Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 1+urban+distribution+facilities PDF
5 1+urban+distribution+facilities PDF
5 1+urban+distribution+facilities PDF
policies part 1
INTRODUCTION
Paucity of loading/unloading areas or facilities is a recurring problem
in many urban areas, and especially in the city centers
Difficulties in collecting
Lack of specific regulations Not appropriate Operators poor information/data about
regulations cooperation
on urban distribution freight/goods distributed
No strict enforcement
Operators poor interest in
creating common
10
distribution management
schemes
3
CONSUMPTION
OF LAND (routes,
modes and
terminals)
Many functions
DISTRIBUTION
STRATEGIES
(including modal
choice)
(Rodrigue and Dablanc 2017)
but
BESTUFFS 2006
Shortcomings in
the data National bodies collect a wide spectrum of
collection are data mainly just to feed national statistics.
due to poor
Local authorities do not survey freight
coordination distribution on a regular basis; data collection
between national is either carried out merely to support political
and local decisions or to provide new data to traffic
authorities: models
10
Many actors, many types of operation, many facilities Complexity of the process
MAIN
STAKEHOLDERS
DIFFERENT INTERPLAY
Regulate
Mitigate LOGISTICS
Addetti
nd Dablanc 2017)
Enforce OPERATORS
logistica
stratore
Cooperate
ORS
Conflict
ale
Cooperate Compete
ADMINSITRATO
loca
Amminis
Conflict
(Rodrigue an
cittadini
itt di i
CITIZENS Cooperate
COMMERCE
Addetti
LOCAL
OPERATORS
commercio
Many actors
11
A warehouse is a
facility where
goods are stored
nc 2017)
center tends to
store goods for
short periods of
time as orders are
fulfilled. on a daily basis
12
Many facilities
Logistic city X X X X
Transit point X X X
13
Actually, the urban consolidation centre has different meanings, but it can be considered as
a range of potential applications along a spectrum dependent upon the split of involvement (or
control) of the public and private sectors,
terms used to refer to the consolidation centre concept therefore include:
- public distribution depot
- central goods sorting point
- urban transhipment centre
- shared-user urban transhipment depot
- freight platforms
- cooperative delivery system
- consolidation centre (sometimes specific, e.g. retail, construction)
- urban distribution centre
- city logistics (or city logistik) schemes
- logistics centre
- pick-up drop-off location
- offsite logistics support concept
14
Id of Id of
possible sites Site optimal sites
Choice
10
15
Top-down approach
Bottom-up approach
5 URBAN DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES AND POLICIES
44
0
For example in Italy, in past times most part of rules in this field was
enforced within the local master plans, whereas now it is comprised
within the Urban Mobility Plans or in the Traffic plans
Disincentives
Participation and
support by external
actions
Incentives to some
forms of deliveries Not appropriate
regulations
plus
(Indirect regulations)
10
17
URBAN
DISTRIBUTION
43
relationships between
implemented measures and
POLICIES respectively:
number of inhabitants,
urban density
size of urban areas
A cluster analysis
surveying 20
European
p cities
policies on delivery Not appropriate
regulations
organization
18
information
19
surveyed European
POLICIES cities
2000000
Inhabitants 1500000
and 1000000
measures 500000
i ea
Em Cr
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
21
Basel Freiburg Bordeaux Utrecht Copenaghen Rotterdam Genoa
5 URBANStockholm
DISTRIBUTION
Milan
FACILITIES
Barcelona Paris Rome Dresden
44
0
surveyed European
POLICIES sqkm
cities
Size of urban
areas and
measures
The widest
Th id t palette
l tt off
interventions is achievable
within 500 sqkm meas.
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Density
and
measures
The
e less
ess co
complex
p e tthe
euurban
ba
context, the highest
meas.
synergy between incentives
and disincentives !!!
10
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
surveyed European
POLICIES cities
inhabitants
restrictiveness-based
approaches
pp ((time slots,,
emissions control, load limits) are usually
with
implemented in urban areas
1,500,000 inhabitants
and more
24
Transit points seem to be the most expensive solution (12.5 Euro/inh. as mean value), vs. the renewal of the
fleet seems the cheapest one (< 5 Euro/inh.).
10
but infrastructural interventions (< 10 Euro/inh.) appear to be the most feasible, in spite of their middle-range costs, due to easiness of decision and implementation
25