General Observations & Comments on DPRs

The observations are similar to that of raised by CWC HQ for 147 proposals.

Nizamabad District

The following DPRs are reported the water spread area of tank is less than 5.0
Ha. Hence not meeting the RRR of Water bodies Guidelines.
Sl.No DPR No. Name of Water Body Water Spread Area (ha.)
1 24 Kishtapoor Anicut 3.500
2 47 Madhu Mathadi 4.300
3 51 Peddamma Anicut 2.500

Latitude and longitude of following water bodies are not shown any water body
when viewed on Google Earth. The same may be clarified/corrected.
Sl.No DPR No. Name of Water Body
1 18 Udgula Kunta
2 22 Thigada Cheru
3 24 Kishtapoor Anicut
4 40 Kudi Cheru
5 51 Peddamma Anicut
6 61 Pedda Cheru
7 63 Mathu sangam anicut
8 68 Pedda cheru
9 74 Mallareddy cheru

Water bodies at Sl.No.13 & Sl/No.14, Latitudes and Longitudes of the water
bodies were found duplicated. The same may be verified.
DPR NO.46 & 53, contour drawing of water body is not provided. The actual
water spread area of water body is observed from Google Earth which is less
than the reported value. This same may be clarified.
 Check slip for preparation of DPR is not enclosed in the DPR No. 38 and the
same may be included.
DPR No. 15 & 16, the front page of report is interchanged (tank name is not
matching with estimate).
The total estimate of 74 Nos of water bodies of Nizamabad is approved for
Rs.4895.24 Lakhs. whereas the actual cost of 74 DPRs are comes to
Rs.3849.490 Lakhs. The same need to be clarified.
The total restoration of storage capacity of 74 Nos of water bodies comes to 1.84
MCM (gap capacity) with cost of restoration Rs.20.926 Cr./MCM which is very
high ( as per CWC HQ observation). This needs to be justified.
All the DPRs of Nizamabad District, chapters such as Water Quality situation in the
water body, Land use pattern, Climatic condition etc, as mentioned in the Guidelines
under clause 4.2 are not included.
Present status and details of existing structures like Sluice, Weir, Bund, and
irrigation channel are not included in the report.
In Benefit Cost ratio calculation, the expenditure for the crop is not matching with
inputs provided by Agricultural dept. and no signature & designation on the
expenditure statement which provided by Agricultural dept.
Implementation schedule (physical & financial wise) and corresponding of funds,
details of arrangements for monitoring and evaluation were not included in the
proposals.
The overall cost of restoration of water bodies should not exceed Rs.1.00 lakh/ ha of
restored CCA only and not overall of the project as per CWC HQ instruction. The
same may ensured all the DPRs.