This rubric evaluates student papers on mapping an issue based on the quality of the title, with an excellent title being both intriguing and appropriate, a very good title being either intriguing or appropriate, an average title just being appropriate, and a poor title having no real title or just stating the assignment name.
This rubric evaluates student papers on mapping an issue based on the quality of the title, with an excellent title being both intriguing and appropriate, a very good title being either intriguing or appropriate, an average title just being appropriate, and a poor title having no real title or just stating the assignment name.
This rubric evaluates student papers on mapping an issue based on the quality of the title, with an excellent title being both intriguing and appropriate, a very good title being either intriguing or appropriate, an average title just being appropriate, and a poor title having no real title or just stating the assignment name.
Mapping the Issue Excellent Very Good Average Poor
Title is both Title is either Title is appropriate There is no title or intriguing and intriguing or for the assignment. the paper is merely appropriate for the appropriate for the titled "Mapping the paper. It both paper. However, it is Issue." catches the reader's not both. attention while at the same time giving an insight to the larger topic discussion.