PEOPLE v.

ROBERT NUEZ y LAGASCA

G.R. No. 112092. March 1, 2001

Accused was found guilty of Illegal possession of firearm resulting to the death of the victim
and pursuant to P.D. 1866 in relation to the 1987 Constitution the court sentences the said
accused to suffer the penalty of life imprisonment and with costs.

HELD:
Appellant was convicted of illegal possession of firearms resulting to the death of the victim.
At the time of the commission of the crime, the existing jurisprudence was People v. Quijada.
The SC held then that the use of an unlicensed firearm in a killing results in two separate
crimes one for the aggravated form of illegal possession of firearm and two, for homicide or
murder. In the meantime, however, Congress passed Republic Act No. 8294, 27 which lowered
the penalties for illegal possession of firearms. Further, Section 1, third par. of R.A. No. 8294
provides If homicide or murder is committed with the use of an unlicensed firearm, such
use of an unlicensed firearm shall be considered as an aggravating circumstance.

In the present case, there were four cases filed against appellant which were all separately
tried. Hence, the evidence as to the homicide and frustrated homicide cases were neither
adopted nor presented before the trial court trying the illegal possession case. For this reason,
there is a dearth of evidence on record to support the finding of homicide and/or frustrated
homicide.

The Court held that accordingly, appellant should only be convicted of simple illegal
possession of firearms. The lowered penalties as provided in R.A. No. 8294, being favorable to
the accused, should be applied retroactively.