Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Program Evaluation Analysis Css
Program Evaluation Analysis Css
Program Evaluation Analysis Css
Trainee 1
B. Course Content
1. Course content vis--vis the program objectives 4
2. Sequencing of the course contents 4
3. Sufficiency of information 4
4. Relevance of course content vis--vis need 4
C. Training Methodology
1. Effectiveness of selected method 4
2. Appropriateness to the course activities 4
Prepared by:
EDMAR F. GAPUZ
TRAINOR
Trainee 2 Trainee 3 Trainee 4 Trainee 5
3 4 5 5
3 4 5 4
1 3 5 3
2 4 5 4
3 4 5 4
3 4 5 4
3 4 5 4
3 4 5 4
3 4 5 4
3 4 5 3
3 4 5 4
3 4 5 4
3 4 5 4
4 4 5 4
3 4 5 3
3 5 4
2 4 5 3
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 5 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
In this area, the item on "Scheduling of activities and time allotment" got
a rating of 3.75 or "Very Good/Very Satisfactory" while the rest were
rated "Good / Adequate".
All items under the Course Content got ratings falling on "Very
Good/Very Satisfactory". This means that the trainees were very
satisfied with the course content.
All the items got and average rating of 4.00 or "Very Good"
respectively.
All the items got and average rating of 4.00 or "Very Good"
respectively.