Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Interview Rating

    Uploaded by

    RaviArryan
    This document contains a summary of ratings for 15 candidates interviewed for a position on October 14, 2006. It includes each candidate's name, experience, and ratings on personal attributes, analytical ability, communication ability, imagination/creativity, personal values, confidence, presence of mind, stress management, commitment, and potential factors. Each metric is rated on a scale of average, above average, or superior. The document also notes the overall assessment and rating for each candidate as very good, good, average, poor, appointed, shortlisted, or rejected. The interviewer is identified as PKU Chandran, the managing director.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Interview Rating

    Uploaded by

    RaviArryan
    14 views1 page
    This document contains a summary of ratings for 15 candidates interviewed for a position on October 14, 2006. It includes each candidate's name, experience, and ratings on personal attributes, analytical ability, communication ability, imagination/creativity, personal values, confidence, presence of mind, stress management, commitment, and potential factors. Each metric is rated on a scale of average, above average, or superior. The document also notes the overall assessment and rating for each candidate as very good, good, average, poor, appointed, shortlisted, or rejected. The interviewer is identified as PKU Chandran, the managing director.

    Original Description:

    Interview Rating

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a summary of ratings for 15 candidates interviewed for a position on October 14, 2006. It includes each candidate's name, experience, and ratings on personal attributes, analytical ability, communication ability, imagination/creativity, personal values, confidence, presence of mind, stress management, commitment, and potential factors. Each metric is rated on a scale of average, above average, or superior. The document also notes the overall assessment and rating for each candidate as very good, good, average, poor, appointed, shortlisted, or rejected. The interviewer is identified as PKU Chandran, the managing director.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    14 views1 page

    Interview Rating

    Uploaded by

    RaviArryan
    This document contains a summary of ratings for 15 candidates interviewed for a position on October 14, 2006. It includes each candidate's name, experience, and ratings on personal attributes, analytical ability, communication ability, imagination/creativity, personal values, confidence, presence of mind, stress management, commitment, and potential factors. Each metric is rated on a scale of average, above average, or superior. The document also notes the overall assessment and rating for each candidate as very good, good, average, poor, appointed, shortlisted, or rejected. The interviewer is identified as PKU Chandran, the managing director.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    KEROMIYONS Intech Private Limited

    Candidates rating for interview conducted on: 14/10/2006

    Position:
    Sl Exp Personal Analytical Comm. Imagin/ Personal Confiden Presence of Stress Commitme Potenctial
    Name DOB/Age Qufn Working Knowledge Maturity Assessment
    No (Yrs) Attribute Ability Ability Creativity Value ce Mind mgmt nt Factors

    Average (AG)/
    1 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    2 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    3 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    4 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    5 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    6 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    7 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    8 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    9 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    10 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    11 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    12 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    13 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    14 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Average (AG)/
    15 Superior (S)
    Above Avg (AA)

    Rating Assessment
    VG-Very Good A-Appointed
    G-Good S-Shortlisted
    AV-Average R-Rejected
    P-Poor Interviewer: PKU Chandran (Managing Director)

    You might also like