Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

TRANSPLANTATION

Transplantation immunology Learning objectives


and ABO incompatibility After reading this article, you should be able to describe:
Nina Plant
C The molecular aspects of grafts that stimulate innate and
specific immune responses to transplants
Peter Wood C The immune mechanisms involved in different types of graft
rejection
C Measures used to prevent or minimise graft rejection

Abstract
An allograft is tissue transplanted from another individual within the
same species. Mechanical trauma to a graft and recipient transplant
site along with graft-derived proinflammatory mediators stimulate including kidney, liver and heart. A xenograft is tissue trans-
a non-specific innate immune response. Dendritic cells and macrophages planted from another species.
present foreign antigen to the adaptive immune system cells and thus The immune system recognizes an allograft as foreign and
initiate a specific and directed response. In order to respond to a specific therefore mounts a response, as it would to any foreign path-
pathogen, an individual must be able to recognize foreign cells as non- ogen. After transplant of a graft, damage to both graft and
self. Major and minor histocompatibility antigens and the ABO blood recipient tissues leads to activation of the non-specific innate
group antigens are central to distinguishing one human from another immune system as well as the specific adaptive immune system.
and therefore in recognizing self from non-self. Genetic polymorphism These responses must be prevented or depressed if the graft is to
describes genes encoded by varying alleles resulting in varied pheno- survive and function.
types within a species. The blood group and major histocompatibility
complex (MHC) are polymorphic, with many different possible allelic Innate immune system
combinations leading to differences between individuals and allowing
Mechanical trauma to the graft and transplant site as well as
an individual to recognize self from non-self. Rejection describes the
graft-derived proinflammatory mediators (following peritrans-
graft injury and loss of function due to the recipients non-acceptance
plant ischaemia followed by reperfusion) stimulate a non-specific
of the graft as self and the response which aims to remove it from the
innate immune response. Damaged cells express damage-
body. Rejection can be classified into hyperacute, acute and chronic
associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) which are recognized
phases. Both cell-mediated and antibody-mediated mechanisms lead to
through Toll-like receptors (Tlrs) and other receptors expressed
allograft tissue destruction. By minimizing MHC mismatch and using
on cells of the innate immune system, leading to activation of the
immunosuppression therapy, the immune response to a graft can be
immune cells. There is local vasodilatation and increased
reduced. This involves familial grafting when possible, matching donors
vascular permeability with infiltration of neutrophils and
and recipients for similar human leucocyte antigen and identification of
macrophages and activation of clotting and complement systems.
preformed recipient antibodies.
These cells secrete cytotoxic substances and phagocytose foreign
material. Dendritic cells are innate immune cells which are
Keywords Acute rejection; allograft; chronic rejection; hyperacute important in presenting foreign antigen to the adaptive immune
rejection; isohaemagglutinins; major histocompatibility; polymorphism system cells and thus initiating a specific immune response
against the grafted tissue.

Adaptive immunity
In order to respond to a specific pathogen, an individual must be
able to recognize foreign cells as non-self. Major histocompati-
Introduction
bility complex (MHC) and minor histocompatibility antigens and
Autograft describes tissue transplanted from one part of the body the ABO blood group antigens are central to distinguishing
to another, such as skin and bone marrow. An isograft describes individuals and therefore to recognizing self from non-self.
tissue transplanted between genetically identical individuals. Although the innate immune system can be effective in elimi-
Allograft describes tissue transplanted from another, non- nating a potential pathogen, the specific adaptive immune
genetically identical, individual within the same species, system allows a targeted approach. The adaptive system is also
able to remember potential pathogens in order to respond more
quickly and efficiently if re-exposed. Adaptive immune responses
are led by lymphocytes with cellular and antibody-mediated
Nina Plant MBChB FRCA is a Specialty Registrar within the North Western
components.
Deanery, currently training out of program as Clinical Fellow at The
Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada. Conflicts of interest: none.
Recognition of the allograft
Peter Wood BSc (Hons) PhD is Senior Lecturer in Immunology at the Genetic polymorphism describes genes encoded by various
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, UK. Conflicts of alleles resulting in varied phenotypes within a species. It was
interest: none declared. thought that most proteins, for example albumin, were

ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 13:6 281 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
TRANSPLANTATION

genetically coded by non-polymorphic genes with uniformity The two main types of T cells are CD4 and CD8 T cells, which
within a species. Polymorphic proteins, including the blood recognize MHC class II- and I-associated antigen respectively.
group and MHC, have many different possible allelic combina- Like antibody, T cells are antigen specific and recognize only one
tions leading to massive phenotypic variation within a pop- antigen. Recognition of a foreign antigen occurs when the innate
ulation, and, importantly, to differences between individuals. immune antigen-presenting cells present antigen to CD4 T cells
The elucidation of the human genome has made this picture in the lymph nodes and other lymphoid tissues. T cells specific to
more complex. It seems that all proteins are produced by genes that antigen bind to the MHCeantigen peptide complex via the
with more or fewer alleles with greater consequent degrees of T-cell receptor. This stimulates the cells to differentiate into
variation of the end product. Polymorphism allows an individual T-helper cells. CD4 T cells can develop into different types of
to recognize self from non-self. In an isograft the donor MHC is helper T cells called Th1, Th2 and Th17 (Figure 1). They are
identical to the recipients and the graft is accepted as self. The characterized by the production of different cytokines and
likelihood of two non-identical individuals having an identical promote different type of immune responses. These include the
MHC allelic make-up is very small and therefore allografts are activation of B cells and CD8 T cells, which have also recognized
inevitably recognized as foreign. Even if matched at MHC, the antigen. These cells differentiate into plasma cells and cytotoxic
presence of different alleles at many genes creates multiple T cells respectively, which then eliminate the recognized foreign
differences between donor and recipient; where genes code for tissue (Figure 2). Th1 cells are thought to be the main promoters
proteins that can stimulate immune responses, the proteins are of rejection responses, but recent data have shown that Th2 and
known as minor histocompatibility antigens. Th17 responses can contribute to graft rejection in different
circumstances.
CD4 T cells can also be induced to become Tregs, which are
Blood group antigens
regulatory T cells that can inhibit other cells of the immune
The ABO and Rhesus systems are two of many blood group
system (Figure 1). They have been shown to be able to inhibit
systems describing antigenic differences between individuals. In
graft rejection experimentally and there is interest in whether
the ABO system, there are four blood groups (A, B, AB, O)
their manipulation can be used to improve clinical transplant
depending on an individuals allelic make-up. Alleles A and B
outcomes.
code for enzymes producing specific erythrocyte cell membrane
carbohydrate antigens A and B. The blood group allele O is a null
Minor histocompatibility complex
allele. These alleles are inherited in a simple Mendelian pattern
Minor transplantation antigens are probably involved in late
with A and B alleles dominant. Both inherited alleles are
onset rejection because they are less effective stimuli to the
expressed antigenically on the erythrocyte.
immune system. Over 80 have been identified, although there are
All humans have antibodies, called isohaemagglutinins, to
potentially thousands including non-ABO blood group antigens
those ABO blood group antigens that they do not express. In the
and those associated with the sex chromosomes.
absence of prior exposure this is thought to occur because of
cross-reactivity between blood group and microbial and food
antigens. These antibodies result in severe transfusion reactions Rejection: response to the allograft
if unmatched blood is transplanted, typifying a type-2 hyper- Rejection describes the graft injury and loss of function due to the
sensitivity reaction (see Hyperacute Rejection below). recipients non-acceptance of the graft as self and the response
which aims to remove it from the body. The recognition of an
Major histocompatibility complex allograft as foreign is almost inevitable. In addition, the response
The MHC is a gene complex encoding three classes of molecule. to an allograft is highly exaggerated. For unknown reasons, allo-
In humans these molecules are also called human leucocyte MHC stimulates about 50-fold more T cells than conventional
antigens (HLAs). MHC class III molecules include complement environmental antigens. This is due to the complexities of
and various cytokines. The primary function of MHC class I and recognizing self and non-self. Direct recognition is when donor
class II molecules is to present self and foreign peptides to T cells. MHC is recognized as foreign; this is thought to cause the
T cells recognize foreign peptides only when they are associated exaggerated T-cell response. Indirect recognition is the recogni-
with a MHC molecule; therefore, MHC molecules are critical in tion of graft antigen presented by self MHC. Type 1 responses are
the recognition of and consequent response to foreign material. not thought to be important in graft rejection.
MHC class I molecules, expressed by all cells, indicate what is
occurring intracellularly by presenting peptides from the internal Cell-mediated responses
cell environment. Conversely, MHC class II molecules present CD8 cytotoxic T cells: these have potent antigen-specific cyto-
peptides from the extracellular compartment and are expressed toxic activity. They identify foreign cells to be killed by recog-
only by antigen-presenting cells. nition of the MHC/antigen peptide and attach to the cell with cell
For antigen peptides to be presented, the antigens must be surface adhesion molecules. They deposit perforins and release
processed intracellularly. The antigens are broken down by proteases that puncture the target cell membrane and breakdown
proteolytic enzymes producing peptides of 8e15 amino-acids in intracellular proteins, initiating apoptosis.
length. These peptides bind to MHC molecules and the MHC/
peptide complex is transported to the cell membrane and Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC): this
expressed on the cell surface. Extracellular antigens must first be describes the process whereby antibodies identify the foreign
endocytosed into the cell for this process to occur. antigen and enable cell-mediated killing (see below).

ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 13:6 282 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
TRANSPLANTATION

Differentiation of CD4 T cells

Cytokines Differential
Nave CD4 promoting cytokines Function in relation to
T cell differentiation Th secreted transplant rejection

IL2 Promotion of CD8 cytotoxic T cell


Th1 IFN production. Promotion of opsonizing
IL12 TNF and complement-fixing antibodies.
IFN Delayed type hypersensitivity.
IL4
IL5 Promotion of non-opsonizing
IL4 IL6 antibody.
IL13 Th2 IL9 Recruitment and activation of
IL10 eosinophils and basophils.
Thp IL6 IL13 Promotion of fibrosis.
TGF
IL17 Recruitment of neutrophils.
Th17 IL17F Activation of endothelial cells.
TGF IL22 Stimulation of fibroblasts.

Treg IL10 Inhibition of graft rejection


TNF

Nave CD4 T cells (Thp) differentiate into different types of helper T cells (Th) or regulatory T cells (Treg)
depending on the cytokines present. These secrete different cytokines and have different functions
in transplantation IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; TGF, transforming growth factor; TNF, tumour necrosis
factor.

Figure 1

Delayed hypersensitivity: antigen-specific T-cell activation trig- Types of rejection


gers non-specific killing mechanisms. There is infiltration of the Hyperacute rejection: as discussed above, when a recipient has
graft tissue by neutrophils and macrophages as well as lympho- been serologically presensitized to an allograft, further exposure
cytes. These cells release nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species, results in rapid or hyperacute rejection. This occurs within
interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), causing minutes to hours of transplantation. Sensitization may be to
an intense inflammatory response and tissue damage. previous transplant material, blood transfusions containing
donor leucocytes or, in parous women, to paternal HLA expressed
Antibody-mediated responses in fetal cells encountered at birth. As in ABO sensitization, this
B cells and T cells specific to the same antigen interact in the can also occur despite no prior exposure because of cross-
specialized lymphoid system. T-cell cytokine release causes reactivity to similar environmental antigens. This early recogni-
a B-cell class switch to produce secretable antibody (immuno- tion by donor-specific circulating antibodies, mainly of ABO
globulin (Ig)G, IgA and IgE). The antibodies retain antigen blood group and MHC-encoded antigen, leads to graft endothelial
specificity but with greater affinity. The B cells that have damage. Subendothelial exposure activates the coagulation
switched class then differentiate into plasma cells, which secrete system, leading to thrombosis and infarction and consequent loss
those antibodies. Foreign cell damage by antibody is mainly due of graft tissue and function. Hyperacute rejection is rare in allo-
to activation of the complement system and ADCC. graft transplantation because routine screening of the recipient
before transplantation identifies antidonor antibodies.
Complement activation: the complement system is a protease
cascade system with sequential activation. It is activated by
antibodyeantigen complexes and leads to the formation of the Acute rejection: this occurs within weeks to months of trans-
complement process end product, the membrane attack plantation. There is graft infiltration by activated lymphocytes
complex. This is able to lyse foreign cells. Complement proteins and monocytes with tissue distortion and destruction and
also identify such material to phagocytes with receptors for vascular insufficiency. The immune mechanism is thought to be
complement components and antibody. a type-4 hypersensitivity reaction characterized by persisting
antigens and T-cell-mediated chronic inflammation. Pharmaco-
ADCC: antibodies identify and coat target cells. Macrophages and logical interventions used in transplantation modulate acute
natural killer cells bind to the Fc region of the antibody, forming rejection responses.
an antigeneantibodyeimmune cell complex. The cells release
toxic substances onto the surface of the target cell, leading to cell Chronic rejection: this describes the gradual loss of function
death. over months to years and is characterized by graft infiltration by

ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 13:6 283 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
TRANSPLANTATION

Familial grafting
Response to transplants Each HLA gene set, or haplotype, is inherited as a whole with each
parent providing one haplotype. When a parent donates to his or
her child there is at least a 50% match of HLA alleles. Siblings
provide a one in four chance of a complete match. Owing to greater
Graft antigens
HLA matching in familial grafting the minor transplant antigens
become more significant in the rejection process.
T-helper cells
Tissue typing
The strength of an immune response relates to the number of
HLA mismatches between donor and recipient. To minimize this,
transplant donors and recipients are matched, providing recipi-
ents with transplant tissue with an HLA make-up as close as
Macrophage
Cytotoxic possible to their own. It is possible to HLA type the majority of
B cell
T cells alleles in order to match donors with recipients. This can be done
by adding specific cytotoxic antibodies to donors and recipients
blood samples. The antibodies bind to surface HLA peptides,
causing B-cell lysis by complement activation. The samples are
Antibody- scored microscopically on the strength of reaction. Donors can
dependent then be matched to recipients with similar phenotypes. More
Plasma cell
cell-mediated
cytotoxicity complex and automated modern techniques are based on the
same principle.

Cross-matching
Complement This identifies preformed antibodies to donor antigens. Recipient
Inflammatory cytokines fixation serum and donor lymphocytes are mixed and antibodies are
identified by lysis of donor cells or by staining and flow cytom-
Graft
etry. The presence of antibodies excludes transplantation of
cells blood and kidney grafts from that donor.
Inflammatory
mediators Immunosuppression
Reproduced with permission from Wood PJ. Immunology of transplantation. In most allografts there will be HLA mismatches as well as minor
Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2006; 7: 6. antigen mismatches. Immunosuppression is, therefore, used to
reduce immune responses and graft rejection. Immunosuppres-
Figure 2 sants depress the acute rejection reactions but do not prevent
hyperacute or chronic rejection. Immunosuppressants reduce
T cells with fibrosis and vascular insufficiency. The mechanism lymphocyte proliferation and activation by blocking activation
is thought to be a delayed response (due to immunosuppression) signalling pathways. Steroids work by reducing lymphocyte
to mismatched minor transplantation antigens. infiltration into graft tissue and inhibiting macrophage function,
particularly cytokine production.
Patients are initiated and maintained on baseline regimes,
Graft-versus-host disease: most rejection reactions are due to
often combination therapy, with additional treatment for acute
the recipients response to a donor graft, but the graft can mount
rejection episodes. The aim of combination therapy is to gain
a response and reject the recipient tissues. This occurs most
sufficient immune depression with minimal adverse effects. A
commonly in bone marrow transplants because the graft
contains viable and active immune tissue and is transplanted into
an immunodeficient recipient. The donor T cells recognize mis-
matched recipient HLA alleles and release inflammatory cyto-
FURTHER READING
kines, resulting in acute and chronic rejection reactions. These
Hale DA. Basic transplant immunology. Surg Clin North Am 2006; 86:
reactions can be prevented by immunosuppressive treatment or
1103e25.
by removal of donor T cells from the graft.
Van Buskirk AM, Pidwell DJ, Adams PW, Orosz CG. Transplantation
immunology. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 278.
Prevention of graft rejection
Wood PJ. Immunological response to infection: inflammatory and adap-
By minimizing HLA mismatch the immune response to a tive immune responses. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2006; 7: 181e3.
graft can be reduced. This involves familial grafting when Wood PJ. Immunology of transplantation. Anaesth Intensive Care Med
possible, matching donors and recipients for similar HLA 2006; 7: 184.
phenotypes, identification of preformed recipient antibodies and Wood PJ. The immune system: recognition of infectious agents. Anaesth
immunosuppression. Intensive Care Med 2006; 7: 179e80.

ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 13:6 284 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

You might also like