. ..

149
2017
 ( )

1385 .

2002 16.
11

1985.

2008 1.

1998 1.

(.).
:

2001 1.

1998 1
:

( .).
1

1984 .
:

21997 1 .
(

)
28 3 - 2000.
(

).

407 2005.

150
2017
 :
.
.
t.benguermaz@univhb-chlef.ez
2017 /02/26 :
2017 /04/05 :

:


.

.




.

.

:
- - - - - - .

151
2017
 The Convergence and incompatibility between the
Rhetoric and the Stylistics attributes
Tata benguermaz
Chlef, Algeria University
t.benguermaz@univhb-chlef.dz
Abstract:
One of the problems facing the researcher stylistic browse during stylistic studies is
problematic relationship between the stylistic and rhetoric, what unites them? And what
does not gather?, And what the nature of their relationship, I offer Abdulsalam Masdi set
of ironies between rhetoric and stylistic, all indicate rope does not break compatibility
between them.
The relation between the stylistics and the rhetoric is sometimes strong andsometimes
weak this imbalance is perceived through functional as well as teleological difference
the ststylistics and the rhetoric melt together and separate from each other in terms
of the historical ath of the stylistic.they cross in the analysis which is known as the
literary discours .besides the use of the analysis tools and descriptive scientific research
methodology in describing the characteristics borrows the rhetorical tools in order to
determine its stylistic attributes.thus , the stylistics analyses the literary discourse using
the rhetorical tools which are used in the stylistic analysis .
And that the most important points that characterize the all the stylistic rhetoric lurk in
rhetoric that is interested to produce the effect that the recipient receives by influencing
element, while considering the stylistic ways and mechanisms of influence by the analysis
of its causes and to highlight the aesthetics

keywords:
Criticism- stylistic context the stylistics- rhetoric- scientific- linguistic analysis-
stylistic attributes

152
2017
 :


((( Pierre Guiraud


(((

:
(((.

:






(((.

:



:
(((.



(( ( : .152
((( : .23 : 22 (( (
((( : .24 ((( : .152

153
2017


la singularit(((:






.


(((





.)Georges Buffon) 1707 / 1788
(((


discours sur le style :
1753
(((



((( :
.

: 6 (( ( ((( : :
((( .29 .29
((( Michael riffaterre essais de stylistique structurale presentation et ((( Buffon discours sur le style texte de l dition de l Abbe j.
traduction de danieldelas Flammarion, p1. pierre,librairie,ch.Poussielgue, p6

154
2017
 :




.
(
)


.




Willy sandres :
...

...



.(((...


.



((( .94

155
2017


.(((...
.








(((

(((.


:
.
(((

:


(((


...


...


...

(( ( : 95
(( ( .204 ((( .196
((( : .198 ((( .27

156
2017
 ((( (((





:
(((





(((

.


.





...

(((.

(( ( .202
(( ( : .24 ((( .95
((( : .24 ((( .23

157
2017


.


:


...


(((



.


.
( : )


:
:




(((
(((.

(( ( .94
((( .19 ((( .27

158
2017
(((
(((.
(((

:

.
.
:
-

.
-
.

.
- ... :
.
- (((...
. :
- (((.
.
-
.
-
.

(( ( : .50 (( ( .44
((( : .199 ((( :
((( .44 .30

159
2017
 -
.








(((





:


.
((( ...
(((

:

.

) (
(( ( .32
((( .45 ((( 1.65

160
2017






:
Michael Riffaterre

. .











.: .
(le contexte stylistique est un pattern
linguistique rompu par un lment qui est (((
imprvisible et le contraste rsultant de cette
)interfrence est le stimulus stylistique
(((


( )essais de stylistique structurale

((( Michael Riffaterre, essais de stylistique structural, p57 ((( : .246

161
2017
 ... : :
( (((critres pour lanalyse du style
)
(((. ...


(((
... ( )

STILUS :
.

(((










le style le stylo

(((
.





.

(( ( : 27
(( ( .88 ((( .56
((( .94 ((( : .88

162
2017



...

(((



:
: :








(((

.





.

.




(( ( .27
((( : .95

163
2017


.
:

(((.




(((






(((
. (((






. .


(( ( : .76
((( .87
((( : 87 ((( .52

164
2017



(((

: (((




((( .






Richelet

le contexte stylistique ... .
...
(((
(((.

Leo spit
...
:

(la stylistique a mon sens pouvait faire le pont
,
)entre la linguistique et l histoire littraire
(((

(( ( : .
(( ( . ((( .106/ 107
((( .45 ((( Leo spitzertudes de style prcd de Leo spitzer et la lecture
((( 75 stylistique par jean Starobinski, p54

165
2017
 (((.

... decodeur
(((.

(((






:

((( pas de fume son feu





.






Encodeur Dcodeur

- -
(((


(((.





(( ( .21
((( .68
((( :
Michael Riffaterre, essais de stylistique structurale, p42 (( ( .95
((( : .26 ((( .66

166
2017



.




(((


(((

il ne reste de l,auteur que le texte
(((


.
(((





(((

.


(((
..

-
.248 (( (
.47 (((
- ...- : .86 (((
: .93 (((
: .89 (((
: .21 (((

167
2017

:


(((

(((.


.


... ...
()


(((.


:


(((




.
(((
74-75 (( (
((( .88-89
(( ( .85 (((
((( .70 .89

168
2017


(..)
: 2 :

1994 .

( .).
3:

( .).
2 :

2010 .

( .).

2004 .
:

( .).
:

1:
1993.
1 :

1999.

1999 .
,
G, Buffon, discours sur le style, texte de l dition
,

de l abbe j. pierre librairiech.Poussielgue, Paris

1896.
Leo spitzer, tudes de style, prcd de
Leo spitzer et la lecture stylistique par jean
Starobinski, Gallimard, 1970.
Michael riffterre, essais de stylistique structurale,
prsentation et traduction de Daniel Riffaterre
Flammarion Paris France 1971.

169
2017


(((:



.
.
elmouden63@gmail.com

2017 /03/21 :
2017 /04/25 :

:

:
:

.


.

:
- - - ...

(( ( . .

171
2017
 Different death: The problematic Heir

Dr. Hassan Elmouden

Marrakech. Morocco
elmouden63@gmail.com

Abstract:
I assume that this question: who am I? is the central question in the novels of the
Moroccan writer Mohamed Berrada. But this issue is addressed in a different way: it's
more of this classic autobiographical form, nor this new autobiographical form called:
fiction... It is a form that can be called: novel of I, and that can be read as a novel and
autobiography at the same time, and dealing with emerging issues: can - we say of this
problematic heir who questioned his legacy, and the question of the transmission of this
legacy to his son, to the new generation...

Keywords:
Novel- novel of I- problematic Heir - Transmission..

172
2017
 ( )1987 -1 :





:
: ( )1987 :

( )2016

:





..


:
(


)2016
( :((()2001
Roman du Je :

.. :
,
L ego littrature

..
.((( ..
Littrature
( intransitive )

:

((( :


/
.

((( Philippe Forest, Le Roman.
((( Dominique Viart (Direction), Paradoxes du biographique. ((( .200

173
2017
 ...
.


((( .

Le fictif
L imaginaire
/ :histoire / Histoire
(((Fonction lucidante :
:

(((.

: :


(((

: (



: )

:
..




((( .9
(((
.
:
Dominique Viart: Larchologie de soi dans la littrature
franaise, in: Vies en rcit, Formes littraires et mdiatiques ((( .31
de la biographie et de lautobiographie, p107 137. ((( Philippe Forest, Le Roman, p16.

174
2017
 :


.. :




:


(((.

: :


:

:
:



..
( )..













:

Antriorit




(((



:
...
..
Intriorit

( .)128

.. : .


( ..
.180

175
2017
 -2 :
) ..
:

: ( )1987
:


( )2016 :

.. ( )..
: ..
:


:




..





:







68 (

. )

:



.
..

176
2017
 :

:
:



: ( .
/ )(((. :

( )
: :

( :





) . :

( ..
)
(((
...
... ..

(((..
:

...





() (

(((

:

68)..
((( .21


((( .21-22
((( .22 217 (( (

177
2017

( /)




:





:
((( --
:

...

:

.



(((
(((

.(((...
(((
:





((( .22
(((
:
1909 1913
: 1922 :
S.Freud, Le roman familial des nvross (1909), in: Nv-

rose, psychose et perversion, pp157-160.
- Otto Rank, 1909 Der Mythus von der Geburt der Helden.
Versuch einer psychologischen Mythendeutung, Schriften
zur angewandten Seelenkunde. Leipzig & Wien. Trad, franc:
Le mythe de la naissance du hros.
((( Marthe Robert,Roman des origines et origines du roman.
((( .16 :
((( .61 : .

178
2017


. .



()...
((( .

. :

:
..
(((.
.. --

.. :

(((.. ((( .


(
: )
...

: repres



:
(((

...

((( .14 -13
((( .115
((( .20 ((( D. Viart, Larchologie de soi dans la littrature franaise,
((( .153 p116-120.

179
2017


((( .


:
...


.
: ((( .
68 :

((( .
(




)

( /)

: ( ) : :

( )...
. :


..
.
..
((( .23

((( .29
((( .30

180
2017
 (((
((( .


:


: :


.(((.. ((( .


.

( )


() .. :
...

() :
.(((..

... :

:
.. ( )

: /
:
: .(((..



((( .197198
((( Laurent demanze, Encres orphelins, Pierre Bergougnioux, G -
rard Mac, Pierre Michon; Paris, Editions Jos Corti, 2008, ((( .157
p 59, p59. ((( .236
((( .201 ((( .25 24

181
2017



...
((( ..

:
.


:
..
(((
.. ( .)2t6
..
.3 :

(


:

/).

:



...
:

.


..
/
.(((.. :
((( Dominique Viart: Le silence des pres au principe du rcit

de filiation, p103.
((( Ibid, p103.


((( .205-204

182
2017
 Dominique Viart: Le silence des pres
au principe du rcit de filiation, Etudes
franaises, Vol. 45, N3, 2009.
Dfamiliarisation(((
Laurent demanze, Encres orphelins,

Pierre Bergougnioux, Grard Mac, Pierre

Michon; Paris, Editions Jos Corti, 2008.

Marthe Robert,Roman des origines et
origines du roman, Paris, Grasset,1972,

rd. Gallimard, coll. Tel, 1977. :
Mathilde Barraband: Hritage et


exemplarit dans: Demain je meurs:
Luvre de d- familiarisation de Christian
Prigent, Etudes franaises, Vol.45, N3, .
2009.

Otto Rank, 1909 Der Mythus von :

der Geburt der Helden. Versuch einer
:
psychologischen Mythendeutung ,
Schriften zur angewandten Seelenkunde.

Leipzig & Wien. Trad, franc: Le mythe de .1987 1
la naissance du hros. Paris, Payot, 1983.

Philippe Forest, Le Roman, Le Je, Ed. .2016

Pleins Feux, Nantes, 2001.
Dominique Viart (Direction), Paradoxes
S.Freud, Le roman familial des nvross du biographique, Revue des Sciences
(1909), in: Nvrose, psychose et Humaines, n263, automne 2001.
perversion. Paris, Presses Universitaires de
Dominique Viart, Larchologie de soi
France ,1973.

dans la littrature franaise, in: Vies en

rcit, Formes littraires et mdiatiques de la
biographie et de lautobiographie, ed. Nota
Bene, Qubec, 2007.

((( Mathilde Barraband: Hritage et exemplarit dans: Demain

je meurs: Luvre de d- familiarisation de Christian Pri-
gent, Etudes franaises, Vol.45, N3, 2009, p58.

183
2017


. .
.

2017 /03/15 :
2017 /04/18 :

:

.

: (
)2008 ( .)2011

:
- - -
- - .

187
2017
 Functional Grammar and architecture of grammars

Ahmed Moutaouakil
Mohamed V University. Morocco
ahmed.moutaouakil@yahoo.com

Abstract:
My main aim in this study is to give an historical overview of the different
and organizations of grammar as proposed during the last four decades within the
theoretical framework of Functional Discourse Grammar and their empirical as well
as epistemological motivations.
A special attention will be paid to the two most recent models, namely "Functional
Discourse Grammar "(Hengeveld and Mackenzie 2008) and "Extended Functional
Discourse Grammar" (Moutaouakil 2011).

Keywords:
Functional Grammar- architecture of grammars- Functional Discourse Grammar-
Extended Functional Discourse Grammar

188
2017
 .1.1 : -

-
- .

.
.


:




.
.
.1 :
/
:
( )1
.

:
. .

:
. (((
:
( ()2 )
.
() (
). ((( F. D. Saussure, Cours de linguistique gnrale.

189
2017

( 2) ( 2)
(((.


.



(((.

(:)2
. ( )2
(2) (2)
( )2



. .
( )4

.
(((
(((.
( )3


. .
((( Chomsky, Noam, Reflections on language.
((( Halliday, M.A.K, Language Structure and Language Fun -
tion. ((( :
((( ( ( )2011 ( )2012 )) .

190
2017
 - ( )5


(
.
)


.
.

.
:

.
(((
.
.

.3.1 : .



/
. (
).
.
.2.1 :


/
.
. :
.
((( Harris, Zellig S, Discourse Analysis. :

191
2017

.

-
. .
:

.
(((
(((.

/
.
.2.2
.


:
( )
.
.1.2.2 .
((( :
.2 :



.1.2

.
( .)Adequacy

((( .
: .
((( Dik, Simon C, The Theory of Functional Grammar. ((( Chomsky, Noam, Reflections on language.

192
2017

.

/ .
.3.2.2 .

(((



.
:



.


.
.2.2.2
.

.3.2 (
: )
.
(((
:
.
.

((( Ibid. ((( Dik, Simon C, The Theory of Functional Grammar.

193
2017

.


/ -
.

-.
. .3 :
.
.1.3



( (
( ))1978 . )

:

( ( ))1978
. ( ( ))1997
( ( ))2003
( (.))2008




) (

.



. .
.2.3
.1.1.3 -

-

194
2017

.
( )

(
).


.

.1.2.3

. ( ( .))1978


. (:)8
()


( )...

.



.

()



( ) (
).
( )

.
:

195
2017
 .2.2.3



.

(:)9

( )9
:

( )9




.
.3.2.3
(
( ))2003

:
:

( )11 : :
< < <

196
2017
 .4.2.3
1.4.2.3
-
.
:
() - :
- ( )
() .
.
( )
()
.

(((
(((.
()
( )14 :
: ()
( )14 () .







:
(( )12 [ ::
[ ([ : )
( )]]])
((( (.)2014
[ : (( )13
((( . ((...)1 (( ...)1 )])

197
2017
 ()9
( )14
:


(((.


(((



.









. .
()10

( )14
(:)15

.
.2.4.2.3

(((


:
((( .
((( (.)2012 ((( : .

198
2017

.4 :
:
-1

.
.
.

-2
( )
.
-3 ( )
( ) .
( )



.
-4 .





(
.
-)

.
( )
.

.

/

199
2017


-

-
(
)...

. .
.1.4


(((
((( :

.



: .

((( : .

. ()

( )
-
. .




((( .
((( . ((( : .

200
2017


.

.
( ())
(:)16 (
( )16 () ^ ^ ==> )
= =
= = .
( )1 6:

() .



.


( )

. .
.3.4
.2.4

.
.
.1 .3 .4 ( )

.

(

201
2017
 )

( .
)

(( ))1997
. ( (.))2008
.1 .2 .3 .4 ( )9()14


.

. :
.
-

( ).
.

:
.


.1 . 1 .2 .3 .4
.

. - -

.
:
.

.
.2 .3 .4

202
2017

:
. ( )17 = [(( )0)0
(( )0])0
( )
: () ()

() ()



.



.
.
.2 . 1 .2 .3 .4



.



:

-
-

.


). ( .





( / )

-


.
.

203
2017
 .3 . 1 .2 .3 .4
-
.

(:)19
.




(:)18

(
).
.3 .3 .4


.
( )
.



(((
.


.


.
-


((( ( ).

204
2017

() ( ( ))14
( 1 ) ( )
( 2 ) (
) .
( )... .

( )

.

-



-
- .
.



:
.




(((.
.



(((


(
)... ()19

((( : . .
((( .

205
2017
 :
:

2014

:
.
2011 .
: .

.
.
2013.
: .

1989 .
:

. 2006 .
.

2013 .
.

.
Chomsky, Noam, Reflections on language.
Pantheon Books New York, 1967.
Dik, Simon C, The Theory of Functional
Grammar. Foris, Dordrecht, 1978.
Halliday, M.A.K, Language Structure and
Language Function,. In: Lyons, John (ed) New
Horizons in Linguistics. Penguin Books, 1970.
Harris, Zellig S, Discourse Analysis, Discourse
Analysis. Mouton
Saussure F. D., Cours de linguistique gnrale,
Publi par Charles Bailly et Albert Sechehaye
Editions Payot & Rivages, Paris1967.

206
2017


( -)
.
.
2017 /03/15 :
2017 /04/20 :
:



.
( )Marie Steffens ()Nick Riemer
. (()Franois Rastier)

( )
( )
( ) .
.

207
2017
 Critical insights into polysemy and its theories
(Rastier, Steffens, Reimer)

Saber Habacha
habacha@gmail.com

Abstract:
In recent years, criticalstudies related to polysemy have emerged. These studies
included a critical reviewof notions such as definition, concept and description. This
review also raised the question regarding the need for a theory of polysemy.
In this paper we seek to highlight some of the ideas put forward by Marie Steffens,
Nick Reimer and Franois Rastier among others who shaped a critical view of issues
related to polysemy in theory and practice.
Theoretical convictions have come to differ from practical procedures that induced
those critical readings. We aim, through this paper, to present attempts to redefine
polysemy (Marie Steffens), a reading about structural doubts putting into question
the very existence of polysemy (Franois Rastier) as well as a critical interpretation
of polysemys syntactical conception (Nick Reimer). Diverse as they are, all these
readings underscore the importance of critically considering all facets of polysemy.

Key words:
polysemy cognitive approach prototypical semantics modelization
lexicalabstraction homonymy

208
2017

- -
(polysmie/


)polysemy

.
.
: (

2015)

[]

((( .
( )Cadiot et Nemo

:



.

([)proprits intrinsques

] (((.
([ )proprits extrinsques
] 2010
[]((( . 18 .2012

( ) .


( )
.
( )
.
.
,
((( Marie Steffens, Qu est-ce que la polysmie? Versune nouvelle
dfinition de la polysmie, p159-169.
http://www.lli.ulaval.ca/fileadmin/llt/fichiers/recherche/re-
vue_LL/numero_special_2011/LLSP2011_159_169.pdf
((( Cadiot et Nemo,1997,p24. ((( Anna Wierzbicka, Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis, p11.

209
2017
 [ ] (


) ( ) ( )
( (((

).
(((. [ ]...




((( .

(((
((( .
.


. :


.


. (((

/
.
(((.



. .
()bote
:
((( Ibid, p26.
( ). ((( Ibid, p28.
((( Nemo, 2003, p91.
((( Nemo2003, 99. ((( Cadiot et Nemo,1997, p28-29.
((( Cadiotet Nemo1997, p32. Kleiber1999, p42. ((( Cadiot1994

210
2017
 ( raison
)[= / (((
]...
.
(((

(((
( )bote .
()botecrnienne

[=] ( .)table
(((

(((.

()1 (((.
/







((( . /
( )vague



(((.
:
:

.

Kleiber1999, p42. ((( Cadiot1994
((( . ((( Kleiber1999, p48.


((( ( )table .

(((
. ( )LCD

( )LED

[ ] . .
:
)((( Frank Brisard, Gert Van Rillaeret Sandra Dominiek (2001
Processing Polysemous, Homonymous, and Vague Adjec-
tives, Cuyckens et Zawada (dir.), Polysemy in Cognitive
Linguistics, Selected papers from the Fifth International Cog-
nitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, John Benjamins
((( AkwaDoumbeBetote, (2002) Les emplois du mot raison, entre Publishing Co, p263.
singularit et rgularit, pp54-62.
((( :
((( Kleiber, 1999, p48. Adrienne Lehrer (2003) Polysemy in derivationnal affixes,
((( Franois Rastier, La polysmieexiste-t-elle? quelquesdoute - Nerlich et al. (dir.), Polysemy: flexible patterns in mind and
constructifs, Etudes Romanes de BRNO. language, p219-232.

211
2017
 . .

.

. (((.



:
.
. ((( .

(
) .
().

.

.





((( .
. -

- .




.

((( Ibid.
((( .
.
[ ]... (

[ ]...

17/08/2005 .)16
((( Franois Rastier, Lapolysmieexiste-t-elle? quelquesdoute -
constructifs.

212
2017


.
/
: ( )1987
( )livre ( )1997 ()grand
( )2001 ( )bote. .

:


.
.
()smasiologique
.



:



.



.
.

.
.

()Kintsch, 1991 .
( )bank

()1986
()ring .

( )
(
)

.
.

213
2017

( .)
.

() .


.
( .
)( .)
.

.
.
:
() .


()


.


() .


: :
()

()discrtisation
. ()
( )56 :1997 :

()
. .

214
2017
 ( )grand ()(((.

:
.
. !((( ( )152 :1972
((( .

.
() (
)

()
.




.
.



( )grand ([)grand vin
] ([ )grand homme ]
( )Franck Neveu, 2006
)[ ]((( .( )grand ( grand pre

( )grand vin
.

( )grand homme
( )grand pre
(
. ).

((( ( )hapaxlegomenon
. . ( )John Trapp
1654 ( () /hpax
))(legmenon () .
() .

( (((
)
((( : . .
.
( )- ()grand( )pre
(((

: . .

215
2017

( ) ((( .
.

( .
)
.


:

. .

.

.
:
. ( : !) .
() :


.
.

: ()plateau

.


((( ( )47 :1997 :
Ildfendait
, , avec une grande assurance cet article
. alorsqu iln avaitparcouru que les grandeslignes qui compos-
aient son chapeau.

: ( )dfendre ( ) ( )parcourir
. ). ( )composer (
(
). ( )assurance ( ). ()article
( ). ( )ligne (
). ( )chapeau ( .).

216
2017
 .
.

.

.
:
. .
(
: )


( .
. .)1988

(
.
)

(
2011 2 )4.4 ()






( )achronique
( .)227 :1974
( )panchronique


. .
()
(.)nosmie .

217
2017



. . :



.

((( :
( )Levin ( )Pinker
()

((( .




( .)



.


. .
( )PSP

:

.
. :


.


(((
(((.
( )PSP

((( Noam Chomsky, Current issues in linguistic theory, p51.
((( Nick Riemer, La conception
, syntaxique de la polysmie: une
((( Riemer, Ibid. critique, Revue de l Associationfranaise de linguistique cogni-
((( Ibid. tive.

218
2017
 .

( )PSP
( )PSP

.
.
( )Goldberg 2006: 95
.

/
()Clark, 1987
. .
))Bolinger, 1968

()Hovav& Levin, 1998
. ()Dixon, 1991
(Jackendoff,

the exam paper was hard : )1996


( )PSP .
::


the exam paper was firm to the touch ( )PSP
:
the exam paper was difficult
:


( .)hard .
( )hard


. .
.

219
2017
 . .


. .

( .)Geeraerts1993, Cruse 2004
. .
:
.


( )
.
.

:

.


. (Dolan )2000

et ses collgues
(Tuggy)1993

( .Geeraerts )1993 ( Fillmore et Atkins )2000

( .)167161 :2003
.

( Allwood )2003
[ ]meaning potential
.
.

220
2017
 ( Geeraerts .
1993 : 236 ) .
.

:

.

.
( ((()ring
:
( ) .
()
( .).


.
.
.
:
.
() () .

(:)ring .
.
.

:
.
((( ( )
( :

).

221
2017

:

Vous vous tonnez, dites-vous, quil .
ait t assez bon pour croire toutes ces
choses; et moi, je vous trouve encore
bien plus bon de vous imaginer quil les .
ait crues(((.
.

.

( )PSP
( )PSP
.

()PSP
.
. ( :)PSP


:
( )PSP

. . 1897
()Goddard ( )Bral

.
( )PSP ([ )bon ]
()better
( )plus bon
. ([)plusniais ](: 8-147
[:)1924 ]1897
( ((()Pitjatjantjara
[ ] ()NicolasAndry
(((
. ( )bon ()meilleur
((( .

222
2017
 /
.



()PSP


.
/ ().
( )1984
()PSP .



()PSP
.
(((.

( )Hudson et al, 1996
:
. ( )likely( )probable ()should
( )ought


.

:

a. He is likely/*probable to fail.
.
.
b. I should/*ought go now.

. .

c. I ought/*should to go now
((( .
( )PSP
.


.
. (

. )
.



.

223
2017
 :
.

(.)PSP


()diathse
.

.



. ((( .


:
((( .
:

.

: .


:
()PSP
.
.

(.)PSP


.
. ((( ( )2005 .
(((
.

224
2017
 .
:

(2015) .
: : ( Geeraerts
. Allwood)
(2015)
: .
:
Allwood, J. 2003. Meaning potentials and .

context: Some consequences for the analysis

of variation in meaning. In: Cuyckens, H., R. .
Dirven, & J. Taylor (eds) Cognitive Approaches
to Lexical Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter, 29-65. :
Betote, AkwaDoumbe (2002) Les emplois du
mot raison, entre singularitetrgularit. In:
Langue franaise. N133, pp. 54-62.

Bolinger, D. 1968. Entailment and the meaning
of structures. Glossa2: 119127.
.
Bral, M. 1924 [1897]. Essai de smantique.

Paris: Hachette.

Brisard, Frank, Gert Van Rillaer et
SandraDominiek )(2001 Processing
Polysemous,Homonymous, and Vague
Adjectives,Cuyckens et Zawada (dir.), Polysemy ((( .
inCognitive Linguistics, Selected papersfrom (((
the Fifth International CognitiveLinguistics
Conference, Amsterdam, JohnBenjamins
Publishing Co, p. 261-283. .
Carr, P. 1990. Linguistic realities. An autonomist

metatheory for the generative enterprise.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .

Chomsky, N. 1964. Current issues in linguistic (((.
theory. The Hague: Mouton.
Clark, E. V. 1987. The principle of contrast:
a constraint on language acquisition.
In:MacWhinney, B. (ed.) Mechanisms of ((( Riemer, La conception syntaxique de la
language acquisition. Hillsdale: Lawrence polysmie: une critique, op. cit.
Erlbaum, 1-33. ((( Ibid.
((( Ibid.

225
2017
 Hovav, M. & B. Levin. 1998. Building verb
meanings. In:Butt, M. & W. Geuder (eds.)
The projection of arguments. Lexical and
compositional factors. Stanford: CSLI, 97-134.
Hudson, R., A. Rosta, J. Holmes & N. Gisborne.
1996. Synonyms and syntax. Journal of
Linguistics 32:439-446
Jackendoff, R. 1996. Conceptual semantics
and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics
7:93-129.
Lehrer, Adrienne (2003) Polysemy in
derivationnal affixes, Nerlich et al. (dir.),
Polysemy: flexible patterns in mind and
language, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter,
p. 219-232.
Levin, B., & M. Hovav. 1992. The Lexical
Semantics of Verbs of Motion: The Perspective
from Unaccusativity. In: Roca, I. (ed.) Thematic
structure: Its role in grammar. Berlin: Foris,
247-269.
Levin, B. & S. Pinker (eds). 1992. Lexical and
conceptual semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Peeters, B. 2012. Linterculturelservi
la sauce MSN, ou quoi sert la
mtalanguesmantiquenaturelle?In: Auger, N.,
F. Demougin& C. Bal (eds) Les enjeux de la
communication interculturelle. Montpellier:
Presses universitaires de Montpellier / Maison
des Sciences Humaines.
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The generative lexicon.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rastier, Franois, 2014, La polysmie existe-
t-elle? quelques doutes constructifs, Etudes
Romanes deBRNO, vol.35, n1.
Rmi-Giraud, S. & L. Panier (eds). 2003.
La polysmieoulempire des sens.Lexique,
discours, reprsentations. Lyon: Presses
universitaires de Lyon.
Ricur, P. 1975. La mtaphore vive. Paris:
Seuil.
Riemer, N. 2005. The Semantics of Polysemy:
Reading meaning in English and Warlpiri.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2017
Cruse, A. 2004. Meaning in language. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Dixon, R. 1991. A new approach to English
grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Dolan, W., L. Vanderwende& S. Richardson.
2000. Polysemy in a broad-coverage natural
language processing system. In:Ravin, Y. &
C. Leacock (eds) Polysemy. Theoretical and
Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 178-204.
Ducrot, O. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris:
Gallimard.
Durkin, K. & J. Manning. 1989. Polysemy and
the subjective lexicon: Semantic relatedness
and the salience of intraword senses. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research 18:577-612.
Evans, N. & D. Wilkins. 2000. In the minds
ear: the semantic extension of perception verbs
in Australian languages. Language 76:546-592
Fillmore, C. & B. Atkins. 2000. Describing
polysemy: the case of crawl. In: Ravin, Y. &
C. Leacock (eds.) Polysemy. Theoretical and
Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford
UniversityPress, 91-110.
Franois, J. 2007. Pour unecartographie de la
polysmieverbale. Leeuven: Peeters.
Geeraerts, D. 1993. Vaguenesss puzzles,
polysemys vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics
4:223-272.
Geeraerts, D. 2010. Theories of lexical
semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, C. 1991. Testing the translatability of
semantic primitives into an Australian Aboriginal
language. Anthropological Linguistics 33:31-
56.
Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: a construction
grammar approach to argument structure.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at work: The
nature of generalization in language. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
226
 Riemer, N. 2006. Reductive Paraphrase and
Meaning: A Critique of Wierzbickian Semantics.
Linguistics and Philosophy 29:347-379.
Riemer, Nick, (2011) La conception syntaxique
de la polysmie:une critique, Revue de
,
l Associationfranaise de linguistique cognitive,
vol.6.
,
Steffens, Marie, (2011) Qu est-ce que la

polysmie? versune nouvelle dfinition

de la polysmie, Langues et linguistique,
numrospcialJournes de linguistique, p.
159-169. InitialementparudansJournes de
linguistique. Actes du XXIIecolloque, Quebec,
Centre international de recherche sur les
activitslangagires, 2008, p. 187-200.
Taylor, J. 1996. On running and jogging.
Cognitive Linguistics 7:21-34.
Taylor, J. 2003. Linguistic categorization (3rd
ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuggy, D. 1993. Ambiguity, polysemy, and
vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4:273-290.
Tyler, A. & V. Evans. 2001. Reconsidering
prepositional polysemy networks: the case of
over. Language 77:724-765.
Vanhove, M. (ed.). 2008. From polysemy to
semantic change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wierzbicka, A. 1985. Lexicography and
Conceptual Analysis, Ann Arbor: Karoma
Publishers.
Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics. Primes and
universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

227
2017
 228
2017



( )


Sbiha. djemaa@gmail.com
2017 /02/04 :
2017 /03/10 :

:
.

.







.
.
:
.
-

229
2017
 Rhetorical lexical movement until the end of the
fifth century: A semantic study
Djemaa Sabiha
Carthaj University. Tunisia
Sbiha. djemaa@gmail.com

Abstract:
Our work is situated within the intellectual activities of discourse and rhetoric.
In this work, we are trying to scrutinize rhetorical lexis in the traditional heritage,
in the light of recent literature on lexical sciences. We have realized that classical
scholars did not use to have a clear representation of rhetorical semantics. The study
of lexis used to be fuzzy and the concepts were different. Despite this fact, classical
scholars were able to produce important lexical and semantic work characterized by
the movement of lexis till the fifth century. Recent scholars have been using it as an
important reference in their encyclopedic works, especially with the advance of recent
linguistic vocabulary resulting from different linguistic theories that are related to
semantic studies and discourse analysis. They have rendered lexical research a well-
established science labeled Lexical science as it is a practical morphological study
of the term related to the concept.

Keywords:
Movement Lexis Discourse Rhetorical lexis Lexical science Heritage
Concept Morphology.

230
2017


.

.


((( . .

.

. .


laterminologie
(((




.


E.Wuster

()
((( ...
.
...

(((.


.
((( ( )
. 162
((( ( ) . 17
((( () ((( : ( ) ( 72)
.203 185 Linguistique

231
2017

.



(((.




(((.
,
.
.

.


.

(((.


... :







(((.



:
((( ( . ) /

.15
((( ( ) ((( ( ) .8
. 1.13 ((( 1.139

232
2017
 .

.





:

() concept
.
()


.


.



.
:

.
.







.



. .

233
2017



(((. .

.1 :




.



.




.



.


.


.2 .
:



. .

(((. :
.
.
...
((( .97 .
((( .487

234
2017


:
(((
((( .

((( . (((


(((.
:

... (((



( ((1
.. :

:
:
(.((1 (((.



.

: ( .((1


(.((1 (((

((( .

((( 6 5 6-7-8
((( .96 .
((( .26-27-28-35-36-39-5/8-70 ((( 22 .
( ((1 .493 ((( 27 .
( ((1 35 ((( () : 1.488
( ((1 21-45-47-52-53-55-56-116-117- ((( .107
.)124-175-178-196-243 ((( .107
( ((1 .55 ((( .94

235
2017
 .

( 388)


. :




.

:
:
(((. - ...

...

-
.
(((.
:


.(((...
.
.
(((.


.
((( .27
((( 6 4 ((( () .40
.43 ((( .41

236
2017

(((.


(((.


.




.
(415)
:


(((.
.


:


((( .



(((. .
( 396) .
:

(((. ( 255)
((( . (((.
((( ( )
.2/121 ((( 16-17-18-19 .
((( 1/202 ((( .75-76
((( ( ) .179 ((( .67

237
2017
 (..)

. :

. (((.


.3
:



.

(((.
.


:




...





.



.


.
(((.
((( ( ) .77
((( .135-136 ((( .16

238
2017

(((.
.

. ( ) ().

.
. (
).
.

.


(..)
((( .
. .

.4 :


(((.

.

(((.
:

((( .117 ((( ( ) .
((( .94 ((( :.121-122-359-398-400

239
2017
 .


.
...

.(((...
:

(((


...
. (((

:
(((


:


((( :




(((.
(((.

((( .94
((( .1
((( .93
((( ( ) 16.199 ((( .82
((( .359
((( .275 .

240
2017

(((.
:

(((.




.










.
).






.




:

(((.

... : (((.
(((.

(((
:

(((.



((( .269
((( .44 ((( .66
((( .46 ((( .246
((( .306 ((( ( ) 54

241
2017


(((. :

((( .
smantique


Smantique .
linguistique .



. .

.5

:
.



signifiant

signifi

.

.



.

((( : ( ) .25 ((( .184

242
2017


.





.
structure
.

smantique structurale

(((.


.


.


.



:



.
()
.
:


.

((( A . J. Greimas, Smantique structurale, p6 :

243
2017
 . 3
.1976
( )

(.). .(((...
:

.2000
( )


.
.1952
( )


.1979 6
( ) .
:
:.1960
:
:

( .)

/
.1963 1

.1988
( )

... ( ) 1

3
()
.1968

( ( )

12-11 1995 .1991

. ( )

() :
.

4
.2007 .1995
()

.1980 18/1
((( ( ) .297

244
2017
 ( )

.1982
59 26 12 1993 .
:
() :

A. J. Greimas, Smantique structurale, ed,

1 .2000
Libaririe Larousse, Paris 1972 .
Dubuc (Robert), Manuel pratique de ( ) :

terminologie, Montral et Paris: linguatech et

conseil internationale de la langue Franaise, .1981
1980.
Iser (Wolfgang), lacte de lecture, thories de
()

leffet esthtique, Bruxelles, Mardaga, 1985. .1999

Rey (Alain), la terminologie: noms et notions, () ( ) (
Paris, 1979.
( ) :

.1988
.1985

.1989
( )

.2005 97
( )

1 .1992
( )

.1984
( )

.1995
( )

.1984
( )

.1984

245
2017




.

sulimanomirat@gmail.com
2017 /02/15 :
2017 /03/20 :
:




.

(4711078/) (3951005/) :

(5381144/)
: (180796/) (207822/)
.










.







. .
:
- - - - -.

247
2017
 Ferrs contribution to the field of Arabic Rhetoric

Suliman Omirat
izmir Ktip elebi University
sulimanomirat@gmail.com

Abstract:
The article focuses on the Arabic Language scholar Ferrs contribution to the field
of Arabic Language and Rhetoric in his book Manil-Kurnan explores his analysis
of a set of rhetorical phenomena dealt with in this book. In addition, the difference
between the approaches in the study of rhetorical phenomena of Ferra and that of the
ones following him is put forward. Finally, the place of Ferra in the science of Arabic
Language and Rhetoric is attempted to be determined.
The work consists of an introduction, main section of the article and conclusion.
The main reason for leading the author to do a research in this area is explained in the
introduction. The background knowledge of Ferras life, the method followed in the
works on the genre of Manil-Kurn in general, and the one that of Ferra are explored
in the introduction as well. The main section of the article focuses on Ferras approach
to such rhetorical arts such as maJzul-akl, hazf, mushkala, iltifat and kinaya. The
article comes to the end with a conclusion where a general assessment of the study is
made.

Keywords:
Rhetoric- Ferra- Kuran-l Karim

248
2017
 : :
(144-207


=761-822):



(189805/)
(209824/) .



(255869/)
(296909/)
. :
: (((
(276889/) .
(286889/)

(189805/)

(337948/) : (198814/)
(207822/) (182798/)



(180796/)
. .
:
:



:

: (((.
(189805/)
((( : (328940/) .159
(203819/) ((( : (4381047/) .1/91
(206821/) (5621167/) :

.10/156 (6261229/)
(6811282/) .8/131
.6/176 .8/145-146

249
2017
 : (215830/)
(311923/)
:
.
(338950/)

.


( ) :

.: :



(209824/)
. :




: .




....






:

( ).


( ).

.
:

-
.
-
(((:





591
((( :
598.599 .

250
2017
 ( :

).
.
} :
{

[]16: ) (
.
} :

{ [ ]4:
:

.
( : )
( ) ()

( )
()
.

() } :

.






{ [ ]4:
:

:

( : )


()

. ( )
()

: .

( ). :


} : .

{ [ ]17:
( ) :
( )
( : ).

.

251
2017

: } :
:
{ [ ]21: }

{ []6:
: .

. .

( ).
:

} :

{ [ ]17:
.
) () (


: .




:


.

: } :

{ []36: :

}
((( . } :
[ ]6: . { { [ ]38:


:



} : {[]61:


. :



.

. } :







{ []45:

: .
.
((( :
( :
).2/300

252
2017
 :

(4711078/) ] [ :

:
:



((( . ( )
: ( )
(6261229/)

.

((( :
(7391338/) .1 :
.

((( (((
.2 :
.
(7631362/)
( ) ( : ).
(((
(7931390/) () ( :
((( ).
() :
(2004) ( :
).

.







(4711078/) ((( :

.385
(6261229/) .393
((( :

(7391338/) .21 ((( : .
(7391338/)
((( :
.1/80 3

(7631362/)
((( :
.1/140
(7931390/) .197
((( : .

253
2017
 : . :




} { [ ]21: (7451344/)

((( .


:



.





} :

((( .

{
(13931973/) :

. [ ]43: : (((.


:

... :

}

{

:
[ ]6: :.

{ [ ]21: }



: ...

) ( : ) (

( :) (((. ( )
:
{
} : } : {
[ ]33: :
: [ ]16:
:
: .
:
:

.

:
((( : (7451344-)

.3/143
((( : (207822-) .1/14 )
( ((( : :
((( : .2/16 .29

254
2017
 { [ ]33: .
(((.
.
(((



: :
:



(((
(6261229/)

}

{ [ ]194::


} { [ ]54::

{

}


[ .(((...]116:


(8371433/) .

((( :
(11191707/)

(((. .

(5381144/)




} :

(180796/)
{ [ ]142: :

((( : (180796-) .1/176
((( : .621
:
.424

((( :
((( : (8371433/) } :
.2/252
(11201707-) ((( :
.5/284 ((( : .2/263

255
2017


} :
:
{ [ ]54:

:


:


(((.

.


:

. :

{ }
(((.
} :
:
{
} :
[ ]67: : :

{ [ ]193:
:
((( } :
} : :
{ [ ]79:
:

{

:
{ []15: } :

. } :
(((.




} :

{ [ ]194:

{ [ ]138:

(5381144/) :


. :
.
:
.

: } { [ ]40:


: .
(((

((( : .1/218 ((( : (5381144/)

((( : .1/64 .2/166
((( : .2/384 ((( : .1/116-117

256
2017
 :
( )


{ } : . :
[ :]193: .

(((.

:


( )

: .
:
.

:

) (
:



(((.





() ( )

.




()

.
.






. .1/335
((( :
((( : .1/83

257
2017


:} : {



{ }


: :
(((.
.









:



.


.

(7391338/)




: } :



{
::
[ ]46-45:
:









(((.

((( : .2/379 .67

((( :

258
2017

.

- -


(4631071/)
(4711078/)

(6371239/) .









:
.




() ()
: () ( )
.


.

} :

{

[ ]73: : } :

{ :

: .

} : {
} :
{ }

259
2017

} :
.
{ :

() } :
{

[ ]82: :

{ [ ]63:
(((. : (((.
:.

:

: } :

) ( { [ ]46-45::

.
(((
:

.


: } :

} :

{ [ ]40-39:
{ [ ]9:



.
( ) ( : )...
} :

} { { [ ]46-45: :

: . :
( :



. ) (((.
:
:



} : }

{ [.]22: { [ ]93: :

} : {
} : :

[ { .]2-1:
. } :


{ :
} :

{ [.]90: ((( : .1/49
.67
((( :
((( : .1/61 ((( : .2/179

260
2017
 .
} :




-
[ {.]93-92:
- } :




{

((( .


[.]9:



. } :

[ {.]5-4:

} : (6371239/)







{ [.]31:

:
-
-

.




(((.

(6261229/)

.



( : )
:
(169785/) :



:
) [ :



(
] } :

((( : (6371239/)

.1/199

((( : .2/135

261
2017

{ [ ]22:
(((. ()

:
.
:
- -



:
}... :


{ [ ]235: : .
.
} : {
[ ]43: : } :

: (((. { [ ]21-20:
) ( :

: ( : ) ) (


} : } :



{


[ . ]22:

(((

{

[]235:

(310923 /): .
) ( :
:
... :





( :
) :
.
...

:

((( : .1/195
((( : .3/16 ((( : .3/211

262
2017


( ) : [.(((]... :
]32: [ : (5381144/):

) .
(
]32: : : [
.


:
: :
( .
]....[ : . ) :
: . ( ) :


:

.
.
( ) :
.((( ... :
(((.

(6061210/) :

:
.
:
:





: [ ]...






:
.


(310923 /) 5/105 ((( :

.
((( : (6061210/) .6/471 .284
((( :

263
2017
 1 :

1962.
(1120-1707)

1

- 1968 .
.

(7391338/)

3 .


- .
(


)

2013. .
(2004)

( ) 4


2013 .
(7391338/)

( ) 2 : .
2007 .
(377987/)


2 : - .
1993 .
(8371433/)
: - .

-2004 .
(4711078/)

1

1991 .
2010.
(328940/) :

(745-1344)

1 1987 .
-1423 .
(13961976/)

(7631362/)

2002 15.
1 :.
(5621167/)

264
2017
 2 2003 .
1987 . (4381047/) 2

(337948/) :
(.) -1995 ( . 1997.
: (180-796) 3 :

1988 .
). (5381144/)

(6811282/) 1
1 : :
-( 1900). - 1998 .
: 1407 3.
. (6371239/)

)EKEV AKADEMI DERGISI( .

19:2015 64:.
.
.
Sultan MehmetlmAratrmal( ( ..).
)arinasanVeToplumBilimleri Dergisi4: (7931390/)

2016 7 :. 2 : .
2007 .
. Dinbilim( (9631556/)

)leriAkademikAratrmaDergisi16:
16-:2016 1:. -1947 .
(207-822) 1:

.
(6261229/)

1 :
1993 .

2 2000 .
(6061210/)

1420 . 3
(6261229/)

265
2017

 (((


:
(((
.

2017 /02/20 :
2017 /04/25 :
:
.

.
:

...
.


.
: - - - - -
((( ( )22 :
DIRK GEERAERTS AND HUBERT CUYCKENS (eds.): THE OXFORD HAND BOOK OFCOGNITIVELINGUISTICS, Oxford Uni-
versity Press, 2007.
Brigitte Nerlich and David D. Clarke: Cognitive Linguistics and the History of Linguistics,pp589- 607 :
Cognitive :
... . :
( .)43-110 2017 .
(((
. ]. [.

269
2017
 Cognitive Linguistics and the History of Linguistics

Brigitte Nerlich and David D. Clarke

Tr: Hafid Ismaili Alaoui
Qatar University
Hafid.ismaili@qu.edu.qa

Abstract:
This study focuses on the past of Cognitive linguistics and its history in order to
make clear that some of the theoreticians that served as a negative reference point
for Cognitive Linguistics were actually closer to the cognitive approach than can be
derived from the discussions.
The study will not, however, try to give an exhaustive overview of all relevant
historical sources- actual ones or neglected ones. In particular, although the long past
of Cognitive Linguistics overlaps significantly with that of philosophy, psychology,
and the cognitive sciences, we it concentrate on the history of linguistics only, with
an occasional excursion to the history of philosophy. Section 2 of this chapter briefly
describes the internal history of Cognitive Linguistics. The following sections discuss
three topic areas of specific importance for Cognitive Linguistics: polysemy, metaphor,
and metonymy; the embodiment of cognition; and the Gestalt nature of linguistics.

Keywords:
Linguistics- Cognitive linguistics- philosophy- psychology- cognitive sciences-
polysemy, metaphor, and metonymy

270
2017
 ( . .1:

Friedrich

Harder48 Ebbinghaus 1908
Sinha )49 (
Farr1991 .)371
. Howard Gardener (1985 )9

: .

( Nerlich
.
1992 .)Clarke1996
.2 :
(

.)2001


/

/


:
/



.




.
: (
)Dik (
)Halliday
( )Givon ( .
)Grice
( Stampe
Dressler )Donegan

271
2017

( William Diver
(Bernardez .)Andr Martinet
1999.)13 ( Langacker(1998:1

( .
Brockman 2000 Sinha
)49
(
) .

. ) (:
) .
[ ]

.

.

1975 /
Lakoff (
( .)2001 .)Peeters 1998
( )

Chomsky .
()2000 .
Noam -
-

.

272
2017
 .



.
1980 .

()
()
()) .
( Fauconnier )Turner Mark Johnson
() . 1979
1980
1989
.
Rene Dirven
.
-
Duisburg [
] ( Janda
( . 2000 3 1999
)11
.)1985 CharlesFillmore 1975
( ) ICLA
RonaldLangacker
(
) . Leonard
ReneDirven ( Talmy 1972
)JohnTaylor .

( 2000/).

273
2017
 ICLA

( )1991 ( )1993 ()1995
[] ( )1997 ()1999
. ( )2001 ()2003
( )2005


. .
.3 :
.



( 19881988
.)1992 .
(((
( )

(
1988 1988 1993 1993
Swiggers 19891992
2001 2006 2000 1979
. 2000 2001 2006 Desmet
1997 Jake1
. .)1999
[]
:

((( metonymy () .
( : )
.

274
2017
 (
). .
Michel Bral
(
( )) . .

([]1887
1991 .)156-57
.

:


.
.1.3 :
.



.


.
.


( .)1883





(
(
)
) .
[] .

([]1897

1924 .)143-44
.

275
2017

.
( ) (
)
( Gur
.)Giora 2003 .



.
. ( )

([ )1991]1884 (
) .
.

(
1995 .)283
.

.

.
Reisig


Stephen Ullmann [ ([ 1991 ]1884 .)149
] ( .)1992

1980

276
2017
 . Traugott
: Warren Koch Blank
Fritz Kleparski
. ...
( 1987 )95-157 (1987
.2.3
( )xxixxxvi
1999 )74-94
Saussure ( Whorf
)
.




( 1999 .)69

(
) . ( .)1980
. Smith

Ludwig Wittgenstein
)(1953 Eleanor Rosch
)(1978 (1982
. .)128
.
(
1936 )90 ()1989
. .)Kanellos (1994
( 1999 )78-77

277
2017
 1975 .
Aristotle

.
.
.3.3

1978
Turner Kovesces



.


.


[] .
.
Jost Trier

.
.
( 1934 197-
)98 ( Kenneth Burke (1945, 1969
. ( :
Bildfeld
( )
Jakel 1999 .)23 1958 .
Bildspender(((Bildempfnger
( 1976 284 ( .
)1980 1967 .)1998

((( . PaulRicoeur
.

278
2017

( 1999 )23 :
.
(
1986 Dingwall Bailer Stahlin
.)2002 [] (
2000)
Max Black
( 1997.)Adams1991 1960
(1962
Dornseiff
()1999
. .)Gibbs 1994
.4
1954

:
( FranzDornseiff Liebert 1995
.)51-149
(

) .
: --
-
( ( Dornseiff 1954142-
)1999 43 Liebert 1955.)151
1890 .1930
Hans Blumenberg
(
( 1957
.)1999 .)1960

279
2017
 .1.4 :
( )1916

( )
.
.

(
)1999
(1997 :
xix
1987.)91 ()

.
...
.

.
. ( )


.
.
)19711929( Gustave Guillaume ( xvii 1997
.)xviii

(
)
. .
)1990-1941( Karl Buhler

280
2017
 () .
(19561956 )

.

Maurice Merleau-Ponty
( .)1958 ([ )1962 ]1945
.

.
( 1996 )27 .
:

Whorf

[ ].... (

. .
( .2.4:
)



.



(

)
( ) -

-
. ( ) (
1999 .)320
( )1999 1999
)Lee1996
.

281
2017
 .3.4:

Sphrenmischung
: ( ) .
... (

[ ] )
.
(1990 ]1934[
.)343
:
.
.
( ) .

.
( []1934 (
1990.)35 2000 )2001

(1924
.)29 :291924
(
1990 )343
. ( . )
.)1999


. .
.
( - 1989 .)36

282
2017
 . (
1956) ()
/ / .
/ /
:
((( ( 1956
1956) .

( : ( Musolff 1993
) .)268
.
.

(1956)

.
.



( 1993.)2 .

( )2002 .4.4
(
).
.
.5

: .
:
((( . ()
.

283
2017

.... ( Rohrer 2
Zlatev Frank
) .
/ .
.2.5 .
.1.5

( )1987 (-
- ) 1966


.
( 1971 1970
. 1999 Cheng 1998) .

Hjelmslev


.
( []1945 1964
1962 1991 .)1994
.
Peeters
( )1999
.
:


.

284
2017


.
.

.

. :


Adams, David. 1991. Metaphors for mankind:

The development of Hans Blumenbergs

.
anthropological metaphorology. Journal of the
History of Ideas 52: 152-66. .
Bernardez, Enrique. 1999. Some reflections on

the origins of cognitive linguistics. Journal of

(
English Studies 9-28. )2000 ( )1993
Black, Max. 1962. Models and metaphors:
Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
( 1985354
Blumenberg, Hans. 1957. Licht als Metapher 1993 .)64
der Wahrheit: Im Vorfeld der philosophischen
Begriffsbildung. Studium Generale 1o: 432-47. .6
Blumenberg, Hans. 1960. Paradigmenzueiner
Metaphorologie. Archiv far Begriffsgeschichte.
Vol. 6. Bonn: Bouvier.
Blumenberg, Hans. 1986. Die Lesbarkeit der
Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Blumenberg, Hans. 1997. Shipwreck with

spectator: Paradigm of a metaphor for existence.
Trans. Steven Rendall. Cambridge, MA: MIT .
Press.
Bral, Michel. 1883. Les lois intellectuelles du

langage: Fragment de smantique. Annuaire de
LAssociation pour lencouragement des tudes

grecques en France 17: 132-42.
Bral, Michel. [1884] 1991. How words are or-
.

285
2017
 gers. 1997. Lhistoire de la smantique pre-
structurale: Quatre tudes. Catholic University
of Leuven, Department of Linguistics, Preprint
no. 156.
Desmet, Piet, and Pierre Swiggers. 1995. In-
troduction. In Michel Brea], De la grammaire
compare a la semantique1-34. Leuven, Bel-
gium: Peeters.
Dirven, Rene. 1993. Metonymy and metaphor:
Different mental strategies of conceptualisation.
LeuvenseBijdragen82: 1-28.
Dirven, Rene, and Ralf Porings, eds. 2002. Met-
aphor and metonymy in comparison and con-
trast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dornseiff, Franz. 1954. Bezeichnungswandel
unseres Wortschatzes: Ein Blick in das See-
lenleben der Sprechenden. Lahr/Schwarzwald,
Germany: Moritz Schauenburg.
Farr, Robert M. 1991. The long past and the
short history of social psychology. European
Journal of Social Psychology 21: 371-80.
Fesmire, Steven A. 1994. What is cognitive
about cognitive linguistics? Metaphor and Sym-
bolic Activity 9: 149-54.
Frank, Roz, Rene Dirven, and Tom Ziemke, eds.
Forthcoming. Body, language, and mind. Vol. 2,
Interrelations between biology, linguistics and
culture. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gardner, Howard. 1985. The minds new sci-
ence: A history of the cognitive revolution. New
York: Basic Books.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1985. Paradigm and paradox:
Explorations into a paradigmatic theory of
meaning and its epistemological background.
Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1988a. Cognitive grammar
and the history of lexical semantics. In Brygida
Rudzka Ostyn, ed., Topics in cognitive linguis-
tics 647-77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1988b. Katz revisited: Aspects
of the history of lexical semantics. In Werner
Hiillen and Rainer Schulze, eds., Understanding
the lexicon: Meaning, sense and world-knowl-
edge in lexical semantics 23-35. Tubingen: Max
Niemeyer Verlag.
2017
ganized in the mind. In George Wolf, ed. and
trans., The beginnings of semantics: Essays,
lectures and reviews 145-51. Oxford: Duck-
worth.
Bral, Michel. [1887] 1991. The history of
words. In George Wolf, ed. and trans., The be-
ginnings of semantics: Essays, lectures and re-
views 152-75. Oxford: Duckworth.
Bral, Michel. [1897] 1924. Essai de sman-
tique: Science des significations. Repr. of 4th
ed. Paris: Gerard Monfort.
Bral, Michel. 1995. De la grammaire com-
pare a`la smantique: Textes de Michel Bral
publies entre 1864 et 1898. Introduction, com-
mentaires et bibliographie par Piet Desmet et
Pierre Swiggers. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.
Brockman, John. 2000. Interview with George
Lakoff after the publication of Philosophy in the
Flesh (1999). http://www.edge.orgidocuments/
archive/edge51.html (accessed Nov. 2000).
Brown, Roger W., and Eric H. Lenneberg. 1958.
Studies in linguistic relativity. In Eleanor E.
Maccoby, Theodore M. Newcomb, and Eugene
L. Hartley, eds., Readings in social psychology
9-18. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Baler, Karl. 1930. The mental development of
the child: A summary of modern psychological
theory. Third impression. London: Routledge
and Kegan Paul.
Buhler, Karl. [19341 1990. Theory of language:
The representational function of language.
Trans. Donald F. Goodwin. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Burke, Kenneth. 1945. A grammar of motives.
Berkeley: University of California Press. Burke,
Kenneth. 1969. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley:
University of California Press. Cheng, Quilong.
1998. Interview with Sydney Lamb for lang-
brain; Language and brain:
Neurocognitive Linguistics, Rice Univer-
sity, Houston, TX. http://www.ruf.rice.edu/
0/07EIngbrain/main.htm (accessed Nov. 2000).
(Published in Foreign Language Teaching and
Research 19992/2: 61-64.)
Desmet, Piet, Dirk Geeraerts, and Pierre Swig-
286
 Jakobson, Roman. 1956a. The metaphoric and
metonymic poles. In Roman Jakobson and
Morris Halle, eds., Fundamentals of language
76-82.The Hague: Mouton.
Jakobson, Roman. 195613. Two aspects of lan-
guage and two types of aphasic disturbances.
In Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudi, eds.,
Language in literature 95-12o. Cam-bridge,
MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University
Press.
Janda, Laura A. 2000. Cognitive linguistics.
Position paper for the SLING2K workshop,
Feb. 2000. http://www.indiana.edu/-slavconf/
SLING2K/pospapers.html (accessed Dec.
2000).
Johnson, Mark, ed. 1981. Philosophical per-
spectives on metaphor. Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota Press.
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind:
The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and
reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Mark. 1993. Moral imagination: Im-
plications of cognitive science for ethics. Chi-
cago: University of Chicago Press.
Kanellos, Ioannis. 1994. Du lieu et de la nature
des phnomnes de typicalit: Playdoyer pour
un Aristote mconnu. Scola 1: to9-33.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dan-
gerous things: What categories reveal about the
mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Met-
aphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chi-
cago Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Phi-
losophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its
challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic
Books.
Lamb, Sydney M. 1970. Linguistic and cogni-
tive networks. In Paul Garvin, ed., Cognition:
A multiple view, 195-222. New York: Spartan
Books.
Lamb, Sydney M. 1971. The crooked path of
progress in cognitive linguistics. CURT 22: 99-
123.
287
2017
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1989. Prospects and problems
of prototype theory. Linguistics 27: 587-612.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993a. Cognitive linguistics
and the history of philosophical epistemology.
In Richard Geiger and Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn,
eds., Conceptualizations and mental processing
in language 53-79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993b. Des deux ctes de la s-
mantique structurale: Smantique historique et
smantique cognitive. Histoire Epistemologie
Langage 15: 111-30.
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1994. The poetics of
mind: Figurative thought, language, and under-
standing. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Gill, Jerry H. 1991. Merleau-Ponty and meta-
phor. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities
Press.
Giora, Rachel, and Inbal Gur. 2003. Irony in
conversation: Salience, role, and context effect.
In Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman,
and David D. Clarke, eds., Polysemy: Flexible
patterns of meaning in mind and language 297-
316. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gross,, Richard. 1999. Psychology: The science
of mind and behaviour. 3rd ed. London: Hodder
and Stoughton.
Guillaume, Gustave. 1929. Temps et verbe:
Thorie des aspects, des modes et des temps.
Paris: Champion.
Guillaume, Gustave. 1971. Leptis de Linguis-
tique 1948-1949. Srie A, Structure smi-
ologique et structure psychique de la langue
franaise I. Ed. Roch Valin. Quebec: Presses de
lUniversit Laval.
Hulzer -Vogt, Heike. 1989. Karl Buhler
(1879-1963) and Wilhelm Stahlin (1883-1975):
Psychologische Fundamente der Metaphern
theorie im ersten Drittel des 20. Jahrhundersts.
Munster, Germany: Nodus Publikationen.
Jakel, Olaf. 1999. Kant, Blumenberg, Weinrich:
Some forgotten contributions to the cognitive
theory of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr.,
and Gerard J. Steen, eds., Metaphor in cognitive
linguistics 9-27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
 Nerlich, Brigitte. 2000. Structuralism, contex-
tualism, dialogism: Voroshilov and Bakhtins
contributions to the debate about the relativity
of meaning. Historiographia Linguistica 27: 79-
102.
Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 1996.
Language, action, and context: The early histo-
ry of pragmatics in Europe and America, 1780-
1930. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 1997.
Polysemy: Patterns in meaning and patterns in
history. HistoriographiaLinguistica24: 359-85.
Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 1999.
Champ, Schema, Sujet: Les contributions de
Buhler, Bartlett et Benveniste a une linguistique
du texte. Langue francaise121: 36-56 (spcial
issue on Phrase, Texte, Discours, ed. E. S.
Karabetian).
Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 2000a.
Blending the past and the present: Conceptual
and linguistic integration, 1800-2000. Logos
and Language: Journal of General Linguistics
and Language Theory 1: 3-18.
Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 2000b.
Semantic fields and frames: Historical explora-
tions of the interface between language, action
and cognition. Journal of Pragmatics32: 125-
50.
Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 2001.
Mind, meaning, and metaphor: The philosophy
and psychology of metaphor in nineteenth-cen-
tury Germany. History of the Human Sciences
14: 39-61.
Nerlich, Brigitte, Robert Ding wall, and David
D. Clarke. 2002. The book of life: How the hu-
man genome project was revealed to the pub-
lic. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the
Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 6:
445-69.
Peeters, Bert. 1998. Cognitive musings. Word
49: 225-37.
Peeters, Bert. 1999. Review of Lamb 1999.
Cognitive Linguistics io: 382-91.
Peeters, Bert. 2001. Does cognitive linguistics
live up to its name? In Rene Dirven, Bruce
2017
Lamb, Sydney M. 1999. Pathways of the brain:
The neurocognitive basis of language. Amster-
dam: John Benjamins.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of
cognitive grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical pre-
requisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1998. Conceptualiza-
tion, symbolization, and grammar. In Michael
Tomasello, ed., The new psychology of lan-
guage: Cognitive and functional approaches to
language structure 1: 1-39. Mahwah, NJ: Law-
rence Erlbaum.
Lee, Penny. 1996. The Whorf theory complex:
A critical reconstruction. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Liebert, Wolf-Andreas. 1995. Metaphernbere-
iche der virologischen Aids forschung. Lexicol-
ogy: An international journal on the structure of
vocabulary 1: 142-82.
Mahon, James Edwin. 1999. Getting your sourc-
es right. What Aristotle didnt say. In Lynne
Cameron and Graham Low, eds., Researching
and applying metaphor 69-80. Cam-bridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. [1945] 1962. The phe-
nomenology of perception. Trans. C. C. Smith.
Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Musolff, Andreas. 1993. Karl Buhlers and Alan
Gardiners concepts of metaphor in the context
of their theories of speech and language. Bei-
tragezur Geschichte der Sprach-wissenschaft3:
225-72.
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1992. Semantic theories in
Europe, 1830-1930: From etymology to con-
textuality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nerlich, Brigitte. 1999. Identity, similarity
and continuity: Saussure and Wittgenstein on
the constitution of linguistic units. In John
E. Joseph, Hans-Josef Niederehe, and Sheila
Embleton, eds, The emergence of the modern
language sciences: Studies on the transition
from historical-comparative to structural lin-
guistics in honour of E. F. Konrad Koerner151-
69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
288
 The dynamics of signs in social life. London:
Routledge.
Trier, Jost. 1934. Deutsche Bedeutungs for-
schung. In Alfred Goetze, Wilhelm Horn, and
Friedrich Maurer, eds., Gertnanische Philolo-
gie: Ergebnisse and Aufgaben. Festschrift fiir
Otto Behagel173-20o. Heidelberg: Carl Winter
Universitatsverlag.
Turner, Mark, Cristina Cacciari, Raymond W.
Gibbs, Jr., and Albert Katz. 1998. Figurative
language and thought. Oxford: Oxford Univer-
sity Press.
Vaihinger, Hans. 1924. The philosophy of as
if: A system of the theoretical, practical and re-
ligious fictions of mankind. Trans. Charles K.
Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Weinrich, Harald. 1967. Semantik der Meta-
pher. Folia Linguistica 1: 3-17.
Weinrich, Harald. 1976. Sprache in Texten.
Stuttgart: Klett.
Weinrich, Harald. 1980. Metapher. In Joachim
Ritter and Karlfried Griinder, eds., Historisches
Worterbuch der Philosophie 5: cols. 1179-
86. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche
Buchge ellschaft.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical in-
vestigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Ox-
ford: Basil Blackwell.
Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, thought,
and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee
Whorl: Ed. John B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Ziemke, Tom, Jordan Zlatev, and Roz Frank,
eds. Forthcoming. Body, language and mind.
Vol. 1, Embodiment. Berlin: Mouton de Gru-
yter.
289
2017
Hawkins, and Esra Sandikcioglu, eds., Lan-
guage and ideology: Cognitive theoretical ap-
proaches 83-106 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Richards, Ivor Armstrong. 1936. The philoso-
phy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1975. La mtaphore vive. Paris:
Seuil.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. The metaphorical process
as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Criti-
cal Inquiry 5: 143-59. (Repr. in Mark Johnson,
ed., Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor
228-47. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 1981.)
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categoriza-
tion. In Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd,
eds., Cognition and categorization 27-48. Hills-
dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Saussure, Ferdi-
nand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique gnrale.
Paris: Payot.
Smith, Michael K. 1982. Metaphor and mind:
Review of Metaphors we live by, by George La-
koff and Mark Johnson. American Speech 57:
128-33.
Stanulewicz, Danuta. 1999. Benjamin Lee
Whorf and cognitive linguistics. In Janusz Ar-
abski, ed., Pase papers in language studies: Pro-
ceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of
the Polish Association for the Study of English,
Szczyrk, May 1998 191-98. Katowice, Poland:
Para.
Swiggers, Pierre. 1989. Le fondement cognitif
et smantique de ltymologie chez Turgot. Ca-
hiers Ferdinand de Saussure 43: 79-89.
Talmy, Leonard. 1972. Semantic structures in
English and Atsugewi. Ph.D. dissertation, Uni-
versity of California, Berkeley.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000a. Toward a cognitive se-
mantics. Vol. 1, Concept structuring systems.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000b. Toward a cognitive se-
mantics. Vol. 2, Typology and process in con-
cept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thibault, Paul J. 1997. Re-reading Saussure:

(((


( )

:

iamer@qu.edu.qa :

2017 /03/05 :
2017 /04/12 :
:



.
.

.

((( . Mark Turner, The Cognitive Study of Art, Language, and Literature, English, Maryland, College Park

291
2017
 The Cognitive Study of Art, Language, and Literature
Mark Turner
English, Maryland, College Park
Tr. Ibrahim Amer
Qatar University
iamer@qu.edu.qa

Abstract:
The cognitive turn in the humanities is an aspect of a more general cognitive turn
taking place in the contemporary study of human beings. Because it interacts with
cognitive neuroscience, it can seem unfamiliar to students of the humanities, but in
fact it draws much of its content, many of its central research questions, and many of
its methods from traditions of the humanities as old as classical rhetoric. Its purpose
in combining old and new, the humanities and the sciences, poetics and cognitive
neurobiology is not to create an academic hybrid but instead to invent a practical,
sustainable, intelligible, intellectually coherent paradigm for answering basic and
recurring questions about the cognitive instruments of art, language, and literature.

Keywords:
The cognitive turn- cognitive neuroscience- Art- Language- Literature.

292
2017
 ( .. :
.)Turner 1998



( .
) ((( Jeanne Fahnestock
.GillesFauconnier ( )1999 / /





.



-

-

.





((( ()For an introduction to blending for students of art, language,
and literature, see Turner 1996 and Turner and Fauconnier
1999. For a survey of current research on blending, see Turn-
er 1999. For the technical details of the theory of blending, see
Fauconnier and Turner 1998.
Turner 1996
.Turner and Fauconnier 1999
.Tunner 1999
Fauconnier and Tunner 1998

293
2017



.



.

.

( )



. .
.







.



.

294
2017




.

.




.
.


.

.




.

.



Harold and the purple Crayon
. Crocket Johnson
([ )1983 ]1955

.

295
2017





.
.

.

:

( ([.)1983 ]1955


:
.


The Runaway Bunny
)2491( Margaret Wise Brown
Johns Picture .
ElizabethMacDonald
( )1991 Le Petit
Prince
.)1943( Antoine de Saint-Exupery
.

. .
.
/
Il etait une dame Tartine

296
2017
 .

.

.:
..
.



This Surgeon is a lumberjack




. .
1997

:
(

( 1406[ 3]) :
Gorgias ) .


. :
.Philomela /
/ /

.

.
WallaceStevens
The Snow

297
2017


.

150 .
(((.


(
)

. ((( A basic mental operation like blending could
not entirely escape detection. Literary cri -
- ics, art historians, psychologists, rhetoricians,
linguists, and other scholars have here and
- there noticed and analyzed individual blends.
There are also theoretical discussions that lean
in the direction of recognizing blending as a
basic mental operation. The most extended is
Arthur Koestlers work The Act of Creation
.
(1964). which presents Carl Dunckers blend
The Buddhist Monk. Fauconnier and Tur -
er (1998) in turn use The Buddhist Monk as
their main heuristic example of blending. But
Koestler regards blending as exceptional and
has no theory of its structural and dynamic
operation. Except under charitable reading of
a few of his passages, he appears to mistake it
for composition of elements selected from the
contributing scenarios.
.


.
.
Arthur Koestler
)1964( The Act of Creation
Carl Duncker . The Buddhist
MonkFauconnier and Turner
. ( )1998
.
. .

298
2017

)56:]2291[1691( Rainer Maria Rilke .

. . .




( )2:]1922[ 1961 Among School Children
William Butler Yeats

:


.







.
.
) Alan Richardson (1998:39
:


(
)




.

299
2017



.

...



.
.









.
.

300
2017
 - -

( .
.
65000000


Yucatan Peninsula
).




( ) .

- -

.





.

















.



( )MLA

301
2017
 1961 [1922] Duino Elegies, translated by C. F. 1999
MacIntyre (Berkeley: University of California
Press).

Turner, Mark 2000
1991 Reading Minds: The Study of English in : 2001
the Age of Cognitive Science (Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press). .
1996 The Literary Mind: The Origins of
Thought and Language (New York: Oxford
University Press).
Brown, Margaret Wise
1998 Figure, in Figurative Language and
1942 The Runaway Bunny, pictures by Clement

Thought, by Cristina Cacciari, Ray Gibbs, Jr.,

Hurd (New York: Harper and Row).

Albert Katz, and Mark Turner, (New York:
Oxford University Press). Fahnestock, Jeanne
1999 Website on Blending and Conceptual 1999 Rhetorical Figures in Science (New York:
Integration: blending.stanford.edu. Oxford University Press).

Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner

Turner, Mark, and Gilles Fauconnier 1998 Conceptual Integration Networks,
Cognitive Science 22 (2): 133-87.
A Mechanism of Creativity, Poetics Today
20:397 418. Johnson, Crockett
https://glossarissimo.wordpress. 1983 [1955] Harold and the Purple Crayon
c o m / 2 0 1 5 / 0 4 / 1 8 / a r - e n - (New York: HarperCollins).
%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%AC%D9%85-%D Koestler, Arthur
8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B5%D8 1964 The Act of Creation (London: Hutchinson
%B7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8% & Co.).
AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D9% Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner
84%D8%A7%D8%BA%D9%8A%D8%A
1989 More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide
9-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A-

to PoeticMetaphor(Chicago: University of
%D8%A5%D9%86%D8%AC%D9%
ChicagoPress).
84%D9%8A/
MacDonald, Elizabeth
1991 Johns Picture, pictures by Dave McTaggart
(New York: Viking).
Richardson, Alan
1998 Brains, Minds, and Texts, Review
20:39-48. Available on-line at http://www2.
bc.edu/~richarad/lcb/rev/mt.html.
Richardson, Peter
In press. Making Thanes: Rhetoric, Literature,
and State Formation in Anglo-Saxon England,
Philological Quarterly.
Rilke, Rainer Maria

302
2017