Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bill Vs Fake News Prone To Abuse: St. Matthew College
Bill Vs Fake News Prone To Abuse: St. Matthew College
Matthew College
Miguel Cristi Street, Ampid II, San Mateo, Rizal
Tel. Nos.: 997-6103/ 997-5947/ 997-3468
For Christians spreading fake news is a sin as it breaks the Eighth Commandment: Thou shall not
bear false witness. Catholic bishops last week reminded the faithful that lying uncharitably
prevents people from making right judgments. Its unclear if they were referring to President
Rody Duterte, who had chided one of them, fervidly denied of course, as having two wives. Fake
news has always plagued history. Rizal falsely was accused of inciting the Katipunan; Bonifacio
was rumored to be napping when it was time to signal the Revolution; Gen. Luna was
misreported as defying Aguinaldo. Gossip dooms men, but its their way.
Reborn-Christian Sen. Joel Villanueva proposes to outlaw news fakery. His bill would imprison
for five years persons who maliciously offer, publish, distribute, circulate, and spread false
info in print, broadcast, or online media. The aim is to zap lies that intend to cause panic,
division, chaos, violence, and hate, or propaganda to blacken or discredit reputations. Violators
also would be fined up to P5 million. Offending public officials face double penalties, plus
perpetual bar from public office. Media managers also would be jailed and fined for refusing to
take down fake news. Of late fake news has been proliferating as political hype and terrorist
propaganda. Hillary Clinton lost the US presidential race due partly to false reports of being
Russias bet, but which turned out to be someone else. The Islamic State has been massacring in
Iraq and Syria, then blaming it all on America and Russia. The Maute is promising in Marawi a
benevolent rule under ISs global caliphate, while beheading Muslims and Christians who shun
its jihad. Villanueva says it is high time for legislation in light of recent events where numerous
fake social media accounts were created to spread false news. His press release cites in
particular Justice Sec. Vitaliano Aguirres false implication of opposition lawmakers to the
Marawi terror rampage. The senator was among those who demanded, in vain, Aguirres
The bill is prone to abuse. A bigot administration can apply it to suppress the opposition. By
prosecuting critics as news fakers, the government can stifle legitimate dissent. Whistleblowers,
not the grafters, would be imprisoned and fined for daring to talk. Investigative journalists would
cram the jails. Democracy would die. Even Villanueva could end up behind bars if a powerful
The way to curb news fakers is by public exposure and shaming. The solution is not the court of
law but the court of public opinion, as University of the Philippines journalism professor Danilo
Arao says. Besides there already are older laws against libel, slander, perjury as recourse.
Governments must balance security and liberty. In the wake of the terror attacks in Manchester
and London, British PM Teresa May growled at big internet firms: (You) cannot allow this
ideology the safe space it needs to breed. Germany recently imposed stiff fines on online
platforms that host hate postings. Yet there is no reason for the tech firms to promote extremism;
in fact they have been active against child porn, copyright infringement, and cyber-fraud and -
bullying. They need to be, as subscribers and advertisers pull out of such atmosphere.