Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hsci 660d Policy Brief
Hsci 660d Policy Brief
By
Kanale Rodrigues
HSCI 660D
6/13/17
Running head: Policy Brief 2
Executive Summary
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) or Obama Care, Only 8.6 percent of the United States
population remains uninsured in 2016. However, health disparities still remain high among the
low social economic status, minority groups, and families that live in high crime areas. Health
disparities can be improved upon with making improvements to the ACA, instead of having that
number increase with the repel of the ACA that is currently being viewed in the senate after
being passed through the house representatives during the month of May 2017.
Running head: Policy Brief 3
The new health care act named the American Health Care Act (AHCA) would lead to over 52
allow health care insurances to increase premiums for the senior population up to five times cost
that the ACA blocked. Citizens with pre-existing conditions switch plans might be charged a
higher premium rate if the insurance agency choices too. AHCA would also be cutting planned
parenthood funding, getting rid of the individual mandate that would allow insurance agencies
can increase prices of their coverages, and the minimum standard that health insurance agencies
had to give with their coverage by offering cheap plans that with what ever the health insurance
Running head: Policy Brief 4
devastating effects on the low economic status, minority groups, and families that live in high
crime areas. Instead improving the ACA by using bipartisan decision-making amongst other
policymakers on the hill to give everyone in the country to have the resources to keep themselves
and their family strong and healthy. The real question is why I am explaining the impact of the
repel of the ACA to those that wrote the AHCA because as explained above about social status
those policymakers being the 1 percent have never had to take care of their families without
having insurance.
The United States public having access to health care coverage is not enough.
Understanding the specific communities needs and how best deliver resources is using the ACA
to the max potential. Families that are low economic status have higher levels of negative mental
health outcomes with the expansion of the market options of the ACA being dropped even lower
Running head: Policy Brief 5
for minority groups that have health care insurance provide social workers and trained public
health workers to instruct patients how to properly take their medicine as well as develop a plan
to match patients with physicians that can speak the same language.
the likelihood of misunderstanding and decrease health disparities based on application of the
physicians instructions. However, repel of the ACA would remove all the hope of the millions
that have insurance because of the ACA. As policy makers just imagine a day you didnt know
where to take your sick family member because you didnt have health insurance, couldnt
effectively understand the physicians instructions, or didnt know if your children were going to
make it home safe every day. Well that is a day in the lives in which policymakers can influence
The ACA is not perfect but can be improve to the best quality coverage to eliminating health
care disparities among the lower social status communities. However, repealing the ACA does
Running head: Policy Brief 6
nothing but put more money in the hands of the 1 percent as well as the policy makers for not
doing their job by protecting and serving those who elected them to office. Also, playing the low
social economic status lack of knowledge on health care never explained to the public that ACA
and Obama care were the same thing, which lead to communities not signing up based on
Policy Recommendations
The ACA could be improved by providing more funds to employers that have to provide
health insurance to their employees as well as be fined for having certain amount of part-time
workers so that more workers can be full time to receive benefits. Also, the ACA should
measure the number of household owners there are to family members instead of coverage based
solely on income. This would allow single parents that just make above the federal poverty line
to still receive coverage even though are above the federal poverty line. This would decrease
health disparities among the low economic status because they would have at least have accesses
to healthcare could improve health care to the target community. Provide increased federal funds
to provide trained workers to educate patients on ACA enrollment and as well as how to properly
administer their medication that physicians have instructed the patient to do, in the long run will
cut down on reoccurring visits to the hospital. Lastly, more coverage options can be added to
specific location so that the sole provider in that area cant charge what they want just because
theyre the only provider in the area. Once again improving the ACA would decrease overall
health disparities of communities that lower end of the social status landscape. To conclude
policy makers need to start using more empathy when making decision instead of playing on the
Running head: Policy Brief 7
hate and misunderstanding of the United States public. Health disparities can be much improved
References:
Butler, D. C., Petterson, S., Phillips, R. L., & Bazemore, A. W. (2012). Measures of Social Deprivation
That Predict Health Care Access and Need within a Rational Area of Primary Care Service
Improve and Repair: Three Ideas to Strengthen the ACA. (2016, January 01). Retrieved June 14, 2017,
from http://democracyjournal.org/magazine/38/improve-and-repair/
https://obamacarefacts.com/sign-ups/obamacare-enrollment-numbers/
Singer, P. (2017, May 04). What does the Republican Obamacare repeal bill actually do? Retrieved June 14,
obamacare-repeal-bill-actually-do/101278668/