Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

DP Operator Manual

DP INCIDENTS

The following incidents have been reproduced with


the kind permission of IMCA. (International Marine
Contractors Association.)

They are intended to show an example of the full set


of reports to the attendees of the Basic and Advanced
DP Operator courses.

All operators should have access to the complete set


of data on their own vessels.

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 1 of 21
DP Operator Manual

T ENSIONING
VESSEL ON DP IN DUAL DGPS
M OORING
OP EN W AT ER
COM P LET ED ON LINE

POSITION OUT
OFLIMITS

ADDIT IONAL
T HRUST ER
SELECT ED

T HRUST ER AT BOT H DGP S


FULL P OW ER INP UT S
AND T RIP S REJECT ED

BOTH DGPS POSITION


DE-SELECTED DROP OUT

DGPS 1
RE-SELECTED

POSITION POSITION HEADING LOSS


LOSS 120M STABILISED 40 DEGRESS

Figure 95/04

COMMENTS
This incident has been explained as a typical soliton effect that can catch an operator unaware in the
South China Sea (for more information see IMCA seminar November 1995)

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Soliton Thruster failure

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 2 of 21
DP Operator Manual

VESSEL ON DP ROV AND 2 TWs AND


ALONGSIDE DIVERS IN HPR ON LINE
PLATFORM WATER

PORT AZIMUTH
THRUSTER
TRIPS

AMBER
ALERT

DIVERS TO
ENGINEER
CLUMP
INVESTIGATES
WEIGHT

WRONG PUMP
STOPPED

STBD AZIMUTH POSITION OUT


THRUSTER RED ALERT OF LIMITS
TRIPS

MANUAL STBD AZIMUTH


CONTROL TO THRUSTER
AVOID PLATFORM RE-STARTED

DIVERS
RECOVERED

Figure 95/09
COMMENTS
Low pitch pressure alarm on the port hydraulic pump came up and the port thruster tripped on low
pressure. The engineer went to investigate and witnessed a large oil spray. On returning to the ECR
the starboard pitch pump was shut down by mistake. The loss of pressure had been caused by a nipple
coming out of the valve block, possibly due to a partly stripped thread.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator error Thruster fault (hydraulic)

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 3 of 21
DP Operator Manual

VESSEL ON DP 10
DIVERS AND DGPS, HPR AND 2
M FROM
ROV IN WATER TWs ON LINE
PLATFORM

RAPID RISE IN
VESSEL SWINGS NUMEROUS
NOISE AND
TO STBD DP ALARMS
VIBRATION

JOYSTICK FIXED THRUSTER


CONTROL RED ALERT MODE
SELECTED DESELECTED

VESSEL FAILS LEVEL CONTROL


TO RESPOND SELECTED

STBD AXIMUTH THRUSTER AT 100%


PITCH IN WRONG DIRECTION

EMERGENCY
CONTACT WITH
STOPPED STBD
PLATFORM
THRUSTER

ROV VESSEL DIVERS


RECOVERED MOVED CLEAR RECOVERED

Figure 95/02
COMMENTS
The DPO had little chance of stopping contact with the platform when the powerful thruster gave full
power 135 degrees from the requested direction. The vessel was off hire for 3 days while starboard
azimuth thruster was stripped down, and a foreign body was found. Presumably the DP alarms
included a thruster fault alarm and the starboard azimuth thruster should have been stopped more
quickly and then the collision could have been avoided.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Thruster fault (hydraulic) Operator error

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 4 of 21
DP Operator Manual

PIPE LAYING VESSEL ON DP IN


OPEN WATER
DGPS ON LINE
TO SPM

STERN TO WEATHER
WEATHER INCREASING

MAIN PROPERELLOR TO DECISION TO TURN


80% PITCH HEAD TO SEA

INSUFFICIEN T VESSEL POSIITON


THRUST TURNING BEING LOST

VESSEL STERN
MANUAL CONTROL
70M OFF POSITION

Figure 96/18
COMMENTS
There will also be a loss of position when changing heading a large amount quickly especially if the
vessel has heading priority. It should never be necessary to go into manual control to out perform the
DP software unless the software is poor or not designed for the operation being performed. In addition
on this vessel the azimuth thrusters do not assist the astern until the main propeller reached 100%
pitch. The vessel is not optimal for working stern to rough weather.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator Error Poor Design (Software)

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 5 of 21
DP Operator Manual

DGPS AND ONE


VESSEL ON
CABLE LAYING TAUT WIRE ON
DP LINE

TAUT WIRE
RAISED

VESSEL DRIFTED
20M OFF POSITION

DGPS REFERENCE TAUT WIRE


SYSTEM DE- SELECTED DEPLOYED

POSITION
STABILISED AFTER
40M EXCURSION

Figure 12/92
COMMENTS
The DGPS reference was interfaced to the DP system via a navigation/survey computer which
configured the DGS into a pseudo-Artemis signal. When the taut wire was raised this pseudo-Artemis
signal became the sole reference. At the same time the navigation computer failed to receive adequate
data from the DGPS system, and continued to output the last pseudo-Artemis signal to the DP
computer.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


DGPS software fault Insufficient commissioning/testing/QA

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 6 of 21
DP Operator Manual

VESSEL ON DP IN
2 DGPS ON
PIPE LAYING MODERATE
WEATHER LINE

POSIITON OUT CONSEQUENC


OF LIMITS E WARNING

No. 2 BOW
THRUSTER TRIPS ON
OVERLOAD

No. 1 BOW THRUSTER No. 3 BOW THRUSTER


TRIPS ON OVERLOAD TRIPS ON OVERLOAD

DRIFT OFF

PIPELINE PULLED
DRIFT OFF OF
OUT OF
ALIGNMENT 824M

Figure 96/14
COMMENTS
The vessel was operating with open bus ties, inadequate power on line and with power limit warnings
on bus 1 and bus 2. The thrusters were poorly set up so that the demanded thrust was either not met or
exceeded. There was heavy pitching and No.2 bow thrust tripped on overload (Amps) before any pitch
reduction was possible (DP unaware of overload because of poor set up). Failure of the other two
thrusters was a consequence of the failure of No. 2. It was not possible to restart them until an azimuth
thruster had been tripped because starting was inhibited when high power was being used by other
thrusters 85%.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Thruster Electrical Protection / Control Inadequate testing / commissioning / QA

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 7 of 21
DP Operator Manual

VESSEL ON DP 3 REFERENCE
WIND 35 KNOTS SYSTEMS ON LINE

WIND AND SEA STATE


INCREASING

MOVING CHANGING
ASTERN HEADING

MARKED POSITION NO "CURRENT"


NOT REACHED UPDATE

MANUAL CONTROL
SELECTED

Figure 21/92
COMMENTS

During operations the wind increased considerably and the decision ws taken to move the vessel to the
optimum heading. This required the vessel to move astern and change the heading 30 degrees. During
one of the moves the vessel failed to reach the marked position. It eventually became necessary to
go into manual control to complete the move. Subsequent tests of software revealed the program was
configured such that the estimated sea current was only updated when the vessel reached the marked
position.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


DP control fault (software) Insufficient commissioning / QA

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 8 of 21
DP Operator Manual
ROV IN WATER
VESSEL ON DP IN 2 DGPS & HPR
CLOSE TO
GOOD WEATHER ON LINE
PLATFORM

AUTO CHANGE OVER


COMPUTER A TO B

PRESS "UPDATE THRUSTERS NOT


OFFLINE" RESPONDING

POSITION OUT HEADING OUT


OF LIMITS OF LIMITS

JOYSTICK
SELECTED

NO RESPONSE

MANUAL CONTROL

Figure 96/10
COMMENTS

There were alarms for A/B difference, network serial interface timeout and then thruster feedback for
thrusters 1, 4 and 5. No final explanation is available but clearly the ADP702 crashed and the vessel
lost position until manual control was selected.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Computer Fault Poor design

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 9 of 21
DP Operator Manual

MOVING TO VESSEL ON
2 TW& HPR ON
GANGWAY DP CLOSE TO
LINE
POSITION PLATFORM

REPLUMB
STARBROAD
TAUTWIRE

HPR TETHER
HPR STILL ON
PULLED
LINE
PREMATURELY

DRIVE OFF

THRUSTERS AT PORT TAUT WIRE


HIGH POWER OUT OF LIMITS

MANUAL CONTROL

POSITION
STABILISED

Figure 96/08
COMMENTS

The man on the transponder winch line was asked to stand by to skip beacon but failed to hear the
stand by part of the message.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator Error Poor Procedures

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 10 of 21
DP Operator Manual

ROV IN WATER
VESSEL ON DP IN DGPS ON LINE HPR
CLOSE TO
SHALLOW WATER ON STAND BY
PLATFORM

DGPS
POSITION HEADING
PERFORMANCE
EXCURSION 5M EXCURSION 8 DEG.
DEGRADED

HPR SELECTED
INSTEAD

VESSEL OUT MOVING AHEAD


OF POSITION BACK TO POSITION

POSITION
OVERSHOOT
BY 45M

ROV MANUAL MOVED OUT OF


RECOVERED CONTROL 5000M ZONE

Figure 96/04
COMMENTS

There had been tests carried out to prove that the arrangement of DGPS and HPR back up was
satisfactory and in the 71m of water the transponder had to be within 50m for it to be a good position
reference. It became outside this range.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator Error Poor Procedures

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 11 of 21
DP Operator Manual

DIVERS IN WATER HPR AND TWO


VESSEL ON DP BETWEEN TAUT WIRES ON
MOORING LINES LINE

BLACKOUT OF
44V
SWITCHBOARD

REVERSE POWER TRIP EMERGENCY


OF GENRATORS No. 2 & GENERATOR AUTO
3 STARTS

VESSEL DRIFT OFF


POSITION (25M 40
Deg)

JOYSTICK DIVERS AND BELL


POWER RESTORED
CONTROL RECOVERED

Figure 5/92

COMMENTS

The vessel was working down weather of the rig and drifted away from the rig and mooring lines
during the blackout. The divers and equipment were back onboard twelve minutes after the blackout.
The cause of the blackout was the operation of the interlocks for shore power to the 440V switchboard
which tripped the high voltage/440V transformers. Any vessel with a shore connection and interlocks
should make sure that these are isolated during DP operations, so that a fault or a single act of mal-
operation cannot cause a DP blackout.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Electrical fault Poor design

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 12 of 21
DP Operator Manual

VESSEL ON DP DIVERS IN BELL ARTEMIS ON LINE

VESSEL MOVING
TO NEW LOCATION

ARTEMIS SIGNAL SYLEDIS


LOST SELECTED

DRIVE OFF

MANUAL
CONTROL
(JOYSTICK)

Figure 8/92
COMMENTS

When the vessel was initially set up on DP, trials were carried out using Artemis only as Syledis was
not available. The vessel was already working when Syledis became available and so DP trials on
Syledis only were not carried out. The vessel was moving in open waters with only one position
reference and one untested backup. Once the vessel commenced the planned movement the Artemis
signal was lost leaving Syledis as the only reference system available. The Syledis system was not
updating position, which was the cause of the drive off. Artemis signals were restored, and vessel went
back in full auto DP on Artemis.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator Error Poor Procedures

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 13 of 21
DP Operator Manual

FOLLOW SUB DGPS ON LINE AS


VESSEL ON DP
MODE PSEUDO ARTEMIS

SURVEY DISPLAY DP CONTROL


SHOWS 20M OFF SHOWS 2M OFF
TRACK TRACK

PSEUDO ARTEMIS
DESELECTED

HPR SELECTED

POSITION
STABILISED

Figure 96/34
COMMENTS

The master discovered after the incident that the differential signal form Inmarsat A had been lost but
the other DGPS used for survey was using an HF diff signal. There was no alarm or rejection of DGPS
when the diff signal was lost and the survey team forgot to inform the bridge. This failure illustrates
the weakness of DGPS supplied by the survey team as pseudo Artemis

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


DGPS Failure (diff signal) Operator Error

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 14 of 21
DP Operator Manual

WAIT ING AT
ST AND-OFF HPR AND ARTEMIS
VESSEL IN DP
POSIT ION ON LINE

A/B DIFFERENCE
ALARM

"M AN/AUT O" "B RE-ST ART "


B COMPUTER
PUSHBUT T ON PUSHBUT T ON
PRESSED
RELOADED PRESSED

ON LINE COMPUTER A
STOPPED

MANUAL CONTROLS USED


TO MAINTAIN POSITION

A COMPUTER RE-
B COMPUTER RE- LOADED
LOADED

BACK ON DP

Figure 14/92

COMMENTS

After reloading the backup computer the operator pressed the restart pushbutton, which caused the
online A computer to stop with the subsequent loss of DP control. The vessels position was
maintained using the manual controls, whilst both A and B computers were again reload. No
investigation was undertaken into this incident and it is likely that the operator stopped the A computer
by mistake.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator error Poor Procedures

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 15 of 21
DP Operator Manual

VESSEL ON DP HPR AND TWO


AIR DIVING IN
CLOSE TO TAUT WIRES ON
PROGRESS
PLATFORM LINE

THRUSTERS IN
FIXED AZIMUTH
MODE

WIND SQUALL AND


DIRECTION
CHANGE

TAUT WIRES OUT POSITION


OF LIMITS (17M) LOSS (8M)

AMBER ALERT

THRUSTERS IN
POSITION
FREE AZIMUTH
RESTORED
MODE

DIVING
RESUMES

Figure 17/92
COMMENTS

The wind squall lasted approximately 3 minutes and was accompanied by a 70 degree change in wind
direction. Since the thrusters were in fixed positions, they could not supply sufficient thrust to counter
the vessels movement. The maximum position loss was 9 metres, after which the vessel started to
regain position. Had the thrusters been in free azimuth mode before the squall, it is likely that the
position loss would have been much less and not necessitated the amber alert. The large wind change
would have had a major impact on the vessel model and a stabilisation period should have been carried
out. Diving resumed after three minutes.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Wind Squall. Operator error (fixed azimuth mode)

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 16 of 21
Basic Operator Course

VESSEL ON DP TWO TAUT WIRES


DIVERS IN WATER
CLOSE TO WATER AND HPR ON LINE

WIND 30-35 KNOTS

POSITION OUT OF HEADING OUT OF


LIMITS LIMITS

BOW THRUSTER
TO 100% PITCH

CENTRE BOW
THRUSTER AMBER ALERT
OVERLOAD TRIP

POSITION
BELL RECOVERED
RESTORED

VESSEL MOVES AWAY TO


INVESTIGATE THRUSTER
FAILURE

Fig 26/92
COMMENTS
It was reported that the vessel initially lost position and heading because of a wind gust and a heavy
swell on the beam. In attempting to regain position the bow thruster wen to 100% starboard thrust, and
shortly afterwards the centre tunnel thruster tripped out. The thruster tripped on overload when
restarted. It was subsequently found that the setting of zero pitch on the centre tunnel thruster was out,
and the thruster motor overloaded when driven 100% starboard. The pitch setting was adjusted and
after testing driving recommenced.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Thruster fault (electrical) Insufficient maintenance

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 17 of 21
Basic Operator Course

VESSEL ON DP CLOSE HPR AND TAUT WIRES


TO PLATFORM ON LINE

NEARBY VESSEL
INTERROGATES SAME
HPR TRANSPONDER

HPR LOST

LOSS OF POSITION
TOWARDS
PLATFORM

Figure 22/92
COMMENTS

No more information is available about this incident. Loss of one position reference should not cause a
loss of position. Of course there can be a small shift of position because the remaining position
reference would have 100% weighting and before it may have had a low weighting. Discussions had
taken place between the two vessels prior to this incident, regarding transponders channels to be used.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator error Poor Procedures

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 18 of 21
Basic Operator Course

TAUT WIRE AND


VESSEL ON DP DIVERS IN WATER
ARTEMIS ON LINE

EMERGENCY
CLEANING 660V 660V BUS-TIE
GENERATOR
SWITCHBOARD OPEN
STARTS

DOOR TO EMERGENCY
GENERATOR ROOM SLAMS

BLACKOUT OF BRIDGE &


NAVIGATION SWITCHBOARD

YELLOW ALERT
GYRO FAILURE UPS ALARM
INITIATED

NO SATISFACTORY
RED ALERT
EXPLANATION

DIVERS RECOVERED AND


BELL RETRIEVED

Figure 32/92
COMMENTS
To clean the 660V switchboard the centre bus-tie was opened. Opening the bus-tie breaker caused the
emergency generator to start. When this was discovered, an engineer went to stop the emergency
generator, but as the door to generator room slammed shut the emergency switchboard supplies to the
bridge and diving switchboard tripped. The DP operators did not know why there was a loss of power
to the UPS and gyros, and initiated a Red Alert whilst the situation was brought under control. The
vessel maintained position while the divers were retrieved. There appears to have been little
communication between the engineers and DP operator, and certainly switchboard cleaning should not
have been undertaken while diving was in progress.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


Operator error

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 19 of 21
Basic Operator Course

VESSEL ON DUAL DGPS


PASSAGE AVAILABLE

DIFF SIGNALS OF
BOTH LOST

CONTINUE
WITHOUT DGPS

Figure 96/51

COMMENTS

The differential corrections were thought to be independent, one Inmarsat A the other Inmarsat B, thus
avoiding a potential single point failure. After this failure it was found that both were transmitted from
the same dish in Eik Norway, and failure of the dish caused loss of both DGPS. This failure happened
twice.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


DGPS Fault Insufficient testing/Commissioning /QA

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 20 of 21
Basic Operator Course

VESSEL ON DP DGPS & HPR ON


ROV IN WATER
NEAR PLATFORM LINE

10M MOVE
INSTIGATED

DGPS REJECTED HPR REJECTED

VESSEL OUT OF
POSITION

VESSEL MOVING
OPERATOR TRIES
TOWARDS
TO STOP MOVE
PLATFORM

MANUAL CONTROL
TO MOVE AWAY

Figure 96/09

COMMENTS

The vessel did not clearly establish the cause of this incident. A move to starboard was input and the
vessel moved to port and continued to move. The alarm print out shows the diff signal was frequently
being lost an hour earlier. We therefore think the most likely cause was DGPS fault or operator error
or both. Once high thrust was used it is possible that the HPR was lost. There should have been three
position references on line.

MAIN CAUSE SECONDARY CAUSE


DGPS Failure (loss of diff) Operator error

15 DP Incidents.doc Page 21 of 21

You might also like