Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pres
Pres
He
appeared before the Commission on the 3rd of September, 1999. While being subjected to cross
examination he did a complete about-turn and went back on the earlier statement. He
categorically stated that he had earlier given a false statement in which he had involved Wasim
Akram. He said he had made the said statement under some misunderstanding. He was immediately
put on ECL (Exit Control List) and subsequently issued with a notice for perjury.
Later, when Ata-ur-Rehman appeared before this Commission again, to be issued a show-cause
notice for perjury, he stated that he had in fact been induced by Aamir Sohail to make a
statement against Wasim Akram and that the affidavit was also given at his instance. He however
reiterated that Wasim Akram had supplied him with a ticket for travelling from Newcastle to
London and that that ticket was charged to Wasim Akrams credit card.
later affidavit. In support of the earlier affidavit, three sources presented themselves:
One was Imran Khan. Imran Khan had earlier stated in his statement that the only knowledge
he had of match-fixing was of when Ata had told him that Wasim had paid him to throw
the Christchurch match. Ata told him this after the news about the first affidavit had
The second source of corroboration was Rashid Latif. Mr. Latif states in this Christchurch
match Wasim Akram had declared himself unfit before the Pakistanis took the field. He
was holding his shoulder as if in pain even before the first ball was bowled. He only
bowled six overs and did not even complete his spell. According to Latif, no balls and
wides were bowled deliberately by Wasim Akram and on at least two occasions the balls
were bowled so wide that the wicket keeper could not get to it and the opposition got
eight wides at a crucial time in the game. These runs were given away at a time when
the weather was turning nasty and with rain imminent the Pakistani bowlers could have
saved the match but they were bowling in such a hurry that the run rate was
accelerated and NZ won the game. In one-day cricket bowlers never bowl bouncers as
they can give away too many runs but the Pakistani bowlers deliberately bowled
bouncers. In Rashids opinion, as he had a clear view from his place behind the
stumps, Wasim (and Salim Malik) were the main culprits for Pakistans loss.
The scorecard shows that the Pakistani bowlers gave away 25 extras. (lb8, w14, nb3).
Twenty five extras means not only 25 bonus runs for the opposition but 17 no balls and
wides total means they had a gift of 17 extra deliveries to score runs off. The detailed
Bowling O M R W
Morrison 10 2 20 3
Pringle 10 1 21 3
Cairns 10 0 36 2
Larsen 10 1 21 1
Hart 4 0 17 0
Thomson 6 0 24 0
Bowling O M R W
Wasim Akram 6.3 0 17 0
Waqar Younis 8.1 1 33 2
Ata-ur-Rehman 9 0 44 1
Aamer Sohail 4 0 18 0
Akram Raza 3.3 0 14 0
Saleem Malik 3 0 12 0